You are on page 1of 5

REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW SYLLABUS

PART II
Civil Procedure
Prof. Tranquil G.S. Salvador III

IX. Amendment and Supplement (Rule 10)

1. PAGCOR v. Lopez, A.M. RTJ-04-1848, October 25, 2005


2. Asean Pacific v. City of Urdaneta, G.R. No. 162525, September 23, 2008
3. Tiu v. PBCOM, G.R. No. 151932, August 19, 2009
4. Biglang Awa v. Philippine Trust Company, G.R. NO. 158998, March 28, 2008

X. Bill of Particulars (Rule 12)

1. Baritua v. Mercader, G.R. No. 136048, January 23, 2001


2. Reyes v. RTC of Makati, G.R. No. 165744, August 11, 2008
3. Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148154, December 17, 2007
4. Estardante v. People, G.R. Nos. 156851-55, February 18, 2008

XI. Service and Filing (Rule 13)

1. Domingo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 169122, February 2, 2010


2. Romulo v. Peralta, G.R. No. 165665, January 31, 2007
3. Spouses Topacio v. Banco Filipino, G.R. No. 157644, November 17, 2010
4. Atlantic Erectors v. Herbal Cove, G.R. No. 148568, March 20, 2003
5. St. Mary of the Woods School v. Office of the Registry of Deeds of Makati,
G.R.No. 174290, January 20, 2009
6. Vicente v. Avera, G.R. No. 169970, January 20, 2009
7. Aberca et al. v. Ver, et al., G.R. No. 166216, March 14, 2012 ]
8. FEU-NRMF v. FEU-NRMF AFW, G.R. No. 168362, October 16, 2006
9. Republic v. BPI, 2013

XII. Summons (Rule 14)

1. Cada v. Time Saver, G.R. No. 181480, January 30, 2009


2. Pascual v. Pascual, G.R. No. 171916, December 4, 2009
3. Manotoc v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 130974, August 16, 2006
4. Sansio v. Mogol, G.R. No. 177007, July 14, 2009
5. Republic v. Glasgow, G.R. No. 170281, January 18, 2008
6. Palma v. Galvez, G.R.No. 165273, March 10, 2010
7. National Petroleum Gas Incorporated, et al. v. RCBC, G.R. No. 183370, August
17, 2015
8. RCBC v. Hi-Tri Development, June 12, 2012
9. De Pedro v. Romasan Development, G.R. No. 194751, November 26, 2014

XIII. Motions (Rule 15)

1. Republic v. Peralta, G.R. No. 150327, June 18, 2003


2. Preysler v. Manila Southcoast, G.R. No. 171872, June 28, 2010
3. Bacelonia v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 143440, February 11, 143440

XIV. Motion to Dismiss (Rule 16)

1. Heirs of Loreto Maramag v.Maramag, G.R. No. 181132, June 5, 2009


2. UCPB v. Beluso, G.R. No. 159912, August 17, 2007
3. Manila Banking v. University of Baguio, G.R. No. 159189, February 21, 2007
4. Corales v. Republic, 2013
5. National Housing Authority v. Baello, 2013
6. Unicapital v. Consing, 2013
7. Brown Araneta v. Araneta, 2013
8. Aquino v. Quiazon, G.R. No. 211248, March 11, 2015

XV. Dismissals by the Plaintiff (Rule 17)

1. Limaco v. Gakuen, G.R.No. 158245, June 30, 2005


2. Pinga v. Heirs of Santiago, G.R. No. 170354, June 30, 2006

XVI. Pre-Trial (Rule 18)

1. Diaz v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 149749, July 25, 2006


2. Alcaraz v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 152202, G.R. No. 152202, July 28, 2006
3. Macasaet v.Macasaet, G.R. No. 154391, September 30, 2004
4. Chingkoe v. Republic, 2013
5. LBL Industries v. City of Lapu-Lapu, 2013

XVII. Intervention (Rule 19)


1. Looyuko v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 102696, July 12, 2001
2. Salas Jr. v. Agila, September 23, 2013
3. Asian Terminals v. Ricafort, G.R. No. 166901, October 27, 2006
4. Salas Jr. v. Aguila, 2013
5. Smart Communications v. Aldecoa, 2013

XVIII. Subpoena (Rule 21)

1. Collado v. Bravo, A.M.-P-99-1377, April 10, 2011


2. Roco v. Contreras, G.R. No. 158275, June 28, 2005

XIX. Deposition (Rules 23 to 29)

a. Deposition taken in another proceeding


Republic v. Sandiganbayan, Jose Africa, Imelda Marcos, et al. G.R. No.
152375, December 13, 2011

b. Deposition may be taken anytime after institution of any action; Uses of


Deposition
Jonathan Land Oil v. Mangudadatu, G.R. No. 155010, August 16, 2004

c. Deposition not a substitute for actual testimony


Sales v. Sabino, G.R. No. 133154, December 9, 2005
Santmaria and Boza v. Cleary, G.R. 197122, July 26, 2016

d. Period to apply for Deposition


Rosete v. Lim, June 8, 2006, G.R. No. 136051
International v. Ley Construction, G.R. NO. 147143, March 10, 2006

e. Non-resident foreign corporation to testify through deposition


San Luis v. Rojas, G.R. 159127, March 3, 2008
Philippine Computer Solutions v. Jose Hernandez, G.R. NO. 168776, July
17, 2007

f. Application of Rule 23 in criminal cases


Manguerra v. Risos, G.R. No. 152643, August 28, 2008

g. Purpose of taking deposition


Pajarilla v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 163515, October 31, 2008

h. Letters rogatory and commission


Dulay v. Dulay, G.R. No. 158857, November 11, 2005
i. Failure to answer written interrogatories
Jaravata v. Karolus, G.R. No. 154988, June 21, 2007

j. Consequences of failure to answer interrogatories


Zepeda v. China Banking Corporation, G.R. No. 172175, October 9, 2006

k. Request for Admission not answered


Sime Darby v. NLRC, G.R. No. 148021, December 6, 2006

l. Request for Admission instead of Offer to Stipulate


Manzano v. Despalidares, G.R.No. 148786, December 16, 2004

m. Failure to respond to a Request for Admission


Limos v. Spouses Odones, G.R. No.186979, August 11, 2011

n. Documents to be produced should be described with particlularity


Solidbank v. Gateway Electronics, G.R. No. 164805, April 30, 2008

XX. Trial, Trial by Commissioners, Hearings and Consolidation of Cases (Rules 30 to


32)

1. Lourdez de Castro v. Crispino de Castro, G.R. No. 172198, June 16, 2009
2. Zulueta v. Asia Brewery, G.R. No. 138137, March 8, 2001
3. Roque v. Magno, G.R. No. 138701, October 17, 2006
4. Mega Land v. C-E Construction, Inc., G.R. No. 165211, July 31, 2007
5. Neri v. Sandiganbayan, 2013

XXI. Demurrer to Evidence (Rule 33)

1. Radiowealth v. Del Rosario, G.R. No. 138739, July 6, 2000


2. People v. Cachola, G.R. No. 148712, January 21, 2004
3. Nilo Oropesa v. Cirilo Oropesa, April 25, 2012, G.R. No. 184528

XXII.Judgment on the Pleadings and Summary Judgment (Rule 34 and 35)

1. Wood Technology v. Equitable Banking, G.R. 153867, February 17, 2005


2. Bascug v. Aranday, A.M.-RTJ 00-1591, April 11, 2002
3. Eland Phil. V. Garcia, G.R. No. 173289, February 17, 2010
4. Smart Communications v. Aldecoa, 2013
XXIII.Judgment (Rule 36)

1. Consing v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 143584, March 10, 2004


2. Heirs of Valdez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 163208, August 13, 2008
3. Intramuros Tennis v. PTA, G.R. No. 135630, September 26, 2000
4. Polymer Rubber Corporation v. Salamuding, 2013
5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Fortune Tobacco Corporation, 2013
6. Gadrinab v. Salamanca, June 11, 2014

XXIV. Motion for Reconsideration and New Trial (Rule 37)

1. Fernandez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 131094, May 16, 2005


2. Republic v. Peralta, G.R. No. 150327, June 18, 2003
3. People v. Odilao, April 14, 2004, G.R. No. 155451
4. Neypes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141524, September 14, 2005
5. Tan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 130314, September 22, 1998

XXV. Petition for Relief from Judgment (Rule 38)

1. Alaban v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.156021, September 23, 2005


2. Samartino v. Raon, G.R. No. 131482, July 3, 2002
3. Purcon v. MRM Philippines et al., G.R. No. 182718, September 26, 2008

You might also like