Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L. W. BUCKALEW
690
&
A. BELL
with crayons to maximize hue saturation. The children were asked to draw
a face on each figure with a lead pencil. The assessment of mood, in response
to color, was based on rating the mouth drawing: an upward curve was defined
as "happy," a downward curve as "sad," and a relatively straight line as "indifferent." Evaluations of mouth angles required the concordance of two judges.
Any drawing which produced disagreement between judges or which had a
nondistinct mouth was discarded.
Resdts.-Each of the 14 figures responded to by a child was assigned to
one of three mood categories, and only 6 of the 252 figures were discarded as
unscorable. A chi squared value of 1.97 '(df = 2, p > .05) resulted from a
3 X 2 test for sex differences in composite mood responses. Combined data
for boys and girls separately were analyzed by a 7 X 3 (colors by mood) test
which yielded a chi squared of 6.73 (df = 12, .p >..05). It was concluded that,
for these children, there were no sex differences in how they responded to the
colors, and colors were not responded to differently in terms of mood. Interestingly, 78% of the collective mood responses were evaluated as "happy"
mouth drawings: each color produced an overwhelming positive affect. Accepting the Eibl-Eibesfeldt (1970) position of a relatively innate and culturally
universal basis for "happy" and "sad" affective espressions, might there be a
predisposition in children towards positive affects which comes to be modified
through experience? These findings, though particularly limited due to the
small number of children tested, suggested that young children might not make
differential associations between color and affect. This interpretation must
respect that the study explored only the 'meaning' and not the 'activeness'
. .
parameter of color-evoked response.
REFERENCES
ADAMS, F. M., & OSGOOD,
C. E. A cross-cultural study of the affective meanlngs of color.
Journal o f Cross-Cultu*al Psychology, 1973, 4. 135-156.
BIRREN,J. E., KINNEY,D K , SCHAIE,K. W.. & WOODRUFF,
D. S. D&elopmental
psychology. Boston, M A Houghton Mifflin, 1981.
BUCKALEW,
L. W., & COFFIELD,
K. E. Drug expectations associated with perceptual
characteristics: e t h n ~ cfactors. Perceptual a n d Motor Skills, 1982, 55, 915-918.
(a)
BUCKALEW,
L. W., & COFFIELD,
K. E. An in;estigacion of drug expectancy as a function
Journal o f .Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1982, 2, 245-248. ( b )
BUCKALEW,
L. W., & COFFIELD,
K. E. Using psychology to support patient compliance:
of capsule color and size and preparation form.
SALLIS,R. E.,
..