Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arafath A
May 2015
Acknowledgement
I wish to thank everyone who has offered fullest support and cooperation for my successful
project. I express my indebtedness to each and every individual who has spent time to make
this project in shape for our career.
First and foremost, I would like to express my appreciation to my Supervisors Ms. Vajira
Edirisinghe for their guidance throughout the preparation of this dissertation. I would also
like to extend my deepest gratitude to all my friends who have helped me directly and
indirectly as well.
Finally, I would like to extend my sincere thanks to all the individuals from the industry who
had given me all the necessary information regarding the project.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
ii
List of Abbreviations
CHAPTER ONE
1.1
Background.................................................................................................................- 1 -
1.2
Aim.............................................................................................................................- 3 -
1.3
Objectives...................................................................................................................- 3 -
1.4
Methodology...............................................................................................................- 3 -
1.4.1
Introduction..-3-
1.4.2
Research Approach...-3-
1.4.3
1.4.3.1 Literature Review..-41.4.3.2 Research Problem Statement.-41.4.3.3 Case Study Design-41.4.3.4 Data Collection.-51.4.3.4.1 Data Collection Technique-51.4.3.4.2 Interview Structure and Process...-5-
1.5
1.4.4
Data Analysis....-5-
1.4.5
Summary...-6-
CHAPTER TWO
2.1
Introduction................................................................................................................- 7 -
2.2
2.3
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.4
CHAPTER THREE
3.1
Introduction..............................................................................................................- 16 -
3.2
3.3
Reasons for non availability of other procurement options in Sri Lankan Context. - 19 -
3.4
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3.3.5
3.3.6
3.3.7
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1.
Introduction..............................................................................................................- 25 -
4.2.
4.2.1
Clients Requirements.......................................................................................- 26 -
4.2.2
Project Characteristic........................................................................................- 26 -
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
4.3.
4.3.1
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1
Introduction..............................................................................................................- 32 -
5.2
5.2.1
5.3
5.3.1
5.4
Analysis the Kattankudy Divisional Hospital Project under D&B procurement system
..................................................................................................................................- 35 -
List of Abbreviations
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
5
PSP
ICTAD
SL
: Sri Lanka
UK
: United Kingdom.
D&B
PFI
PPP
JV
: Joint venture
BOQ
: Bill of Quantity
BOT
BOO
BOOT
GDP
BOI
: Board of Investment
R&D
ADB
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
In any country, the construction industry plays a major role, which is given that considerable
contribution to the national economy (Rameezdeen, 2002). Thus well being of national
construction industry is of paramount importance for economic development and long term
growth of a country.
According to Macdermott and Rolwlinson (1999) the acquisition of new buildings or space
within the buildings, either by directly buying, renting or leasing from the open market or by
designing and building the facility to meet a specific need.
Each and every project in construction industry has its own style. Suitable procurement
systems should be chosen for the construction industry projects so that we can avoid
unwanted problems and can quickly achieve the desired goal. Selecting the wrong
procurement system may cause project failure and dissatisfaction of overall performance
(Rameezdeen, 2006). Client/ consultant should consider various factors which are influencing
the procurement systems in regard to the project. It is possible to reduce the overall project
construction cost by the average of 5% through the appropriate procurement system (Alhazmi
and McCaffer, 2000).
Selection of appropriate procurement system is very difficult for the clients as each
procurement system has its own characteristics and disadvantages. Selecting the right
procurement system is crucial and is a very complex task for the client and/or the project
team. According to research, when selecting procurement system the client/ consultant should
consider various factors, such as; client requirements, objectives and external environment
factors (NEDO et al., 1985, cited Luu et al., 2003).
Clients are presently using different types of procurement routes due to greater advantages
being achieved by alternative procurement systems. This new procurement method has
shown, when implemented to give much better results than the previous system therefore the
new method is now been introduced (Cheung et al., 2001).
The instantaneous need in the Sri Lankan construction industry the selection criterion for a
procurement method is very vital. According to Najeeb (2005), Rameezdeen (2007), various
different procurement systems are rarely used in Sri Lankan construction industry. A review of
current practice of procurement system in Sri Lankan construction industry reveals that the
majority of projects are procured using traditional Measure and Pay procurement method
(Rameezdeen, 2007)
The clients are hesitant to choose a procurement method other than the traditional measure
and pay in Sri Lanka. It can be reasoned out as the poor awareness, afraid to take the risk on
the other systems and the knowledge about the procurement systems existing. Furthermore, it
can be said the industrial practitioners are not willing to implement the different types of
procurement. This premonition should be taken out from the industry for its constant
development in future.
SL construction industry use ICTAD document, published by the Institute for Construction
Training and Development (ICTAD). In the United Kingdom (UK) construction industry
many routes are used including Design and Build. According to Royal Institute of Charted
Surveyors (RICS) research, in UK Design and Build (D&B) procurement is used since 1995.
1.2
Aim
Identify and analyze the factors influencing the The Best Procurement Route to Use in Sri
Lanka.
1.3
Objectives
1. Identify and analysis the different types of procurement systems which are used in the
construction industry and identify the factors to be considered for the procurement
selection.
2. Analyse and identify the current procurement systems in Sri Lanka and the barrier for
alternative procurement system.
3. Identify and analyse the selection of suitable procurement system for two projects and
investigate the factors that were considered before selecting the procurement system
also investigate the satisfaction of overall performance.
4. Compare the traditional design and build procurement system and analyse the
Kattankudy hospital project under Design and Build procurement system.
1.4
Methodology
1.4.1 Introduction
The aim of this chapter is to describe the research process of this study.
In case study design there were two aspects to be considered: identification of case study
analysis method and case selection. of case study analysis method was contracting
organization since this study was focused to investigate the methods used in the costruction
project and to find out the best suitable procurement method . Because, the investigation to be
done within construction of different construction organizations in order to achieve reliable
outcome. Second step was selection of cases, where researcher obtains a sample that is
uniquely suite to the study.
Three Studies were carried out in completed hospital construction sites of C3 - C5 grade
contracting organizations in this research, based on access and time limitations. This study
selected multiple cases to provide multiple sources of evidence.
offices. During the interview each interviewee was asked for information, opinions and
insights based on an identical set of questions. This approach increased the comparability of
results and facilitated the organization, analysis and evaluation of information collected.
Face-to- face interviews were held with the selected participant of each case study. Most of
interviews were carried out in English medium. The data collected through the readable
version of interview transcripts was developed through manual transcribing. To address moral
issues during the interview process.
1.4.5 Summary
This chapter has presented research approach and research process use in this research study
1.5
Chapter One:
Chapter Two:
Chapter Three:
Chapter Four:
Chapter Five:
Chapter Six:
CHAPTER 2
BUILDING PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
2.1 Introduction
There are several definitions for construction procurement given by various sources.
Procurement is understood simply as getting things done. According to Love et al. (1998),
Masterman (2002), McDermott (1999), describe client adopt the organisational structure to
manage their construction project in terms of design and construction (cited Rameezdeen and
Silva, 2002). Further, Mohsini and Davidson (1989) cited Peter McDermott (1999) defines
the acquisition of new buildings or space within the buildings, either by directly buying,
renting or leasing from the open market or by designing and building the facility to meet a
specific need.
The increasingly complex and varying demands placed upon its construction industry by the
clients not only come about from the need to offer more refined commercial and industrial
working environments at minimum cost and maximum speed. But additionally from the fact
that client organisation are also complex with different categories of customers requiring
discrete solution to their procurement needs (Masterman and Gameson, 1997).
On the other hand clients or property developers influence their professional advisers and the
contractual arrangements and select a contractor with right commitment to meeting project
targets. Furthermore inexperienced clients are lead by their advisors and contractors and are
offered what the construction team thinks is best. In balancing all these difficulties proper
selection of procurement is extremely vital.
According to Bennett and Grice (1999), cited Chan et al (2001), the correct choice of
construction procurement method will lead to a successful project ending. However the result
of a wrong choice of procurement method will lead to an overall general dissatisfaction or
even project failure. Therefore, the appropriate procurement method is essential to achieve
the goals and to also achieve the best value for money.
This chapter explains the general classification of procurement methods, which is used all
over the world. And briefly discuss the factors which are influencing the section of
appropriate procurement method.
to be aware of these various basic characteristics in order to assist them in the selection of the
most appropriate procurement system for their particular project.
The choice of procurement system is a key strategic decision. Clients of the construction
industry depend upon the advice given in order to decide the most suitable method of
procuring their project from start to end. The client's requirements need to be matched
however this can sometimes prove difficult as the client tends to be vague and inaccurate.
The capability of industry is important especially if customer satisfaction is to be attained and
. Each method has different demands, risk allocations and responsibilities. The studies of
NEDO (1985), Masterman (2002), Frank (1998) (cited Rameezdeen and Silva, 2002) and
different authors has given different definition and according to that they are summarized in
to four broader classifications in this study as follows,
Integrated
Management Oriented
Collaborative
Management Contracting
Partnering
Lump Sum
Package deal
Construction Management
Joint Venture
Prime Cost
Turn Key
Develop & Construct
Private Finance Initiative (PFI)
The separate procurement system is a very common contracting method in the construction
industry. It was popular until the 1960s, which it was then called a Traditional System. The
main features of traditional system are rigid separation of design from construction
(Masterman 2002, Samuel 2010).
Usually client appoints the consultant team to verify the design. This team will help to
complete the project according to the clients satisfaction. Once the design completed by the
consultant team, then it is used as the basis of a competitive bidding process to select an
appropriate contractor (Samuel, 2010).
Lead designer of the project has to go through different stages such as design development,
tendering, contract administration, supervision of works and finally handover the completed
project. There are three sub-categories under this system, namely;
This procurement system calls as implies, basically the design and construction are integrated
together (Masterman, 2002). The consultant is appointed on the behalf of client, and then the
consultant will give the responsibilities to the main contractor to complete the whole project
accordance with the agreed performance specification. The contractor is then responsible for
the design and construction risk, which gives greater protection for client. There are some
variants under this system.
those that can be well defined by the client during the bidding and negotiation
stage (Harris and McCaffer, 2006).
(Aswroth, 2006)
Develop and Construct Contract
The client assigns design consultants to prepare conceptual design drawings .
Once assigned the contractor will complete the design and construct the
project (Samuel et al, 2010).
The management orientated procurement system tries to bridge the gap between the design
and construction process (Rameezdeen, 2002). This famously has two widely practicing
variables in the industry all over the world. Which are:
Management Contracting
The contractor appointed on the basis of fee in the early stage which means,
he/she entering in the design stage to assist and advice the design team. He/she
is the responsible for the work carried out by separate work contractor (Potter,
1995).
Construction Management
The contractor is appointed to manage the construction process on the basis of
fee. He/she supervise the trade contractors and may coordinate the work of
design team (Porter, 1995)
The basic feature of collaborative procurement systems is the collaboration between two or
more parties to achieve successful project objectives through fair dealing, commitment, and
shared investment (Valanne and Huon 1999, cited Wipulanayake 2004).There are two major
variants;
Partnering
It is a long term contractual relationship between two or more organisation.
This relationship requires openness between the parties, trust and an
understanding of each others individual expectations and values (Sir Michael
Latham 1994, Construction Industry Institute 1991, cited Denise, B, 2003).
Recently there have been significant changes in the construction industry such as technical
and economic condition. At the same time basic requirements of clients also change. There
are new procurement systems which have been developed in the construction industry to
fulfil the clients requirements. Cost, time and quality are the three most important parameters
of project performance. Even though, there are other factors (internal and external factors)
also contributing directly or indirectly to the selection appropriate procurement strategy in
term of value for money for the project (Kumaraswami and Dissanayake 1998, Chen et al
2003, Seeley 2002).
Studies of Moshini (1993), Masterman and Gameson (1994), Rowlinson (1999), Walker
(1989), Alhazmi and McCaffer (2000), Kumaraswami and Dissanake (1998) cited
Rameezdeen (2007), overall factors affecting the procurement selection can be grouped under
three main criteria.
The type of building procurement chosen by the client is of importance due to the complexity
of the situation, with a wide range of objective criteria and procurement arrangement. What
needs to be considered is vast for the client as they have to make the appropriate choice in
regards to procurement arrangement (Jeyamathan, 2009).
Design input: does the client want to influence the design and, if so, to what extent?
Client control: how hand-on does the client wish to be in the management of the
project?
Cost certainty: what level of cost certainly does the client require before signing the
By using a list of criteria to come to a conclusion to the right procurement method for a
building project, allows the client to clearly see their key goals and objectives.
CHAPTER 3
PROCUREMENT SYSTEM IN SRI
LANKA
3.1Introduction
Most of the procurement systems are briefly described in the previous chapter however there
are limited numbers of procurement systems practiced in Sri Lanka (Najeeb, 2005). There are
only limited choices of procurement system used during the early. And these procurement
systems has several catalyst of changes which have occurred on the procurement systems
during later part of the 20th century to meet new requirements. These systems have a greater
demand from clients, contractors and the professions of Sri Lankan construction industry
(Thanuja, 2009).
Although, any procurement systems can be used for any kind of construction project, they
must be appropriate to the circumstances to get maximum benefits. Kumaraswami (1996)
argued that drawing upon example from Sri Lanka, the achievement of technological
transfer from developed to developing countries has been dissatisfied by the use of
inappropriate procurement systems.
The liberalisation of the economy in 1977 stimulated, additional private and public sector
investment in buildings and other infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka which gave
unprecedented opportunities for local and foreign private contractors. Consequences of these
changes were that limited choice of procurement systems evolved. However, changes have
occurred in building procurement because the clients are more conscious of the need to
change and they are looking for alternative procurement procedures. This means client are
able to get the project completed quickly within a reasonable cost limit and acceptable
standard of quality.
The Sri Lankan construction industry generally remains poorly organized, highly fragmented
and low in productivity and it is also not well established and advanced as in developed
countries (Shiyamini et al, 2005). Under these circumstances, Sri Lankan construction
industry has four popular systems practiced in most of the projects; i.e. measure and pay,
lump sum, prime cost and design and build. There are a fair few management oriented
procurement systems used in Sri Lanka, as identified through the past survey (Shiyamini et
al, 2007).
Construction industry in Sri Lanka is now becoming more popular. It is quickly growing.
Today it has now become a very influential and governing factor of the construction industry.
Therefore the growth in the property development could be regarded as a key to the
development of all sectors in the economy.
The instantaneous need in Sri Lankan construction industry the selection criterion for a
procurement method is very vital. In the context of the Sri Lankan construction industry,
numbers of different types of procurement methods are being used very rarely compare to
other country (Shiyamini et al, 2007). Sri Lankan construction industry has not developed.
Therefore, they are widely using traditional procurement method such as Measure and Pay.
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
22
1977 - 1982
1987 - 1987
1997
81
86
91
96
00
55
50
58
50
64
12
10
8
7
10
10
8
5
4
3
22
31
28
35
21
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
3
1
100
100
100
100
100
of Design and Build Procurement System
2001
- 03
72
5
1
22
0
0
100
in Sri
Lanka
According to above research, traditional procuring method seems to be strong. Also Maqdul
(2014), Anuradha (2014), said this has not been changed yet.
procurement system is a next alternative procurement option but it is not popular due to there
being an inadequate in-house design teams in contractors organisation (Joseph et al., 2008).
In the case of design and build contracts it takes time for design approval by consultant with
modification of developer (Shiyamini, 2009). But it will save the time at pre contract period
in some stages. The advantages of design and build contracts cannot be achieved in Sri
Lankan context due to non availability of talented in house design team in contractors
(Shiyamini, 2009). These types of contracts in small scale occurred in Tsunami housing
construction projects in very low frequency (Maqdul, 2014).
The reason behind the Sri Lankan professionals using the conventional system is due to the
dominance of the system in the market. It has been found that the public contracting entities
extensively use the Measure and Pay rewarding method for the design and build system even
though that the lump sum technique is conventionally used for design and build system. In
various instances they bid for lump sum contractual method and later change to Measure and
Pay method, due to the difficulties faced after the commencement of the project. This ensures
the unfamiliarity of Sri Lankan public contracting organizations with the D&B system. In
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
24
addition, most of the private contracting organizations have less experience with D&B
projects due to the controlling of the traditional purchase of goods and/or services system in
the market. Consequently, most of the contractors professionals are unwilling to work for
D&B projects in Sri Lanka (Joseph, 2008).
In Sri Lanka, the clients are hesitant to choose a procurement method other than the
traditional measure and pay. Further, it can be a reasoned out to be due to: poor awareness,
being afraid to take the risk on the other systems and the lack of knowledge about the
procurement system existing. Also, it can be said the industrial practitioners are not willing to
implement the different type of procurement. This premonition should be taken out from the
industry for its constant development in future.
3.4Barriers
Procurement
System
in
There is several alternative procurement systems used worldwide. For example, Design and
build is very popular in many countries such as UK, China, USA, etc. (Shiyamini et at, 2007).
In Sri Lanka Design and Build (D&B) contract document was published by ICTAD few years
ago. But it is not popular unlike traditional systems Joseph et al (2008) has identified several
significant factors for the barrier in terms of internal and external environmental factors. They
are as follows:
1. The Sri Lankan government does not give much support to alternative procurement
systems
2. Research and development institutes only contribute a very small amount towards the
development of alternative procurement systems in Sri Lanka
3. Clients lack of knowledge in regard to alternative procurement systems
4. Professional contractors are unfamiliar with alternative procurement systems which
are available
5. Clients lack of experience with alternative projects
6. Governments first choice that the design and build procurement system is the only
one considering time factor
7. Consultants have their own power to select the procurement system for the projects
8. Poor relationship between the clients and the consultants
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
25
Clients are essential in the construction procurement selection. According to Joseph et al.
(2008), clients lack of knowledge regarding alternative procurement systems is the major
restriction to the development of alternative procurement system in Sri Lanka. Contractors
and institutes are not willing to educate their clients in alternative procurement systems.
Therefore, the client does not change the type of procurement system they require and stick to
the traditional procurement system as that is all they know (Maqdul, 2014).
Further, the client does not have much experience with alternative procurement systems.
Most clients do not want to take an extra risk to choose alternative procurement systems also
(Joseph et al., 2008).
For example, design and build procurement system is very popular and widely used in other
countries but it is not popular in Sri Lanaka. This is due to the clients inadequate knowledge
and lack of experience in design and builds procurement system. These implement a negative
impact to the growth of design and build procurement systems in Sri Lanka (Maqdul, 2014).
Furthermore the client is more concerned with keeping costs down.
In Sri Lanka, the government is a major client in the construction industry and its policies and
regulations sometimes restrict the choice of suitable procurement system by the client
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
26
In Sri Lankan construction industry contractors are not familiar with alternative procurement
process. This is the other barrier for the development of new procurement system (Joseph,
2008). The cause is that the traditional system is dominated the Sri Lankan construction
market. Therefore contracting organisations have lack of experience.
For example, in Sri Lanka most of the contractors go for the joint venture with design teams
for design and build projects as contractors find it easier to outsource the design team. Also
the contractors' professionals are unwilling to accept the changes when involving in D&B
process due to the uncertainty and strict culture of the Sri Lankan construction professionals
(Joseph et al., 2008).
The Government is a major client in the Sri Lankan construction industry (Shiyamini et al.,
2007). Government policies have an impact on the economy and its regulations, which
restrict the choice of a procurement system.
For example, the Board of Investment (BOI) approval may affect the selection of
procurement systems. According to Joseph et al. (2008), the government started to procure
more projects using design and build procurement system from the year 2001, after
publishing Standard Bidding Document for design and build contracts. But biddings are not
open to private sector organisations.
Sri Lankan construction industry has a considerable contribution to the Gross Domestic
Product (GDP, nearly 8.5%) to the economy (Central Bank, 2014). So, the construction
industry is an important sector as it has an effect on the economy and this in turn means that
it affects inflation rates and interest rates.
The R&D institutes are very vital to construction industry compared to other countries where
R&D is not seen as so important. The contribution of R&D to develop alternative
procurement systems impacts the construction industry and pushes the introduction of new
changes to procurement systems; however this has not happened in the Sri Lankan
construction industry (Joseph et al. 2008). This is another barrier for the development of
alternative procurement system in Sri Lanka.
According to Joseph et al. (2008), Professional institutes contribute a very small amount to
the growth of alternative procurement system in Sri Lanka. Because few professional
institutes do not suggest design and build procurement system as to protect small and medium
contractors from involving in design and Build projects. This is another restriction for
development of alternative procurement system in Sri Lanka.
CHAPTER 4
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
29
CASE STUDIES
4.1.
Introduction
Each and every procurement systems has its own style and appropriate procurement system
which help avoid problems which may occur. To achieve the specific goals of the project, one
needs to choose an appropriate procurement system for the project. This is important for the
entire construction project (Rameezdeen, 2006). Selection of procurement systems is
influenced by clients requirement (Gordon ,1994; Ambrose and Tucker ,1999;
Rowlinson,1999), clients characteristics (Moshini,1993; Masterman and Gameson,1994;
Molenaar,1999), project characteristics (Chen et al., 2003) and external environment factors
(Walker ,1989; Hughes,1989; Sheath et al ,1994; Alhazmi and McCaffer ,2000;
Kumaraswami and Dissanayake,1998)(cited Chen et al., 2003). The clients requirement is
the most important factor which influences the procurement selection (Turner, 1990).
The case study has been taken from the building project. It is a hospital project, which was
constructed under traditional measure and pays procurement system and design and builds
procurement system.
4.2.
The Sri Lanka Red Cross Society and Internal Federation of Red Cross & Red Crescent
Societies have planned to construct a Divisional Hospital at Baticaloa district. The client is
expecting the following features together with utilities, landscaping and all services which
include: electricity, water supply and disposal:
Main building
Operation theatres
Doctors quarters
Nurses quarters
Minor staff quarters
Morgue building
Kitchen building
Parking
The client is expecting the project to be finished within 18 months. He is expecting medium
quality within a reasonable price range.
In the construction industry there are several types of projects such as commercial, industrial,
residential, recreational, social and large infrastructure projects. This is a kind of social
project and it is a two story building.
Project
Employer
Donor
Consultant
Main contractor
Contract Sum
Type of contract
Commencement of work
Period of completion
Retention
Defect liability period
Period of interim payments
Ascertained liquidated damages
Period of final measurement
Date of completion
Period of Maintenance
: 12 calendar month
4.2.4 Reason for the Separated Procurement System for this Project
Sri Lanka Red Cross Society (SLRC) and International Federation of Red Cross (IFRC) and
Red Crescent Societies (RCS) and the Architect Co-Partnership (Pvt.) Ltd. had decided to go
for separated procurement system and use Measure and pay system because the work had
been designed for a public client. The same client and consultant carried out a successful
project at Ampara in the past year. Through the experience from the previous project the
parties wanted to procure this project as a separated system. Another reason why they wanted
to go for separated procurement system was the duration of this project being eighteen
calendar months, so this procurement system was the most suitable for this kind of project.
The tendering method used for this project is an open tender, therefore only M1 contractors
(ICTAD) were capable to bid this project. It may help to select qualified and experienced
contractor for this project and that have competitive characteristics. Due to high competition,
the contractors offer more prices that are accurate.
In addition, it serves detailed documents in tendering as well. The design has to be fully
developed and all uncertainties must be cleared up before tenders are invited then only can
tendering costs be minimized, proper competition ensured and then the final project cost can
be seen as lower than the other procurement methods.
In our case client is more concern about the final cost of the project. Therefore, when
payments are made, there will be fewer disputes. In this arrangement the existence of a priced
Bill of Quantities enables interim valuations to be assessed easily and variations to be quickly
and accurately valued by rates. The use of this method provides a higher degree of certainty
that quality and functional standards will be met.
Further, separate procurement system need more time to achieve the desired target so this
kind of arrangement is suitable for this hospital project. A separate system can identify the
separation of design and construction. The disadvantage for this procurement system is low
team spirit and buildability. Further this will lead to conflicts between the both parties. But
there are number of project members involved for this project so team spirit is a key factor
for a successful project. Another disadvantage is the lack of communication between clients
and the project team.
According to this separate procurement system, no mistakes can be made by the designers
because complete work drawings have been developed fully and detailed out prior to
tendering this is another advantage for this procurement system. The client expected a low
level of risk management through the procurement system because the risks are generally fair
and balanced between the parties to the contractor. So the client needed to get the project
completed on the expected time, which is 18 calendar months after the time from bid. The
client is expected a medium level of speed. The aim of this hospital project is to provide a
valuable service to the people.
This construction is affected by the external environment factors which are weather
condition, civil war, market competitiveness, etc. The main disrupting factor is the weather
condition and civil war.
When the client does not have any experience about the
construction of such a project, the client risk is greater. But the client of this project has
knowledge about similar kind of projects. When considering this aspect, this procurement
system is suitable for this project, to some extent.
The Separated System has been established in the SL many decades ago. Therefore clients of
the industry have been used to using it and since non-traditional methods are newly
introduced there is little awareness of the clients which are attracted towards them (Maqdul,
2014).
There is lack of firms to undertake projects with non-traditional procurement systems. Since
non-traditional methods are not long introduced the numbers of firms which actually
undertake projects with non-traditional procurement systems are very few and far between. In
non-traditional systems sometimes the power of the Architect and the Design Engineer may
be much less. Therefore they may not favour to move from the separated systems.
Nontraditional systems such as Design and Build, Management Oriented, Collaborative
Systems and Partnering are more complex. Therefore these systems are needed more
professionalism and because of the complexity the client may not understand these systems.
This creates a barrier which prevents developing these systems and therefore because of these
reasons client and consultants decided to adopt measure and pay procurement system for their
projects.
4.3.
Government decided to build a base hospital at Chilaw. The client required a three storied
building for OPD, clinic and paramedical unit, cafeteria and car parking. The total cost of
this project was 221 Million Sri Lankan Rupees and the construction period took two years.
The consultant of this project was R. Susil Weddikkara & Associates (pvt) Ltd and the
contractor is Maga Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd. Client and consultant decided to go through
design and build procurement system and was a two-stage tendering method (Anuradha,
2014).
The government decided to go through the design and build project due to single point
responsibilities. It meant clients had to deal with one single organisation this was an
advantage for the client. Since client had specific requirements there was little uncertainty
and the final project cost could be achieved and this cost was less than what it would have
been if another type procurement system was used.
Another factor was the use of an integrated procurement arrangement which enabled the
design and construction to be overlapped which resulted in improved communications being
established between the client and the contractor. These two characteristics enabled a shorter,
overall project to be achieved and project management efficiency to be improved. This was a
huge advantage for the project because it gave the client time to finish this project quicker (24
months). Also there was direct communication between the client and contractor. Therefore
the contractor could respond to the clients requirements quickly.
Often it can be that the clients brief is ambiguous and they do not communicate their wishes
precisely to the contractor. This can lead to great difficulty in evaluating proposals and tender
submissions. But in our case the client had specified his requirements clearly, therefore there
were not any problems.
In this arrangement the absence of a Bill of Quantities makes the valuation of variations
difficult and limits the freedom of clients to make alterations to the design of the project
during the post-contract period. This is one of the big disadvantages of this system. The client
should have awareness regarding the variations before he goes into the contract and he should
make sure to minimize those variations. But in this case client clearly specified his
requirements (Anuradha, 2014).
This project was completed on time. The reasons for this were:
Client very effective management and good brief, multi-headed client problems had
been overcome
Designer clear documentation, competent clients advisors, adequate design
information and good site supervision and adequate coordination details
Contractor and designer single organisation effective management, good team work
spirit
This design and build procurement system was established to be an effective procure process
and good project management of design and construction from all participants. The whole
team gave better attention to coordination of services as time. Therefore the project outcome
was successful. The reasons for this were:
CHAPTER 5
ANALYSIS
5.1Introduction
We were briefly discussing the traditional and integrated procurement system in chapter two.
This chapter will now cover the advantages and disadvantages of Traditional and Design and
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
36
Build procurement systems. Also analysis the Kattankudy Divisional Hospital Project under
design and build procurement system.
Past studies of Masterman (2002), Morledge et al. (2006), Mark (2007), Debbie et al. (2005),
and Construction Excellence (2005), listed several advantages and disadvantages of each
systems.
According to Masterman (2002), Morledge et al. (2006), Mark (2007), Debbie et al. (2005),
and Construction Excellence (2005);
Advantages:
1. Tenders are on a like-for-like basis
2. Scheme fully pre-designed and specified
3. Early commitment to maximum price
4. Reduced estimating risk (and therefore cost to Employer)
5. Provides contractually agreed prices for valuation of variations, cost control and
analysis
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
37
Disadvantages:
1. Length of time from inception through to completion.
2. Projects over-running their contract periods Final costs being higher than expected.
3. Separation of responsibility for design and construction can delay a teamwork
approach and lead to adversarial attitudes if problems occur.
4. Late Involvement of the builder can limit his contribution.
According to Masterman (2002), Morledge et al. (2006), Mark (2007), Debbie et al. (2005),
and Construction Excellence (2005);
Advantages
1. Single point of contact between client and contractor.
2. If a clients requirement is precisely specified, accuracy of the final project cost is
achieved which is less than other procurement methods.
3. Design and construction is overlapped which results in better communication being
established between the contractor and the client. These two characteristics permit
shorter, overall project periods to be obtained and project management efficiency to
be much improved.
Disadvantages
1. The clients brief is often unclear and does not illustrate exactly what he is proposing
to the contractor.
2. Under this procurement system there is no bill of quantity. It is very difficult to
calculate the valuation of variations and also the client cannot make any changes in
the design.
3. Compared to other procurement systems, clients have less power to control the
features of design and aesthetics of the building.
This Hospital project took more than 18 months to complete (Maqdul, 2014), it was
completed and handed over on the 23rd of July 2012. If the client and consults chose the
Design and Build procurement system, it would have been possible to complete the project
within the time period this is because this type of procurement system could have reduced the
time consumption while integrating the design and construction together, also making the
coordination for different parts of design and construction easier. On the other hand, early
The Best Procurement System to Use in Sri Lanka
39
involvement of contractor could have reduced the time required and integration of the design
of different parts, enabling easier communication and reducing the complexity and
eliminating the unnecessary delay (Mark et al, 2007).
According to Mark et al. (2007), from the client point of view, time, cost and quality are the
basic criteria. Most clients want high quality, at a lower cost, in the shortest time frame
however this is not always possible. Each procurement system has a different time, cost and
quality scenarios
triangle
with
eternal
different Result
priorities
Quality
Cost
Time
Quality
Time
Cost
Quality
Lowest Cost
Cost
Quality
Time
Time
may
not
prejudiced
But Quality will suffer.
be
Source: The Aqua Group Guide to Procurement, Tendering & Contract Administration
The traditional procurement system is a consequently slow process. This is due to the
separation of design and construction (www.constructingexcellence.org.uk). But the D&B
procurement system is faster than the traditional procurement system.
According to Ibiyemi (2008), the use of design and build is ever increasing with many clients
perceiving it as providing better value for money and giving rise to fewer disputes than other
procurement methods. Further, Saxon (2000) and Banik (2001) cited Ibiyemi (2008) argued
that
integration of design and construction offers better performance in time and cost resulting in
lesser defects ,In this case clients do not expect high quality (Maqdul, 2014).
The Construction Process
Source: The Aqua Group Guide to Procurement, Tendering & Contract Administration
According to Samuel (2010), Design and Build procurement systems are suitable for all
clients, including inexperienced clients. But our clients have experience in the construction
industry. Further, client has to deal with a single organisation because of the single point
responsibility (Rosli, 2006). Therefore, clients can transfer the risk to the contractor
(Morledge, 2006). In addition if there are any problems which occur the client/ employer
does not have to claim against different parties (www.thkp.co.uk).
Further, under the design and build procurement process, all members come under one
contractor, which means they have a long term relationship. In traditional procurement
system, it is difficult to manage the design and construction team however it is easier in
design and build procurement system.
CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
The comprehensive investigation attempted to identify the best procurement route to use in
Sri Lanka as the Traditional procurement system dominates the whole construction industry.
This trend needs to change and the introduction of alternative procurement systems in the
construction market needs to occur.
The Project outcome should fulfil and satisfy the clients. The success behind every
construction project depends on the procurement system that is used to procure the building.
The selection of an appropriate procurement system is very important and is influenced by
several factors such as client requirement, project characteristics, external environmental
factors etc.
This study was based on lecture reviews and case studies. The lecture review was obtained
through published books, journals, magazines, and the internet and from people who are
worked at site construction industries such as Project Engineers and Quantity surveyors.
Most of the procurement systems which are practiced around the world are indentified
through the literature review. Based on lecture reviews and conversations with people
working in the construction industry in SL it can be said that the traditional procurement
system is very popular and widely used for both public and private sectors until now. Further,
the Sri Lankan government is responsible in providing all public construction; they are the
largest client to the construction industry in Sri Lanka.
There are several barriers for the introduction of alternative procurement systems. Such as:
clients have inadequate knowledge regarding alternative procurement systems also
construction professionals are unwilling to change themselves. Thus, alternative procurement
systems do not contribute to the professional institutes and research and development.
According to these case studies, choice and use of an unsuitable procurement system is not
the only reason for an unsatisfied overall performance. Other reasons include: the
coordination of building team is also vital for the success of a project. Traditional
procurement systems do not have a power of coordination process due to separation of design
and construction. Clients have to deal with many coordination problems. Under design and
build procurement system, all problems in relation to coordination still exist but they would
pass to the contractor side. Therefore, project success can be enhanced by a good team spirit
and high degree of cooperation between the project participants (www.cibse.org).
Through these case studies we are suggesting Design and build procurement system best for
Sri Lanka. It is very popular in many countries such as the UK, Canada, Greek, etc.
(Shiyamini et al., 2007). Compared to traditional systems, it has many advantages and is
suitable for all clients. Also it has good team spirit, which is possible for the long term
partnering for future projects such as hospitals, schools, etc.
Through these studies we have identified the major causes for poor performance within the
construction industry and it is due to the poor selection of appropriate procurement systems.
It is due to the feebleness of existing procurement systems that cause this poor performance
of the construction industry. To overcome this displeasing nature, several alternative
procurement systems were evolved. These changes reflect the Sri Lankan construction
industry as well. The following can be recommended to the probable solution;
Measure and pay is still practiced in construction industry for huge number of
projects. In the government projects, this type of systems is probably used with. The
government rules are against the alternative procurement systems, it requires the
measure and pay to be subjected based on ICTAD conditions of contract. This should
be avoided to increase the usage of new procurement systems.
Management oriented system still in initial stage in major projects, which are
considered under this study. If the project management firms had been considered
then the management oriented systems could have been in a high degree of use. In
addition, to create harmonic environment for management oriented systems especially
for management contracting sub contractors need to be strengthen.
Experienced clients try to avoid following the traditional systems rather than using the
alternative systems such as D & B, management oriented systems, etc. Inexperienced
clients, who dont have proper ideas, they can get the assistance from experts.
Most of the professionals are committed to lack of knowledge and miss proposals
over the procurement systems. So, awareness programme and seminars should be
scheduled to World Bank or Asian Development Bank (ADB) and ICTAD.
REFERENCES
Ashworth, A. (2006) in 5 (ed.) Contractual Procedures in the Construction Industry. Harlow:
Pearson Prentice Hall.
Alhazmi, T., Mccaffer, R., (2000) 'Project Procurement Systems Selection Model', Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, 126 (3), pp. 176 - 183.
Brian Bagnall, O. B., John Cavilla, Richard Oakes, Quentin Pickard, Geoffrey Poole Friba,
A Review of Some of the Principles. [Online]. Available at:
http://www.thkp.co.uk/media/bulletins-new/Design%20and%20Build%20HK.pdf (Accessed:
21/10/2014).
Cheung Sai-On, Y.-W. W., Tsun-Ip Lam, Mei-Yung Leung (2001) 'Analytical Hierarchy
Process Based Procurement Selection Method', Management and Economics, 19 (4), pp. 427
- 437.
Legal & Property Service [Online]. Available at: https://cms.wiltshire.gov.uk/Data/Cabinet
%20(SDC)/20050629/Agenda/R07-2005_06_29.pdf (Accessed: 21/12/2014).
[Online]. Available at: www.abayomiibiyemi.nl/PROCUREMENT%20PAPER.doc
(Accessed: 23/12/2014).
Institute for Construction Training and Development (ICTAD). [Online]. Available at:
http://www.ictad.lk/ (Accessed: 10/08/2014).