You are on page 1of 3

D rug and A lcohol S ervices I nformation S ystem

The DASIS Report


March 2001 May 2, 2003

American Indian/Alaska Native


Treatment Admissions in Rural and
Urban Areas: 2000
A
merican Indians and Alaska Natives
In Brief made up less than 1 percent of the
U.S. population in 2000. During
● For American Indian/Alaska Native that same period, 2.4 percent of all admis-
admissions, alcohol was the lead- sions to publicly funded substance abuse
ing substance of abuse across all treatment facilities involved American
levels of urbanization, ranging from Indians and Alaska Natives.1 Few national
47 percent in large central metro surveys collect information on this rela-
areas to 76 percent in non-metro tively small population. However, the
areas without cities Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) is
● American Indian/Alaska Native large enough to permit analysis of sub-
admissions in large central metro stance abuse among American Indians and
areas were almost three times Alaska Natives.
more likely to report daily use of TEDS is an annual compilation of data
alcohol than similar admissions in on the demographic characteristics and
non-metro areas without cities (55 substance abuse problems of those admit-
vs. 20 percent) ted for substance abuse treatment. The
information comes primarily from facilities
● The average age at first use of the
that receive some public funding. TEDS
primary substance of abuse was records represent admissions rather than
younger for American Indian/ individuals, as a person may be admitted
Alaska Native admissions in non- to treatment more than once.
metro areas without cities (15) than
for those in large central metro American Indian/Alaska Native treat-
areas (17) ment admissions were examined for five
urbanization levels, based on the county

The DASIS Report is published periodically by the Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA). All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA.
Additional copies of this report or other reports from the Office of Applied Studies are available on-line: http://www.DrugAbuseStatistics.samhsa.gov.
Citation of the source is appreciated.
DASIS REPORT: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKA NATIVE TREATMENT ADMISSIONS IN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS: 2000 May 2, 2003

classification scheme developed by


the National Center for Health Table 2. American Indian/Alaska Native Admissions and All TEDS
Statistics2: Admissions, by Urbanization Level*: 2000

Large Central Metro–County American Indian/ All TEDS


in a Metropolitan Statistical Area Alaska Native Admissions Admissions
(MSA) of 1 million or more Urbanization Level Number Percent Number Percent
population that contained all or Large Central Metro 7,990 16.0 447,918 30.9
part of the largest central city of the
MSA Large Fringe Metro 5,245 10.5 283,598 19.5

Large Fringe Metro–County Small Metro 20,260 40.4 464,015 32.0


in a large MSA (1 million or more
Non-Metro with City 9,859 19.7 151,120 10.4
population) that did not contain
any part of the largest central city of Non-Metro without City 6,705 13.4 104,406 7.2
the MSA
Source: 2000 SAMHSA Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS).
Small Metro–County in an
MSA with less than 1 million About 33 percent of American almost three times more likely to
population Indian/Alaska Native admissions report daily use of the primary
were in non-metropolitan areas substance than similar admissions
Non-Metro with City–
compared with 18 percent of all in non-metropolitan areas without
County not in an MSA but with a
TEDS admissions (Table 2). cities (55 vs. 20 percent).
city of 10,000 or more population
Conversely, 67 percent of Ameri-
Non-Metro without City– can Indian/Alaska Native
County not in an MSA and admissions were in metropolitan Age
without a city of 10,000 or more counties compared with 82 percent
Large central metropolitan area
population of all TEDS admissions.
American Indian/Alaska Native
TEDS records indicate where admissions were older at admission
persons entered treatment and not Primary Substance than those in non-metropolitan
their area of residence. As not all areas without cities, but there was
counties have substance abuse of Abuse not a consistent trend across rural/
treatment facilities, people may Regardless of level of urbanization, urban areas (Figure 1). About 17
seek treatment in a county whose alcohol was the leading substance percent of American Indian/Alaska
urbanization level differs from that of abuse, ranging from 47 percent Native admissions in large central
of their county of residence. Table of American Indian/Alaska Native metropolitan areas were 45 or
1 compares the urbanization admissions in large central metro- older, whereas about 12 percent of
distribution of all counties in the politan areas to 76 percent of such their counterparts in non-metro-
United States with that of counties admissions in non-metropolitan politan areas were 45 or older.
with treatment facilities reporting to areas without cities (Table 3). The Conversely, 6 percent of American
TEDS. second most frequently reported Indian/Alaska Native admissions in
substance of abuse in central and large central metropolitan areas
Table 1. County Urbanization fringe large metropolitan areas was were younger than age 18, whereas
in the U.S. and in Counties opiates (23 and 19 percent, respec- 13 percent of those admissions in
with Treatment Facilities tively), while marijuana was second non-metropolitan areas without
Reporting to TEDS: 2000 in the small metropolitan areas (16 cities were younger than 18.
percent), non-metropolitan areas Abuse of drugs started later
United
with cities (19 percent), and non- among American Indian/Alaska
States TEDS
metropolitan areas without cities Native admissions in large central
No. of Counties 3,000 1,479 (14 percent). metropolitan areas (17 years old on
Percent average) than among American
Frequency of use of the primary
Large Central Metro 2% 4% substance of abuse declined in a Indian/Alaska Native admissions in
Large Fringe Metro 8% 11% consistent trend from urban areas non-metropolitan areas without
Small Metro 17% 24% to rural areas. American Indian/ cities (15 years old on average).
Non-Metro with City 15% 22% Alaska Native admissions in large
Non-Metro without City 58% 39% central metropolitan areas were
May 2, 2003 DASIS REPORT: AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKA NATIVE TREATMENT ADMISSIONS IN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS: 2000

Source of Referral Table 3. Primary Substance of Abuse among American Indian/


Alaska Natives, by Urbanization Level: 2000
Among American Indian/Alaska
Native admissions, referrals
through the criminal justice system Alcohol Opiates Marijuana Cocaine Stimulants Other
were most likely in non-metropoli- Urbanization Level Percent
tan areas without cities (54 percent) Large Central Metro 46.6 23.2 11.5 9.6 7.5 1.6
and least likely in large central
Large Fringe Metro 44.5 19.1 16.1 11.9 6.4 2.0
metropolitan areas (32 percent).
Self- or individual referrals among Small Metro 55.5 6.9 16.3 11.9 6.0 3.4
American Indian/Alaska Native
Non-Metro with City 60.7 3.6 18.8 7.4 6.2 3.3
admissions were most likely in
metropolitan areas (average 32 Non-Metro without City 76.2 1.3 14.2 3.2 3.6 1.5
percent) and least likely in non-
metropolitan areas without cities
(20 percent).
Figure 1. American Indian/Alaska Native Age at Admission, by
End Notes
Urbanization Level: 2000
1
This report is limited to facilities receiving State
funds (including Federal Block Grant funds), and
Percent of American Indians/Alaska Natives

Alabama does not collect data on whether


clients are American Indians or Alaska Natives.
40
Data on admissions to treatment facilities funded 35 34
solely by the Federal Indian Health Service or by 29 30
29 30 29 29
tribal authorities do not report to TEDS and 30 27 27
therefore are not included in this report. 25
24
2 25
Eberhardt, M.S., Ingram, D.D., Makuc, D.M., et al. 21
(2001). Urban and Rural Health Chartbook. 19 19
20 17
Health, United States, 2001 (DHHS Publication 14
No. PHS 01-1232-1). Hyattsville, MD: National 15 13 13 13 12
11 11
Center for Health Statistics. 9 9
10 6
5
Table Note
0
* Approximately 9 percent (4,957) of American Large Central Large Fringe Small Metro Non-Metro Non-Metro
Indian/Alaska Native admissions and 9 percent Metro Metro with City without City
(148,646) of all TEDS admissions did not have
an urbanization code. <18 18-24 25-34 35-44 45+

The Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) is an integrated data system maintained by the Office of Applied Studies,
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). One component of DASIS is the Treatment Episode Data Set
(TEDS). TEDS is a compilation of data on the demographic characteristics and substance abuse problems of those admitted for substance
abuse treatment. The information comes primarily from facilities that receive some public funding. Information on treatment admissions is
routinely collected by State administrative systems and then submitted to SAMHSA in a standard format. Approximately 1.6 million records are
included in TEDS each year. TEDS records represent admissions rather than individuals, as a person may be admitted to treatment more
than once.
The DASIS Report is prepared by the Office of Applied Studies, SAMHSA; Synectics for Management Decisions, Inc., Arlington, Virginia;
and RTI, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Information and data for this issue are based on data reported to TEDS through April 1, 2002.
Access the latest TEDS reports at: http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/dasis.htm
Access the latest TEDS public use files at: http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/SAMHDA.htm
Other substance abuse reports are available at: http://www.DrugAbuseStatistics.samhsa.gov

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Office of Applied Studies
www.samhsa.gov

You might also like