NATIONAL UNIVERSITY-COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE

HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE 4; FILIPINO ARCHITECTURE

Midterm Major Plate
2nd semester AY15-16

Group no. ______ Section.________

Members names:
1. _______________________________
2. _______________________________
3. _______________________________

signatures
_________________
_________________
_________________

GRADE

Objective: Outcome base exam.

COMPARATIVE METHOD PLATE. The learners must already understand the Historical analysis of architectural styles base on the past
exercises/lecture SPANISH IMPERIAL AND AMERICAN INSULAR COLONIAL architecture in the Philippines
INSTRUCTION:

A grade of 0 shall be given if the student failed to present anything regarding the subject matter.

Draw the, Perspectives with spot details and Plan with information and comparative analysis.

All inputs in 4030 size board (ONE BOARD ONLY)

Any media rendition (no computer aided and no cut-out-patches) for the drawings. W/PLASTIC COVER

Maximum of 3 members only.

Submission of plate 15mins after grace period, designated time only. (MIDTERM WEEK, February 3-8,2018)

Students will have a short defense upon the submission, NO SHOW-NO GRADE-NO MORE REMEDIAL

The following requirements in the plate

Compare the STRUCTURES
1. Bahay Kubo to Maranao Torogan to Bahay na Bato
To Tsalet
2. Any Spanish Colonial Church with convent
to St.Mary & John Cathedral
3. Intramuros Site Plan during Spanish Colony to
Intramuros-Extramuros:Lawton to Luneta Site Plan
during American Imperial (fit in 1/4 size of the board)
4. Ayuntamiento de Manila to Old Legislative Building,
Old dept.of Finance
5. Palacio del Gobernador de Manila to
Malacaang Executive House,

Information
General information
Geography, geology, climate,
Culture, influence
Building Information
1. Year of Foundation
2. Location (draw the Map)
3. Who Commissioned? Purpose?
4. Early Builder or Architect
5. Significance/Importance of
Structure? Usage?
6. Style
7. Influence/Religion
8. Building Material

Spot detail
Drawing with Identification of Materials
And Building Anatomy
1. Roof
2. Special/striking feature
3. Plan/Space
4. Windows
5. Door
6. Arch
7. Columns/Pillars
8. Ornaments and Etc

6. Old Univ.Sto. Tomas Intramuros to Old National-U

To Gabaldon Type school
7. Hotel de Oriente to Manila Hotel
8. Teatro de Binondo to Metropolitan Theater
9. Tutuban Rail Station to Paco Rail Station
10. Old San Juan de Dios Hospital to Phil.Gen.Hospital
11. Aduana de Manila to Bureau of Customs

History of Architecture Rubrics (grades)

Information
12
No information input in
The drawing plate

14
All drawing has information
But some are incorrect.

16
With Complete and Correct
Information in every
Structures.

18
With Complete and Clear
Information, Historical
Background, Building
Materials and other significant
information about
the Structures.

20
With Complete information
And the group clearly
Defended and
Understand the topic

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY-COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE

HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE 4; FILIPINO ARCHITECTURE
Midterm Major Plate
2nd semester AY15-16

Comparative Analysis
10
13
The students cannot analyze Incomplete comparative
the structures .
Analysis information.

15
With Complete and Clear
Comparative analysis in every
Structures.

17
With Complete and Clear
Comparative analysis,
Historical
Background, Building
Materials and other significant
information about
the Structures.

20
With Complete
Comparative analysis
And the group clearly
Defended and
Understand the topic

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Drawing Content
10
14
16
Incomplete drawings
Complete drawings but
Complete drawings but
several structures are wrong. has a problem in details, some
structures are wrong
No presentable boarder and
Title block

20
Complete structures
With good grade of lines
, clear ornamentations
, and building feature

With presentable boarder and

Title block

25
Complete structures
With good grade of lines
, clear ornamentations
, building feature, the learners
Added architectural callouts,
Spot details and other
architectural inputs

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Rendering Techniques
12
14
Has very low skill in
-Tried to imitate, use of
Rendition and presentation
Computer aided medium,
technique
-Cut outs,
-poor lettering technique
-Patches and other
Improper architectural
Presentation

16
-Good execution of
Monochrome technique,
- ink and pencil
Rendition
-Good lettering technique
-Good Spacing layout
-Good Background render
- plain boarder

18
- V.Good mix media color
Rendering technique
With proper layout presentation
- V. Good Hierarchy layout
- V. Good in water color Rendition
- with correct ornamented boarder

20
Excellent mix media color
Rendering technique,
With Realistic execution
And with presentable layout

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Group work, Significance in the group drawing plate

6
6
10
The presentation are
There is an attempt to show
With good group
obviously
importance, however, the
Execution
executed separately
drawings
They consult the instructor
are mixed up. No UNITY
Once or twice only.
of execution

13
With very good group
Execution
AND WEEKLY CLASSROOM
CONSULTAITON

15
EXELLENT GROUP
Cooperation!!

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Prepared by:

Ar. Roy John de Guzman, UAP

National-U Asst. Professor 2
History of Architecture Adviser