1. The educational sector is undergoing a rapid transformation and adopting multi-pronged approach to education. More and more universities are proposing to setup inter disciplinary institutes. 2. Moreover as a building typology the college campus is undergoing major organ transplants. New means of education are upgrading the three systems of informational exchange-Video, Voice, Data. 3. This thesis addresses this phenomenon of change of the education institute both in terms of the education program and the building program. 4. Development is the single preoccupation of all civilizations after survival. It is on an insightful level that the needs of specialized further education can be addressed. This school is a project deals with intellectual resources and canalizing it towards the development of the community. It is a lateral method of injecting creative fluids into the society. 5. The school becomes a tangible icon of this wave of change that is sweeping the society. Architecturally, it shall stand for all the ideologies that are of core importance of this organization. ARCHITECTURAL CHALLENGES: 1. Recognizing the magnitude of incorporation of technology into the education institute that will take place in the future generation and provide space for it. 2. Addressing issues of flexibility and adaptability and creating an environment that is pliable but not anonymous. 3. Evolving an architectural vocabulary for departments like interactivity and wellness that are both contemporary origin but diametrically opposite in their approach while solving all the prevalent issues of campus designs. 4. Experimenting with the paradox between energy consciousness and interactivity. 5. Addressing questions of identity and place making. AIM: 1. To develop sensitivity towards campus planning for tangential educational strategies while incorporating concepts of interactivity with it. OBJECTIVES: 1. Understanding the ideology of the school and translating it into built form. 2. Studding site and climate responsive design methods to find context specific solutions. 3. Focus on aspects of site planning. 4. Evolving an architectural vocabulary with respect to form, materials, shape, and scale of the project. 5. Undertake a special analysis and detail out the building design. 6. Integrating infrastructure with the building program. 7. Addressing the issues of identity, familiarity and place making in the design. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Understanding the design process and role of architecture in the design of educational institutions. 2. Studying and experiencing the working of an institution. 3. Understanding the nuances of campus designs with respect to site planning. 4. Evolving an architectural vocabulary for each department. 5. Finding the best solution in terms of site and context responsive architecture. 6. Understanding special implications of specialized activities. 7. Translating the vision of the institute into architectural solution. 8. Experimenting with new approaches towards architecture interactivity. 9. Touching upon issues of image ability and place making.