Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The introduction of a paper in science prepares the reader for the results and discussion to
follow. By giving the reader context, relevance, and the previous work that has been done in
the field, the writer is setting the stage for the rest of the work to be presented. If the reader
fully understands the direction from which the work comes, the meaning of the science can be
better understood.
Major components:
Background
What questions have been answered, and what questions remain unanswered?
Relevance
Please see the handy example to see how this plays out in a real science paper!
Major components:
Materials
What did you use to perform the experiment? (In real literature you would often need to
give brand names so that others could replicate the experiment exactly, but you do NOT
need to worry about that!)
What amounts of reagents did you use? Specifically, how much of each chemical was
used in the experiment. It is best if you report these amounts in whatever was
measured (grams, mL, etc) and converted to moles when appropriate.
*If you use a solution, it is CRUCIAL that you report the concentration (molarity) of the
solution
Methods
What did you do in the lab to get your results? How did you measure your reagents and
with what precision? What kind of visual markers did you use to determine when a step
was completed? How did you ascertain that your measurements were precise? How
many replications of the measurements did you do?
How did you manipulate the materials? Explain the state of the glassware (eg, Solution
was added into a clean, dry buret. Describe how you measured the amounts of
reagents that you did.
How did you perform your data analysis? BRIEFLY. This should just be a statement of
general methods that will be explained in more detail in your data analysis section.
Tips:
Report your methods in third person (please see pink note in the example!)
Give the amounts in parentheses after the reagent name is described, eg: Starch
solution (1 mL) was added to the beaker. (see yellow note in the example!)
Please see the handy example to see how this plays out in a real science paper!
Please see the handy example to see how this plays out in a real science paper!
Major components:
Restatement of Background/Relevance
What has been done in the past on this topic? Where does the field stand in this area?
o Does the background support the results found in this study?
What questions have been answered, and what questions remain unanswered?
o Does this study answer any of these questions? Does it raise further questions?
What might be done next?
Describe results in a way that the reader can easily grasp onto that they might have
missed in the thicket of the data analysis/ results section.
Please see the handy example to see how this plays out in a real science paper!