Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Appellant
vs.
CATHERINE HADSELL
Respondent
Superior Court
County of Contra Costa
Case No.: Dl 1-00783 AND Dl 100775
Garrett C. Dailey
SBN: 76180
2915 McClure Street
Oakland, California 94609
Tel: (510) 465-3920
Fax: (510) 465-7348
Al49679
CATHERINE HADSELL
Respondent
Contra Costa County Case Numbers
MSDl 100775, MSDl 10783
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
FILED BY A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT;
MOTION TO DISMISS TARDY APPEAL;
AND
MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON
DISENTITLEMENT DOCTRINE
I.
litigant by the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. A copy of that Order is
filed herewith as Exhibit A 1 A subsequent order filed June 13, 2016, found that
Appellant has owed Respondent $91,869.86 in sanctions for over four years
despite having income of $21.000 per month.
A copy of the Order is filed herewith as Exhibit C. The Order states:
An earlier version of that Order was later filed on May 28, 2016. A copy of
that Order is filed herewith as Exhibit B.
1.
The Court finds that Respondent's actions in this matter
indicate a concerted effo11 to grind down the other side and delay final
determination of this matter. Consistent with the Memorandum of
Points and Authorities filed on behalf of Petitioner on October 16,
2015, and the holdings in In Re Marriage of Rifkin and Carty (2015)
234 Cal.App. 4th 1339, and In Re Marriage of Falcone vs. Fyke (2012)
203 Cal.App.4th 96, the Court finds that Respondent, Christopher
Hadsell comes within the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure
Section 391 (b )(3), and therefore, that Respondent, Christopher Hadsell
qualifies as a vexatious litigant.
2.
The Com1 Orders that while acting In Pro Persona, any
new filing of Respondent, Christopher Hadsell will require the preapproval of the Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa County Superior
Court. At this time, the Presiding Judge is Judge Austin. This ruling
regarding a pre-filing Order goes into effect at 11 :50 a.m. on April 28,
2016.
3.
The Court notes that following a lengthy trial in 2012
before Judge Treat, Respondent was sanctioned in the sum of $75,000
with accrued interest as of the filing date of October 16, 2015 of
$16,869.86, resulting in a total of $91,869.86. Respondent has failed to
pay the sanctions as ordered for a period of almost four years.
Respondent has failed to update his Income and Expense Declaration in
compliance with the local rules of Court. The most recent income
information of Respondent available to the Court was submitted in
2013 and indicates that Respondent had monthly, average income at
that time of $21,000. It is within the Court's discretion to rely upon the
income information of Respondent presented in 2013. The Court notes
that pursuant to the filings of Respondent relating to custody and
visitation, Respondent resides in a four-bedroom home in Dublin,
California which accommodates teenage children as well as himself.
The house alone is an indication that Respondent can afford to pay
even additional sanctions, and he chooses not to pay them. Based on
the conduct of Respondent and the finding that Respondent has the
ability to pay additional sanctions, the Com1 Orders Respondent to pay
additional, post-Judgment sanctions pursuant to Family Code Section
271 in the sum of $80,000.
4.
The Court finds that it is within the Court's discretion to
require that Respondent post a bond as security prior to initiating future
litigation in this matter. Prior to Respondent, acting as a self-
persona without filing a bond. He filed a request to file new litigation with the
Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa County Superior Court on October 11, 2016,
but has not lodged a copy of an order permitting these appeals. In fact, his act of
filing these appeals without prior approval and without posting a bond was a
patent violation of the Pre filing Order.
A copy of his Notice of Appeal is filed herewith as Exhibit D.
Code Civ. Proc. 391.7 states in part:
a) In addition to any other relief provided in this title, the court may,
on its own motion or the motion of any party, enter a prefiling order
which prohibits a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in
the courts of this state in propria persona without first obtaining
leave of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court where
the litigation is proposed to be filed. Disobedience of the order by a
vexatious litigant may be punished as a contempt of court.
(b) The presiding justice or presiding judge shall permit the filing of
that litigation only if it appears that the litigation has merit and has
not been filed for the purposes of harassment or delay. The presiding
justice or presiding judge may condition the filing of the litigation
upon the furnishing of security for the benefit of the defendants as
provided in Section 391.3.
(c) The clerk may not file any litigation presented by a vexatious
litigant subject to a prefiling order unless the vexatious litigant first
obtains an order from the presiding justice or presiding judge
permitting the filing. If the clerk mistakenly files the litigation
without the order, any party may file with the clerk and serve, or the
presiding justice or presiding judge may direct the clerk to file and
3
modification" of the original. the time to appeal runs from the original judgment,
not the revised one. The only difference between the two orders is that the
Amended Order, which was filed first, contains Appellant's mailing address. Thus,
it was the operative order.
Appellant's Notice of Appeal, filed October 11, 2016, purports to appeal
from the May 28th order declaring him a vexatious litigant and requiring a
prefiling order. It notes that he filed a motion for a new trial on July 11, 2016. (See
a copy of the Notice of Appeal, filed herewith as Exhibit D.)
By noting that he filed a CCP 663 notice on July 11, 2016, Appellant
appears to believe that somehow that notice extended his time to file an appeal. He
is mistaken.
Here are the operative dates:
~
July 11, 2016: Appellant filed CCP 663a Notice of Intention to Move for
New Trial
October 10, 2016 Appellant filed Notice of Appeal from Vexatious Litigant
order- 158 days after the order was filed. (Exhibit D.)
Calif. Rules of Ct., rule 8.108 extends the time to file a Notice of Appeal
from an appealable order if one files a "valid notice of intention to move for a new
trial." Code of Civ. Proc. 663a requires that a notice of intention to set aside or
vacate a judgment pursuant to section 663 be made within "15 days of the date of
5
mailing of notice of entry of judgment by the clerk of the court .... " Here, the
motion for a new trial was not filed for 68 days. Hence, it was not a "valid notice
of intention to move for a new trial'' and ineffective to extend the time for
Appellant to appeal the prefiling order.
The appeal from the Amended Prefiling Order-Vexatious Litigant is tardy
and must be dismissed. (Calif Rules of Ct., rule 8.104(b ); In re Marriage of Eben-
found to have the ability to comply with both the support orders and to pay the
four-years old sanctions order. In fact, he was sanctioned an additional $80,000 on
April 28, 2016. (See Findings and Order After Hearing filed June 13, 2016, a copy
of which is filed herewith as Exhibit C.) None of those sanctions have been paid.
In addition, as seen from the Declaration of Alyssa LeGrand, a Child
Support Specialist employed with the Contra Costa County of Department of
Child Support Services, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit F hereto, Appellant
is $93, 714.84 in arrears on his support obligations to Respondent and his children.
Said Declaration suggests that Appellant had the ability to voluntarily pay his
support because the Department was able to levy on $285,000 of his assets to
partially satisfy his obligations.
Although he has not formally been adjudged in contempt, the recent
findings of the Court that he has income of $200,000 per year certainly places him
6
v. MacPherson (1939) 13 Cal. 2d 271, wherein the Court held that a party to an
action cannot, with right or reason, ask the aid and assistance of a court in hearing
his demands while he stands in an attitude of contempt to legal orders and
processes of the courts of this state.
Recently, in In re Marriage of Hofer (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 454, the
husband appealed from an attorney's fee order arguing that it was made without
any information as to his income or assets. The problem was that said information
had been requested, but husband refused to produce it alleging that his family,
who owned the businesses by whom he was employed, forbade it. The Court of
Appeal dismissed his appeal:
"Where a party unlawfully withholds evidence of his income and
assets, he will not be heard to complain that an order is not based on
the evidence he refuses to disclose." (Id. at p. 458.)
The basis for this ruling was the "disentitlement doctrine", which enables
an appellate court to stay or to dismiss the appeal of a party who has refused to
obey the superior court's legal orders. The dismissal of husband's appeal was an
exercise of a state court's inherent power to use its processes to induce compliance
with a presumptively valid order.
VERff LCA.l
l<J~
that
MC-700
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
(To l>e completed only if a party is making the motion)
NAME:
FIRM NAME.
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP CODE:
TELEPHONE NO.:
FAX NO.:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
COURT OF APPEAL,
CASE NAME:
AMENDED
1.
7 51 p INE STREET
p. 0. BOX 911
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
FAMILY LAW BUILDING
Dll-00775
order:
2.
Dthe court
CATHERINE HADSELL
3.
The person or persons identified in item 1, unless represented by an attorney, are prohibited from filing any new litigation in the
courts of California without approval of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court in which the action is to be filed.
4.
The clerk is ordered to provide a copy of this order to the California Judicial Council by fax at 415-865-4329 or by mail
at the address below.
Date:
JUDICIAL OFFICER
Page 1of1
Form Adopted !or Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
Essential
E]Forms-
Cc
EXHIBIT A
.
Dorothea Johnson
DEPUTYCLERK
MC-700
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
(To be completed only if a party 1s making the moffon)
NAME:
"IRMNAME:
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP CODE:
FAX NO.:
TELEPHONE NO.:
r---1
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
IXl
STREET ADDRESS:
MAiLING ADDRESS.
CITYANDZIPCODE:
BRANCHNAME:
CASE NAME:
n n f.'-.'~.' . :~.
lJ
~,f:.:;..::
- ' .. :.
'
7 51 p INE STREET
p 0. BOX 911
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
FAMILY LAW BUILDING
CATHERINE HADSELL VS. CHRISTOPHER JAMES HADSELL
CASE NUMBER:
1.
.... _.!
;;:J
Dll-00775
Name and address of each plaintiff or cross-complainant or other party subject to this prefiling order:
2.
Dthe court
CATHERINE HADSELL
[XJ
party (name):
3.
The person or persons identified in item 1, unless represented by an attorney, are prohibited from filing any new litigation in the
courts of California without approval of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court in which the action is to be filed.
4.
The clerk is ordered to provide a copy of this order to the California Judicial Council by fax at 415-865-4329 or by mail
at the address below.
Date:
'<::..
JUDICIAL OFFICER
TERRI MOCKLER
EXHIBIT B
Essential
,0Forms-
Dll-00775
FL-340
FORCOURTUSEONL.Y
ATTORNEY OR PARYY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, stal11 Ber number, Biid Bdc/Je9s):
63-30QQ
Fl\XNO. (Optlons/):510-7
6 3-314 4
0 !L
Costa
7 51 Pine Street
MAl~ING ADDRESS: PO Box 911
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Martinez, CA 94553
sRANCHNAME: Peter L. Spinet ta Family Law Center
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: Catherine Hadsell
STREET AOCIRESS:
JUN 13 2016
[DJ
Dll-00775
IXI
Petitioner's RFO filed l0/16/15, Respondent's RFO filed 3/17/16, Petitioner's RFO
filed 12/4/15, Respondent's RFO filed 03/14/16, Respondent's RFO filed 03/14/16
As attached
on form FL-341
IX) Other
Cl
3. Child support:
As attached
on form FL-342
Other
As attached
on form FL-343
Other
IXI
5. Property orders:
As attached
Cl
on form FL-344
D
D
Other
6. Attorney's fees
As attached
Cl
on form FL-346
IX]
Other
7. Other orders:
CXl
As attached
**
5 - 2 (ii
F~l~~8~~n~f ~'Q'~~~se
FL-340 (Rev, Januaty 1, 2012)
(eJ iss(~~Ai"iDRMr
In Dept.:
TERRI MOCKLER
\ 1
Not applicable
at (time):
Date:
Not applicable
Not appllcable
Not applicable
~ - - - - -JUDICIAL
-OFFICER
--'--C:;c;:kd for :l5 ll.:k1;; 3
&N""' CP."'.' '5i_1 ".i::;~;;
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
OTHER PARTY
Paga I ol 1
Hadsell,
EXHIBIT C
2
3
MARRIAGE OF HADSELL
CONTRA. COSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ACTION NO: Dll-00775
ATIACHMENT TO FINDINGS AND ORDER AFTER HEARING
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
5
6
7
The Court finds that pursuant to Cal.Civ.Proc. Section 632, Respondent is not entitled to a:
written Statement of Decision. Therefore, Respondent's request for a written statement of
decision is denied. Pursuant to the request of Respondent, the Court issued an oral Statement of
Decision as follows:
I.
Vexatious. Litigant
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
1. The Court finds that Respondent's actions in this matter indicate a concerted effort to
grind down the other side and delay final determination of this matter. Consistent with the
Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed on behalf of Petitioner on October 16, 2015, and the
holdings in In Re Marriage of Rifkin and Carty (2015) 234 Cal.App. 4th 1339, and In Re Marriage
of Falcone vs. Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4111 96, the Court finds that Respondent, Christopher
Hadsell comes within the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 391(b)(3), and
therefore, that Respondent, Christopher Hadsell qualifies as a vexatious litigant.
17
18
19
20
2. The Court Orders that while acting In Pro Persona, any new filing of Respondent,
Christopher Hadsell will require the pre-approval of the Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa
County Superior Court. At this time, the Presiding Judge is Judge Austin. This ruling regarding a
pre-filing Order goes into effect at 11 :50 a.m. on April 28, 2016.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. The Court notes that following a lengthy trial in 2012 before Judge Treat, Respondent
was sanctioned in the sum of $75,000 with accrued interest as of the filing date of October 16,
2015 of $16,869.86, resulting in a total of $91,869.86. Respondent has failed to pay the sanctions
as ordered for a period of almost four years. Respondent has failed to update his Income and
Expense Declaration in compliance with the local rules of Court. The most recent income
infonnation of Respondent available to the Court was submitted in 2013 and indicates that
Respondent had monthly, average income at that time of $21,000. It is within the Court's
discretion to rely upon the income infonnation of Respondent presented in 2013. The Court notes
FOIJI
that pursuant to the filings of Respondent relating to custody and visitation, Respondent resides in
himself. The house alone is an indication that Respondent can afford to pay even additional
sanctions, and he chooses not to pay them. Based on the conduct of Respondent and the finding
that Respondent has the ability to pay additional sanctions, the Court Orders Respondent to pay
additional, post-Judgment sanctions pursuant to Family Code Section 271 in the sum of$80,000.
4. The Court finds that it is within the Court's discretion to require that Respondent post a
bond as security prior to initiating future litigation in this matter. Prior to Respondent, acting as a
self-represented litigant, submitting any new pleadings in this matter, Respondent shall be required
10
11
II.
12
13
Adjudication is denied.
14
III.
1S
Petitioner's Request for Order filed on December 4, 2015 for the appointment
of Minor's Counsel
6. The.Court finds that this issue is moot based on the superseding Orders issued on
16
17
March 30, 2016. Pursuant to the Stipulation stated on the record by Petitioner, this issue is
18
dropped.
19
IV.
20
21
22
Respondent's Request for Order filed on March 14, 2016 to set aside and
7. The Court finds that this issue is moot based on the superseding Orders issued on
March 30, 2016. Respondent's request is denied.
23
V.
24
25
26
27
28
fOAH
2.
APP-002
FOR COURT USE ONLY
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address):
Christopher Hadsell
-9000 Crow Canyon Rd., S-399
Danville, CA 94506
TELEPHONE NO.:
(925) 482-6502
Contra Costa
751 Pine St.
P.O. Box 911
Martinez. CA 94553
Peter L. Spinetta Family Law Center
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
Christopher Hadsell
Catherine Hadsell
CASE NUMBER:
CJ CROSS-APPEAL
(UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE)
MSD 11-00783
(Consolidated w/MSD 11-00775)
Notice: Please read Information on Appeal Procedures for Unlimited Civil Cases (Judicial Council form
APP-001) before completing this form. This form must be filed in the superior court, not in the Court of Appeal.
1.
Christopher Hadsell
appeals from the following judgment or order in this case, which was entered on (date):
CJ
[{]
CJ
CJ
CJ
D
[ZJ
An order after judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1 (a)(2)
CJ
2.
Default judgment
Judgment after an order granting a summary judgment motion
Judgment of dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure sections 581d, 583.250, 583.360, or 583.430
Other (describe and specify code section that authorizes this appeal):
Date:
I 0/1 I /2016
Christopher Hadsell
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
Cal
EXHIBIT D
APP-002
CASE NUMBER:
CASE NAME:
MSD 11-00783
NOTICE TO PARTIES: A copy of this document must be mailed or personally delivered to the other party or parties to this appeal. A PARTY TO
THE APPEAL MAY NOT PERFORM THE MAILING OR DELIVERY HIMSELF OR HERSELF. A person who is at least 18 years old and is not a
party to this appeal must complete the information below and mail (by first-class mail, postage prepaid) or personally deliver the front and back of
this document. When the front and back of this document have been completed and a copy mailed or personally delivered, the original may then
be filed with the court.
PROOF OF SERVICE
Personal Service
1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this legal action.
2. My residence or business address is (specify):
Professional Process Service. 3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd., #126. Lafayette. CA 94549
and Form MC-701
3. I mailed or personally delivered a copy of the Notice of Appeal/Cross-Appeal (Unlimited Civil Case) as follows (complete either a orb):
a.
[ZJ
(b)
[ZJ
deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with the postage fully prepaid.
placed the envelope for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown in items below, following
our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is
deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with
postage fully prepaid.
October I I, 2016
Lafayette, CA
CJ
Jeanne M Kosta
(SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)
Page 2 of 2
c
MC-702
P"QR COURT
1...0URT
~000
~ ... wpher
Crow
Ddnv:i.1le~
rtt.t:PHO~.fENO
~. M4.it /.f)f.JRL>:::
C>~
use ON:. t
Ead'''';I:
Rd.
~~JG
CA
{9:2:3}
4d2=()SQ2
Dl l . () (J 7 8
.]
'01 gb~~~i~~:Et:-Per______
1
. ' ...
~-
f'Vll S
_
'
APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION
'""""' UPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CunL .t'i:I Ccstd
srtt:rtr;.t>nPts~I
7Sl Pine St
re.<~L
p . () ~ Bo.x. 9 l .1
cTYANozwcoDE Mart::icnc,z, CA 94553
MAH.ING AUDRf.~<>
r -P:11~~;~~~h~~~ki:~:a:==~~~:~Lii~aii::Fi- ~-~L~-~\v=~;;
I
0
DEFENDANT/ RESPONDENT: eatht'!. :t fneo Hadse1 l, (' ~.
f\
(Io;.
-- \
-::~LITIGAT~~o:~J~.~~~:~-_v~
t
~
1
. \ .
Type of case:
f,
Limited. Civil
Unlimited Civil
c::J Probate
\~;;_;:~115--
Small Claims
Other
-----"'-----------'-..,;..1.~---- -~
. . . . . . . _____________ _
ORDER
Approval to file the atta~hed dbcum~nt is:
a.
b.
c.
Grant~d
Denied
Other.:
CS1
<0,:,;
~c;
.42...:.......
K. AUSTIN
EXHIBIT E
11
:\9\
:-a~
..
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
11
12
13
14
Catherine Hadsell,
Petitioner,
vs.
Christopher Hadsell,
Respondent.
15
16
DECLAR.ll,.TION
l 7
18
19
am
Child
Support
Specialist
employed
with
the
Contra
Costa
County
20
in that capacity,
21
records of payments and disbursements as required by the laws of the State of
22
California and of the United States.
23
2.
have personal knowledge of the facts as set forth herein and if called upon
24
to test:ify, could competently testify as t;o the truth of those matter set .forth
25
herein.
26
Ill
27
Ill
28
200000001358920
Dll-07755
DCSS ACCOUNTING
EXHIBIT F
3.
The
C>:Jlifcrnia
federal
child/
law
State
to
keep
Department
:~1a
and
of
i. rita in
Child
Support
records
t?ervices
re,::e itJt s
.::f
l~alifcrnia
.1.s
ma:-1dated
under
d.isbursemen~.s
and
of
reco~ds
in
simply
as
3
a
computerized
kno~"/Ii
r:;ystem
a.s
ccs1;p
~renera.Jly
CSE:,
!~eferred
to
4
The
"CSE."
SL;~~te
CalitGrn.1a
D-1.sbursernent
tc contemporaneouF;ly document,
responsi.blE:~
s~~eguards
4.
i.n
,; ,
2016,
based
en
c-ecords
maintained
account :.!1g
of
the
payments
a.nd
for
the
by
is
November
On
sou)
(hereinafter
Uni.t
SDU,
the
payment
child,
spousEA 1
a11d
medicaJ.
10
support
11
in
the
abo1e
referenced
following a modification of
a,;
matter
~rnpport~
req~1esced
by
our
at.torney
staff
12
13
14
due.
.1. 5
Exhibit
"B"
represents
amounts
due
for
16
spousal
sup.oort
for
and
child support.:
Exhi.bi t
"D"
Exhibit
represents
"C"
represents
arnounts
due
fo.r:
medical suppoct.
17
5.
18
a.
19
20
reported a
payment
of
$758
for
when she
2.l
22
Mother
$640.42 was paid to tl1e SDU by income withhold.i.ng order i.n September of
2013.
e.
$25S.31 was paid to the SDU by incor:e withholc'.ing order .i.n November of
2013.
23
d.
$194,199.38 was credited in January of 2014 for payments made to the SDU
24
pursuant to a notice to withhold issued pursuant to Family Code Sections
25
e.
27
28
200000001358920
Dll-07755
DCSS ACCOUNTING
6.
Nei.t:.her
Deparl:.ment:.
nor
SDU
records
show
a..ny
voluntary
payments
made
by
2
7.
The
accounting
shows
respondent
owes
$93, 714. 84
in
delinquent
support
consisting of $'&8,974.37
4
in child support:,
$34,862.79
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
< . h -
'=----.;:_.::....
A:!.ys~fo. I.JeGrand
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 .s
26
27
28
Dll-07755
200000001358920
DCSS ACCOUNTING
Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
CP:
NCP:
Court Order:
200000001358920-1
Corn:ra Co:ota
CATHERINE Hl\DSELL
CHRISTOPHE? ~ADSELL
D2.l-0077S
MM-CCYY
Current
Charge
Totals: 361,538.95
Printed by bt;ari,
93, 7 Jt.J. H4
Principal
Balance
St
758.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
640.42
0.00
258.31
0.00
"94,199.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90,854.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
286,710.35
83,1 0. i
10,5 4 .1
93, ' 4.8
0. 00
286, 110. 35
Support Paid
Aid
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(). 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. ()()
[). 00
0.00
0.00
0. (;()
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(). 00
0. ()
0.00
0.00
0.00
G.OC
0.00
0. 00
0.00
146,748.00
151,759.00
156,770.00
161,781.00
166,151.58
171,162.58
17~:),
915.27
180,926.27
0.00
5,011.00
10,022.00
15, 033 .00
20,044.00
2S,055.00
30,066.00
35,077.0C
40,088.00
45,099.00
50,110.00
55,121.00
Monthly
Interest
0.00
0.00
0. 00
1,288.91
1,331.47
l,329.70
1,411.15
1,406.81
1,494.07
0.00
0.00
42.56
82.38
127.68
164.74
212. 79
255.36
288.31
340.47
370.68
425. :;9
Interest
Balance
0.00
0.00
1,288.91
2,620.38
3,950.08
'>,361.23
6,768.04
8,262.ll
0.00
0. 00
42.56
124. 94
2 52. 62
417.36
630.i.5
885.51
1,173.82
1,514.29
1,884.97
2,310.56
2,778.71
3 '240. 00
3,793.27
4,369.88
5,008.26
5,667.24
6,390.75
6,427.74
6,463.53
6,539.30
6,650.49
6,804.50
6,997.'0
7,213.99
7,485.09
7,785.43
Total Balance
146,748.00
151,759.00
158,058.91.
164,401.38
170,101.6&
176,523.81
182,683.Jl
189,188.38
0.00
5,011.0:l
10,064.56
15,157.94
20,296.62
25,472.36
30,696.15
35,962.51
41,261.82
46,613.29
51-,994.97
5~;,102.00
444.84
8,'.)29.31
8,974.15
57,684.00
60,266.00
466. 71
9,440.86
<!72. f32
9,913.68
57,431.56
62,910.71
68,383.00
73,947.27
79,534.88
85,184.26
90,854.24
96,588.75
10,782.50
1.5,384.99
20,066.76
24,783.95
29,543.96
34,370.56
39,221.45
44,126.55
1;9,783.89
55,496.61
61, 019 .31
64,076.15
67,124.86
70,179.68
80,558.71
B3,140.71
0.00
660.45
0.00
10,5'/4.13
10, 57'1.13
91,132.84
93,714.84
60,J:.)2.00
468 . .15
65,143.00
'70,154.00
75,165.00
80,176.00
85,187.00
90,198.00
4,354.76
8,921.46
.J.3,527.46
18,133.46
22,739.'16
27,373.46
32,007.46
.36,641.46
41,998.46
461.29
553.27
576.61
638.38
52,520.00
658.98
723.51
35.99
35.79
75.77
111.19
154.01
192.60
216.89
271. 1.0
300.34
355.72
388.16
47,3::)5.46
8, 1_41.15
18,836.24
p. 1
,,,
Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
CP:
NCP:
Court Order:
Child Support
200000001333920-1
Contra Costa
CATHERINE HADSELL
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
DJ.1 .... 00T75
r
!
MM-CCYY) Current
Charge
05-2013 75,330.00
05-2013 2,511.00
05-2013 2,511.00
07-2013 2,511.00
08 .. 2013 2,511.00
09-2013 2,511.00
10-2013 2,511.00
11-2013 2,511.00
12 ..2003 2,511.00
01-2014 2,511.00
02 ()2014 2,511.00
03-2014 2,511.00
04- 2014 2,511.00
05 -2014 2' 511. 00
06 <2014 2,511.00
07-2014 2' 511. 00
08-2014 2,511.00
09-2014
2,511.00
10-2014 2' 511. 00
11-2014 2,511.00
12 2014 2' 511. 00
01-2015 2, 511. 00
02-2015 2,511.00
03-2Q15 2,511.00
04-2015 2,511.00
05-2015 2,511.00
06 .. 2015 2,511.-00
07-2015 2,511.00
08-2015 2' 511. 00
09-2015 2,066.70
10-2015 2,-06.00
11 .. 2015 2,106.00
12-2015 2,106.00
01-2016 2' 134. 00
02-2016 2,134.00
03-2016 2,134.00
042016 2,857.00
05-2016 2,857.00
062016 2,664.54
07-20-6 2,582.00
08-2016 2,582.00
09-2016 2,582.00
10-2016 7,915.99
10-2016 2,582.00
11-2016 2,582.00
Totals: 189,629.23
Aid
St
I
-----'
106,383.24
83,24:1.99
9,292.97
43, 991. 23
4, 983.14
~8,974.37
0.00
.149,947.83
48,974.37
Support Paid
------
Principal
Balance
Monthly
Interest
Interest
Balance
Tot:.'
~:1~~~-~1
------~
ADJ
0.00
758.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
640.42
0.00
258.31
o.oo
000,()82.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-7,709.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
77,083.00
79,094.00
82,105.00
84,616.00
86,486.58
88,997.58
91,250.27
93, 761.27
0.00
2,511.00
5,022.00
7,533.00
10,044.00
12,555.00
15,066.00
17,577.00
:rn, 08B. oo
22,599.00
25,110.00
27,621.00
30,132 .. 00
32,643.00
35,154.00
37,665.00
40,176.00
42,687.00
45,198.00
0.00
2,066.70
4,172.70
6,278.70
8,384.70
-0,518.70
12,652.70
14,786.70
17,643.70
20,500.70
2:>,165.24
25,747.24
28,329.24
30,911.24
0.00
0.00
41,409.23
43,991.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. CJO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ADJ
0.00
0.00
1-19,947.83
0.00
Print.ad by btari, Contra Costa Nov 21, 2016 3;26pm SAT ver S.4a cur
o.oo
0.00
676.00
697.33
695.47
734.54
731.49
775.00
0 .. 00
0.00
21.33
41. 28
63.98
82.55
106 .. 63
127.96
144.47
170.61
185.75
213. 26
234.59
231.15
277.24
288.94
319. 89
330.21
362.55
0.00
0.00
17.55
34.30
53.33
71.02
83. 34
107.17
121.2149.44
168. 04
196 . 21
218.08
232.21
0.00
328.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
676.00
1,373.33
2,068.80
2,803.34
3,534.83
4,309.83
0.00
0.00
21. 33
62.61
126.59
209.14
315.77
443.73
588.20
758 .s1
944.56
1,157.82
1,392.41
1,623.56
1,900.80
2,189.74
2,509.63
2,839.84
3,202.39
3,202.39
3,202.3<:1
3,219.94
3,254.24
3,307.57
3,378.59
3,461.93
3,569.10
3,690.30
3, 839 74
4,007.78
4,203.99
4,422.07
4,654-28
77,083.00
79,594.00
82' 781. 00
85,989.33
88,555.38
91,800.92
94,785.10
98,071.10
0.00
2,511.00
5,043.33
7,595.61
10,170.59
12' 764. 14
15,381.77
18' 020. 7:3
20,676.20
23,357.81
26,054.56
28,778.82
31,524.41
34,266.56
37,054.80
39,854.74
42,685.63
45,526.84
48,400.39
3,202.39
5,269.09
7,392.64
9,532.94
11,692.27
13,897.29
16,114.63
18,355.80
21,334.00
24,340.44
27,173.02
29, 951.23
32,751.31
35,565.52
4,983.14
4,983.14
46,392.3,'
48,974.37
9-292.97
p. l
...
Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
CP:
NCP:
Court Order:
Spousal Support
200000001358920-1
Contra Costa
CATHERINE H!,DSELL
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Dl :-0077 s
i MMC~-~ i
Current
Totals: 155,328.00
Aid l'
~!.-. . --
95,000.00
60,328.00
9,~15.65
29,354. 6
~, 50iL 3
34,862. 9
0.00
129,580.86
34,862.79
Support Paid
------
Principal
...L . .
~~~-~-~~........J.
ADJ
0 100
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
86,435.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
43,145.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o ~oo
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
129,580.86
0.00
vi;~r
5.4a cur
62,828.00
65,328.00
67,828.00
70,328.00
72,828.00
75,328.00
77,828.00
80,328.00
0.00
2,500.00
.,000.00
7,500.00
10,000.00
12,500.00
15,000.00
17,500.00
20,000.00
22,500.00
25,000.00
27,500.00
30,000.00
32,500.00
35,000.00
37,500.00
40,000.00
42,500.00
45,000.00
4,354.76
6,854.76
9,354.76
11,854.76
14,354.76
16,854.76
19,354.76
21,854.76
24,354.76
26,854.76
29,354.76
29,354.76
29,354.76
29,354.76
29,354.;;16
29,354.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
554.84
576.07
578.04
618.54
619.13
661. 00
0.00
0.00
21. 23
41.10
63.70
82.19
106.16
127 .4.
143.84
169.86
184.93
212.33
233.56
230.14
276. 03
287.67
318 .49
328. 77
360.96
36.99
35.79
58.22
76.89
100.68
121.58
133. 55
163.93
1 79. ;.:_4
206.28
220.12
248.63
248.63
240.61
248. 63
0.00
0.00
o.oo
554.84
1,130.91
1,708.95
2,327.49
2,946.62
3,607.62
0.00
0.00
21.23
62.33
126.03
208.22
314 .38
441.78
585.62
755.48
940 .41
1,152.74
1,386.30
1,616.44
1,892.47
2,180.14
2,498.63
2,827.40
3,188.36
3,225.35
3,261.14
3,309.36
3,396.25
3,496.93
3,618.51
3,752.06
3,915.99
4, 095 .13
4,301.41
4,521.53
4,770.16
5,018.79
5,259.40
5,508.03
5,508.03
9, .. 15.65
p. l
62,828.00
65,328.00
68.382.84
71,458.91
74,536.95
77,655.49
80,774.62
83,935.62
0.00
2,500.00
5,021.23
7,562.33
10,126.03
12,708.22
15,314.38
17,941.78
20,585.62
23,255.48
25,940.41
28,652.74
31,386.30
34,116.44
36,892.47
39,680.14
42,498.63
45,327.40
48,188.36
7,580.11
10,115.90
12,674.12
15,251.01
17, 851. 69
20,473.27
23,106.82
25,770.75
28,449.8.9
31,156.17
33,876.29
34,124.92
34,373.55
34,614.16
34,862.79
34,862.79
Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
Medical Support
200000001358920 1
CP:
NCP:
Contr<i Costa
CATHERINE HADSELL
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Court Order:
DJl-00775
Aid
MMCCYY
0.00
_1_6,631.72
427.62
0.00
12A2015
01-2016
022016
03 2016
04 2016
05-2016
06-2016
07.2016
08-2016
09-2016
10-2016
10-2016
11-2016
6,837.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,877.68
Support Paid
Principal
Balance
ADJ
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,794.72
0.00
0.00
Totals: 16,631.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
'.'. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837,00
6,837.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(]. 00
0.00
9,794.72
9,794.72
7.1s1.66
a.co
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,181.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. Ol)
9' 7 94. 72
82.96
9,877.68
7,18l.ti6
St
05-2013
05-2013
062013
07-2013
08-2013
09 2013
10 2013
11 2013
12 2013
01 20H
02-2014
03-2014
04-2014
05-2014
06 2014
07-2014
082014
092014
102014
11 2014
12 2014
01 2015
02-2015
03-2015
Ot.-2015
05-2015
06-2015
07 2015
08-2015
09-2015
1020.15
112015
0. 00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C.JO
0.00
0.00
0.00
ADJ
0.00
Printed by btari, Contra Costa Nev 21, 2016 3:27pm SAT ver S.4a cur
Monthly
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
58.07
58.07
56.19
58.07
56.19
58.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
82. 96
0.00
interest
Balance
Total Balance
0. OC
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,895.07
6,953.14
7,009.33
7,067.40
7,123.59
7,181.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. OD
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
G.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
82.96
82.96
9,877.68
9,877.68
0.00
0.00
58.07
16 .14
72.33
30.40
86.59
44. 66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
427.62
p. 1
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, BRENDA K. PORTO, declare as follows:
I am over eighteen years of age and not a party to the within action; my business
address is 2915 McClure Street, Oakland, California 94609; I am employed in Alameda
County, California. I am familiar with my employer's practices for the collection and
processing of materials for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and that practice is
that materials are deposited with the United States Postal Service the same day of office
collection in the ordinary course of business.
On November 23, 2016, I served a copy of the following document(s): MOTION TO
DISMISS APPEAL FILED BY A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT; MOTION TO DISMISS
TARDY APPEAL; AND MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON DISENTITLEMENT
DOCTRINE
On the addressee(s):
BY MAIL -- by placing a true copy of the above-referenced document(s) enclosed in
X
a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Oakland, California,
addressed as set forth below, on the date set forth above.
__ BY FACSIMILE -- by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the
fax number(s) set forth below, on the date set forth above, before 5:00 p.m.
Clerk of the Court (via efiling)
COURT OF APPEAL
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Christopher j. Hadsell (via email and first class mail)
9000 Crow Canyon Road, S-399
Danville, California 94506
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 23, 2016, at
Oakland, California.
~~\2_~~
Brenda K. Porto