Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Meteorites
Underlying every topic in planetary science are two basic properties of the solar system
that are determined from the analysis of meteorites. First, meteorites give us our best
estimate of the age of the solar system. The time at which the solar system formed
provides a time frame for judging the significance of many of the physical processes that
affect the planets. Second, meteorites give us our best estimate of the initial composition of
the solar system. Incredibly, the elemental abundances found in the oldest meteorites, the
chondrites, match point for point with the elemental abundances found spectroscopically in
the Suns photosphere. The study of meteorites, which is quite interdisciplinary, is central
to the study of planetary science as a whole.
21
2.1.1 The Allende Fall
An extremely important fall occurred in Chihuahua, Mexico, in 1969, when a large
meteor was observed to come into the atmosphere in several pieces. The first piece was
found near a house in the small village of Pueblito de Allende. Following standard practice,
all of the meteorite fragments that were recovered from that fall are collectively named
Allende. The Allende fall occurred just as the Apollo program was swinging into full gear,
and it gave scientists who were preparing for the arrival of moon rocks an opportunity to
practice on an extraterrestrial sample. Because it is such an old meteorite, and because
there is plenty of it to go around, analysis of the Allende meteorite has taught us much
about the early solar system.
Allende is a member of an important class of stony meteorites called chondrites.
They are so named because they contain chondrules (from the Greek word condros,
meaning grain), which are primitive, spherical objects that condensed out of the proto-
planetary nebula before being incorporated into the larger rock. Chondrules are puzzling
features because their existence implies significant heating event in the early solar nebula
( 0 to 10 Ma). The glassy texture of these igneous features implies heating to tempera-
tures in excess of 1500 C to 1900 C, followed by rapid cooling, on a time scale of on the
order of an hour. The mm-size of the chondrules indicates that they were distributed in the
solar nebula, but the rate of cooling required to explain them rules out formation very close
to the sun, where the solar nebula would have been much too warm. Many mechanisms for
this flash heating event have been discussed, often relating the thermal or electromagnetic
emissions from the variable, nascent sun. In the fall of 1999 scientists from the University
of Dublin proposed that chondrules were produced by a gamma ray burst. Gamma ray
bursts are rare and extremely poorly understood phenomena that may be related to ex-
plosive end of life of supermassive stars. Another idea is that shock waves related to the
formation of Jupiter provided the impetus for chondrule formation. It remains to be seen
whether chondrule formation was a consequence of one of these low probability events.
22
Maud Land. Meteorites are dark and easy to spot on ice. It turned out that these nine
specimens were members of four different classes of meteorites. Since that time, thousands
of meteorites have been recovered from Antarctica. The meteorites collect naturally at
locations where the ice sheets, which flow several meters per year under their own weight,
stagnate when they encounter mountain ranges. Wind erosion then ablates the top layers
of the ice and, over time, a concentration of meteorites works its way to the top. Such ice
is bluish in color and is easy to spot from the air, which allows scientists to plan ahead for
the best places to look. A robot designed by Japanese scientists to search autonomously
for meteorites made its first find in January, 2000.
23
and cannot jump the potential well but Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle tells us that a
particle can sometimes exist outside the threshold due to uncertainty in position.
- Beta decay - escape of an electron or positron by:
(1) Electron emission ( ): for nuclides over-rich in neutrons
(n p + e + )
(2) Positron emission ( + ): for nuclides depleted in neutrons (p n + e+ + )
(3) Electron capture (ec): an S electron in K shell on an atom has finite probability
of being inside nucleus.
- Gamma decay - emission of gamma radiation that occurs when nuclei are in excited
energy states. Newly-produced nuclei are not in the ground state and produce -rays.
Nuclear binding energies are very large and nuclei are so small (order 1 angstrom =
8
10 cm) that radioactive decay rates are not significantly affected by physical conditions
on Earth such as pressure and temperature. However, half-lives can be changed slightly by
changes in bonding energy. For example, solar wind studies have shown that radioactive
beryllium decays at slightly different rates on the sun and Earth.
Radioactive decay is governed by the Poisson probability distribution. Other
Poisson processes include the number of impact craters that form on a planets surface
over a given time interval, the waiting time for a subway train, the number of typos made
by an experienced typist, or any other process that involves random events that occur
infrequently.
It is useful to review the derivation of the Poisson probability distribution because it
shows where the concept of a half-life in radioactive decay originates. Also, we will be
using the same method for calculating expected values from random processes introduced
here when we study blackbody radiation in Chapter 4.
We start first with the binomial probability distribution. Consider n independent
tries of an experiment whose outcome is either yes or no, but not maybe. If the
probability of yes is p, and the probability of no is 1 p, then the probability Pn (j)
of getting yes j times out of n tries is given by the binomial probability distribution:
n j
Pn (j) = p (1 p)nj , (2.1)
j
n
where j is pronounced n choose j, and is defined to be:
n n!
. (2.2)
j j!(n j)!
For example, the probability that exactly 2 students in a class of 20 were born on August
8 is: 2 18
20! 1 364
P20 (2) = = 0.0014 . (2.3)
2!18! 365 365
The binomial distribution is the discrete analog of the bell-shaped normal distribution
found in experiments with continuous sampling. Notice that (2.1) gives the j-th term of
the binomial expansion of [p + (1 p)]n , which is the source of the distributions name.
24
Since p + (1 p) = 1, summing over all cases yields unity as required for a probability
distribution.
Now consider a group of N radioactive particles. We would like to know the expected
number of particles that will decay in a particular time interval, say in 1 second. This is a
quantum mechanical process, and is therefore random. The probability of decay is small for
a given particle, and so we can always divide up any 1-second time interval into enough n
smaller subintervals such that at most only one particle will decay during each subinterval.
This is where the events that occur infrequently in time or space requirement is used.
The total number of decays per second, j, will then have a binomial distribution. We dont
know p, but we do know that p will decrease as we make the subintervals shorter, and that
p will increase as N increases. After enough subdivisions have been made such that each
bin contains either 0 or 1 event, further doubling of the number of subdivisions will only
reduce by half the probability that one subdivision contains an event. This means that we
can write:
N
p= , (2.4)
n
where is a constant with units of inverse time. Using (2.4) in place of p in (2.1) and
taking the limit n yields the Poisson probability distribution P (j):
j nj
n(n 1) (n j + 1) N N
P (j) = lim Pn (j) = lim 1 ,
n n j! n n
(N )j n n 1
nj+1
N
j
N
n
= lim 1 1 ,
j! n n n n n n
n
(N )j N (N )j N
= lim 1 = e . (2.5)
j! n n j!
Since (2.5) gives eN times the j-th term of the Taylor expansion of eN , the sum of all
the terms adds up to unity, as required.
The physical significance of N is found by calculating the average, or expected, value
of j, which we denote by j:
X X
j (N )j N
j P (j) = j e
j=0 j=1
j!
X
N (N )j1
= N e = N . (2.7)
j1=0
(j 1)!
25
Thus N is just the average number of particles that decay per second, and is based on the
probability of a particular decay mechanism operating in an atom of a given element. The
change in the total number N of radioactive particles over the time interval dt is therefore:
dN
= N . (2.8)
dt
Rewriting, we write
dN
= dt
N
Integrating both sides we find
lnN = t + c
where the constant c is found in the limit where t 0 to be lnNo . Taking the exponential
of both sides we may write
N (t) = No et , (2.9)
where No is the initial number of radioactive particles. Equation (2.9) is the rate law of
radioactive decay. The half-life, T1/2 , which represents the time it takes for half of the
number of particles to decay, is found by setting N/No = 1/2 such that
N 1 ln 2 0.69315
= = eT1/2 T1/2 = = . (2.10)
No 2
Note that the half-life represents an alternative way of expressing the decay constant .
In principle, the experimentally-demonstrated accuracy of the simple expression (2.10)
allows for the determination of the absolute ages of billion-year-old rocks. However, in
practice the initial concentration of the radioactive parent element No is very often not
known. We can more easily measure the concentration of the daughter product (D ),
which is simply
D = No N . (2.11)
We may substitute (2.9) for N to find
D = No No et = No 1 et . (2.12)
26
the it is necessary to make an allowance for the non-radiogenic initial daughter product
Do by writing
D = Do + N (et 1). (2.13)
Only a fraction of the rubidium present in the solar nebula has so far decayed. If t is the
time since some melting event reset the isotope ratios to their high-temperature values,
then by (2.9), the current amount of 87 Rb is reduced from its initial amount 87 Rb0 by:
87
Rb = 87 Rb0 e87 t .
The current amount of strontium, 87 Sr, is therefore increased from its initial amount, 87 Sr0 ,
by:
87
Sr = 87 Sr0 + 87 Rb0 87 Rb
= 87 Sr0 + 87 Rb(e87 t 1) . (2.14)
To proceed with the dating, one uses a mass spectrometer to measure the amounts
of Sr and 87 Rb present in each sample. Since different parts of a rock will contain
87
different concentrations of the unknown quantity 87 Sr0 , we must normalize against another
stable isotope with similar chemistry that occurs in proportional concentrations, like 86 Sr.
Dividing (2.14) by 86 Sr yields:
87
87 87
Sr Sr Rb 87 t
86 Sr
= 86 Sr
+ 86 Sr
(e 1) . (2.15)
0
The presence of initial daughter abundances also requires more than one measurement of
the parent/daughter ratio to obtain an age. Samples that have different 87 Rb/86 Sr ratios
can be plotted versus 87 Sr/86 Sr using (2.15). The 87 Rb/86 Sr ratio varies naturally from
one mineral to another. For example it is typically higher in plagioclase than in pyroxene,
so a spread in the samples is obtained by mineral separation. When plotted, the two ratios
fall on a straight line called an isochron (meaning
87 86equal
time), which by (2.15) has a
slope of (e 1) t and a y-intercept of
t
Sr/ Sr 0 . If the the decay constant of
the radioactive parent is known, the isochron yields the age, t, of the rock.
The most useful decay systems for radiometric dating are Rubidium-Strontium (Rb-
Sr), Samarium-Neodymium (Sm-Nd), Potassium-Argon (K-Ar), Thorium-Lead (Th-Pb),
27
and the two Uranium-Lead (U-Pb) systems. In order for a parent-daughter system to be
useful, a non-radiogenic reference isotope of the daughter must be present for comparison.
In addition, the decay constant of the parent must be accurately known. The accuracy
of radiometric dating also depends on to what extent the rock under study has been a
chemically closed system with respect to the parent and daughter elements. If it has not
been a closed system then the daughter/parent ratio will not be solely due to radioactive
decay, and the time information will be corrupted.
The U-Pb system is especially useful because only measurements of Pb are required,
and Pb tends to be reliable because it is not too mobile in rock. Also, because of decades
of nuclear research the decay constants for uranium are very accurately known. Zircon
crystals are resistant to uranium diffusion and are commonly used for this dating scheme.
There are four isotopes of Pb: 204 Pb, 206 Pb, 207 Pb, 208 Pb. Only 204 Pb does not have a
radioactive progenitor, and the decay schemes for the other three isotopes are:
238
U 206 Pb , 238 = 1.55 1010 yr1 , T1/2 = 4.5 By
235
U 207 Pb , 235 = 9.85 1010 yr1 , T1/2 = 0.7 By
232
Th 208 Pb , 232 = 4.95 1011 yr1 , T1/2 = 14 By .
204
Using (2.13) and referencing to Pb:
206
206
Pb Pb 238
U 238 t
204 Pb
= 204 Pb
+ 204 Pb
e 1 ,
0
207
207
Pb Pb 235
U 235 t
204 Pb
= 204 Pb
+ 204 Pb
e 1 .
0
207 204 206
Now take the ratio of Pb/ Pb to Pb/204 Pb:
207
207
Pb Pb
204 Pb 204 Pb 235
U e235 t 1
206
206
0 = 238 U e238 t 1
,
Pb Pb
204 Pb
204
Pb 0
The age information is contained in the slope, M , using only isotopes of Pb. The value
of 235 U/238 U is 1/137.88, and this ratio is very nearly constant in all natural materials.
28
To determine the initial lead ratios the standard practice is to look to meteorites. Iron
meteorites have virtually no uranium. The least radiogenic lead found anywhere is in the
Canyon Diablo meteorite. This is defined as primordial lead, the best estimate of the
initial lead ratio in the solar nebula.
29
billion years before they were pulverized. Lunar rocks are indeed older than terrestrial
rocks, but they are still not the oldest rocks in the solar system.
2.4 Chondrites
210
from Earth, the Moon and Mars plot along straight lines with the same slope (=-1/2).
This is expected, and reflects one and two extra neutrons, respectively for 17 O and 18 O
compared to 16 O. The straight lines reflect the partitioning of oxygen isotopes into silicate
rocks during melting and crystallization. Terrestrial and lunar rocks plot along the same
straight line indicating that they formed in the same part of the solar system. The Martian
meteorites form a line that parallels the Earth-Moon line. Achondrites also form a line that
parallels the Earth-Moon line, consistent with their supposed history of igneous processes.
The carbonaceous chondrites form a pseudo-line, but it does not have the same slope as
for the igneous planetary and asteroidal bodies. The slope is steeper, which suggests that
some process injected 16 O into the solar nebula, lowering the 17 O/16 O and 18 O/16 O ratios
at the same rate. The process that caused this 16 O infusion isnt known.
211
just like the breccias found on the lunar highlands. The study of breccias has provided
information on the accretional growth and processing of parent bodies. The effects of shock
metamorphism have been seen in all major groups of meteorites. It appears that collision-
induced high speed impacts took place before, during, and after the initial accretion and
differentiation of the parent bodies.
Meteorites contain information related to their long exposures to galactic cosmic rays,
solar radiation and the solar wind. It is possible to determine how long a meteorite existed
free of its parent body before it impacted Earth by examining the cosmic ray damage.
Noble gases are the most volatile elements in meteorites, but they are nonetheless present
in measurable quantities in virtually all meteorites. Trapped noble gases are either solar
or planetary. The solar noble gases are actually implanted solar-wind or solar-flare
material, and provide relatively direct information about the sun. The planetary noble
gases have elemental abundances similar to those found in Earths atmosphere.
2.5 Achondrites
Eucrites, Diogenites and Howardites. These are igneous meteorites that lack
water-bearing (hydrous) or oxidized minerals. It is believed that these meteorites formed
in a chondritic parent body that underwent partial melting. We will consider the possible
heat source later in this chapter.
Ureilites. These meteorites contain olivine and pigeonite (a calcium-rich pyroxene),
and the matrix contains graphite or diamond. The carbon content suggests a that these
meteorites are re-processed carbonaceous chondrites.
Meteorites from the Moon. Some meteorites have breccias with white clasts in
darker matrix, like lunar rocks. The lunar origin of some meteorites was established with-
out contention because there exist many lunar samples which provided close geochemical
and petrological matches to the meteorite samples. The identification of lunar meteorites
opened the door to dynamical studies that subsequently established the possibility that
meteorites can viably be deposited at Earth from Mars.
Shergottites are named after a meteorite that fell in 1865 in Shergotty, which is
located in the northeastern Indian state of Bihar, which borders Nepal. Unlike the eu-
crites, their pyroxene and plagioclase mineralogy is strikingly similar to terrestrial basalts.
They also have small amounts of the hydrous mineral amphibole kaersutite, whereas eu-
crites show no evidence of water in their minerals, and they have some magnetite, which
contains iron in oxided form (Fe+3 ), whereas eucrites contain only reduced iron. Their
pyroxene crystals are elongated and arranged horizontally the way such crystals would ac-
cumulate after settling to the bottom of a magma chamber. Such igneous rocks are called
cumulates, and they can only occur in bodies with a large enough gravity field to allow
gravitational settling. Two other types of cumulate meteorites have hydrous and oxided
minerals like the shergottites, these are the nakhlites, which contain the dark-green to
black pyroxene mineral augite, and a unique meteorite that fell in Chassigny, France called
chassignite, which contains mostly olivine. These three types of meteorites had for nearly
two decades been referred to as the SNC (pronounced snick) meteorites.
The SNC meteorites have been dated by radioactive methods and most, though not all,
have igneous crystallization ages of 1 BY. Thus these rocks formed on a body in which
212
igneous volcanism occurred over 3 BY after the age of the solar system, which suggests a
rather large (read: planet-sized) body. Since it is difficult to move material away from the
sun, planets beyond Earth were the most likely candidates. By process of elimination Mars
was originally hypothesized as the parent body for the SNC meteorites. Originally there
was a great deal of skepticism about the possibility of transporting material from Mars to
Earth, but it has now been shown to be dynamically possible. However, many workers have
rightly asked why the source planet could not be Earth itself. In other words, rocks blasted
off Earth into space by impacts that eventually re-impacted after some time in space. The
smoking gun in the Martian origin of SNCs came from analysis of gas inclusions in some
of these rocks. Noble gas ratios are diagnostic of source regions because these gases do
not readily combine and fractionate. Noble gas abundances of the SNCs were shown to
be much different than the Earths atmosphere but identical to the atmosphere of Mars as
determined by the Viking landers.
Recently, many more examples of putative Martian meteorites have been discovered
that have a range of characteristics that do not make them easily classifiable under the SNC
designation. The meteorites are more now more generally referred to as simply Martian
meteorites. It is now understood that these rocks can be ejected from Mars during the
impact process without being strongly shocked or heated.
The martian meteorite ALH84001, discovered in Antarctica, was originally not des-
ignated as originating from Mars because it has a crystallization age of 4 BY, much older
than most SNCs. The Martian origin of this rock was estabilshed on the basis of its oxygen
isotope signature, which matched that of other Martian meteorites and was much different
that that of terrestrial rocks. ALH84001 gained a great deal of attention because it was
proposed to contain evidence of ancient Martian life by David McKay and his colleagues.
The evidence included the presence of nano-features reminiscent of bacteria, but many
times smaller, the presence of organic material called polyachromatic hydrocarbons, and
the presence of magnetite of a form that is often deposited by biogenic processes. There
has been a great deal of controversy about whether these features do indeed represent evi-
dence for past life on Mars. Research continues on this and other Martian meteorites that
contain such features, with a careful eye towards understanding the potential for terrestrial
contamination.
213
solution averaging usually about 10% but sometimes up to 20%. There are also smaller
amounts of sulfide, graphite and occasionally silicate inclusions.
Within the iron there are two metal phases:
- the body-centered cubic () form kamacite (5.5% nickel)
- the face-centered cubic () taenite (variable, but usually > 27% nickel)
These phases occur because iron and nickel form a solid solution when mixed and are
not completely miscible as they begin to cool. The iron and nickel are structurally similar
but not identical. At high temperatures they exchange freely because the crystal lattice is
expanded. But when cooling sets in their slight differences produce lattices with slightly
different structures. At a point the total energy of the system is minimized by segregating
the elements into 2 separate lattices: one rich in iron and the other poor. To minimize the
mismatch where the lattices connect, newly formed lattices form in preferred orientations
called exsolution lamellae.
Approximately 75% of iron meteorites exhibit a crystal pattern called Widmanstat-
ten structure, which is the term used for these exsolution lamellae. The pattern is
observed by taking a meteorite that is cut and polished and dipping it in acid. Because
this pattern forms when an iron-nickel alloy crystallizes, it is an indication that some as-
teroids were at least partially melted after they formed. In fact, the details of the pattern
tell the cooling history of the meteorite parent body from which it was derived. From the
iron-nickel phase diagram we can see the evolution of the relative amounts of iron and
nickel that crystallized as the iron cooled. And from the variations in composition across
Widmanstatten structure boundaries it is possible to constrain the rate of cooling.
214
them to convert silicon to heavier and more stable nuclei. The most stable and thus most
abundant element produced in the e-process is iron.
215
Problems
1. Most of the meteorites that have been found on Earth are irons but most meteoroids
in Earth-crossing orbits are rocky. (a) How do we know this? (b) Why are rocky meteorites
under-represented in the terrestrial record?
2. Show that for atoms of a radioactive species with decay constant , the mean life
1
is . Start off by writing an expression for the number of atoms that decay in the time
period from t to t + t. Then integrate over all time to get the mean life.
4. Prepare a report on Martian meteorites that examines critically the evidence that
they come from Mars [see McSween, 1994]. Can this evidence bear the weight of the
suggestion by McKay etal. [1996] that ALH84001 contains evidence of biology?
References
Keizo, Y. & H. Kojima, Photographic catalog of the Antarctic meteorites, National Institute
of Polar Research, Tokyo, 1987.
Kerridge, J.F. & M.S. Matthews, Meteorites and the early solar system, University of
Arizona Press, 1988.
McKay, D.S, E.K. Gibson Jr., K.L. Thomas-Keprta, H. Vali, C.S. Romanek, S.J. Clemett,
X.D.F. Chillier, C.R. Maechling, R.N. Zare, Search for past life on Mars: possible
relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite ALH84001, 1996.
McSween, H.Y., Meteorites and their parent planets, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
McSween, H.Y., What we have learned about Mars from SNC meteorites, Meteoritics 29,
757-79, 1994.
Mason, B., Handbook of elemental abundances in meteorites, Gordon and Breach, New
York, 1971.
Mendenhall, W., R.L. Scheaffer & D.D. Wackerly, Mathematical statistics with applications,
2nd ed., Duxbury Press, Boston, 1981.
Sears, D.W., The nature and origin of meteorites, Oxford University Press, New York,
1978.
Wasson, J.T., Meteorites: their record of early solar system history, Freeman and Co., New
York, 1985.
216