Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER
37
Compressor
Efficiency
Effect on Driver Load
451
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Lieberman_Ch37_451-458.indd 451
3/20/08 12:55:38 PM
Compressor Efficiency
452
37.1
Jet Engine
A gas- or diesel-fired turbine driver is essentially the same as a jet engine?
The burning gas spins a turbine. The turbine spins two compressors:
The natural-gas compressor we have been discussing.
An air compressor. The discharge pressure from this air
compressor might be 80 to 90 psig. The compressed air is used
as the combustion air supply to combust the turbines fuel. The
majority of the horsepower output from the turbine (perhaps
60 percent) is used to drive this combustion air compressor.
The horsepower output from a gas turbine is seldom limited by the
position of the fuel-gas regulator, as I just described in the previous example.
The limit is usually the exhaust temperature of the combustion or flue gases.
The turbines blades have a metallurgical temperature limit of 1100 to 1200F
(as designated by the manufacturer). The temperature of the exhaust
combustion gases correlates with the temperature of the turbine blades.
Now, let us again assume that our natural-gas compressor rotor
begins to foul with salt, drilling mud, and/or a paraffin wax, produced
with the gas. Here is what will happen:
1. The flow of compressed natural gas will decrease.
2. The turbine and the compressor will both spin faster.
3. The combustion airflow from the front-end air compressor
will increase.
4. The air-to-fuel ratio in the turbines combustion chamber will
increase.
5. The exhaust combustion flue-gas temperature will drop as
the air-to-fuel ratio rises.
6. The fuel-gas regulator can now be opened, because we are no
longer constrained by the exhaust-gas temperature.
7. The extra fuel gas, plus the extra combustion air, increases the
horsepower output from the turbine.
Strange to say, but we could move almost as much natural gas with a
dirty compressor rotor as we could with a clean compressor rotor. Of
course, the amount of fuel we needed to run the turbine increased
substantially as the rotor salted up. But our fuel in Laredo was selfproduced, and therefore more or less free natural gas, so we did not care.
37.2
3/20/08 12:55:39 PM
Compressor Efficiency
Chapter 37:
Compressor Efficiency
453
(P2 / P1 ) 1
T2 T1
(37.1)
3/20/08 12:55:40 PM
Compressor Efficiency
454
37.3
Relative Efficiency
You cannot use the information presented in this text to design
compressors. You cannot use the information presented in this
book to calculate actual compressor efficiency. Those are complex
subjects.
But we are not concerned with establishing the actual compressor
efficiency. What we wish to know are the answers to the following
sorts of questions:
What is my compressor efficiency today compared to its
efficiency last month or right after the unit turnaround last
year?
What is my compressor efficiency today compared to its
design efficiency?
What is the efficiency of cylinder A compared to cylinder B
on my reciprocating compressor?
Which is more efficientmy beat-up, old centrifugal
compressor, or my brand-new reciprocating compressor? Both
machines are working in parallel, but which has a better
adiabatic compression efficiency?
We can answer these questions using Eq. (37.1), which defines
relative efficiency. The calculated numerical value of relative efficiency
means nothing! The equation may be used only to compare two sets
of operating data. The equation is not even thermodynamically
correct. But it is sufficiently correct, provided the services represented
by the two sets of data are reasonably similar, and the compression
ratios are within 10 to 20 percent of each other.
3/20/08 12:55:40 PM
Compressor Efficiency
Chapter 37:
Filter
Compressor Efficiency
395F
0.4 #
455
Air to
regenerator
34 #
0#
Fouled axial compressor
Eff. ~
(P2/P1 1)
75 F
T1
T2
P2
P1
Normal
65F
355F
37 #
0.5 #
Design
100F
345F
39 #
0.6 #
(T2 T1)
FIGURE 37.1
T2 T1 = 395 75 = 320
Relative efficiency =
2.406
= .00752
320
Normal condition:
Relative efciency = .00911
Design condition:
Relative efciency = .01147
From these relative-efficiency values, we can draw the following
conclusions:
The axial compressor running in the fouled condition is
operating at only 82.5 percent of its normal condition efficiency.
This means that the fouling problem is really rather severe.
The adiabatic compression efficiency of the air compressor,
running in its normal condition, is only 79.4 percent of its design
3/20/08 12:55:40 PM
Compressor Efficiency
456
37.3.2
Parallel Compressors
1
T2 T1
37.4
3/20/08 12:55:41 PM
Compressor Efficiency
Chapter 37:
P1
4 psig
Wet gas
Compressor Efficiency
P2
46 psig
2 psig
In-line
filter
basket
Drum
FIGURE 37.2
457
Compressor
filter. This filter had apparently never been cleaned. Our client then
asked us to calculate the percent of the motor amps being wasted
across the partially plugged basket filter.
To answer this question, we may use the following formula:
P
Relative work = 2
P1
( K 1)/K
The ratio of the specific heats K for the gas was 1.33. Therefore
K 1 1.33 1.00
=
= 0.25
K
1.33
Atmospheric pressure in Pasadena on the day our data were
taken equaled 15 psia, or 30.6 Hg.
Therefore, the relative work required by the compressor, with the
existing restriction of the fouled filter, was
46 + 15
Relative work, fouled filter =
2 + 15
0.25
1 = 0.376
0.25
1 = 0.338
3/20/08 12:55:42 PM
Compressor Efficiency
458
3/20/08 12:55:42 PM