Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Fig. 1.2.2 Frame Model in the X and Y direction [mm]
2
1.5 Input of Gravity Load
The input of gravity of load is combination of 1 D + 1 L, where D is dead load and L is life load. It can
be showed by Table 1.5.1
The gravity load is calculated by multiplying the section area of node and distributed of load, where the
section area of node is divided into eight type. The description can be indicated by Figure 1.5.1.
Fig. 1.5.1 The Section Area of Distributed Gravity Load And Seismic Weight of 1st Until 11th Stories
The weight of node of the first level until twelfth level can be seen in the Table 1.5.2 until 1.5.4.
3
Table 1.5.2 The Weight of Node of 1stLevel Until 6th Level Subjected to The Gravity Loads (1D+1L)
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Section Area [m2] 4.32 8.64 9.27 9.45 8.64 17.28 18.54 18.90
Distributed Load
8.55 8.55 8.55 8.55 8.55 8.55 8.55 8.55
[kN/m2]
Concentrated
36.94 73.88 79.27 80.80 73.88 147.76 158.53 161.61
Load [kN]
Table 1.5.3 The Weight of Node of 7th Level Until 11th Level Subjected to The Gravity Loads (1D+1L)
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Section Area [m2] 4.32 8.64 9.27 9.45 8.64 17.28 18.54 18.90
Distributed Load
8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52
[kN/m2]
Concentrated
36.81 73.62 78.99 80.52 73.62 147.23 157.97 161.04
Load [kN]
Table 1.5.4 The Weight of Node of 12thLevel Subjected to The Gravity Loads (1D+1L)
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2
Section Area [m ] 4.32 8.64 9.27 9.45 8.64 17.28 18.54 18.90
Distributed Load
5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65
[kN/m2]
Concentrated
24.39 48.78 52.34 53.36 48.78 97.57 104.68 106.71
Load [kN]
4
Fig. 1.6.2 The Section Area of Distributed of Seismic Weight Base Floor [W0]
The weight of the node for the base floor until twelfth level of seismic weight can be seen in the Table
1.6.2 until 1.6.5
Table 1.6.2 The Weight of Node of Base Floor of Input of Seismic Weight (1D+0.25L)
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6
Section Area
12.96 25.92 27.36 25.92 51.84 54.72
[m2]
Distributed
6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65
Load [kN/m2]
Concentrated
86.184 172.368 181.944 172.368 344.736 363.888
Load [kN]
Table 1.6.3 The Weight of Node of 1st Level Until 6th Level of Input of Seismic Weight (1D+0.25L)
5
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Section Area [m2] 4.32 8.64 9.27 9.45 8.64 17.28 18.54 18.90
Distributed Load
6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65 6.65
[kN/m2]
Concentrated
28.74 57.48 61.67 62.87 57.48 114.97 123.35 125.74
Load [kN]
Table 1.6.4 The Weight of Node of 7th Level Until 11th Level of Input Of Seismic Weight (1D+0.25L)
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2
Section Area [m ] 4.32 8.64 9.27 9.45 8.64 17.28 18.54 18.90
Distributed Load
6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62
[kN/m2]
Concentrated
28.61 57.22 61.39 62.59 57.22 114.44 122.79 125.17
Load [kN]
Table 1.6.5 The Weight of Node of 12st of Input of seismic Weight (1D+0.25L)
Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Section Area [m2] 4.32 8.64 9.27 9.45 8.64 17.28 18.54 18.90
Distributed Load
4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
[kN/m2]
Concentrated
21.06 42.11 45.18 46.06 42.11 84.22 90.36 92.12
Load [kN]
The resume calcualation of distribution of input seismic weight for base isolation building can be seen by Table
Table 1.6.6 Resume Distribution of Input Seismic Weight (1D+0.25L) of Base Isolation Building
Level 1 D [kN] 0.25 L [kN] 1D+0.25L [kN] (1D+0.25L) [kN]
0 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 112025.00
1 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 103211.00
2 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 94397.00
3 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 85583.00
4 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 76769.00
5 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 67955.00
6 7976.00 838.00 8814.00 59141.00
7 7936.00 838.00 8774.00 50327.00
8 7936.00 838.00 8774.00 41553.00
9 7936.00 838.00 8774.00 32779.00
10 7936.00 838.00 8774.00 24005.00
11 7936.00 838.00 8774.00 15231.00
12 6116.00 341.00 6457.00 6457.00
6
1.7 Input Properties of Base Isolation System
The type of base isolation system in this study is high damping rubber bearing system (HDRB)
HT100X6R, where HDRB is a product of Bridgestone company (Japan), The Hysteresis of this product
MAX
illustrated in Figure 1.7.1, where Qd is charcteritic strength, Keq is equivalent stiffness and is
Q MAX
maximum displacement. The value of Qd, Keq and are obtained by equation 1.7.3 until 1.7.5.
Qd
Keq
Kd
A
Keq=Geq (1.7 .4)
H
The shape of base isolation product could be seen by figure 1.7.2, where total height of rubber is 248 mm,
rubber diameter is 1000 mm and total cros section area is 748900 mm.
7
Fig. 1.7.2 Base Isolation Product of Bridgestone company (HDRB) HT100X6R
The mechanical characteristic of base isolation product for the maximum horizontal displacement is
related to the maximum shear strain, the maximum displacement of this product is 669.9 mm with the
maximum of shear strain is 2.7. It can be seen by figure 1.7.3.
[Qy]
Fig. 1.7.3 Shear Strain Base Isolation Product of Bridgestone company (HDRB) HT100X6R
Where {U} is ratio characterictic strength to maximum shear force, {H} is total thickness of rubber,
{ } is shear strain and {A} is cross sectional area.
According to the figure 1.7.1, the hysteresis of base isolation product can be modeled by billinear model,
The values of elastic stiffness {K1}, plastic stiffnes {K2}, yield shear force {Qy} and yield displacement
{dy} are obtained by equation 1.7.6 until 1.7.9.
K 1i
Qy= Qd (1.7 .8)
K 1iK 2i
Qd
dy= dy (1.7 .9)
K 1iK 2i
The relationship between yield shear force and yield displacement of base isolation product illustrated by
Figure 1.7.4
8
Fig. 1.7.4 Relationship Between Yield Shear Force and Yield Displacement
max is assumed to be 2.7, the calculation of numerical parameters Geq, Keq, U, K1, K2 and Qd are as
Geq( max )=0.62 ( 2.8553.878 2.7+ 2.903 2.721.016 2.73 +0.1364 2.7 4 ) =0.495 N /mm2
748900 N kN
Keq( max )=0.495 =1566 =15.66
248 mm cm
kN
K 2( max )=15.66 ( 10.322 ) =10.6167
cm
kN
K 1 ( max )=10 10.6167=106.167
cm
10
Qy( max )= 337.876 kN =375.417 kN
9
337.876
y( max )= =3.533 cm
9 10.6167
Qmax = 1044 [kN]
Based on the result of calculation of properties base isolation, billinear hysteresis of base isolation
K equivalent MAX = 66.96 [cm]
Qy = 375.14[kN]
illustrated by Figure 1.7.2
K1 9
y = 3.533 [cm]
Displacement [cm]
According to the Figure 1.7.2, the properties of base isolation system can be showed by Table 1.7.1.
Table 1.7.1 Input Properties of Base Isolation System ( = 1.0 and = 2.7)
g SM 1
S A ( T M , h0 ) = (1.8 .1)
TM
1
S D ( T M , h 0) =S A ( T M , h0 ) (1.8 .2)
2
10
2
= (1.8 .3)
TM
g SM 1 T M2 T
S D ( T M , h 0) = 2
=g S M 1 M2 (1.8.4 )
TM 4 4
S D ( T M , h0 ) 1
= (1.8 .6)
S D ( T M , heq ) 1
BM
1
S D ( T M , heq )= S D ( T eq , h0 ) (1.8 .7)
M
T eq 1
MAX =g S M 1 2
( 1.8.8)
4 BM
T eq=2
WT
(g K eq )
( 1.8.9)
According to the Indonesian code the estimation maximum of displacement could be written in the Eq.
(1.8.10), where {T} is time period fundamental that is calculated by Eq. (1.8.11).
2
T /T eq
1+
' MAX = MAX
11
2.5
1.5
Factor of BM
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Effective Damping Heq [% ]
The
relationship between
BM and
H eq could be seen by figure 1.8.1
The number of HDRB is the numerical parameter in this study. to finding the number of the optimum of
the HDRB system could be used iteration calculation of equation 1.8.1 until 1.8.11, where the value of the
quantity of HDRB for calculation optimum HDRB is assumed to be 25, 30, 35 and 40 unit. Table 1.8.1
illustrated iteration of calculation of 30 unit isolation system, the other of iteration could be seen in the
appendixs.
12
N
30 30 30 30 30 30
Teq ( MAX ) [sec ]
2.768 3.184 3.163 3.150 3.153 3.153
MAX [cm]
62.628 74.676 75.720 75.554 75.594 75.585
SM 1
2
[cm /sec ]
1411.200 1411.200 1411.200 1411.200 1411.200 1411.200
BM
1.580 1.524 1.493 1.491 1.491 1.491
Fh
0.633 0.656 0.670 0.671 0.671 0.671
' MAX [cm]
52.308 63.639 64.472 64.295 64.337 64.327
0 MAX
2.109 2.566 2.600 2.593 2.594 2.594
The value of final of iteration according to the all iteration (25, 30, 35 and 40 unit base isolation) is
represented by the Table 1.8.2.
Table 1.8.2 The Value of Final of All Iteration (25, 30, 35 and 40 unit base isolation)
Keq Teq ' MAX
Number N Heq MAX
[kN/cm2] [sec] [cm]
1 25 16.29567 3.328268 0.192224 69.07264 2.785187
2 30 15.13417 3.152713 0.197003 64.3273 2.593843
3 35 14.69693 2.961945 0.202924 59.31507 2.391737
4 40 14.73971 2.766622 0.209269 54.38981 2.193138
The Figure 1.8.2 illustrated relationship between number of base isolation and deformation.
Fig. 1.8.2 The Relationship between Number of Base Isolation { N } and Deformation { ' MAX }
The Figure 1.8.3 illustrated relationship between number of base isolation and equivalent time period.
13
fig. 1.8.3 The Relationship between Number of Base Isolation {
N } and Equivalent Time Period { Teq}
The Figure 1.8.4 illustrated relationship between equivalent time period and deformation.
Fig. 1.8.4 The Relationship between Equivalent Time Period { Teq} and A= r 2 Deformation
' MAX
According to the figure 1.8.2 until 1.8.4, the number of base isolation in this study will use 36 unit with
the value of estimation deformation of 36 unit base isolation is 58.315 cm and value of maximum shear
strain
{ MAX } is 2.35.
14
1600.00
1400.00
1200.00
1000.00(SMS Condition)
Padang Spectrum El Centro NS El Centro EW
SA [cm/sec2] 800.00
600.00
400.00
0.00
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
The time series response acceleration of simulated earthquake ground motion of El Centro EW indicated
by Figure 1.9.2.
15
Fig. 1.9.2 Time Series Response Acceleration of Simulated Ground Motion Elcentro-EW
The time series response acceleration of simulated earthquake ground motion of El Centro NS indicated
by Figure 1.9.3.
Fig. 1.9.3 Time Series Response Acceleration of Simulated Ground Motion Elcentro-NS
The time series response acceleration of simulated earthquake ground motion of Kobe NS indicated by
Figure 1.9.4
Fig. 1.9.4 Time Series Response Acceleration of Simulated Ground Motion Kobe-NS
The time series response acceleration of simulated earthquake ground motion of Kobe EW indicated by
Figure 1.9.5
Fig. 1.9.5 Time Series Response Acceleration of Simulated Ground Motion Kobe-EW
According to the Figure 1.9.2 until 1.9.5, the maximum value of acceleration for padang city of simulated
earthquake ground motion El Centro EW, El Centro NS, Kobe EW, Kobe NS can be seen by Table 1.9.1
Table 1.9.1 The Value of Maximum Acceleration of Simulated Earthquake Ground Motion
16
Acceleration
No. Type of Ground Motion
[cm/sec2]
1. El Centro EW 553.44
2. El Centro NS 545.73
3. Kobe EW 729.86
4. Kobe NS 665.06
2 h1 1 222 h1 2 12 2h 2 h2 2
a0 = 2 2
,a 1= 1 12 (1 .10 .2)
2 1 1 22
h1, 1 , h2 2
The values of and of ordinary building are represented by Table 1.10.1 and the
values of
h1, 1 , h2 and 2 of base isolation building are also represented by Table 1.10.2.
Ta
bl No. Notation Value e
1
h1 2 [%]
2
h2 2 [%]
3
1 4.017 [rad/sec]
4
2 11.111 [rad/sec]
17
The value of damping factor take 2 % for ordinary building because the type of structure is steel structure
that has damping value equal 2 %.
2
h2 2 [%]
3
1 1.99 [rad/sec]
4
2 7.36 [rad/sec]
value of damping take 2 % for base isolation building because the dynamic calculation of structure use
billinear hysteresis therefore equivalent damping of base isolation is not necessary to consider.
The acceleration response spectrum for 2% and 5% damping of El Centro Ew, El Centro NS, Kobe EW
and Kobe NS can be seen by Figure 1.10.1 until 1.10.4.
3000.00
2000.00
SA [cm/sec2] 1000.00
El Centro-EW [h=2%] El Centro-EW [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
18
3000.00
2000.00
SA [cm/sec2] 1000.00
El Centro-NS [h=2%] El Centro-NS [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
19
Fig. 1.10.4 Spectrum of Acceleration of Kobe EW with 2%, 5% Damping
Illustrated in Figure 1.10.1 until 1.10.4 the spectrum acceleration of structure with 2% damping is bigger
than 5% damping.
The velocity of response spectrum for 2% and 5% damping of El Centro-Ew, El Centro-NS, Kobe EW
and Kobe NS can be seen by Figure 1.10.5 until 1.10.8.
600.00
400.00
SV [cm/sec] 200.00
El Centro-EW [h=2%] El Centro-EW [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
20
400.00
SV [cm/sec] 200.00
Kobe-NS [h=2%] Kobe-NS [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
SV [cm/sec] 200.00
Kobe-EW [h=2%] Kobe-EW [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
Illustrated in Figure 1.10.5 until 1.10.8 the spectrum velocity of structure with 2% damping is bigger than
5% damping.
The displacement response spectrum respsonse spectrum for 2% and 5% damping of El Centro Ew, El
Centro NS, Kobe EW and Kobe NS can be seen by Figure 1.10.9 until 1.10.12.
21
300.00
200.00
SD [cm] 100.00
El Centro-EW [h=2%] El Centro-EW [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
SD [cm] 100.00
El Centro-NS [h=2%] El Centro-NS [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
22
Fig. 1.10.11 Spectrum of Displacement of Kobe NS with 2%, 5% Damping
300.00
200.00
SD [cm] 100.00
Kobe-EW [h=2%] Kobe-EW [h=5%]
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
Time Period [sec]
Illustrated in Figure 1.10.9 until 1.10.12 the spectrum displacement of structure with 2% damping is
bigger than 5% damping.
23
9.00 5.23 0.19 0.05 0.00 0.00 -7.78 0.00 0.00 0.58
10.00 5.62 0.18 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.95 0.95 0.58
The summation of equivalent mass ratio in the X direction of Table 1.11.1 eigen analysis is 0.95 and the
summation of equivalent mass ratio in the X direction of Table 1.11.2 eigen analysis is 1.00 according to
Indonesian code SNI 1726-2014 clause 7.9.1 the minimum summation equivalent mass ratio is 0.90, its
mean the result calculation of dynamic eigen value analysis is ok. Based on the participation factor in the
x direction of Table 1.10.1 and 1.10.2, the main of mode shape of ordinary building are mode number [1],
[3], [5] and [7] and mode shape of base isolation building are mode number [1] and [3].
24
Fig. 1.12.1 Modal Displacement of Ordinary Building
10.00
8.00
6.00
MODE 1ST MODE 3rd
4.00
2.00
0.00
-1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50
Illustrated on Figure 1.12.1 and 1.12.2 the dominant modal displacement is the 1st mode shape, it show
displacement building when subjected to the seismic load
1.13. Distribution of The Maximum Response Displacement of Ordinary and Base Isolation
Building
25
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
Story 5
NON4 LINEAR ORDINARY BUILDING BASE ISOLATOR BUIILDING
3
2
1
0
10.00 30.00 50.00 70.00 90.00 110.00
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Max. Displacement [cm]
Figure 1.13.1
represent distribution of the maximum response displacement of ordinary and base isolation building of
El Centro EW ground motion in the X direction
Figure 1.13.2 represent distribution of the maximum response displacement of ordinary and base isolation
building of El Centro NS ground motion in the X direction
26
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
Story
5
NON LINEAR ORDINARY BUILDING BASE ISOLATOR BUIILDING
4
3
2
1
0
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00
Max. Displacement [cm]
Figure 1.13.3 represent distribution of the maximum response displacement of ordinary and base isolation
building of Kobe EW ground motion in the X direction
27
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
Story
5
NON LINEAR ORDINARY BUILDING BASE ISOLATOR BUIILDING
4
3
2
1
0
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00
Max. Displacement [cm]
Figure 1.13.4 represent distribution of the maximum response displacement of ordinary and base isolation
building of Kobe NS ground motion in the X direction
28
Fig. 1.13.4 Distribution Maximum Response Displacement Of Ordinary Building
And Base Isolation Building Of Kobe NS
Illustrated on Figure 1.13.1 until 1.13.4 the biggest of displacement at the top floor is base isolation
building, The displacement of all figure base isolation system for each floor is bigger than ordinary
building.
The value maximum response displacement of ordinary building and base isolation building of all Figure
1.13.1 until 1.13.4 showed by Table 1.13.1.
Table 1.13.1 Maximum Response Displacement Nonlinear Ordinary And Base Isolation Building
El Centro NS [cm] El Centro EW [cm] Kobe NS [cm] Kobe EW [cm]
Level Ordinar Base Ordinar Base Base Base
Ordinary Ordinary
y Isolation y Isolation Isolation Isolation
0 - 51.20 - 64.96 - 63.47 - 38.09
1 3.32 52.95 3.48 67.24 3.79 65.84 3.24 39.58
2 9.97 56.01 11.41 71.30 12.05 70.14 10.00 42.13
3 17.83 59.21 22.44 75.62 22.78 74.61 17.99 44.92
4 25.70 62.27 35.32 79.90 34.97 78.64 26.13 48.03
5 31.75 64.64 47.07 83.44 46.80 81.63 32.89 50.87
6 36.12 66.50 56.06 86.48 56.45 84.08 38.02 53.45
7 39.71 68.18 63.00 89.51 63.96 86.25 42.31 56.10
8 43.00 69.70 68.75 92.56 69.68 88.17 46.17 58.75
9 45.88 70.93 73.37 95.27 73.64 89.77 49.27 60.99
10 48.75 72.10 77.29 97.97 76.69 91.21 51.68 63.14
11 51.47 73.13 80.21 100.20 78.97 92.31 53.30 64.92
12 53.39 73.87 81.84 101.70 80.31 93.05 54.24 66.12
According to the Table 1.13.1 the value of response displacement at the top floor of nonlinear ordinary
building is smaller than response displacement of isolation building. The biggest of displacement of
ordinary building is El Centro EW and The biggest of displacement of base isolation building is El Centro
EW.
The deflection of base isolation system according to the figure 1.13.1 until 1.13.4 showed by Table 1.12.2
29
Shear Strain { } 2.065 2.619 2.559 1.536
According to the Table 1.13.2, the biggest of maximum response deformation of base isolation system is
2.619. It mean the value of response deformation of base isolation system is smaller than upper limit
shear strain { Max }.
1.13. Maximum Response Acceleration of Ordinary Building and Base Isolation Building
Figure 1.13.1 until 1.13.4 represent maximum response acceleration of nonlinear ordinary and base
isolation building of El Centro EW, El Centro NS, Kobe EW and Kobe NS ground motion in the X
direction
12
9
Story
3
30
And Base Isolation Building Of El Centro EW
12
9
Story
6
31
Fig. 1.13.3 Distribution Maximum Response Acceleration of Ordinary Building
And Base Isolation Building of Kobe EW
Illustrated on Figure 1.13.1 until 1.13.4 the biggest of acceleration occur in the top floor building, the
acceleration of base isolation each story is smaller than acceleration of ordinary building.
The value maximum response acceleration of nonlinear ordinary building and base isolation building of
all Figure 1.13.1 until 1.13.4 showed by Table 1.13.1.
Table 1.13.1 Maximum Response Acceleration Nonlinear Ordinary And Base Isolation Building
El Centro NS El Centro EW Kobe NS Kobe EW
[cm/sec2] [cm/sec2] [cm/sec2] [cm/sec2]
Level
Base Base Base Base
Ordinary Ordinary Ordinary Ordinary
Isolation Isolation Isolation Isolation
0 - 512 - 603 - 580 - 553
1 532 517 635 577 596 576 692 518
2 634 555 719 510 600 540 647 449
3 664 572 745 478 676 456 689 438
4 648 537 721 445 753 474 729 436
5 611 532 691 487 822 500 802 424
6 688 480 851 515 831 513 882 441
7 610 518 820 454 791 494 902 482
8 602 504 717 477 699 499 858 515
32
9 716 434 704 547 677 518 761 492
10 766 475 820 611 827 467 752 475
11 839 652 918 721 955 647 1004 631
12 1367 892 1439 994 1374 961 1575 806
According to the Table 1.13.1, the acceleration of base isolation each story is smaller than acceleration
ordinary building, The maximum response of acceleration in the top floor of ordinary building is Kobe
EW and the maximum response acceleration of base isolation building is Elcentro EW.
1.14 Maximum Response Story Drift of Ordinary Building and Base Isolation Building
The Figure 1.14.1 until 1.14.5 represent response story drift of ordinary building and base isolation
building of El Centro EW, El Centro NS, Kobe EW and Kobe NS ground motion in the X direction.
12
33
12
NON LINEAR ORDINARY BUILDING
9
6
Story BASE ISOLATOR BUILDING
3
34
Fig. 1.14.3 Distribution Maximum Response Story Drift of Ordinary Building
and Base Isolation Building of Kobe EW
Illustrated in Figure 1.14.1 until 1.14.4 the maximum story drift of ordinary building occur in the 4th
story and all Figure maximum story drift of ordinary building is bigger than the upper limit of story drift
ordinary building. The story drift of base isolation building is smaller than the ordinary building. The
values of story drift nonlinear ordinary building and base isolation building of all Figure 1.14.1 until
1.14.4 showed by Table 1.14.1
Table 1.14.1 The Value Of Story Drift Non Linear Ordinary Building And Base Isolation Building
UPPER LIMIT
El Centro NS El Centro EW Kobe NS Kobe EW
STORY DRIFT
Leve
l Base Base Base Base
Ordinar Ordinar Ordinar Ordinar Base
Isolatio Isolatio Isolatio Isolatio Ordinary
y y y y Isolation
n n n n
1 2.77 1.79 3.31 1.83 3.29 2.24 2.78 1.42 8.08 8.40
2 6.25 3.10 7.96 3.96 7.80 4.19 5.92 2.37 8.08 8.40
3 7.91 3.31 11.09 4.96 10.82 4.48 7.59 2.54 8.08 8.40
4 8.30 3.43 12.93 5.39 12.78 4.18 8.41 2.94 8.08 8.40
5 6.49 2.80 11.74 4.48 12.07 3.20 7.29 2.85 8.08 8.40
6 4.34 2.24 8.97 3.56 9.69 2.63 5.52 2.79 8.08 8.40
7 3.43 1.97 6.94 3.38 7.51 2.34 4.48 3.06 8.08 8.40
35
8 3.33 1.68 5.74 3.28 5.71 2.07 3.96 3.20 8.08 8.40
9 2.96 1.19 4.59 2.76 3.94 1.68 3.15 2.83 8.08 8.40
10 2.56 0.87 3.78 2.60 2.98 1.48 2.33 2.80 8.08 8.40
11 1.76 0.54 2.63 2.08 2.10 1.11 1.35 2.31 8.08 8.40
12 1.05 0.29 1.44 1.37 1.20 0.74 0.62 1.52 8.08 8.40
According to the Table 1.14.1, The biggest story drift occurs in the 4th story and the biggest story drift of
nonlinear ordinary building is El Centro EW with the value of story drift equal 12.93 cm and the biggest
story drift of base isolation building is El Centro EW with the value of story drift equal 5.39 cm. It can be
concluded the story drift of ordinary building not ok because the story drift is bigger than the upper limit
of story drift, the story drift of base isolation building is ok because the upper limit of story drift is smaller
than the upper limit of story drift.
1.15 Relationship Story Drift Angle of Ordinary Building and Base Isolation Building
The relationship between drift angle and story of ordinary building and base isolation building of El
Centro EW, El Centro NS, Kobe EW and Kobe NS ground motion illustrated by Figure 1.15.1 until 1.15.4
12
9
Story
6
36
12
9
Story
6
Story
6
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
Drift Angle
37
Fig. 1.15.3 Relationship Story Drift Angle of Ordinary Building
and Base Isolation Building Kobe EW
1.16 Maximum Layer Shear Force Each Story of Ordinary Building and Base Isolation Building
The maximum layer shear force each story of ordinary building and base isolation building of El Centro
EW, El Centro NS, Kobe EW and Kobe NS ground motion illustrated by Figure 1.16.1 until 1.16.4.
12
9
Story
6
38
Fig. 1.16.1 Maximum Layer Shear Force Each Story of Ordinary Building
and Base Isolation Building El Centro EW
12
9
Story
6
Fig. 1.16.2 Maximum Layer Shear Force Each Level of Ordinary Building
and Base Isolation Building El Centro NS
12
9
Story
6
39
Fig. 1.16.3 Maximum Layer Shear Force Each Level of Ordinary Building
and Base Isolation Building Kobe EW
Fig. 1.16.4 Maximum Layer Shear Force Each Level of Ordinary Building
and Base Isolation Building Kobe NS
According to the figure 1.16.1 until 1.16.4 the value of the maximum layer shear force for each stories
showed on the table 1.16.1.
Table 1.16.1 Distribution Maximum Layer Shear Force of Ordinary And Base Isolation Building
El Centro NS El Centro EW Kobe NS Kobe EW
Level Base Base Base Base
Ordinary Ordinary Ordinary Ordinary
Isolation Isolation Isolation Isolation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Illustrated in Figure 1.16.1 the maximum layer shear force of 1st story of the ordinary building is 36910
kN and the value of maximum layer shear force at the 1st story of base isolation building is 34330
40
kN.Illustrated in Figure 1.16.2 the value of the maximum layer shear force of 1st story of the ordinary
building is 37710 kN and the value of maximum layer shear force at the 1st story of base isolation
building is 30850 kN.
1.17 Distribution of Story Shear Coeffcient of Ordinary Building and Base Isolation Building
The distribution of story shear coeffcient of ordinary building and base isolation building illustrated by
Figure 1.17.1 until 1.17.4.
The Figure 1.17.1 represent distribution of story shear coeffcient of ordinary building and base isolation
building of El Centro EW ground motion in the X direction.
12
9
Story
6
The Figure 1.17.2 represent distribution of story shear coeffcient of ordinary building and base isolation
building of El Centro NS ground motion in the X direction.
41
12
9
Story
6
ISOLATOR BUILDING ORDINARY BUILDING
3
0
Story
6
42
Fig. 1.17.3 Distribution Story Shear Coeffcient of Ordinary Building and
Base Isolation Building Kobe EW
According to the figure 1.17.1 until 1.17.4 the value of the maximum layer shear force for each stories
showed on the table 1.17.1.
Table 1.17.1 Distribution Maximum Layer Shear Force of Ordinary And Base Isolation Building
El Centro NS El Centro EW Kobe NS Kobe EW
Level Base Base Base Base
Ordinary Ordinary Ordinary Ordinary
Isolation Isolation Isolation Isolation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Illustrated in Figure 1.16.1 the maximum layer shear force of 1st story of the ordinary building is 36910
kN and the value of maximum layer shear force at the 1st story of base isolation building is 34330 kN. kN
and the value of maximum layer shear force at the 1st story of base isolation building is 34330 kN. kN
and the value of maximum layer shear force at the 1st story of base isolation building is 34330 kN. kN
and the value of maximum layer shear force at the 1st story of base isolation building is 34330 kN.
1.18 Relationship Max. Story Drift and Story Shear Force of Base Isolation Building (Base Floor)
43
The Figure 1.18.1 until 1.18.4 represent maximum response story drift of Base Isolation Building El
Centro-EW, El Centro NS, Kobe EW and Kobe NS ground motion at the base floor in the X direction.
50000.00
Max capacity of base
40000.00isolation is 37602.792 kN
30000.00
20000.00
0.00
-60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00
-70.00 -50.00 -30.00-10000.00
-10.00 10.00 30.00 50.00 70.00
-20000.00
Upper
Limit
-30000.00 Base Isolation is 66.7 [cm]
Drift [cm]
Fig. 1.18.1 Relationship Max. Story Drift and Story Shear Force of Base Isolation Building
(Base Floor) Elcentro-EW
Illustrated in Figure 1.18.1 the maximum story drift of base floor is 64.96 cm and the maximum of the
shear force is 36990 kN. The maximum capacity of base isolation is 37602.792 kN and the maximum
drift of upper limit base isolation is 66.7 cm.
44
30000.00
Upper
Limit 20000.00
Base Isolation is 66.7 [cm]
10000.00
0.00
Shear Force [kN] -60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00
-70.00 -50.00 -30.00-10000.00
-10.00 10.00 30.00 50.00 70.00
-20000.00
-30000.00
-40000.00
Drift [cm]
Fig. 1.18.2 Relationship Max. Story Drift and Story Shear Force of Base Isolation Building
(Base Floor) El Centro NS
Illustrated in Figure 1.18.2 the maximum story drift of base floor is 51.20 cm and the maximum of the
shear force is 31730 kN. The maximum capacity of base isolation is 37602.792 kN and the maximum
displacement of upper limit base isolation is 66.7 cm.
45
40000.00
Upper
30000.00 Limit
Base Isolation is 66.7 [cm]
20000.00
10000.00
-20000.00
-30000.00
-40000.00
Drift [cm]
Fig. 1.18.3 Relationship Max. Story Drift and Story Shear Force of Base Isolation Building
(Base Floor) Kobe EW
Illustrated in Figure 1.18.3 the maximum story drift of base floor is 38.09 cm and the maximum of the
shear force is 26720 kN. The maximum capacity of base isolation is 37602.792 kN and the maximum
displacement of upper limit base isolation is 66.7 cm.
46
40000.00
30000.00
20000.00
10000.00
Shear Force [kN]
0.00
-60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00
-70.00 -50.00 -30.00-10000.00
-10.00 10.00 30.00 50.00 70.00
-20000.00
-30000.00
Drift [cm]
Upper
Limit
Base Isolation is 66.7 [cm]
Fig. 1.18.4 Relationship Max. Story Drift and Story Shear Force of Base Isolation Building
(Base Floor) Kobe NS
Illustrated in Figure 1.18.4 the maximum story drift of base floor is 63.47 cm and the maximum of the
shear force is 36420 kN. The maximum capacity of base isolation is 37602.792 kN and the maximum
displacement of upper limit base isolation is 66.7 cm.
According to the Figure 1.18.1 until 1.18.4 all of the maximum of story drift of base isolation smaller
than upper limit drift of base isolation and the capacity of base isolation bigger than shear force of base
isolation.
Conclusion
The use of base isolation system on the building with the category of high seismic intensity area is
very effective to reduce the danger of earthquake risk. It can be proved by the analysis that has
been performed on the seismic performance analysis of the base isolation system building and
ordinary building. The result shows that the building using base isolation system can extend the
time period of the building which has an effect on reducing the acceleration values in the buildings
and also reducing the shear force of the earthquake.
47
The use of base isolations in the buildings can minimize displacement large and story drift of the
structure. It can be seen from the studies that have been done by a very noticeable difference from
the value of story drift in the building base isolation system and ordinary building where the value
of the maximum story drift of the building with base isolation system is 5.39 cm and the value of the
maximum story drift of ordinary building is 12.93 cm. According to Indonesia code, the upper limit
of the story drift in this study for ordinary buildings is 8.08 cm and the upper limit of the story drift
base isolation building is 8,40 cm. It can be concluded that the story drift of ordinary building is
bigger than the upper limit story drift of ordinary building and the story drift of base isolation
building is smaller than the upper limit of the story drift of base isolation system.
48