Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281746728
CITATIONS
READS
82
5 authors, including:
Rune Korsholm Andersen
Valentina Fabi
Politecnico di Torino
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
B.W. Olesen
Politecnico di Torino
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
International Energy Agency Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme, Annex 66,
Definition and Simulation of Occupant Behavior in Buildings View project
International Energy Agency Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme, Annex 66,
Definition and Simulation of Occupant Behavior in Buildings View project
International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Department of Energy, Polytechnic of Turin, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 8 January 2013
Received in revised form
4 July 2013
Accepted 8 July 2013
A method of dening occupants window opening behaviour patterns in simulation programs, based on
measurements is proposed.
Occupants window opening behaviour has a strong effect on indoor environment and the energy
consumed to sustain it. Only few models of window opening behaviour exist and these are solely based
on the thermal indoor/outdoor environment. Consequently, users of simulation software are often left
with little or no guidance for the modelling of occupants window opening behaviour, resulting in
potentially large discrepancies between real and simulated energy consumption and indoor
environment.
Measurements of occupants window opening behaviour were conducted in 15 dwellings in Denmark
during eight months. Indoor and outdoor environmental conditions were monitored in an effort to relate
the behaviour of the occupants to the environmental conditions. The dwellings were categorized in four
groups according to ventilation type (natural/mechanical) and ownership (owner-occupied/rented) in
order to investigate common patterns of behaviour. Logistic regression was used to infer the probability
of opening and closing a window.
The occupants window opening behaviour was governed by different but distinct habits in each
dwelling. However, common patterns were also identied in the analysis: Indoor CO2 concentration
(used as indicator of indoor air quality) and outdoor temperature were the two single most important
variables in determining the window opening and closing probability, respectively.
The models could be implemented into most simulation programs, which would enable a better
chance of mimicking the behaviour of the occupants in the building and thus simulating the indoor
environment and energy consumption correctly.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Occupant behaviour
Building controls
Adaptation
Window opening
Building energy performance simulation
Air quality
1. Introduction
Occupants who have the possibility to control their indoor
environment have been found to be more satised and suffer
from fewer building related symptoms than occupants who
occupy environments in which they have no control [1e4]. These
studies emphasize the signicance of providing occupants with
rich opportunities of interacting with building controls. In doing
so, the control of the building is to some extent left in the hands
of the occupants. However, occupant behaviour varies signicantly between individuals which results in large variation of
the indoor environment and energy consumption of buildings
[5e9]. Because of this, it is important to take occupants
102
Table 1
Overview of referenced studies of window opening and ventilation.
Reference
Sample size
Geographical location
Duration of measurement
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
Virginia, USA
California and Virginia, USA
Denmark
Denmark
UK
One year
One year
One week
2.5 nights (only nights)
Transverse: 1 day each month for one
year. Longitudinal: 3 months
Switzerland
Germany
UK
UK
Pakistan
3 months
13 months
3 months
3 months
1 questionnaire each month for 16
months
7 years
Apartments: 1 year. Dormitory: 1
month
One winter
2 questionnaires
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
Switzerland
Switzerland and Japan
[27]
[28]
[29]
[34]
Literature review
Literature review
24 dwellings
e
e
Scotland, UK
[35]
[36]
Switzerland
Denmark
103
Air temperature ( C)
RH (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
Global Solar radiation (W/m2)
Sunshine hours (daily values) (Number of hours with sunshine
(insolation higher than 120 W/m2))
Behaviour
Window position (open/closed)*
*In three of the dwellings, the actual opening angle of the
window was measured.
Fig. 1 depicts some of the monitored windows.
The indoor environment measurements were carried out with
Hobo U12-012 data loggers [32]. The CO2 concentration was
measured using a Vaisala GMW22 sensor [33] connected to the
Hobo logger as depicted in Fig. 2. Both the CO2 sensors and the
Hobo data loggers were newly calibrated from the factory. The CO2
sensors were tested against a newly calibrated Innova multigas
analyser both before and after the measuring period. The temperature sensors in the hobo data loggers were also tested before the
measurements. The outdoor environmental variables were obtained from the Danish meteorological institute [31]. Data from the
meteorological station closest to each of the dwellings was used.
The closest meteorological stations did not measure precipitation
and since local wind direction is very sensitive to local conditions it
was decided not to include the direction of the wind.
The window position (open/closed) was measured using a Hobo
U9 sensor [32]. Three of the windows were hitched in the top and
tilted outwards when opening. In these cases the tilt was measured
using an accelerometer (HOBO UA-004-64 Pendant G) [32]
attached to the window frame. In this way, the opening angle of
the window was measured.
Generally, all measurements were carried out in the (main)
living room and the (main) bedroom in each dwelling. The window
sensors were installed on windows that inhabitants used most
often when ventilating the dwelling. The number of operable
windows varied between dwellings from 1 to 4 windows in the
bedrooms and 3 to 6 windows in the living rooms.
Table 2
Description of residents and characteristics of the dwellings.
Dwelling
index
Number of openings
in period
Average age of
the residents
Number of
residents
Year of construction
(and renovation)
Floor area
(m2)
Distance from
meteorological
station (km)a
Floor
level
Smokers amongst
residents
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
334
82
235
73
337
718
258
25
65
82
1
341
241
166
153
65
57
70
76
78
63
55
35
59
71
64
60
28
60
26
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
1
3
2
4
2
1994
1928
1956
1981
1945
1981
1945
1945
1901
1945
1945
1981
1981
1981
1967
126
145
130
83
86
83
109
87
190
77
109
80
85
84
139
8
13
4
11
5
11
5
5
8
5
5
11
11
11
9
Ground
Ground
Ground
1st
1st
2nd
2nd
1st
Ground
1st
1st
Ground
Ground
1st
Ground
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
(1976)
(2001)
(2001)
(1957)
(2001)
(2001)
(2001)
The distance was measured in a straight line from the address to the geographical location of the weather station.
104
Fig. 1. Pictures of windows in some of the monitored dwellings. The rest of the monitored windows were of similar type and of similar size.
Fig. 2. Pictures of the instruments used to measure the indoor environmental variables and window opening behaviour. Top left: CO2 monitor connected to a data-logger with built
in temperature, relative humidity and illumination sensors. Top right: Window state sensor (open/closed). Bottom: window state sensor (open/closed) and window position sensor.
105
p
log
a b1 $x1 b2 $x2 / bn $xn
1p
Table 3
Description of groups investigated related to the ownership and ventilation type.
Group
Ownership
Ventilation type
Dwelling index
1
2
3
4
Owner-occupied
Owner-occupied
Rental
Rental
Natural
Mechanical
Natural
Mechanical
3,
1,
6,
5,
4, 16
10
8, 9, 11, 12
7, 13, 14, 15
(1)
where
p is the probability of an opening/closing event
a is the intercept
b1n are coefcients
x1n are explanatory variables such as temperature, CO2 concentration etc.
However, the probability might depend differently on x1 at one
level of x2 as compared to another level of x2 (e.g. an increase in
temperature might increase the probability of opening a window in
the bedroom, whereas the same increase might result in a lower
probability in the living room). An example like the one described
above would not be well described by a model based on equation
(1). Equation (2) deals with interactions between variables by
adding interaction terms to the model.
p
a b1 $x1 b2 $x2 / bn $xn c12 $x1 $x2
log
1p
c13 $x1 $x3 /
(2)
Equation (2) was used to infer the probability of windows being
opened or closed. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used
as a basis for forward and backward selection of variables in the
regression models [37]. Each individual variable was rst tted to
the measured window opening data and then AIC was calculated
Table 4
List of explanatory variables used to infer the models of opening and closing
windows.
Variable
Unit
Season
Room
Time of day
Week day
Outdoor temperature
Wind speed
Outdoor relative humidity
Solar radiation
Solar hours
Indoor temperature
Indoor relative humidity
Indoor illumination
Indoor CO2 concentration
Indoor Dew point
Dwelling index
Winter/spring/summer
Bedroom/living room
Night/morning/day/afternoon/evening
Workday/weekend
C
m/s
%
W/m2
h
C
%
Lux
ppm
C
e
106
Table 5
Variable transformations. Log is the natural logarithm.
Variable
Transformed variable
Log(CO2) [Log(ppm)]
Log(Illumination) [Log(Lux)]
Log(Wind speed 1) [Log(m/s)]
Log(Solar radiation 1) [Log(W/m2)]
for each t. The variable with the lowest AIC was selected and the
remaining variables were then tested one by one on a bivariate
level, to see if any of the bivariate models resulted in a lower AIC. If
this was the case, the remaining variables were tested in a model
with three variables and so on (forward selection). At each step, the
AIC was also calculated for models, where each of the selected
variables was removed from the models (backward selection). In
this way, the nal model included variables and interaction terms
that resulted in the lowest AIC. To limit the complexity of the
model, only interaction terms between continuous and nominal
variables, e.g. indoor temperature and day of week were included in
the analyses. Table 4 lists all explanatory variables used in the
inference of the window opening and closing models.
In the interpretation of the coefcients, the sign, the size and the
scale of the corresponding variable have to be taken into account.
For example, a coefcient for solar hours of 0.057 might seem to
impact the probability more than an outdoor relative humidity
coefcient of 0.029 (group 4, opening model). However, the scales
of the two variables (solar hours: 0 to 16.1, outdoor RH: 28%e100%)
should be taken into account: Schweiker et al. [39] suggested to
multiply the scale of the variable with the coefcient, to get an
indication of the magnitude of the impact from each variable. In the
example described above the magnitude of the impact was
0.057(16.1-0) 0.91 and 0.029(100-28) 2.08 for the solar hours
and the outdoor relative humidity respectively, revealing that the
outdoor RH had a higher impact on the probability than the solar
hours.
When using logistic regression, it is required that all variables
are independent. Since the data was obtained in 15 dwellings with
different physical properties and different inhabitants, all variables
could not be assumed a priori to be independent of the dwelling it
was obtained from. Variable independency was tested by assigning
an index to each of the dwellings, which was used as a factor in the
analyses. If an interaction term between a variable and the dwelling
index was retained in the model, it was taken as an indication of
Table 6
Descriptive statistics of the monitored variables used to infer the window opening and closing models.
Group 1
Windows closed
Windows open
Group 2
Windows closed
Windows open
Group 3
Windows closed
Windows open
Group 4
Windows closed
Windows open
Indoor temperature
Indoor R.H.
CO2
Outdoor temperature
Outdoor R.H.
Lux
Wind
Solar radiation
Solar hours
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
30.3
17.1
22.1
21.8
2.0
29.2
17.2
22.9
22.8
1.8
69
24
46
45
7
67
26
38
38
6
3065
355
862
773
369
2229
328
520
464
175
26.9
6.9
9.6
9.3
6.2
25.5
1.4
13.5
13.6
5.1
100
24
76
76
18
100
30
61
58
18
16063
4
159
51
458
8077
4
278
99
447
13.2
0.0
2.8
2.5
2.1
9.1
0.0
3.1
3.0
1.7
918
0
199
63
252
904
0
413
437
272
16.1
0.0
8.5
8.1
5.0
16.1
0.0
10.8
13.0
4.7
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
27.3
13.5
22.3
22.6
2.0
27.3
12.0
18.1
17.2
3.2
49
24
36
35
4
53
25
40
40
5
4453
377
722
648
310
1959
363
516
468
142
24.0
6.0
7.5
7.0
5.1
24.0
6.0
8.0
7.0
5.4
100
25
75
78
18
100
25
74
78
19
1494
4
111
36
183
32280
4
295
43
1500
17.3
0.0
3.3
2.7
2.6
17.3
0.0
4.3
3.7
2.9
904
0
165
23
234
883
0
203
91
240
14.9
0.0
6.9
6.1
4.8
14.9
0.0
6.7
6.3
4.8
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
31.2
14.1
22.3
22.3
2.0
27.7
11.5
19.9
19.1
3.5
63
21
37
37
5
54
22
38
38
5
3634
338
780
612
462
3295
333
590
520
232
26.3
5.8
7.4
6.8
5.2
26.3
5.8
7.9
6.3
6.0
100
24
73
76
18
100
25
75
80
19
32280
4
179
43
888
2456
4
80
43
130
13.0
0.0
3.3
2.9
2.2
13.0
0.0
3.3
2.9
2.2
904
0
164
36
230
883
0
141
6
229
15.3
0.0
6.1
5.5
5.0
15.2
0.0
6.7
5.7
5.4
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
Max
Min
Mean
Median
St. Dev.
28.8
9.8
20.9
20.8
2.2
29.1
11.9
22.0
22.2
2.4
73
21
42
42
8
69
22
44
43
8
4636
333
702
628
292
3530
328
492
437
142
28.6
7.7
7.9
7.1
5.9
29.4
7.2
14.1
14.6
5.9
100
28
80
84
17
100
28
71
71
19
23442
4
85
36
206
13935
4
132
59
229
13.5
0.0
3.0
2.5
2.3
13.5
0.0
3.1
2.7
2.1
918
0
138
11
208
918
0
293
238
276
16.1
0.0
6.6
6.2
4.7
16.1
0.0
9.2
9.4
5.0
107
Table 7
A list of variables that interacted with the dwelling index indicating that they were not independent of the dwelling in which they were measured. The table states in which
models (Open and/or close) the interactions were found. If interactions with the dwelling index occurred, the variable was removed from the window opening and/or closing
models.
Model
Group
Group
Group
Group
1
2
3
4
Indoor temperature
Outdoor temperature
Solar radiation
CO2 concentration
Time of day
Illumination
None
Open and Close
None
Close
None
Open
None
None
None
Open
Close
None
None
None
Close
Close
None
None
None
Open and Close
None
None
None
Close
dependence and the variable was removed from the model. Variables that did not interact with the dwelling index were assumed to
be independent of the individual dwelling.
Correlations between explanatory variables may result in
ination of the estimated variance of the inferred coefcient, which
in turn will result in too wide condence intervals. To estimate the
size of the ination due to correlations between all explanatory
variables (multicolinearity), generalized variance ination factors
(GVIF) were calculated for coefcients of all continuous explanatory
variables. The GVIF estimates the ination of the variance, due to
multicolinearity as compared to no multicolinearity. Since the GVIF
is an estimate of the ination of the variance, the GVIF1/(2$Df) is an
estimate of the factor by which the standard error and condence
interval is inated due to multicolinearity between explanatory
variables.
Prior to the regression analyses, four variables were transformed
to obtain a better distribution. Table 5 describes how the variables
were transformed.
The statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical
software R and the models were inferred using the step function
in R [38].
4. Results
In this section, the main results of the statistical analysis are
presented. Table 6 presents descriptive statistics of all measured
variables in each of the four groups.
All results from group 1 are presented in this section, while
tables with inferred coefcients and results from the VIF analyses
from groups 2, 3 and 4 are presented in Appendix 1.
The dwelling index affected the impact of some of the explanatory variables as concerns the probability of opening and closing a
window. This indicates different habits in the different dwellings
included in the four groups, which were not described by the
measured variables. For example, the CO2 concentration interacted
with the dwelling index in the model for closing windows in group
3, indicating that the windows were closed at different (but
distinct) concentrations of CO2 in each dwelling. The variables that
interacted with the dwelling index were removed from the models
where the interaction occurred. In the further analyses, the
dwelling index was not included, since we were not interested in
the behaviour in each single dwelling, but in the overall behaviour
in all of the surveyed dwellings.
Table 8
Coefcients and magnitudes of the opening and closing models inferred based on data from Group 1. The coefcient refers to the a and b1n in formula (2). The magnitude is
a measure of the impact of the variable on the probability. It was calculated as the coefcient of the variable multiplied by the scale of the variable.
Variable
Time/room
Open window
Coefcient
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Bedroom
Living room
Bedroom
Living room
23.83
23.04
24.06
24.32
24.47
10.58
9.80
10.82
11.08
11.22
24.72
23.94
24.96
25.22
25.36
11.47
10.69
11.71
11.97
12.12
1.87
0.23$103
0.163
0.501
Close window
Condence interval
2.5%
97.5%
27.78
27.06
28.10
28.35
28.49
16.40
15.66
16.69
16.95
17.09
28.69
27.97
29.00
29.26
29.40
17.35
16.58
17.60
17.85
17.95
1.37
0.81
0.11
0.14
19.88
19.03
20.03
20.29
20.45
4.76
3.93
4.94
5.20
5.35
20.75
19.91
20.91
21.17
21.33
5.60
4.80
5.82
6.09
6.28
2.37
0.81
0.22
0.86
Magnitude
Coefcient
Condence interval
2.5%
97.5%
1.93
0.84
1.22
1.00
0.38
5.31
4.22
4.61
4.39
3.77
0.77
0.32
0.06
0.16
0.77
4.15
3.06
3.45
3.23
2.61
3.67
2.71
3.09
2.87
2.25
7.76
6.76
7.15
6.93
6.31
2.59
1.62
2.01
1.79
1.17
5.98
5.02
5.40
5.19
4.56
0.19
1.03
0.65
0.87
1.48
2.87
1.69
2.07
1.85
1.23
1.05
2.26
1.88
2.10
2.72
2.32
1.11
1.49
1.27
0.66
0.15
0.02
0.037
0.104
0.19
0.03
0.003
0.046
0.12
0.01
0.077
0.162
Magnitude
4
0.00
2.15
3.42
4.07
1.21
1.56
4.34
108
Variable
p
9:80 0:23$103 $logCO2 0:163$ti
log
1p
0:501$logRad 1
Time
Solar radiation
Season
Room
Indoor temperature
CO2 concentration
Room: CO2
Relative humidity
Outdoor temperature
Outdoor relative humidity
RH: Room
Opening window
GVIF
Df
GVIF1/(2$Df)
3.7
3.5
1.1
353
1.1
3.0
338
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.2
1.9
1.0
18.8
1.1
1.7
18.4
Closing window
GVIF
Df
GVIF1/(2$Df)
1.9
1.1
1.9
52
1
1
1.4
7.2
6.4
2.4
3.0
60
1
1
1
1
2.5
1.6
1.7
7.7
(3)
p
23:04 1:87$logCO2 0:163$ti
log
1p
0:501$logRad 1
Table 9
Results of performed VIF analysis for variables of group 1. The GVIF1/(2$Df) describes
how inated the condence intervals in Table 8 are due to multicolinearity.
(4)
109
Fig. 3. Graphical representation of the window opening model. The probability of opening a window is depicted for different indoor temperatures as a function of CO2 concentration (left) for different CO2 concentrations as a function of indoor temperature (middle) and for different temperatures as a function of solar radiation.
Fig. 4. Graphical representation of the window closing model from group 1. The probability of closing a window is depicted for different levels of indoor relative humidity as a
function of outdoor temperature (left), for different outdoor temperatures as a function of outdoor relative humidity (middle) and for different outdoor temperatures as a function of
the indoor relative humidity.
110
Table 1
Coefcients and magnitudes of the opening and closing models inferred based on data from Group 2. The coefcient refers to the a and b1n in formula (2). The magnitude
is a measure of the impact of the variable on the probability. It was calculated as the coefcient of the variable multiplied by the scale of the variable.
Variable
Time/Room
Open window
Coefcient
Intercept
Illumination [log(Lux)]
CO2 concentration [Log(ppm)]
Outdoor Relative Humidity [%]
Solar hours [h]
Outdoor temperature [ C]
Solar radiation [Log(W/m2)]
Bedroom
Living room
e
e
e
e
Bedroom
Living room
Bedroom
Living room
13.49
13.49
0.27
1.40
0.02
e
e
e
e
e
Close window
Condence interval
2.5%
97.5%
15.64
15.64
0.17
1.10
0.03
11.33
11.33
0.37
1.71
0.01
Magnitude
e
e
2
3
1.5
e
e
e
e
e
Coefcient
4.75
4.19
0.62
e
e
0.06
0.03
0.26
0.59
0.04
Condence interval
2.5%
97.5%
5.53
3.03
0.67
3.98
5.34
0.57
0.09
0.02
0.34
0.45
0.17
0.02
0.08
0.19
0.74
0.26
Magnitude
e
e
6
e
e
0.86
0.90
7.85
4.04
0.30
Opening window
GVIF
Df
Closing window
GVIF1/(2$Df)
GVIF
Df
111
Table 4
Results of performed VIF analysis for variables of group 3. The GVIF1/(2$Df) describes
how inated the condence intervals in Table 3 are due to multicolinearity.
Variable
GVIF1/(2$Df)
Opening window
1/(2$Df)
Lux
CO2
Outdoor RH
Solar radiation
Sun hours
Room: Outdoor temperature
Room: Solar radiation
Room
Outdoor temperature
1.4
1.3
1.4
1
1
1
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.9
6.8
1.7
7.1
8.9
9.8
3.0
1
1
1
1
1
1
GVIF Df GVIF
1.4
CO2
1.1
Time
1.1
Room
Indoor temperature
Sun hours
Relative humidity
Outdoor temperature
Room: indoor temperature
Time: indoor temperature
Time: relative humidity
Outdoor temperature: time
Room: outdoor temperature
2.6
1.3
2.7
3.0
3.1
1.7
1
4
1.0
1.0
Closing window
GVIF
Df GVIF1/(2$Df)
7.07E09
230
11.7
2.2
15.1
22.0
263
774.3E06
110.6E06
18.6E03
7.3
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
17.0
15.2
3.4
1.5
3.9
4.7
16.2
12.9
10.1
3.4
2.7
Group 3:
Table 3
Coefcients and magnitudes of the opening and closing models inferred based on data from Group 3. The coefcient refers to the a and b1n in formula (2). The magnitude
is a measure of the impact of the variable on the probability. It was calculated as the coefcient of the variable multiplied by the scale of the variable.
Variable
Time/room
Open window
Coefcient
Indoor Temperature [ C]
Living room
Outdoor Temperature [ C]
Bedroom
Outdoor temperature [ C]
Living room
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
Night
Morning
Day
Afternoon
Evening
17.69
15.51
17.09
18.23
17.13
17.69
15.51
17.09
18.23
17.13
1.75
Close window
Condence interval
2.5%
97.5%
18.80
16.63
18.24
19.40
18.26
18.80
16.63
18.24
19.40
18.26
1.60
16.59
14.38
15.94
17.05
15.99
16.59
14.38
15.94
17.05
15.99
1.90
Magnitude
Coefcient
Condence interval
2.5%
97.5%
2.68
0.51
7.67
12.78
13.22
14.68
16.85
9.69
4.57
4.13
6.50
6.37
13.84
20.94
20.81
9.90
10.32
2.88
4.07
3.98
1.14
5.36
1.50
4.63
5.64
19.45
23.38
16.50
13.22
12.24
0.40
0.15
0.21
0.70
0.60
0.25
0.51
0.45
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.12
0.13
0.07
0.09
0.13
0.01
0.27
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.16
0.06
0.15
0.07
0.08
0.29
0.03
0.08
0.57
0.48
0.37
0.69
0.65
0.23
0.29
0.08
0.03
0.23
0.16
0.18
0.22
0.11
0.36
0.30
0.32
0.32
0.24
0.02
0.24
0.15
0.11
0.52
0.27
0.33
0.83
0.73
0.13
0.32
0.25
0.33
0.19
0.09
0.21
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.08
0.17
0.10
0.12
0.17
0.08
0.14
0.07
0.02
0.06
Magnitude
4.16
6.55
2.39
3.38
11.36
9.79
4.05
8.21
7.22
0.75
0.81
0.19
3.85
4.28
2.10
2.77
4.09
0.43
8.56
6.37
7.05
7.75
4.93
1.84
4.88
2.14
1.27
112
Group 4:
Table 5
Coefcients and magnitudes of the opening and closing models inferred based on data from Group 4. The coefcient refers to the a and b1n in formula (2). The magnitude
is a measure of the impact of the variable on the probability. It was calculated as the coefcient of the variable multiplied by the scale of the variable.
Variable
Season/Room
Open window
Coefcient
Intercept e Bedroom
Winter
Spring
Summer
Winter
Spring
Summer
Winter
Spring
Summer
Winter
Spring
Summer
Bedroom
Living room
Solar radiation
Solar hours
Outdoor relative humidity
Illumination
Indoor temperature
Bedroom
Living room
Bedroom
Living room
Bedroom
Living room
CO2 concentration
Indoor relative humidity
Close window
Condence interval
18.53
18.53
18.53
3.56
3.56
3.56
0.019
0.019
0.019
0.059
0.059
0.059
0.18
0.35
0.057
0.029
0.26
0.10
0.38
1.16
0.30
2.50%
97.50%
20.55
20.55
20.55
6.82
6.82
6.82
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.14
0.28
0.043
0.024
0.20
1.92
0.47
0.91
0.12
16.51
16.51
16.51
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.23
0.42
0.070
0.033
0.33
2.12
0.29
1.40
0.71
Table 6
Results of performed VIF analysis for variables of group 4. The GVIF1/(2$Df) describes
how inated the condence intervals in Table 5 are due to multicolinearity.
Variable
Opening window
GVIF
Closing window
Df GVIF1/(2$Df) GVIF
Solar radiation
4.0 1
Outdoor relative humidity
2.0 1
Room
530.0 1
Sun hours
1.3 1
Indoor temperature
3.1 1
Lux
1.8 1
CO2 concentration
3.0 1
Outdoor temperature
5.5 1
Solar radiation: room
8.3 1
Room: indoor temperature
203.3 1
Room: CO2 concentration
363.5 1
Room: outdoor temperature
9.0 1
Indoor relative humidity
Season
Outdoor temperature:
season
Room: indoor relative
humidity
2.0
1.4
23.0
1.1
1.8
1.3
1.7
2.3
2.9
14.2
19.1
3.0
1.7
2.7
27.0
1.5
Df GVIF1/(2$Df)
1
1
1
1
1.3
1.6
5.2
1.2
175.9 1
13.3
6.8
3.5
98.3
1968.8
1
1
2
2
2.6
1.9
3.1
6.7
34.2 1
5.8
References
[1] Leaman A, Bordass B. Productivity in buildings: the killer variables. Building
Research & Information 1999;27(1):4e20.
[2] Paciuk M. The role of personal control of the environment in thermal comfort
and satisfaction at the workplace (Ph.D. thesis). University of WisconsinMilwaukee; 1989.
[3] Roulet CA, Johner N, Foradini F, Bluyssen P, Cox C, Fernandes EO, et al. Percieved health and comfort in relation to energy use and building characteristics. Building Research and Information 2006;34(5):467e74.
[4] Toftum J. Central automatic control or distributed occupant control for better
indoor environment quality in the future, Building and environment. Building
and Environment 2010;45:23e8.
Magnitude
0.68
0.68
0.68
2.16
2.16
2.16
1.24
2.39
0.91
2.08
2.30
1.93
7.25
3.04
0.78
Coefcient
Condence interval
Magnitude
2.50%
97.50%
4.28
2.98
4.94
0.62
0.68
1.28
0.038
0.147
0.057
0.17
0.27
0.18
0.13
0.13
0.089
0.028
5.21
4.18
6.24
1.72
0.66
2.71
0.161
0.321
0.233
0.29
0.45
0.36
0.09
0.09
0.103
0.033
3.35
1.78
3.63
0.48
2.01
0.15
0.084
0.027
0.119
0.04
0.10
0.01
0.16
0.16
0.075
0.023
1.41
5.38
2.09
6.06
10.04
6.75
0.86
0.86
1.43
2.01
0.063
0.036
0.051
0.017
0.075
0.056
2.99
1.72
[5] Bahaj AS, James PAB. Urban energy generation: the added value of photovoltaics in social housing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
2007;11:2121e36.
[6] Rathouse K, Young B. RPDH15: use of domestic heating controls, Defras
Market Transformation Programme.
[7] Seligman, Darly JM, Becker LJ. Behavioral approaches to residential energy
conservation. Energy and Buildings 1977/78;1:325e37.
[8] Andersen R. The inuence of occupants behaviour on energy consumption
investigated in 290 identical dwellings and in 35 apartments. In: Proceedings
of healthy buildings 2012, 8e12 July 2012, Brisbane, Australia 2012.
[9] Offermann F, Brennan S, Hodgson A, Jenkins P. Window usage, ventilation,
and formaldehyde concentrations in new California homes. In: Proceedings of
the 11th international conference on indoor air quality and climate, indoor air
2008. Copenhagen, Denmark. [Paper ID: 767].
[10] Bishop RC, Frey DJ. Occupant effects on energy performance of monitored
houses. In: Proceedings of: the 10th national passive solar conference 1985.
p. 395e400.
[11] Kristensen L, Jensen OM, editors. Erfaringsopflgning p lavenergibyggeri
klasse 1 og 2.- med Fremtidens Parcelhuse som eksempel, repport for
Energiforskningsprogrammet. Det Grnne Hus in cooperation with SBi; 2007
[In Danish].
[12] Andersen RV, Olesen BW, Toftum J. Simulation of the effects of occupant
behaviour on indoor climate and energy consumption. In: Proceedings of Clima
2007: 9th REHVA World Congress: WellBeing Indoors, Helsinki, Finland 2007.
[13] Wallace LA, Emmerich SJ, Howard-Reed C. Continuous measurements of air
change rates in an occupied house for 1 year: the effect of temperature, wind
fans and windows. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 2002;12:296e306.
[14] Howard-Reed C, Walllace LA, Ott WR. The effect of opening windows on air
change rates in two homes. Air and Waste Management Association 2002;52:
147e59.
[15] Kvistgaard B, Collet PF. In: Sherman MH, editor. The users inuence on air
change, air change rate and air tightness in buildings. Philadelphia: American
Society for Testing and Materials; 1990. p. 67e76. ASTM. STP 1067.
[16] Bek G, Toftum J, Clausen G. Modeling ventilation rates in bedrooms based on
building characteristics and occupant behaviour. Building and Environment
2011;46:2230e7.
[17] Rijal HB, Tuohy P, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Samuel A, Clarke J. Using results
from eld surveys to predict the effect of open windows on thermal comfort
and energy use in buildings. Energy and Buildings 2007;39:823e36.
[18] Haldi F, Robinson D. On the behaviour and adaptation of ofce occupants.
Building and Environment 2008;43:2163e77.
113
[28] Fabi V, Andersen RV, Corgnati SP, Olesen BW. Occupants window opening
behaviour: a literature review of factors inuencing occupant behaviour and
model. Building and Environment 2012;58:188e98.
[29] Roetzel A, Tsangrassoulis A, Dietrich U, Bushing S. A review of occupant
control on natural ventilation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
2009;14:1001e13.
[30] Keiding L. In: Keiding Lis, editor. Environmental factors of everyday life in
Denmark e with specic focus on housing environment. Copenhagen (: Statens
Institute for Folkesundhed (SIF); 2003 [in Danish with summary in English].
[31] Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngbyvej 100, DK-2100 Copenhagen E,
Denmark.
[32] http://www.onsetcomp.com/.
[33] http://www.vaisala.com/.
[34] Brundrett GW. Window ventilation and human behaviour. In: Proceedings of
the rst international indoor climate symposium in Copenhagen: indoor
climate, effects on human comfort, performance and health in residential,
commercial and light-industry buildings 1978. p. 317e30.
[35] Dubrul C. Technical note AIVC 23, inhabitant behaviour with respect to
ventilation e a summary report of IEA Annex VIII; March 1988.
[36] Andersen R, Toftum J, Olesen B. Survey of occupant behaviour and control of
indoor environment in Danish dwellings. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on air distribution in rooms, Roomvent 2007 June 2007.
Helsinki, Finland.
[37] Allison PD. Logistic regression using the SAS system. SAS Institute; 1999.
[38] Documentation of the step function in R: 127.0.0.1:16820/library/stats/html/
step.html visited on December 22-2011.
[39] Schweiker M, Schweiker M, Shukuya M. Comparison of theoretical and statistical models of air-conditioning-usage behavior in a residential setting under
Japanese climatic conditions. Building and Environment 2009;44:2137e49.