Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Haiti's Lesson
The earthquake is being used to entrench neocolonial control over Haiti.
Both in its death and destruction, the earthquake which hit
nity, equal to $31 billion in present day value, was being collected
by France till 1947 and paid through a debt from us banks. The us
reaction, led by the United States (us), has appeared prompt and
by Haiti's population remained suspect for the us, which sent cia
vated its relief operations, as did countries like France, Brazil and
Britain. Apart from governments, people all over the world have
Haiti was among the richest colonies of the world in the 18th
well in Haiti. The land of the invincible black slave army is not
allowed to have an army of its own but is "protected" by an, almost
trade for its owner - France - at the time of the French revolution.
which now decides whose, and what, aid comes into Haiti, us se
Haiti to hand over control of its airports and ports to the us army
already getting into Haiti as part of this aid. Other indications sug
gest that Haiti will be given more doses of colonial style "laissez
faire" economic policies and its state will be kept under the sharp
philanthropy of the very same powers which, over the last two
sent to regain Haiti for France. Independent Haiti, for the first
denigrate the country and its proud people. The western media is
Haiti surely does need help at this moment when its houses,
hospitals, schools, offices, roads, ports and morale are down. Un
it has generated all over the world, has become another tool in the
Economic & Political weekly E33S3 January 30, 2010 vol xlv no 5 5
This content downloaded from 35.8.11.3 on Tue, 13 Dec 2016 05:38:42 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
hands of the global powers to perpetuate the very same under help Haiti, also takes up the political responsibility of opposing
development and poverty which so hollowed out Haiti that every
ing the people there. Aid should be used to lessen the pain of Haiti,
global popular opinion, which has come out so handsomely to not made into yet another lesson in colonialism.
and the Supreme Court (sc). And, the litigant was the sc (its
order of a single judge, held that the Supreme Court cannot shield
itself from the exemptions provided by the rti Act, more specifi
The sc and the high courts are not only "public authorities" judges of the sc without the sanction of the cji in the matter, is a
under the rti Act, but the disclosures about their judges' assets big hurdle as far as the very launch of a criminal investigation
are essential elements of judicial accountability, including trans against a judge is concerned. Then, there is the clause about low
parency. The Delhi High Court thus held that the main restraints
ering the dignity of the court in the Contempt of Court Act, 1971,
on the disclosure of their assets that the sc judges wanted cannot where even if one were to expose a judge with evidence, there is
someone in the know can point to significant properties not arbitrariness of the executive. To guard them from political inter
declared, or questions can be asked about whether the judge's ference, judges are virtually irremovable except through im
assets are disproportionate to his/her known sources of income
tions against the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, far in independent India was in 1991, against justice V Ramaswami,
P D Dinakaran were made only after he was recommended for who was found guilty of wilful and gross misuse of office when
appointment to the sc. In other words, why did the lawyers of the he was the chief justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court,
Forum for Judicial Accountability and members of the Commit but it could not get the support of the two-thirds majority in
tee on Judicial Accountability not express their misgivings about Parliament that was required to sustain it.
Madras High Court, and later, when he was appointed Chief Jus
of the right to know as part of the right to free speech comes in,
and if the people have the right to know about the background
cial authority? If disclosures of assets had been the norm, then where citizens can give evidence about the background of a judge,
charges of misconduct and corruption might have surfaced much which will then be taken into account in deciding upon his/her
earlier than they in fact did. And, of course, the manner of select
This content downloaded from 35.8.11.3 on Tue, 13 Dec 2016 05:38:42 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms