Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Public Comment1 concerning the retention of the 18th Judicial District Chief Justice
CITIZEN FEEDBACK
The Colorado Constitution, Article 6 [Judicial Department]
Section 5 [Personnel of Court-Department-Chief Justice]; subsection
4 states as follows:
(4) The chief justice [of the Supreme Court] shall appoint from
the district judges of each judicial district a chief judge to
serve at the pleasure of the chief justice. A chief judge shall
receive no additional salary by reason of holding such position.
Each chief judge shall have and exercise such administrative
powers over all judges of all courts within his district as may
be delegated to him by the chief justice.
The protocol for all Chief District Court judges in Colorado states:
In addition to maintaining a docket, as chief judge, Samour
will
be responsible
for
appointing
the
district
administrator, chief probation officer, and clerks of the
court; assisting in the personnel, financial, and casemanagement duties of the district; and seeing that the
business of the courts is conducted efficiently and
effectively.
Judge Carlos Samour is the appointed Chief Justice of the 18th
judicial district under Supreme Court Chief Justice Nancy Rice and
as such is directly responsible for the actions of the judges and
administration under his control and direction.
Previous survey results for retention of 62.18%5 have noted
him for his knowledge of law and fairness but that is only 50% of
his job. As Chief Justice, he also has an equal responsibility to
make sure the 18th Judicial District and all of its actors are
complying with the Constitution and laws of Colorado. That has not
been done to the detriment of myself and hundreds if not thousands
3
August 25th, 2015, Federal US District Judge William Martinez [no relation] blocked the Denver Justices Directive
saying it is almost always in the public interest to prevent a first amendment violation.
4
On 3/28/2016, I was contacted by a court personal who indicated the directive was on hold pending review by the
10th circuit Court of Appeals. The fact that the Directive of Judge Samour has not been suspended by himself, confirms
that he does not respect pro-se litigants right to protest the corrupted actions under his watch.
5
This low retention rate of 62% by voters was in sharp contrast to his survey review which recommended a 95%
retention level. I believe the discrepancy is due to the non-inclusion of pro-se litigants in many surveys and Judge
Samours negligence in correcting serious issues of those under his command and control.
According to a 2014 study by the Colorado Supreme Court, 51% of all civil litigants in Colorado are now pro-se.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/colorado-judiciary/denver-colorado-80202/colorado-judiciary-edward-burnscharles-m-pratt-christopher-cross-michael-bender-greg-723512
7
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/colorado-judiciary/centennial-colorado-80112/colorado-judiciary-charles-m-prattedward-burns-tammy-herivel-raymond-goodwin-christo-722796
9
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Jennifer-S-Gromley-Tamra-Palmer/GREENWOOD-VILLAGE-Colorado8I0111/Jennifer-S-Gromley-Tamra-Palmer-Palmer-Goertzel-and-Associates-PC-Matthew-Alex-Dil-1131260
_________________________________________
State Judicial Performance
Commissioners: