COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Barangay 157 Zone 16 Malibay, Pasay City, Metro Manila

CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH
ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN

ASUQUE, Karsten GUITGUITEN, Rochelle

BURGOS, Marlo NAGRAMPA,Cyril
CAJIGAS, Ronald NEBALASCA, Timothy
CANOSA, BJ RAAGAS, Shaine
GARCIA, Kristelle
Schedule: Tuesdays And Thursdays
3:30 PM TO 5:00 PM
Instructor: Arch. Sylvester Shaun D. Seno
 VICINITY MAP
AND
LOCATION MAP
 FOUR PRINCIPLES

Natural
Surveillance
Natural
Access
Control
Territorial
Reinforcement
Maintenance
ROAD AND PEDESTRIAN
LINKAGES

MAIN ROAD ACCESS:

APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS
MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL
 NATURAL
SURVEILLANCE
 NATURAL
SURVEILLANCE
MAIN ROAD ACCESS:
APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL

AREA THAT IS POTENTIAL

FOR A NATURAL
SURVEILLANCE

AREA THAT HAS A LOW

NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
POTENTIAL
 NATURAL
SURVEILLANCE
MAIN ROAD ACCESS:
APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL

AREA THAT IS POTENTIAL

FOR A NATURAL
SURVEILLANCE

AREA THAT HAS A LOW

NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
POTENTIAL

CRIME HOTSPOTS
NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
NATURAL SURVEILLANCE ASSESSMENT

The main pedestrian access do have a

potential to have a natural surveillance
except that there are so many man-made
obstructions
No human-scale street lights that can help
reduce crime hot spot at night
There are a lot of smalls interconnected
alleys that has no natural surveillance
and therefore becomes crime prone areas.
There are so many blind spot and hiding
places due to informal settlers that cause
overcrowding in the neighborhood
Natural access
control

MAIN ROAD ACCESS:

APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS
MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL
Natural access
control

ACCESS POINTS

MAIN ROAD ACCESS:

APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS
MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL
Natural access
control

DEAD END POINTS

ACCESS POINTS
MAIN ROAD ACCESS:
APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS
MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL
Natural access
control
Natural access
control
Natural access
control
 Natural access control
ASSESSMENT

There are a lot of access points from

different barangays that is not controlled
by any means
The main entrance is dilapidated and
cannot be easily recognized
A lot of obstructions that causes traffic
to various pedestrian access.
The legibility of the place is poor due to
numerous access points that may cause
confusion
 TERRITORIALITY
REINFORCEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE

MAIN ROAD ACCESS:

APELO CRUZ
MAIN PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS
MINOR PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

BARANGAY HALL
 TERRITORIALITY
REINFORCEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE

PRIVATE INDUSTRY
TERRITORY

RESIDENTIAL
TERRITORY
 TERRITORIALITY
REINFORCEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE
TERRITORIALITY
REINFORCEMEN
T AND
MAINTENANCE
 TERRITORIALITY REINFORCEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT

Due to insufficiency of space, lack of

identity and quality in terms of their
habitat is prevalent.
No sidewalks, or landscaping that can
enhance the legibility of the place.
Materials used are predominantly light
weight and do have a low fire
resistivity
Most of the materials is hard to
maintain because of its quality, most of
them are built for temporary purposes.
THE THREE D APPROACH

All human space has some designated

purpose.
All human space has social,
cultural, legal or physical
definitions that prescribe desired
and acceptable behaviours.
All human space is designed to
support and control the desired
behaviours.
 1. DESIGNATION
What is the designated purpose of
this space?
For what purpose was it originally
intended?
How well does the space support its
current use or its intended use?
Is there a conflict?
 2. DEFINITION
How is space defined?
Is it clear who owns it?
Where are its borders?
Are there social or cultural
definitions that affect how space is used?
Are legal or administrative rules
clearly set out and reinforced in policy?
Are there signs?
Is there conflict or confusion between
purpose and definition?
 3. DESIGN
How well does the physical design support the
intended function?
How well does the physical design support the
desired or accepted behaviours?
Does the physical design conflict with or impede
the productive use of the space or
the proper functioning of the intended human
activity?
Is there confusion or conflict in the manner in
which physical design is intended to
control behaviour?
 GUIDE STRATEGIES FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF CPTED

1. allow for clear sight lines,

2. provide adequate lighting,
3. minimise concealed and isolated routes,
4. avoid entrapment,
5. reduce isolation,
6. promote land use mix,
7. use of activity generators,
8. create a sense of ownership through maintenance
and management,
9. provide signs and information and
10. improve overall design of the built environment.
THANK YOU