Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reykjavik University Center for Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Reykjavik University, School of Business, Menntavegur 1, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
VCU da Vinci Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 807 S. Cathedral Place, Richmond, VA 23284-4000, USA
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 23 February 2015
Received in revised form 26 January 2016
Accepted 3 February 2016
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Service benets
Functional benets
Emotional benets
Social benets
Customer satisfaction
Service innovation
a b s t r a c t
While marketing literature has dened the benets concept broadly, there is limited empirical research clarifying
what benets constitute and how they contribute to customer satisfaction in the B2B service context. Benets
have typically been characterized as falling under a single, all-encompassing concept, but emerging thinking
views them as multi-dimensional, including functional, emotional and social benets. This research examines
whether this demarcation applies in the B2B services context, and if so, how these three types of benets are
related with customer satisfaction. Based on a survey of 335 customers of recently launched B2B services, the
demarcation of these three types of benets appears warranted and each type of benet exhibits a different
pattern of relationship with customer satisfaction. Functional benets are found to be positively related with
customer satisfaction, while emotional benets and social benets exhibit non-linear relationships. Emotional
benets have a diminishing effect on customer satisfaction as they increase and social benets reach a plateau
after a threshold point. These results suggest that recognizing the three types of benets and the different shapes
of their relationships with customer satisfaction can result in effective strategies for driving customer satisfaction
when innovating new B2B services. Managerial and research implications are discussed.
2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Businesses across the world are increasingly focused on services due
to their growing prevalence and importance in today's marketplace
(Raddats & Easingwood, 2010; Galston, 2015). This focus results in an
increased emphasis on service innovation in B2B contexts, recognized
as essential to achieve competitive advantage in industrial markets
(Rae, Fudge, & Hudson, 2012).
The prescribed approach to service innovation is to be customercentric and address benets that solve customer problems, which will
in turn deliver greater customer satisfaction (Kuczmarski & Mandolia,
2013). Benets, dened as the fundamental need or want that customers
satisfy when consuming a product or service (Kotler, 2003), are integral to
customer value creation (Zeithaml, 1988), play a requisite role in
customer satisfaction (Lindgreen & Wynstra, 2005), and are a fundamental focus of service innovation (Kotler, 2003; Kuczmarski & Mandolia,
2013). However, the specics of how benets contribute in the B2B
service context remain largely unexamined as most literature to-date
has focused on benets in the nal consumer (B2C) context.
An emergent theme about benets is that they appear to be
multi-dimensional rather than falling comfortably under a single,
all-encompassing concept. A number of researchers, e.g. Boksberger
and Melsen (2011), Lapierre (2000), Macdonald, Wilson, Martinez,
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: marina@ru.is (M. Candi), kbkahn@vcu.edu (K.B. Kahn).
and Toossi (2011) and Day and Crask (2000), advocate for a multidimensional approach to value, which encompasses benets. The literature indicates that three types of benets should be taken into account:
functional benets, emotional benets and social benets. Of these three
types, functional benets have traditionally received the most attention,
particularly in B2B contexts, e.g. factors such as speed, efciency, and
cost (Qualls & Rosa, 1995). Emotional benets, which pertain to
emotion, and social benets, which correspond to self-identity or
self-image, remain largely overlooked in examinations of B2B service
innovation. Therefore, this research poses two questions: (1) Does a
demarcation of functional, emotional, and social benets apply in
the B2B service context? (2) If so, how do these three types of benets
contribute to customer satisfaction?
Conducting research to examine contributions of benets to
customer satisfaction has the potential to point to effective strategies
for driving customer satisfaction when innovating B2B services. The
examination of functional, emotional and social benets and their
potential contributions to customer satisfaction forms the basis for
providing recommendations about how to maximize customer satisfaction through strategic combinations of benets in service innovation
and provide guidance to practitioners about where to focus efforts.
Furthermore, the study of emotional and social benets addresses calls
by Prior (2013), whose work provides evidence of their relevance to the
B2B service context. In addition, this research addresses calls by Cova
and Salle (2008) and Lowe and Hwang (2012) to look beyond the B2B
versus B2C dichotomy and strive for cross-fertilization between consumer
theory and industrial marketing theory.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
0019-8501/ 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
3. Methodology
To examine the effects of service benets on customer satisfaction, a
survey among actual recent customers of newly launched B2B services
was deemed an appropriate data collection methodology. A total of 42
Northern European service rms that had launched a new B2B service
within the last year participated in the research. The services came
from a broad range of sectors as summarized in Table 1. The rms
employed from 1 to 200 employees, with an average size of 16
employees. Hence, the sample of participating rms can be classed as
small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs). These rms were relatively
young, ranging in age from 3 to 17 years with an average age of
10 years from founding.
Each of the participating rms made customer lists available for use
in this research. For each customer on the list, an informant who was an
active user of the specic newly launched service was identied. This
ensured that each informant was qualied to respond to the survey.
To further conrm qualications, the survey started with a question
about whether the respondent had used the service in question and
felt knowledgeable about the service. Since the research focused on
newly launched services, the lengths of the B2B relationships with
respect to the services studied were uniformly short. A total of 1678
business customer names and email addresses were provided. In return
for providing this information, the companies received detailed results
of the ndings for their rms' newly launched services.
The survey was pilot tested by about 100 customers and minor
adjustments in wording were made based on pilot testers' comments.
Following pilot testing, emails were sent to the lists of customers
provided by the participating rms requesting that they ll in an online survey about a particular new service, which they had used. Up to
two reminder emails were sent to those customers that did not respond.
A total of 378 responses were received (23% response rate). This represents a very good response rate for an Internet-based survey. Responses
in which respondents indicated that they were not familiar with the service in question and responses exhibiting severe outlier characteristics,
potentially caused by frivolous response behavior, were omitted from
analysis, resulting in a nal sample size of 335 and a usable response
rate of 20%.
An instrument for assessing benets that customers gain from a
service was developed based on the work of Park et al. (1986). A total
of fteen survey items were formulated as Likert-type statements
with possible responses from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Exploratory
factor analysis using primary components and varimax rotation was
conducted using Stata 13.1. Three items loading poorly or having
substantial cross-loadings were discarded in a process of scale renement.
Table 1
Groups of industry sectors represented in the data.
Group of sectors
R&D services, testing
Technical services, e.g. equipment maintenance,
transport, distribution
Enterprise solutions, software as services (SAS)
Consulting services, e.g. engineering, architecture
Ofce services, e.g. printing and supplies
Software development
Percentage
of sample
10%
10%
18%
18%
21%
23%
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
The result was twelve items loading on three variables, one for functional
benets, one for emotional benets, and one for social benets. The split
between functional benets and the other two types of benets is in
line with existing research on utilitarian and hedonic product benets
(e.g. Batra & Ahtola, 1990; Voss, Spangenberg, & Grohmann, 2003; Swan
& Combs, 1976). The split between emotional benets and social benets
conrms that these are separate concepts for B2B services and that
customers are likely to ascribe different levels of value to them, as has
been found for products (Sheth et al., 1991; Sweeney & Soutar, 2001).
It is noted that while B2B customers can be expected to be more
rational in their evaluations of services than end consumers, the persons
responding to the survey might derive pleasure and/or stature from
using a procured B2B service. This human element lies at the core of
the notion that emotional benets and social benets can matter in
the B2B context similarly to what has been conrmed in the B2C
context.
Customer satisfaction was measured using two items based on Hui,
Zhao, Fan, and Au (2004), asking how satised customers were with
the service in question and how likely they would be to recommend
the service to someone else. Both questions had possible answers
from 1 (not satised at all, not very likely) to 5 (very satised, very
likely).
The measurement model was tested using conrmatory factor analysis (CFA) in Stata 13.1 and yielded very good t indices (Shah &
Goldstein, 2006) with 2 = 108 (68 degrees of freedom), root mean
squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.042, comparative t
index (CFI) = 0.99 and TuckerLewis index (TLI) = 0.98. The loadings,
composite reliabilities, and average variances extracted are shown in
Table 2. Composite reliabilities are all well over the generally accepted
cutoff of 0.7. This indicates that the items sufciently represent the
variables. Similarly, average variances extracted were all above the
generally accepted cutoff of 0.5. This indicates that a large proportion
of the variance is captured by each variable rather than measurement
error.
Various procedural remedies were used to minimize common
method bias as recommended by Podsakoff, MacKenzie, and Podsakoff
(2003). The introduction to the survey emphasized that there were no
right or wrong answers and respondents were promised anonymity.
The survey items were carefully constructed to avoid ambiguity, terminology that might not be understood, long question texts and doublebarreled questions. Although there are no denitive statistical tests for
common method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2003) a Harman's single-factor
test was conducted in which all the items making up the independent
variables were included in factor analysis. This resulted in the expected
Table 2
Reliability and validity of measures.
Variable
Items
Functional
service
benets
Emotional
service
benets
Social service
benets
Customer
satisfaction
Loading
()
CR
AVE
three factors, providing evidence that common method bias was not
likely a problem.
4. Results and discussion
Structural equation modeling using Stata 13.1 was employed to
analyze the dataset. Prior to applying this analysis, summary statistics
for each of the study's variables along with pairwise correlations
between variables were evaluated (see Table 3). Squared correlations
were compared with average variances extracted (AVEs) and since all
squared correlations were smaller than the respective AVEs, discriminant validity was supported (Hair, Black, Babin, & Anderson, 2010;
Anderson & Gerbing, 1988).
The possibility of multi-collinearity was examined in accordance
with the guidelines presented by Grewal, Cote, and Baumgartner
(2004) for detecting potential multi-collinearity across various ranges
of correlations between independent variables. Grewal et al. (2004)
show that provided reliability is strong (over 0.7), R2 is acceptable
(the structural model had an R2 of 0.59), and sample size is sufciently
large, multi-collinearity is not likely to be a problem. Variance ination
factors were also examined. The highest variance ination factor was
found to be 1.55, which is well below the conservative threshold of 5
(Marquardt, 1970). Based on this analysis, it was surmised that multicollinearity was not likely a problem.
Table 4 presents the results of the structural equation model analysis. As shown, all three types of benets have a statistically signicant
relationship with customer satisfaction. These results provide evidence
in support of hypotheses H1, H2, and H3. Since Table 4 shows standardized coefcients, the contributions of each of the three types of benets
can be compared and we note that the contribution of functional benets is strongest, which is not surprising for B2B services.
Various tests were conducted to examine the robustness of the
structural model. Because a wide range of sectors was represented in
the data, a regression analysis including dummy variables for each of
the groups of industry sectors in the sample was run. None of the
dummy variables were statistically signicant, indicating an absence
of industry effects and suggesting generalizability of ndings across
the B2B service sectors represented.
Another robustness test involved examining partial residual plots to
examine the possible existence of second-order relationships between
each type of benet and customer satisfaction. In fact, nonlinear
relationships in models including customer satisfaction have been
suggested by the literature (e.g. Anderson & Mittal, 2000), but there is
no clear consensus about the shapes of these relationships. This examination led to the conclusion that there might be second-order relationships, leading to two additional procedures being applied. Group
variables for each of the three types of benets were introduced in the
structural model to separate responses into above or below average
groups. Each grouping variable was added to a fully constrained
model in which all coefcients, covariances, and loadings were forced
to be equal across the two groups (Bollen, 1989). Constraints were
then lifted so that coefcients, covariances, and loadings for the grouping variable of interest were allowed to differ between the groups. The
Table 3
Summary statistics and correlations.
Variable
1
2
3
4
Functional service
benets
Emotional service
benets
Social service benets
Customer satisfaction
Mean
Std.dev.
2.98
0.69
0.64
0.28
0.25
0.32
2.52
2.83
3.5
0.82
0.93
0.81
0.53
0.50
0.57
0.74
0.66
0.55
0.44
0.81
0.54
0.30
0.29
0.77
Notes: average variances extracted are shown diagonally in bold. Pairwise correlations are
shown in the left side of the matrix and squared correlations are shown in the right side of
the matrix.
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
Table 4
Results of structural equation model analysis.
Standardized coef.
Std.err.
PNz
0.415
0.259
0.199
0.089
0.104
0.095
4.690
2.500
2.100
0.000
0.012
0.036
Notes: model t statistics: 2 = 125, d.f. = 68, root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05, Comparative t index (CFI) = 0.98, TuckerLewis index/non-normed t index
(TLI/NNFI) = 0.97, Coefcient of determination (CD) = 0.99, standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) = 0.04.
p b 0.05.
p b 0.01.
5. Conclusions
This research examined the benets of new B2B services to clarify
the nature of the benets concept and examine relationships with the
Table 5
Results of OLS including squared benets.
Standardized coef.
Std. err.
PNz
0.26
0.22
0.21
0.03
0.09
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.03
5.14
3.78
4.24
0.87
2.41
1.99
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.383
0.016
0.047
Functional benets
Emotional benets
Social benets
Functional benets2
Emotional benets2
Social benets2
Notes: R2 = 0.46, F = 40 (p = 0.00).
p b 0.05.
p b 0.01.
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
were provided by the same respondents. Reasonable procedural measures were taken to minimize this limitation and to ensure that survey respondents were competent to reect the company perspective regarding
benets and satisfaction, but future research might consider a different
data collection approach. Secondly, a broader cross-section of industries
would establish greater generalizability of research results however,
the present research did not indicate differences across the industries
included. Thirdly, the fact that all the B2B services studied were provided by Northern European rms raises the issue of generalizability to
other geographical locations. While not all customers of these rms
were Northern European, replication in other parts of the world is
warranted.
An additional research avenue is to use customer loyalty as a dependent variable, instead of customer satisfaction. This is because loyalty
may be quite relevant when considering more hedonic services for
which satisfying expectations or fullling needs may not be the most
important consideration (e.g. Arnould & Price, 1993). Indeed, Jones,
Reynolds, and Arnold (2006) argue that customer satisfaction is not
necessarily directly related with customer loyalty. Repeating the analysis conducted in the present paper with a measure of customer loyalty
as the dependent variable could be a valuable avenue for further
research.
Together these and other related future research efforts are encouraged to help clarify and provide additional understanding around the
benets concept in the B2B context. Honing a theory base on what
this concept represents and enacts is worthwhile because benets
represent a fundamental aspect of marketing theory and underlie B2B
company strategy for service delivery and service innovation.
Acknowledgement
Part of the funding for this work was provided from the European
Union Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological
development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 324448,
and by the Icelandic Research Fund, grant agreement no. 100668022.
References
Allen, M. W., & Ng, S. H. (1999). The direct and indirect inuences of human values on
product ownership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 539.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A
review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Anderson, E. W., & Mittal, V. (2000). Strengthening the satisfaction-prot chain. Journal of
Service Research, 3, 107.
Arnould, E., & Price, L. L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended
service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 2445.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. A. (1990). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer
attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159170.
Beltagui, A., Candi, M., & Riedel, J. C. (2012). Design in the experience economy: Using
emotional design for service innovation. Advances in International Marketing, 23(1),
111135.
Beltagui, A., Darler, W., & Candi, M. (2015). Measuring the deliverable and impressible
dimensions of service experience. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(3),
478492.
Boksberger, P. E., & Melsen, L. (2011). Perceived value: A critical examination of denitions,
concepts and measures for the service industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 25(3),
229240.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bruhn, M., Schnebelen, S., & Schafer, D. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of the quality
of e-customer-to-customer interactions in B2B brand communities. Industrial Marketing
Management, 43, 164176.
Candi, M. (2007). The role of design in the development of technology-based services.
Design Studies, 28, 559583.
Candi, M., & Saemundsson, R. J. (2011). Exploring the relationship between aesthetic
design as an element of new service development and performance. Journal of
Product Innovation Management, 28, 536557.
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by design: The role of hedonic
versus utilitarian benets. Journal of Marketing, 72, 4863.
Christensen, C. M., Cook, S., & Hall, T. (2006). What customers want from your products.
Harvard Business School Working Knowledge Series.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efcacy: Development of a
measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189211.
Cova, B., & Salle, R. (2008). The industrial/consumer marketing dichotomy revisited: A
case for outdated justication? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(1), 311.
Day, E., & Crask, M. R. (2000). Value assessment: The antecedent of customer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining
Behavior, 13, 5260.
Fernell, G. (1978). Consumers' perceptions of the product-use situation. Journal of
Marketing, 42, 3847.
Francalanci, C. (2001). Predicting the implementation effort of ERP projects: Empirical
evidence on SAP/R3. Journal of Information Technology, 16, 3348.
Galston, E. (2015). The trillion-dollar market to remake business applications, Techcrunch,
June 10. http://techcrunch.com/2015/06/10/show-me-the-trillion-dollar-market/
Glynn, M. S. (2010). The moderating effect of brand strength in manufacturerreseller
relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 12261233.
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error
in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science,
23(4), 519529.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A
global perspective (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption:
Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132140.
Hui, M. K., Zhao, X., Fan, X., & Au, K. (2004). When does the service process matter? A test
of two competing theories. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 465475.
Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping
value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research,
59(9), 974981.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand
equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 122.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Kuczmarski, T., & Mandolia, R. (2013). Service development. In K. B. Kahn (Ed.), PDMA
handbook of new product development (pp. 5167) (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John
Wiley and Sons.
Lapierre, J. (2000). Customer-perceived value in industrial contexts. Journal of Business &
Industrial Marketing, 15, 122145.
Lemke, F., Clark, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Customer experience quality: An exploration in
business and consumer contexts using repertory grid technique. The Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 846869.
Lilien, G. L., Grewal, R., Bowman, D., Ding, M., Grifn, A., Kumar, V., ... Wang, Q. (2010).
Calculating, creating, and claiming value in business markets: Status and research
agenda. Marketing Letters, 21(3), 287299.
Lindgreen, A., & Wynstra, F. (2005). Value in business markets: What do we know?
Where are we going? Industrial Marketing Management, 34(7), 732748.
Lindgreen, A., Hingley, M. K., Grant, D. B., & Morgan, R. E. (2012). Value in business and
industrial marketing: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management,
41(1), 207214.
Lowe, S., & Hwang, K. S. (2012). A NICE agenda for IMP research. Industrial Marketing
Management, 41(4), 706714.
Macdonald, E. K., Wilson, H., Martinez, V., & Toossi, A. (2011). Assesing value-in-use: A
conceptual framework and exploratory study. Industrial Marketing Management, 40,
671682.
Marquardt, D. W. (1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation,
and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics, 12, 591612.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Miles, L. D. (1961). Techniques of value analysis and engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company.
Mittal, B. (1988). The role of affective choice mode in the consumer purchase of expressive
products. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(4), 499524.
Mittal, B., & Lee, M. S. (1989). A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of
Economic Psychology, 10(3), 363389.
Mittal, V., Ross, W. T., Jr., & Baldasare, P. M. (1998). The asymmetric impact of negative
and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase
intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 33.
Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York,
NY: Basic books.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50, 135145.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in
behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879903.
Prior, D. D. (2013). Supplier representative activities and customer perceived value
in complex industrial solutions. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8),
11921201.
Qualls, W. J., & Rosa, J. A. (1995). Assessing industrial buyers' perceptions of quality and
their effects on satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 24, 359368.
Raddats, C., & Easingwood, C. (2010). Services growth options for B2B product-centric
businesses. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 13341345.
Rae, J., Fudge, C., & Hudson, C. (2012). Growing B2B services: 3 trends to act upon now.
Innovation Management, 1-10.
Ravald, A., & Grnroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European
Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 1930.
Richins, M. L. (1994). Valuing things: The public and private meanings of possessions.
Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 504521.
Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1987). Advertising and promotion management. Singapor:
McGraw-Hill.
Snchez-Fernndez, R., & Iniesta-Bonillo, M.. (2006). Consumer perception of value:
Literature review and a new conceptual framework. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction,
Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 19, 19.
Schmitt, B. H. (2004). Customer experience management, a revolutionary approach to
connecting with your customers. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002
Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations
management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management,
24, 148169.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B., & Gross, B. (1991). Consumption values and market choices.
Cincinnati: South-Western.
Snelders, D., & Schoormans, J. P. (2004). An exploratory study of the relation between
concrete and abstract product attributes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6),
803820.
Stock, R. M. (2011). How does product program innovativeness affect customer satisfaction?
A comparison of goods and services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39,
813827.
Swan, J. E., & Combs, L. J. (1976). Product performance and consumer satisfaction: A new
concept. Journal of Marketing, 40(2), 2533.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a
multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77, 203220.
Ulaga, W. (2001). Customer value in business markets: An agenda for inquiry. Industrial
Marketing Management, 30(4), 315319.
Ulaga, W., & Chacour, S. (2001). Measuring customer-perceived value in business markets: a
prerequisite for marketing strategy development and implementation. Industrial
Marketing Management, 30(6), 525540.
Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a
research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436456.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian
dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310320.
Vriens, M., & Ter Hofstede, F. (2000). Linking attributes, benets, and consumer values.
Marketing Research, 510 (Fall).
Yamamoto, M., & Lambert, D. R. (1994). The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation
of industrial products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(4), 309324.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end
model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 222.
Please cite this article as: Candi, M., & Kahn, K.B., Functional, emotional, and social benets of new B2B services, Industrial Marketing Management
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.002