Remote viewing: superpower processes and

layers of meaning
Inside the clandestine workings of large intelligence agencies (such as the CIA, MI6, former
KGB, etc.), it is said that some operatives and analysts score very big success rates because
they are good at teasing seven layers of meaning out of any given situation.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, those who cannot do this teasing may end up plodding
and grunting along, perhaps only within the layer that best fits into the limited contexts of
their reality boxes.
Reality boxes do exist that perceive only what is immediately obvious, especially those that
rely only on the fixed and limited ranges of the physical five senses.
THE TEASING
Because the teasing among layers of meaning leads to increases of eciency, it is well worth
trying to consider what it consists of.
At some beginning level, the teasing will have to include deducing what is not obvious, and
then deducing what the implications are of what is not obvious.
From there, processes usually referred to as insight and intuition can arise, and perhaps other
more subtle kinds of processes that have never been identified.
In conventional terms, deducing is not usually thought of as a superpower. While the
physically obvious can of course stimulate deducing, it is largely not a product of the physical
five senses but of that aspect of ourselves we refer to as mind.
More specifically, deducing seems to be the product of that aspect of mind referred to as
ratiocination, and which, in English, is defined as a reasoned train of thought resulting in the
processes of exact thinking.
But it is important to know that the term is taken from the Latin RATIOCINATUS meaning to
reckon.
Definitions for RECKON are given as a somewhat imprecise mixture of: to count, to
estimate, to compute, to calculate, to consider, to regard (i.e., to watch), to judge.
Reckoning can take place with regard to determining from a fixed basis. Or it can take
place without a fixed basis - in which event no one can explain how it works.
In that case, definitions of what might be going are handed over to the jurisdiction of the term
KEN which in English is defined as: the range of vision [not eyeball vision] and the range of
perception, understanding, or knowledge.

However, one principle source of KEN is the Old Norse language, in which it is defined, in
English, as a mix of: to perceive, to know, to recognize, with emphasis on to recognize.
In contrast to the English definitions, though, a more in-depth study of Old Norse establishes
that KENNING was used to refer to: the power or faculty of attaining to direct knowledge or
cognition without rational thought or inference.
This, of course, is our present definition of INTUITION, an activity-process that usually cannot
be accounted for via rational thought or inference.
And, indeed, intelligence analysts who are good at teasing among seven layers of meaning
often have a hard time selling their observations and conclusions to their establishments
BECAUSE of the diculty of relating them to rational thought or inference.
Along these lines, it is worth mentioning that although insight is valued if it turns out well,
INSIGHT is defined as: the power or act of seeing, or penetrating, into a situation via the
act of apprehending the inner nature of things or of seeing intuitively. In other words, by
kenning.
SUPERPOWERS NOT RECOGNIZED AS SUCH
One of the purposes of this essay is to bring to light the concept that deducing, insight, and
intuition ARE superpowers, although they are not generally recognized as such.
The reason is that those modalities can transcend not only the obvious, but also the limits of
rational thought or inference. They can also transcend the limits of the five physical senses,
and of physicality per se.
So, there is a modicum or humorous irony involved in discovering that top-dog intelligence
analysts and operatives must be employing aspects of those modalities within the great
intelligence establishments that otherwise commonly consider them only as giggle-factors.
One could as well add that various kinds of telepathy might factor in alongside deducing,
insight, and intuition.
For it might be that top-dog analysts have modicums of that biggest giggle factor modality,
too of course perhaps without their own recognition of it, and certainly never admitting it.
One reason for mentioning this does have to do with teasing seven layers of meaning out of
situations.
Well, the kinds of situations being referred to always involve not only people but their
thoughts, motives, and goals as well. Is this not the case?
HUMAN SECRECY vs HUMAN SUPERPOWERS
If one studies the fascinating arts and crafts of intelligence organizations, it can be seen, in
the bigger world picture, things were easier in the past when the five physical senses alone
served spies and subsequent analysis of their information quite well.
In that more simple time, the discovery of motives was generally left to the diplomatic
services, one of whose jobs was to try to apprehend motives via interchanges at the
diplomatic level.

When this actually worked, things went along quite well. But when it didnt, largely because
many real motives could not be penetrated, or were not believed if they were chanced upon,
some very sorry outcomes soon followed.
Eventually, the situation got more complicated. Secrecy has always been seen as valuable in
the historical sense, but with the advent of modern technological surveillance and detection it
became more dicult not only to protect secrecy, but also to detect it.
As we of the present generations have witnessed, this diculty soon evolved into
establishing enormously extensive, and even a morass of ways and means of protecting
secrecy not only from technological penetrations, but from diplomatic exchanges, and from
spies, analysts, and possible moles as well.
The breadth and depth of all this soon achieved astonishing proportions, so much so that it
became increasingly dicult to detect motives, whose motives to detect, or to even to detect
if there were any of them at all at loose somewhere in the world.
Any success in secretizing motives, and any failure to detect them (not even a clue), will
probably result in some kind of infamy, one situation of which we already have lived
through.
And THAT comprises several of the layers of meaning that can be teased out of that
SITUATION.
We now know that what equates to super-secrecy can prevail and have its complex way
among even super-complex conventional modalities of intelligence gathering and analysis.
One reason for this (already discussed in other essays in this website) is not the excellence of
anyone involved, but rather that on both sides of any secrecy fence there is extreme
reluctance with respect to developing the superpowers of deducing, insight, intuition, and
especially of telepathy. Secrecy, and its maintenance, depends on preventing these
superpowers from coming into substantial active existence.
Simply put, the threat to secrecy of the enhancement of those giggle-factor kinds of
developments means that secrecy manipulating might have a more dicult time of carrying
on. It is quite clear that teasing at least seven layers of meaning out of any situation involves
recognizing that layers of meaning undoubtedly exist not only with regard to a given situation,
but also to all things.
In the case of this present essay, it can be said:
(1) Secrecy exists, obviously and covertly so;
(2) Human superpowers also exist;
(3) The conventions of secrecy do not want the superpowers to be developed into useful
advantages;
(4) Therefore, conventional situations following the supposed advantages of secrecy make
clever and successful eorts to distort appreciation of superpower evidence;
(5) This distorting disables and alienates constructive research and development of
superpowers;
(6) A superpower vacuum thus comes into existence within the species that possesses raw
superpowers; and so the superpowers cannot develop any muscle.

(7) Therefore, super-secrecy can proceed - and claim victims among any number of
conventional situations that otherwise might oppose it in conventional terms;
(8) The principle reason for this is that our species possesses the superpower of cleverness.
When mobilized to even a near-perfect degree, it can outwit just about everything, certainly
including conventional situations.
Well, above are EIGHT layers of meaning that can be teased out of THAT situation.
SECRECY AND SCUMBAGGERY
Meanwhile, back at the ranch of more mundane human aairs, there is a rather large human
tendency to think that what is obvious is really what it seems to be or is accepted as. Thus, it
is possible to think that the obvious does exist, and to establish a fair modicum of trust in it.
But behind whatever is accepted, there always exist factors that are not obvious, and human
history is littered with plenty of stressful examples of this.
Put more simply, it can turn out that the obvious might not be what you ultimately get
because what you end up getting was not obvious to begin with.
Take scumbaggery, for example. Proficient scumbags would not get very far if it was obvious
that they were scumbags.
And, as many have gloomily experienced, it takes something like the fabled superpower
called the sixth sense to get a defensive edge on scumbags who are not obviously such, and
to do so BEFORE they walk away with, for example, billions of dollars harvested from ones
money, investments, and trust. The term SCUMBAG came into English use not too long ago,
probably about 1971. But it was preceded by older terms having approximately the same
meaning, to wit: A vulgar term of abuse, but also denoting a despicable person deserving to
be despised.
Along with its earlier companion terms, scumbag is slang, of course. And as such, neither the
terms nor their meanings can be ocially recognized.
Thus, their meanings can neither enter into philosophical, scientific, or sociological discourse,
and so there is no ocial examination of the phenomena of scumbaggery.
The meanings of the term do not even enter into the versatile conspiracy literature, and
astrology has yet to produce studies regarding the astrology of scumbags.
Be all that as it may, scumbags benefit not only from secrecy, but also from the lack of
developed superpowers via which they might be detected earlier rather than later.
Here, then, is yet another vacuum regarding the superpowers, and it is largely because of it
that many scumbags can rise to important and powerful positions in conventional societies
that do not permit the superpowers to grow and flex any muscle.
Scumbaggery is not only a collective of despicable motives. It is also a SITUATION out of
which several layers of meaning can be teased.
For example, one possible meaning involves the accepted context that SCUMBAG is a

vulgar term. So its meanings cannot be incorporated into conventional non-vulgar contexts,
EVEN IF its eects and results ultimately prove to be super-vulgar in the extreme and, in the
process of becoming so, simply trash non-vulgar contexts.
Another possible meaning of scumbaggery is that various types of scumbags are always of
potential use to power mongers who may need fall-guys when this or that power mongering
wobbles a little.
That certainly accounts for instances where scumbags, already partially identified as such,
remain in good standing in certain power-mongering circles. There are some rather excellent
historical and present examples of this.
Another possible meaning has to do with the avoidance by scumbags of situations in which
modicums of deduction, insight, and intuition might be present and which might result in
scumbag discovery.
Yet another possible meaning is that if ostensible superpowers hesitated to deal with
scumbaggery simply on the grounds that it is vulgar, then this would result in great joy and
satisfaction to all sorts and types of scumbags.
Ultimately, various degrees of scumbag eciency can be reckoned by the number of victims
claimed.
Indeed, any activity in any walk of life that intends to create victims is a format of
scumbaggery, in that the more victims that result the more serious and abysmal the formats
have been.
The principal reason here for entering so frankly into the contexts of scumbaggery versus the
superpowers is that a sort of elitist myth exists about developing the superpowers: to wit,
that they can be, or should be, developed only by dealing with the positive AND by avoiding
the vulgar.
Well, if scumbaggery did not exist at all, or even too much, then the NEED for activation of
the superpowers would not be all that important, would it?
In any event, the positive version of developing the superpowers will not, in the end, evoke
lean, mean, superpower fighting machines - even on behalf of the positive version itself.
Indeed, there are several layers of meaning that can be teased out of THAT situation and
which, as a superpower exercise, the reader can attempt to achieve if interested.

Existing user? Sign in here

REGISTER NOW (/register?referrer=)

(Source: biomindsuperpowers.com; http://tinyurl.com/hkef7az) (http://tinyurl.com/hkef7az)))

Back to INF (/web)

Related Articles

(/article/new-study-reveals-harmful-eects-of-dim-light-exposure-during-sleep)

New study reveals harmful effects of dim light exposure during sleep
(/article/new-study-reveals-harmful-effects-of-dim-light-exposure-duringsleep)
December 22nd, 2016

(/article/five-benefits-of-unplugging-for-the-holidays-plus-five-tips)

Five benefits of unplugging for the holidays plus five tips (/article/fivebenefits-of-unplugging-for-the-holidays-plus-five-tips)
December 23rd, 2016

(/article/remote-viewing-the-importance-of-process-discovery)

Remote viewing: the importance of process discovery (/article/remoteviewing-the-importance-of-process-discovery)

December 14th, 2015

REGISTER (/register?referrer=)
Search
Home (/#!/1)

! Events (/#!/events/1)
" Adverts (/#!/adverts/1)
Reviews (/#!/reviews/1)

+ ANCIENT MYSTERIES (/#!/CATEGORY/17/1)

+ CLIMATE & ECOLOGY (/#!/CATEGORY/51/1)
+ CONSCIOUSNESS (/#!/CATEGORY/15/1)
+ FOOD & COOKING (/#!/CATEGORY/27/1)
+ GEOPOLITICS (/#!/CATEGORY/26/1)
+ HEALTH & HEALING (/#!/CATEGORY/16/1)
+ HOME/FAMILY/PETS (/#!/CATEGORY/125/1)
+ HUMAN RIGHTS (/#!/CATEGORY/11/1)
+ SCIENCE FUTURES (/#!/CATEGORY/18/1)

LOG IN
Go!

+ SELF-SUFFICIENCY (/#!/CATEGORY/29/1)
+ SPIRITUAL/PSYCHIC (/#!/CATEGORY/28/1)
+ UNEXPLAINED (/#!/CATEGORY/30/1)
+ CHANNELS
Join Nexus Newsfeed Email List/Newsletter

(https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/alternative-news-project/id929924171?
mt=8)

(https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?

id=org.alternativenewsproject.anp&hl=en)
Follow @EditorANP (https://twitter.com/EditorANP)