Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 2
Introduction
Mittal Steel USA is the major producer of carbon, alloy and roll-bonded clad plate for the petroleum,
petrochemical and chemical processing industries in
the United States. We operate three facilities in
Pennsylvania and Indiana for the production of
plate.
Many of the more than 450 grades of carbon and alloy plate steels produced by Mittal Steel USA are
pressure vessel quality (PVQ) grades used in the design and fabrication of process vessels. In addition,
we offer the thinnest, thickest, widest and heaviest
plates available in North America. For a comprehensive list of PVQ grades and availability, refer to our
Plate Steel Specification Guide.
Two pressure vessel plate steel specifications comprise, by far, the most popular process vessel applications. Based on Mittal Steel USAs experience,
ASME SA516 (ASTM A516) carbon steel and ASME
SA387 (ASTM A387) alloy steel are detailed technically in this brochure.
Production Practices
Figure 1
Coatesville Steelmaking Process Plan
Electrodes
Automatic
Alloys
Automatic
Alloys
Wire Feed
Argon Stirring
Argon Stirring
Ladle Furnace
Ladle Degasser
Continuous
Cast Slabs
Ladle
Bottom
Poured Ingots
Page 3
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
Figure 3
Available CE Maximums for Normalized A516
0.50
CE Maximum
0.48
0.46
0.44
Grade 70 w/PWHT
0.42
0.40
0.38
0.36
0.34
0.32
0
5- 8
Figure 4
Effect of Heat Treatment on Transverse CVN
Toughness of A516
200
Q+T
CVN Absorbed Energy - Ft lbs
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
150
Normalized
100
AsAs-rolled
50
0
-110
-60
-10
40
90
Temperature (F)
140
190
240
Page 4
As a % of Original Strength
% of Original Tensile
100
98
96
94
92
1125F- 2 hrs
90
1175F- 8 hrs
1-1/2
88
30
31
As Norm
32
33
34
35
36
Larson-Miller Parameter
Figure 7
The Effects of PWHT on Impact Properties *
LMP vs. CVN Energy @ -50oF
100
1-1/2
80
CVN (Ft-lbs)
Figure 6
The Effects of PWHT on Tensile Properties *
60
40
20
Figure 5
As Norm
32
33
34
Larson-Miller Parameter
35
36
Larson-Miller Parameter
Hours of PWHT
TEMP (F)
1125
0.010
0.013
0.016
0.019
0.022
0.025
0.028
0.030
1150
0.018
0.021
0.024
0.027
0.030
0.033
0.036
0.038
1175
0.026
0.029
0.032
0.035
0.038
0.041
0.044
0.046
1200
0.034
0.037
0.040
0.043
0.041
0.049
0.052
0.054
1225
0.042
0.045
0.048
0.051
0.049
0.057
0.060
0.062
1250
0.050
0.053
0.056
0.059
0.065
0.065
0.068
0.070
Page 5
Figure 8
The Effects of PWHT on Impact Properties
LMP vs. % of Original Energy @ -50oF
% of Original Ft-lbs
100
3
80
1-1/2
60
40
20
1125F1125F- 2 hrs
1175F1175F- 8 hrs
0
30
31
As Norm
32
33
34
35
36
Larson-Miller Parameter
Figure 9
The Effects of PWHT on Impact Properties
LMP vs. 35 Ft-lb Transition Temperature
Temperature (F)
0
-20
-40
1-1/2
-60
-80
-100
1125F- 2 hrs
1175F- 8 hrs
-120
30
As 31
Norm
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Larson-Miller Parameter
Results of 1-1/2 and 3 plates
pass through the steel shell containment boundary. If there is an absence of inclusions in the
steel, this is done harmlessly while creating an
iron-sulfide scale at the reaction interface.
However, if inclusions are present, the ions nucleate at these voids and form hydrogen gas
pockets, appearing as blisters on the steels surface. High internal pressure can eventually
cause the inclusions to be initiation sites for further hydrogen -induced, or stepwise cracking
(HIC) in the steel.
To meet HIC testing requirements, it is imperative to have very clean steels with low inclusion
contents. All HIC-Tested A516 steels are produced to our exclusive Fineline process, which
reduces sulfur levels to 0.002% or less and employs calcium treatment for inclusion shape
control. Maximum levels of phosphorus and oxygen may also be accepted.
Besides cleanliness, we have found heat treating to be very important in attaining satisfactory results with HIC tests. Mittal Steel USA will
not perform HIC tests on unheat-treated products. Both normalizing and Q&T heat treatments are available and help meet other properties as well.
Page 6
Mittal Steel USAs HIC-Tested A516 can be produced in plate thicknesses from 3/8 through 6
inches and plate weights to 55,000 pounds. Other
thicknesses and weights will be considered on an
individual basis. HIC testing of these steels is performed as outlined in Mittal Steel USAs HIC-01
series of specifications found in Figure 11.
Figure 11
Available Sour Service-Testing Criteria
M it t a l U S A T e st M e t h o d /
S p e c ific a tio n
S o lut io n
T e st C rit e r ia ,
A v e ra g e o f
CLR
%
CTR
CSR
H IC -A - 1 5
H IC - B - 1 5
H IC -A - 5
H IC - A - 1 5 S
H IC - A - 1 0 S
H IC - A - 1 5 C S
H IC - A - 1 0 C S
T M 0 2 8 4 /A
T M 0 2 8 4 /B
T M 0 2 8 4 /A
T M 0 2 8 4 /A
T M 0 2 8 4 /A
T M 0 2 8 4 /A
T M 0 2 8 4 /A
O v e rall
O v e rall
O v e rall
S p e c im e n
S p e c im e n
C ro ss-se c t io n
C ro ss-se c t io n
15
15
5
15
10
15
10
5
5
1
3
2
5
2
5
5
0.3 75
1
0 .5
1
1
S S C -A -0 1
S S C -A -0 2
AST M G 39
TM 0177
Method A
V isu a l, n o c ra c k s
@ 70% SM Y S
na
na
na
na
na
na
HIC-A-15 is the default testing scheme, additional quality extras apply for more restrictive
requirements. SSC-01-A requires Q+T. Cross-sectional testing, depending on plate
thickness, may also require Q&T.
Testing frequency is on a per melt/thickness basis for HIC tests and on heaviest thickness
ordered for SSC tests unless otherwise specified by a customers specification.
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 10
H+
Had
H+
FeS
Had
Fe++
H+
H+
H2
90
Hab
Hab
microcrack
Cumulative %
80
Blister
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
(H2 gas)
0
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
10%
15%
Page 7
Figure 14
General Microstructure of Clean A516-60
No HIC Cracking
No SSC Failures
through 110%
SMYS
80.4% actual YS
200X
Figure 15
The Effect of Microstructural Banding on
HIC and SSC Test Performance of A516-60
Figure 16
HIC Test Results (TM0284 Solution A) - A516-60
Melt
D3861
C3866
C3818
D3822
D3826
D3905
D3818
D3871
D3826
D3826
D3894
D3822
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.11
0.12
0.78
1.22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0001
0.0001
0.0029
0.0029
Page 8
Chemistry
Figure 17
Sulfur
Phosphorus
0.005%
0.008%
Tin
0.010%
0.010%
Antimony
0.0025%
0.0025%
Arsenic
0.010%
0.010%
Page 9
Figure 19
Number of Heats
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Number of Heats
X bar
X bar is normally considered only appropriate for
Regular
Melting
Controlled
welding consumables not base plate, but can be
offered when so desired. The maximum levels
available by grade are:
The application of J factor for Grade 11 is
often misunderstood and as a result, somewhat higher J factors for Grade 11 may be
required to allow for higher Mn and minimum silicon levels required to meet
J
strength levels in thicker plates and/or
G ra d e F a c to r
X bar
when extensive PWHT is required. The ef12
110
12
fect of chemistry balance on strength is
11
150
12
illustrated in Figure 20. In this example,
22
90
15
tensile strength of Grade 11 plate, 1-3/8
inch thick in the normalized and tempered
condition, is plotted against Larson-Miller
Parameter (LMP). Mittal Steel USA has
found that there is an excellent correlation
between strength, thickness, chemistry
The distributions of J and X bar data for Grade
and time-temperature parameters such as
22 are shown in Figures 18 and 19. More
Larson-Miller { P = T(C + log t) x 1000}. In
restrictive levels of individual tramp elements,
the chart, the effects of both additional
or J and X bar factors, will be considered on a
chemistry, represented by a conventional
case-by-case basis.
carbon equivalent, as well as more stress
relief, represented by higher LMP factors,
are shown. Clearly, when trying to achieve
Class 2 properties of 75 KSI minimum tenFigure 18
sile strength, chemistry and PWHT must be
Distribution of J Factors for A387
considered carefully. More will also be said
Grade 22 Utilizing Melting Practices to
Control Tramp Elements
about this in the section on toughness. Distribution for J and X bar factors for Grade
11 are depicted in Figures 21 and 22.
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
J Factor
Regular Melting
Controlled
Page 10
Figure 20
The Effect of Time - Temperature on Tensile
Strength of N+T 1-3/8 A387-11
95
Tensile (ksi)
90
85
80
75
70
65
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Larson-Miller Parameter
.58 CE
.68 CE
Figure 21
30
0
28
0
26
0
24
0
22
0
20
0
18
0
16
0
14
0
12
0
60
80
10
0
Number of Heats
J Factor
Controlled Melting
Figure 22
10
11
12
X bar
Regular Melting
Figure 23
Number of Heats
Regular Melting
13
14
Controlled
15
16
17
Page 11
Figure 24
C
V
N
As Received
Step Cooled
f
t 40
l
b
s
Delta T40
Temperature
End users and fabricators typically impose various post-weld heat-treatment (stress relief) requirements when specifying A387 steels that
are driven by the applicable ASME construction
Figure 25
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
55
60
65
70
J Factor
75
80
85
1/4 T
1/2 T
Page 12
Figure 28
Figure 26
U3566-5
U3566-9
C8200-4D
C8713-6G
U6037-6
U2821-4
U2821-5
U2840-7
U2840-1
U2840-2
U3566-10
U5504-1
U5598-1
U7514-1
U7521-6
2.62
2.375
2.375
2.25
2.625
1.85
2.25
2.56
4.187
3.56
2.25
3.56
3.56
1.84
3.04
Loc
1/2t
1/4t
1/4t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/2t
1/4t
1/4t
Average
200
-120
-185
-185
-151
-162
-126
-145
-122
-160
-125
-133
-145
-155
-170
-185
15
10
-30
3
4
21
7
0
10
30
-11
-5
15
0
25
-83
-160
-185
-143
-158
-105
-138
-122
-135
-50
-133
-145
-113
-170
-110
-151
-130
240
120
80
40
-100
2 Plate
Figure 27
The Effect of Step-Cooling on A387 Grade 5
N+T
T40 = 43o
160
As N & T
1275F - 8 hrs
1350F - 4 hrs
-80
-60
-40
-20
Figure 29
Grain Boundary Embrittlement A387-22
N+T+SC
210
180
150
120
90
60
30
0
-240
-200
-160
-120
-80
-40
40
80
120
Temperature (F)
Page 13
Figure 33
Microstructural Effects of Time-Temperature in N+T A387-11
1160oF
1275oF
1340oF
Figure 30
The Effect of a 100oF Increase in Tempering
Temperatures on N & T A387-11
Hr.
Tensile (ksi)
84
82
1250oF +
1200oF- 6 hrs
80
31.91
1
Hr.
1350oF +
1300oF- 6 hrs
78
34.18
1/2 Hr
32.40
1 Hr
76
35.46
1/2 Hr
1/2 Hr
34.70
36.00
35.34
37.08
1 Hr
1 Hr
74
33
34
35
36
37
38
Larson-Miller Parameter
4
Hrs.
33.38
4
4 Hr
Hr
4 Hr
4 Hr
Figure 34
Percentage Loss of Original CVN Toughness with
Increasing PWHT After Initial N + T as f(test
temperature): A387-11 2" Plate
Figure 31
Time Temperature Parameter Illustrative Example
100
90
Past Practice
Current Trends
0F
80
1300 oF
% Loss
70
+40F
-40F
60
50
-20F
40
30
20
10
0
34.86 LMP
36.94 LMP
34.5
35
35.5
36
36.5
37
37.5
38
38.5
LMP
Figure 32
1250oF +
1200oF -6 hrs
1350oF +
1300oF -6
hrs
34
35
36
37
38
Q&T
39
Page 14
Ultrasonic Quality
ASTM A1041-04
Carbon
Grade 315
(Composition, %)
0.08 0.12
Manganese
0.25 0.45
Chromium
2.8 3.2
Molybdenum
0.65 0.85
Vanadium
0.20 0.30
Tungsten
1.35 1.65
ASTM A1041-04
Tensile Requirements
Grade 315
Tensile Strength, ksi
[MPa]
105 to 135
[725 to 930]
85
[ 585]
Elongation in 2 in.
[50 mm], Min
16
Page 15
Technical Literature
A516 Steels
1. Hydrogen Induced Cracking (HIC) Resistance of A516 Grade 70 Plate Steel, Emil
G. Hamburg and Alexander D. Wilson,
AIME-TMS Conference Metallurgy of Vacuum Degassed Steel Products, October
1989
2. HIC Testing of A516 Grade 70 Steels, E.
G. Hamburg and A. D. Wilson, NACE Corrosion 93, March 1993, NACE, Houston, TX
3. Performance Characteristics of Special
Clean Pressure Vessel Steel Subjected to
SSC and HIC Testing, Kenneth E. Orie
and Fred B. Fletcher, Paper No. 632, Corrosion 99, April 1999, NACE, Houston, TX
4. The Effect of PWHT on Normalized BaseMetal Properties of ASTM A516 Steel,
Ken Orie and Charles R. Roper, Welding
Research Council Bulletin 481, May 2003
A387 Steels
More information:
IMPORTANT: The information provided herein is based on testing or Mittal Steel USAs experience and is accurate and realistic to the best of our knowledge at the time of publication. However, characteristics described or implied may not apply in all situations. Mittal Steel USA reserves the right to make changes in practices that may render some information
outdated or obsolete. In cases where specific plate properties are desired, Mittal Steel USA should be consulted for current information and/or capabilities.
Mill Locations:
Burns Harbor, IN
Coatesville, PA
Conshohocken, PA
May 15, 2006