Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cost Calculator
This Cost Calculator is designed to help landscaping companies and landscape managers
estimate the cost savings associated with recycling and reusing hardscapes and green waste.
Green waste includes yard trimmings, leaves, plants, grass and other organic waste. The specific
hardscape materials addressed in this tool include: lumber, brick, and concrete and aspalt. The
Cost Calculator demonstrates that recycling and reusing hardscapes and landscape waste can
offer significant savings compared to disposal, depending on a facility's material needs and
proximity to recycling facilities.
Based on the values that you enter in the Inputs tab, the Cost Calculator tab estimates the cost of
four scenarios for handling hardscape and landscape waste: (1) reusing all waste possible on-site,
then recycling all waste possible, and then disposing of the rest; (2) reusing all waste possible and
disposing of the rest; (3) recycling as much of the remaining waste as possible and disposing of
the rest; and (4) disposing of all materials. If you are not generating a particular waste during a
given time frame, enter "0" in the corresponding cell. Increasing the use of compost over time may
offer additional cost savings in terms of reduced fertilizer and/or pesticide use, but the calculator
does not consider these potential savings.
In the Cost Data tab, EPA provides national averages of costs associated with recycling and
disposing landscape waste. Cost data collected from sources dated before 2006 are adjusted for
inflation. If you prefer, you can substitute your own cost data into the green cells. EPA
encourages users to change the fuel cost data in cell B26 of the Cost Data tab.
The EHS Benefits tab provides a summary of the environmental, health and safety benefits of
recycling and reusing landscape waste.
The Quantified Benefits tab provides estimates of environmental impacts avoided by reusing and
recycling waste instead of landfilling waste. Although many benefits are quantified, including
lifecycle benefits of avoided virgin material production, and avoided impacts from transportation,
data are not available to develop a general estimate of some key benefits associated with
recycling and reusing landscape waste, including reducing runoff and nonpoint source pollution
and improving soil health. To calculate your GHG emissions from alternative green waste
management methods, see EPA's WARM model at:
http://epa.gov/climatechange/wycd/waste/calculators/Warm_home.html
The Environmental Data tab presents data utilized on the environmental impacts associated with
the production, use, disposal, and transportation of asphalt, concrete, bricks, and lumber.
Macros need to be enabled for the calculator to work properly. Each time you run the calculator,
you should save the file under a different file name to maintain a complete record. The file name
will appear at the top of each printed page.
Please direct any questions or comments on this cost calculator to: Jean Schwab, U.S. EPA
GreenScapes Program Manager, schwab.jean@epa.gov or 703-308-8669.
South-Central
Green Waste
How many cubic yards of green waste are generated annually?
What percentage of the volume of green waste is wood > 1" diameter?
How many cubic yards of compost will you use per year, on average over the next 10 years?
How many cubic yards of mulch will you use per year, on average over the next 10 years?
77
24%
15
11
Do you own a large chipper ( 6"+) to chip lumber and large branches?
Yes
Yes
$17.80
43
43
65
Yes
$16.00
26
1
3
6
10
50
1
3
6
10
Yes
$22.00
600
3000
6000
10000
0%
233
1500
3000
5000
1200
3600
7200
12000
658
1974
3948
6580
29
Do you plan on purchasing recycled bricks instead of new bricks for construction projects?
How much do recycled bricks cost (per used brick)?
Roughly how many times will you remove brick in the next year?
In the next three years?
In the next six years?
In the next ten years?
How many miles does new brick travel to reach your site?
Roughly how many times will you need to order brick in the next year?
In the next three years?
In the next six years?
In the next ten years?
Concrete & Asphalt
How many tons of concrete waste will be generated at your site over the next year?
Over the next three years?
Over the next six years?
Over the next ten years?
Yes
$0.18
2
6
12
20
50
1
3
6
10
Yes
1.2
3
6
10
3
6
12
20
Yes
$15.50
25
1
3
6
10
50
1
3
6
10
Yes
$15.00
25
1
3
6
10
50
1
3
6
10
1.6
3
6
10
1 year
3 years
6 years
10 years
$0
$0
$0
$0
$17
$0
$0
$0
$0
$36
$0
$0
$0
$0
$72
$0
$0
$0
$0
$119
$0
$20
$2
$0
$33
$15
$0
$42
$4
$0
$98
$46
$0
$84
$7
$0
$195
$92
$0
$140
$12
$0
$325
$154
$93
$9
$27
$0
$0
$214
$214
$278
$36
$80
$0
$0
$619
$206
$555
$72
$161
$0
$0
$1,238
$206
$926
$120
$268
$0
$0
$2,064
$206
1 year
3 years
6 years
10 years
$0
$0
$0
$0
$17
$0
$0
$0
$0
$36
$0
$0
$0
$0
$72
$0
$0
$0
$0
$119
$0
$20
$2
$0
$33
$15
$0
$42
$4
$0
$98
$46
$0
$84
$7
$0
$195
$92
$0
$140
$12
$0
$325
$154
$138
$15
$32
$0
$0
$270
$270
$413
$60
$97
$0
$0
$794
$265
$826
$119
$194
$0
$0
$1,589
$265
$1,376
$199
$323
$0
$0
$2,648
$265
1 year
3 years
6 years
10 years
$257
$78
$91
$118
$36
$770
$235
$585
$355
$72
$1,539
$471
$1,170
$711
$143
$2,565
$784
$1,950
$1,184
$238
$274
$14
$59
$18
$25
$971
$971
$822
$72
$178
$45
$47
$3,181
$1,060
$1,645
$144
$356
$90
$93
$6,361
$1,060
$2,741
$240
$594
$150
$155
$10,602
$1,060
1 year
3 years
6 years
10 years
$257
$78
$91
$118
$36
$770
$235
$585
$355
$72
$1,539
$471
$1,170
$711
$143
$2,565
$784
$1,950
$1,184
$238
$408
$24
$71
$42
$42
$1,168
$1,168
$1,223
$119
$214
$79
$79
$3,732
$1,244
$2,446
$238
$429
$159
$159
$7,464
$1,244
$4,076
$397
$715
$265
$265
$12,440
$1,244
Unit
Cost Estimate
$77.58
$50.92
$34.07
$38.46
$26.47
$41.51
$/Ton
$37.72
Capital Cost
N/A
Sources
Concrete/Asphalt Crushers. September, 2003.
$64,350 <http://p2library.nfesc.navy.mil/P2_Opportunity_Handbook/7_III_6.html>
Labor Cost
Equipment Maintenance Cost
$/Ton
$/Ton
Units
Cost Estimate
Units
Cost Estimate
$/Hour
Time to shred/chip
Hours/CY
Maintenance of Commercial
Chipper $/Hour Used
Initial Cost of 6" Commercial
Chipper
N/A
Amount Saved by Mulching
$/CY
Chipper Maintenance
Cost
Blades
0.05 Personal Communication with Customer Service, BearCat. August 29, 2007
$54.96
$8,318.96
$2.78
Replacement Time
(Hours)
10
$27.13
Bearings
$60
50
Total
N/A
N/A
Units
$/Cu. Yard
Mulch
$/Cu. Yard
$/LF
Brick
$/Brick
Norwalk
Power
Equipment
Company. Bear
Catcost
Commercial
Chippers
6"
This value
is calculated
by subtracting
the total
of producing
a CY (Gravity
of mulchFeed)
from the
Capacity
- Bear Cata 71620.
Accessed
27,of2007.
cost
of purchasing
CY of mulch.
TheAugust
total cost
producing a CY of mulch is equal the See Total Below
<https://017e702.netsolstores.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1886>.
The Bear
71620saved
sells by
for mulching
$7,999. on-site
product
of the time to chip a CY of yard waste and the sum of the hourly labor and
This
is theCat
amount
maintenance costs.
rather than buying mulch.
Cost Per Hour
Source
$26.62
Comments
$248 is the retail price for the blade
replacement kit
Cost Estimate
Compost
Comments
Comments
$266
Fuel
Sources
States
CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT
DE, MD, NJ, PA, VA, WV
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
IN, IA, MI, MN, MO, OH, WI
AZ, AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
CO, KS, MT, NE, ND, SD, UT, WY
CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, WA
Sources Ron, Tyler, Rod, and Goldstein, Nora. "Increasing Dollar Value for Compost
Alexander,
Products." Biocycle. Oct. 2004 <http://www.environmental$17.10 expert.com/resulteacharticle4.asp?cid=6042&codi=4162>.
Comments
Earth Products. Orange County Landfill -- Orange County, NC. Accessed December 29,
$7.13 2006. <http://www.co.orange.nc.us/recycling/earthproducts.asp>
Lumber and Plywood Estimating Price Guide. Ace Hardware. January 30, 2006.
$0.39 <http://www.acehardware.net/estimate/>.
Liu, Henry; Williams, Burkett and Haynes, Kirk. Improving Freezing and Thawing
$0.39 Properties of Fly Ash Bricks. March, 2005. <http://www.flyash.info/2005/20liu.pdf>.
Unit
Crushed Surfacing
Conversion Factors
Cost Estimate
Source and Comment
States
$77.58 Repa, Edward, Ph.D (2005) NSWMA 2005 Tip Fee Survey.
CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT
<http://wastec.isproductions.net/webmodules/webarticles/articlefiles/478-Tipping%20Fee
%20Bulletin%202005.pdf>
If you know your own disposal cost per ton, change the green cell to the left for your
Dayton, Kevin J., State Construction Engineer, WSDOT Headquarters Construction
region.
Office. Construction Update. August 8, 2006. p. 1.
<http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/Construction/CostIndex/CostIndexPdf/constructionupdater
$/Ton
$11.92 eport.pdf>
From
To
Factor
Brick
Bricks
Tons
Tons
Cu. Yards
Carbon
CO2
Yard Waste
Linear Feet
Linear Feet
KWh
MJ
Kilograms
Metric Tons
Ounces
MTCO2E
Gallons
Cu. Yards
Cu. Yards
Tons
Cubic Yards
MJ
BTU
Pounds
Tons
Grams
MTCE
Kilograms
Tons
Cu. Yards
Source
Table 4. Accessed on November 4, 2006.
0.00225 <http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/tables2.html>.
Comments
This value was given in pounds and converted
to tons by dividing by 2000.
0.83 http://www.buckscontainerservices.com/conversions.htm
0.2727
3.79
General Permit for Yard Waste Composting Facilities Under the South
Dakota Waste Management Program. Board of Minerals and
Environment. Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
October 13, 1998. p. 6.
<http://www.state.sd.us/DENR/DES/WasteMgn/SWaste/COMPGEN.p This value was given in pounds and converted
0.2 df>.
to tons by dividing by 2000.
Wilson, C.R. and Feucht, J.R. Composting of Yard Waste. Colorado
State University Coopertive Extension. October, 1997.
0.375 <http://www.ext.colostate.edu/PUBS/GARDEN/07212.pdf>.
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0
1 year
3 years
6 years
Time
Average Annual Hardscape and Landscape Waste Dispostion Cost (Over 10 Years)
Cost
Cost
$14,000
$1,400.00
$1,200.00
$1,000.00
$800.00
$600.00
$400.00
$200.00
$0.00
Maximum
Reuse, then
Recycle,
Landfill
Remaining
Waste
Maximum
Reuse,
Landfill
Remaining
Waste
Recycle All
Waste
Where
Facilities
Exist
Approach
(Waste Disposition)
Landfill All
Waste
10 years
Recycling and Reusing Hardscape and Landscape Waste Environmental, Health and Safety
Benefits
Reduces waste/demand for landfill space because materials that would otherwise be disposed
of are reused or recycled.
Reuses waste materials because hardscape and landscape waste is being reused directly onsite.
Reduces air pollution or improves air quality because reusing materials on-site results in fewer
pollutants emitted from transporting waste materials, and methane emissions from landfills are
reduced from both reuse and recycling.
Conserves fossil fuels because energy needed to transport both hardscape and landscape
wastes, as well as new materials, will be reduced. Also, compost can reduce the need for
chemical fertilizers, the production of which is fossil fuel intensive.
Conserves timber because reused and recycled lumber reduces demand for virgin lumber.
In addition to the above benefits, the following benefits are associated with maximizing
compost use and minimizing use of fertilizers and pesticides:
Conserves water because compost can improve the water retention of the soil, reducing the need
for irrigation.
Reduces human exposure to hazardous materials or substances because compost can
reduce the need for pesticides and herbicides and the associated human exposures.
Reduces runoff and nonpoint source pollution because compost can substitute for pesticides
and fertilizers, which can produce polluted runoff.
Improves groundwater recharge because compost increases the soil's ability to retain water.
Improves soil quality and retards erosion because using compost improves soil quality.
6 years
122,400
62,400
0
6 years
9,000
9,000
0
10 years
204,000
104,000
0
10 years
15,000
15,000
0
21,514
35,856
51,266
11,764
2,058
19,524
3,801
723
6 years
17,766
14,634
0
85,444
19,606
3,431
32,540
6,335
1,205
10 years
29,610
24,390
0
680
34,117
1,134
56,862
10,864
6,420
1,365
29,682
32,728
23,495
6 years
12,000
18,106
10,701
2,276
49,470
54,547
39,158
10 years
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
270
858
507
1,608
1,014
3,216
1,690
5,360
1,491
2,796
5,592
9,320
465
1,004
87
3,009
807
334
1 year
2,400
0
0
1,249
2,406
260
8,036
1,551
693
3 years
6,000
0
0
2,498
4,812
521
16,073
3,102
1,385
6 years
12,000
0
0
4,163
8,021
868
26,788
5,170
2,309
10 years
20,000
0
0
115
2,362
288
5,904
576
11,808
960
19,680
4,272
10,680
21,360
35,600
819
515
87
2,181
65
116
2,214
1,521
260
3,440
3,323
281
4,428
3,042
521
13,031
360
641
7,380
5,071
868
21,718
600
1,069
1 year
29,660
13,940
0
43,600
11,055
3 years
86,583
43,017
0
129,600
35,327
6 years
173,166
86,034
0
259,200
70,655
10 years
288,610
143,390
0
432,000
117,758
8,380
3,843
620
34,528
13,019
2,233
69,056
26,039
4,465
115,093
43,398
7,442
13,106
36,079
78,309
130,515
6,644
4,463
23,139
13,083
39,991
26,244
66,652
43,740
5,763
499
13,476
1,135
26,952
2,270
44,920
3,784
3 years
61,200
0
31,200
3 years
4,500
0
4,500
6 years
122,400
0
62,400
6 years
9,000
0
9,000
10 years
204,000
0
104,000
10 years
15,000
0
15,000
5,398
10,796
17,993
13,291
5,584
976
8,491
1,881
307
3 years
8,883
0
7,317
26,581
11,169
1,952
16,982
3,761
614
6 years
17,766
0
14,634
44,302
18,615
3,253
28,304
6,268
1,023
10 years
29,610
0
24,390
187
9,354
373
18,708
622
31,179
3,492
2,560
514
11,554
9,024
6,533
3 years
6,000
6,984
5,119
1,028
23,108
18,047
13,066
6 years
12,000
11,640
8,532
1,713
38,513
30,079
21,777
10 years
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
270
858
507
1,608
1,014
3,216
1,690
5,360
1,491
2,796
5,592
9,320
465
1,004
87
3,009
807
334
1 year
2,400
0
0
1,249
2,406
260
8,036
1,551
693
3 years
6,000
0
0
2,498
4,812
521
16,073
3,102
1,385
6 years
12,000
0
0
4,163
8,021
868
26,788
5,170
2,309
10 years
20,000
0
0
115
2,362
288
5,904
576
11,808
960
19,680
4,272
10,680
21,360
35,600
819
515
87
2,181
65
116
2,214
1,521
260
3,440
3,323
281
4,428
3,042
521
13,031
360
641
7,380
5,071
868
21,718
600
1,069
1 year
29,660
0
13,940
29,660
7,176
3 years
86,583
0
43,017
86,583
22,264
6 years
173,166
0
86,034
173,166
44,527
10 years
288,610
0
143,390
288,610
74,212
4,697
3,528
547
20,246
12,072
2,010
40,491
24,143
4,021
67,485
40,238
6,701
11,588
31,521
69,193
115,322
4,191
2,709
15,779
7,814
25,270
15,706
42,117
26,177
5,763
448
13,476
982
26,952
1,963
44,920
3,272
3 years
0
92,400
0
3 years
0
9,000
0
6 years
0
184,800
0
6 years
0
18,000
0
10 years
0
308,000
0
10 years
0
30,000
0
10,718
21,436
35,727
24,495
300
55
1,281
21
75
3 years
0
16,200
0
48,991
599
111
2,563
42
151
6 years
0
32,400
0
81,652
999
184
4,271
71
252
10 years
0
54,000
0
340
17,059
680
34,117
1,134
56,862
3,916
850
271
4,757
16,215
11,477
3 years
0
7,831
1,701
542
9,514
32,429
22,953
6 years
0
13,052
2,835
904
15,857
54,049
38,256
10 years
0
3,200
0
6,000
0
12,000
0
20,000
0
181
105
340
196
679
392
1,132
653
102
121
18
485
42
15
1 year
0
2,400
0
267
344
54
1,410
86
41
3 years
0
6,000
0
534
688
109
2,819
172
82
6 years
0
12,000
0
889
1,147
182
4,699
287
137
10 years
0
20,000
0
136
78
340
196
679
392
1,132
653
93
117
18
475
33
14
267
344
54
1,410
86
41
534
688
109
2,819
172
82
889
1,147
182
4,699
287
137
1 year
0
43,600
0
43,600
8,013
3 years
0
129,600
0
129,600
28,169
6 years
0
259,200
0
259,200
56,337
10 years
0
432,000
0
432,000
93,896
6,425
620
145
28,945
1,838
435
57,890
3,676
871
96,483
6,127
1,451
2,970
8,858
17,716
29,526
5,487
3,874
16,408
11,634
32,816
23,269
54,694
38,781
0
430
0
1,020
0
2,039
0
3,398
Enery Avoide d (M J)
Recycling and Reusing Hardscape and Landscape Waste Environmental Benefits Graphs
14,000
12,000
300,000
10,000
250,000
8,000
200,000
6,000
150,000
4,000
100,000
2,000
50,000
Em is s io n s A v o id e d ( g r a m s )
0
1 year
3 years
6 years
Time
Maximum Reuse, then Recycle, Landfill Remaining Waste
Maximum Reuse, Landfill Remaining Waste
Recycle All Waste Where Facilities Exist
Maximum
Reuse, then
Recycle,
Landf ill
Remaining
Waste
10 years
Em is s io n s A vo id e d (lb s .
o f C O2 e q u ivale n t)
Tons
450,000
Maximum
Reuse,
Landf ill
Remaining
Waste
Recycle All
Waste Where
Facilities Exist
14,000
12,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
W a te r C o n s e r ve d ( g a llo n s )
CO
Maximum
Reuse,
Landf ill
Remainin
g Waste
VOC
NOx
SO2
390
380
370
360
350
340
330
320
310
300
Maximum
Reuse,
Landf ill
Remaining
Waste
0
Maximum
Reuse, then
Recycle,
Landf ill
Remaining
Waste
PM
Maximum
Reuse, then
Recycle,
Landf ill
Remaining
Waste
2,000
Recycle
All Waste
Where
Facilities
Exist
Recycle All
Waste Where
Facilities Exist
Hazardous Was te
Avoided (gram s )
Maximum
Reuse,
then
Recycle,
Landf ill
Remainin
g Waste
Maximum
Reuse,
Landf ill
Remaining
Waste
Recycle All
Waste Where
Facilities Exist
Maximum
Reuse, Landfill
Remaining
Waste
Recycle All
Waste Where
Facilities Exist
1
2
3
4
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Recycling and Reusing Hardscape and Landscape Waste Environmental Coefficients
Energy
Haz
Waste
Water
Use
NOx
SO2
g/ton
44
551
331
g/ton
27
484
1,998
g/ton
48
172
1,410
g/ton
MJ/ton
183,016
1,968
37,099
536
201,800
2106
kg/mbf
0.0812
0.0812
0.0812
kg C/mbf
907.9
1113.3
1010.6
Material
CO
units
Asphalt
Concrete
Brick
g/ton
42
337
45
VOC
23
PM
GHG
Material
CO
units
Asphalt
Concrete
units
Lumber (average)
Green Waste
Transportation Impacts
28
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
HDDV Class
Class Source
g/ton
gal./ton
3,560
96
932
169
42
MJ/mbf
3705
3492
3598.5
units
VOC
g/ton
10.54
10.54
NOx
SO2
g/ton
25.0
25.0
g/ton
22.1
22.1
PM
GHG
Energy
Haz
Waste
g/ton
1.76
1.76
g/ton
MJ/ton
10,000
65
10,000
65
0
0
kg C/mbf
MJ/mbf
1002.2727 3572.73
CO
g/mi
VOC
g/mi
NOx
g/mi
SO2
PM
GHG
Capacity
g/mi
g/mi
g/mi
tons
Concrete Mixer
Asphalt Tanker
4.327
4.327
0.6067
0.6067
1584.8
1584.8
20
20
5.784
0.6632
1685.6
27
5.784
g/mi
0.6632
g/mi
1685.6
g/mi
9.12
cy
Water
Use
kg/ton
113
113
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
no
2
2
1
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
no
3; 12 for GHG
3; 12 for GHG
3; 12 for GHG
Source
13; 14 for GHG
13; 14 for GHG
Capacity Source
29
30
Recycling Coefficients
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Notes
We use these coefficients to estimate impacts from transportation for delivery and
disposal, and which are not included in the coefficients above.
The source says concrete mixers typically have a 8-12 cy capacity. 10 cy is the average of
this range. 10 cubic yards was multiplied by two becasue 1 cy of concrete equals
4 approximately 2 tons.
5
Alabama Brick can place 12,000 bricks in their tractor trailers. This number was converted
6 into tons.
A 50 ft tractor trailer can fit two units of 20' 6x2 lumber. Each unit is 3040 board feet. The
7 per unit board footage was multiplied by two and converted into tons.
The source gives the capacity of a triple axle dump truck as 16-20 cy. This range was
averaged. We assume that all disposal and off-site recycling of waste is transported by
Dump Truck
5.784
1.009 24.715 0.3665 0.6632
1685.6
18
10 dump truck.
Emissions were derived from EPA's MOBILE6 Vehicle Emissions Modeling Software. The model was run for both class 8a and 8b to determine emissions in grams per mile.
8a
8a
8
11
8b
8b
8b
10
Sources:
1. Koroneos, C. and Dompros, A. Environmental Assessment of Brick Production in Greece. March 17, 2006.
2. Pavement Life-Cycle Assessment Tool for Environmental and Economic Effects (PaLATE). Consortium on Green Design and Manufacturing, University of California Berkeley.
3. Puettman, Maureen & Wilson, James. Life Cycle Analysis of Wood Products: Cradle-to-Gate LCI of Residential Wood Building Materials. Wood and Fiber Science, December 2005, V. 37. www.corrim.org/reports/2005/swst/18.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2007.
4. Concrete in Practice: What, Why & How?, CIP31 - Ordering Ready Mix Concrete. NRMCA. buildersconcrete.com/UserFiles/File/Ordering%20Ready%20Mix%20Concrete.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2007.
5. Paul, Stephanie; Puspa-Dewi, Linda; Lueprasert, Kamolwan; and Madon, Heinko Dona. Asphalt Paving Operation. https://engineering.purdue.edu/CEM/People/Personal/Halpin/Sim/Examples/pave.htm. Accessed November 8, 2007.
6. Alabama Brick. Personal Communication, November 7, 2007.
7. Curtis Lumber. Personal Communication, November 7, 2007.
8. Concrete Mixing Truck. Accessed November 7, 2007. http://www.jgtec.com.cn/english/html-en/gongcheng/hntj.htm
9. Tractor Trailor - 148,000 lbs. Denver: The Mile High City. http://www.denvergov.org/EquipmentList/SemiTractorTrailerOperator/SemiTractorTrailerOperator1/tabid/386845/Default.aspx. Accessed November 8, 2007.
10. Dump Truck-On Road. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.nimsonline.com/resource_typing/Dump%20Truck-On%20Road.htm. Accessed November 8, 2007.
11. International 8300 Asphalt Tanker 1988. http://www.used-trucks-central.org/truckview.php?view=308. Accessed November 8, 2007.
12. Milota, M.; West, C.; and Hartley, I. Gate-to-Gate Life-Cycle Inventory of Softwood Lumber Production. Wood and Fiber Science, December 2005, v. 37. www.corrim.org/reports/2005/swst/47.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2007.
13. Cochran, K.M. Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling: Methods, Markets, and Policty. University of Florida, 2006.
14. WARM Model. Environmental Protection Agency. Appendix B: Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Emission Factors
The charts below present the quantity of pollutants avoided on average, for each of the three alternative scenarios and contexual measures.
Maximum Reuse, then Recycle, Landfill Remaining Waste
Total Environmental Benefit
Waste Avoided
Statistic
Statistic
28,861
14,339
11,776
11,509
4,340
744
13,052
6,665
PM Avoided (grams) =
4,374
4,492
28,861
14,339
7,421
6,749
4,024
670
11,532
4,212
PM Avoided (grams) =
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Avoided (grams) =
2,618
4,492
43,200
9,390
9,648
613
145
2,953
5,469
PM Avoided (grams) =
RCRA Hazardous Waste
Avoided (grams) =
3,878
340
Sources
1. Wastes: What You Can Do - Basic Facts About Waste. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/osw/facts.htm
2. Calculations and References. US EPA. http://www.epa.gov/solar/energy-resources/refs.html
3. USA Quickfacts. U.S. Census Bureau State and County Quickfacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
4. Vehicle Emissions - Transportation Air Quality Selected Facts and Figures. EPA. January 2006.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/aqfactbk/page15.htm
5. EPA, Emissions Facts, http://www.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/f00013.htm
6. Lethal Legacy. U.S. PIRG Education Fund, 2003. http://uspirg.org/uspirg.asp?id2=11087
7. ICF Consulting, North American Trade and Transportation Corridors: Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Strategies, Prepared for the North
American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, February 2001.
8. Clothes Washers. Energy Guide, http://www.energyguide.com/library/EnergyLibraryTopic.asp?bid=austin&prd=10&TID=17246&SubjectID=8374
9. Mercury Thermometer Fact Sheet. http://www.hendersoncountync.org/health/Documents/Mercury%20Thermometer%20fact%20sheet.pdf
Recycling and Reusing Hardscape and Landscape Waste Default Cost Data
Reference this sheet if you want to re-enter default values into the Cost Data Page
Disposal Fees
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
South
Midwest
South-Central
West-Central
West
Unit
Cost Estimate
$77.58
$50.92
$34.07
$38.46
$26.47
$41.51
$/Ton
$37.72
Capital Cost
N/A
Sources
Concrete/Asphalt Crushers. September, 2003.
$64,350 <http://p2library.nfesc.navy.mil/P2_Opportunity_Handbook/7_III_6.html>
Labor Cost
Equipment Maintenance Cost
$/Ton
$/Ton
Units
Cost Estimate
Units
Cost Estimate
$/Hour
Time to shred/chip
Hours/CY
Maintenance of Commercial
Chipper
$/Hour
Used
Initial Cost of 6" Commercial
Chipper
N/A
Amount Saved by Mulching
$/CY
Chipper Maintenance
Cost
Sources
$52.91
$8,318.96
$2.89
Replacement Time
(Hours)
Blades
$266
10
Gasoline
$25.08
Bearings
$60
50
Total
N/A
N/A
Units
$26.62
$/Cu. Yard
Mulch
$/Cu. Yard
$/LF
Comments
Comments
Bear Cat estimated that a 6" chipper can chip
This feet
brochure
says that
industry
average by
100
per minute.
100the
feet
was multiplied
for
labor is
the mulching-related
amount of cubic yards
in $25/hour.
1 foot of 2"x6"
lumber. The inverse of this figure was divided
by 60 to convert to hours/CY.
See Total Below
The Bear
71620
sells by
formulching
$7,999. on-site
This
is theCat
amount
saved
rather than buying mulch.
Comments
$248 is the retail price for the blade
replacement kit
Cost Estimate
Compost
States
CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT
DE, MD, NJ, PA, VA, WV
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
IN, IA, MI, MN, MO, OH, WI
AZ, AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
CO, KS, MT, NE, ND, SD, UT, WY
CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, WA
Sources Ron, Tyler, Rod, and Goldstein, Nora. "Increasing Dollar Value for
Alexander,
Compost Products." Biocycle. Oct. 2004 <http://www.environmental$17.10 expert.com/resulteacharticle4.asp?cid=6042&codi=4162>.
Comments
Recycling and Reusing Hardscape and Landscape Waste Default Cost Data
Reference this sheet if you want to re-enter default values into the Cost Data Page
Disposal Fees
Northeast
Unit
Brick
Crushed Surfacing
Conversion Factors
Cost Estimate
Source and Comment
States
$77.58 Repa, Edward, Ph.D (2005) NSWMA 2005 Tip Fee Survey.
CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT
<http://wastec.isproductions.net/webmodules/webarticles/articlefiles/478-Tipping
%20Fee%20Bulletin%202005.pdf>
If you know your own disposal cost per ton, change the green cell to the left for your
This website states that ordinary bricks cost
region.
between $300-$400 per thousand. This range
Liu, Henry; Williams, Burkett and Haynes, Kirk. Improving Freezing and Thawing
was averaged to $350 per thousand or $0.35
$/Ton
$/Brick
$0.39 Properties of Fly Ash Bricks. March, 2005. <http://www.flyash.info/2005/20liu.pdf>. per brick.
$/Ton
From
To
Factor
Brick
Bricks
Tons
Tons
Cu. Yards
Carbon
CO2
Gallons
Yard Waste
Cu. Yards
Tons
Cu. Yards
Cu. Yards
Source
Table 4. Accessed on November 4, 2006.
0.00225 <http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/tables2.html>.
Comments
This value was given in pounds and converted
to tons by dividing by 2000.
0.83 http://www.buckscontainerservices.com/conversions.htm
0.2727
3.79
General Permit for Yard Waste Composting Facilities Under the South
Dakota Waste Management Program. Board of Minerals and
Environment. Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
October 13, 1998. p. 6.
<http://www.state.sd.us/DENR/DES/WasteMgn/SWaste/COMPGEN.p This value was given in pounds and converted
0.2 df>.
to tons by dividing by 2000.
Wilson, C.R. and Feucht, J.R. Composting of Yard Waste. Colorado
State University Coopertive Extension. October, 1997.
0.375 <http://www.ext.colostate.edu/PUBS/GARDEN/07212.pdf>.