Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In considering the process of change in 20th century China how far can
the establishment of the PRC be considered a turning point?
I believe it is possible to say that the establishment of the PRC can be considered
a turning point in China, I will be investigating whether the PRC really brought
about political change from the point onwards of 1949 and will be judging
whether it really was a government that took control of power and its people
which lead to much economic and social change, I will contrast this to the period
before 1949 on such events like the events of the warlord period, the civil war
between the CCP and the nationalists and the threat that the dynasty
experienced from outside countries, therefore I will be looking at the period
before 1949 and after to judge whether the PRC had really brought about much
political change and social change.
Under the rule of the dynasty, there had not been a strong government but
rather harsh system of rule where society lacked basic freedom and were forced
to live under a totalitarian society - all authority came from the top and the
peoples duty was to obey. Since the establishment of the PRC Moa had
liberated the peasants through the events of the Cultural Revolution 1966 and
the Great leap forward 1958-61, these events had brought about a significant
change as they highlighted the need for reform. Such events like the Cultural
Revolution 1966 would not have been possible under the rule of the dynasty as it
deviated from the traditional imperialist rule. Maos peoples republic of China
abolished this imperialist rule and had transformed society; this was evident
through the abolishment of the landlords 1928, who were no longer in charge of
land. American Chinese born female general, born in 1930, states: 1The greatest
liberation has been for the working people. Previously in China, workers and
peasants had absolutely no status; now, they may still be poor, but its not the
same. At least now, society and the media and officials have to show respect for
them, whether they mean it or not, and theyre supposed to be the masters!
Before Liberation, the expression Chinese people didnt include them. This
showed a significant political change.
None the less, this does not mean that Mao had completely conformed society,
in fact it could be said that Maos rule was rather a reflection of the imperialist
rule in a different time era .More so with reference to the book History of China
in which 2American Scholar Lee Faigon states The Great leap forward did cause
somewhat damage, however never the loss without these movements the
Chinese economy would not have developed in the powerful way that it
encouraged reform. This quote demonstrates the opinion of a minority of people
who feel that the great leap forward was a success, however it is important to
question the validity of such quotes, in this case the historian himself is Chinese
and therefore has a reason to say that the great leap forward was successful, like
1 China a modern world pg. 238
2 China the stealth empire pg. 56
9 A guide to chinas adoption of the past, confrontation of the future pg. 132