Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secondary Contact:
Dhruv Roy, London (44) 20-7176-6709; dhruv.roy@standardandpoors.com
Table Of Contents
Rationale
Outlook
Company Description
Liquidity: Strong
Outlook
The stable outlook on U.K.-based private equity firm 3i Group PLC (3i) reflects Standard & Poor's Ratings Services'
expectation that the group's "strong" liquidity and conservative leverage policy will continue to support its financial
profile over the two-year outlook horizon.
Downside scenario
We could lower the ratings over the two-year outlook horizon if:
We observe re-leveraging of the balance sheet, measured by net debt to adjusted total equity moving closer to
0.8x (from 0.05x at year-end March 31, 2015);
We consider that 3i demonstrates a reduced commitment to a conservative leverage and liquidity policy; and
We perceive that 3i's restructuring initiatives have materially eroded the franchise.
Upside scenario
While unlikely in the near term, we could raise the rating if:
Company Description
Founded in 1945, 3i is a mid-market-focused private equity firm and alternative asset manager. It is organized around
three business lines: private equity, debt management, and infrastructure. 3i has a long track record in European
mid-market private equity, investing in companies with enterprise values of 100 million-500 million. In debt
management, the group invests primarily in senior secured loans, specializing in the management of collateralized loan
obligations (CLOs). 3i's infrastructure business invests across core infrastructure with a focus on the U.K. and Europe,
primarily public-private-partnership (PPP) and low-risk energy projects in developed markets.
On March 31, 2015, 3i had total AUM of 13.5 billion, of which the on-balance-sheet investment portfolio represented
about 24% and fee-generating third-party AUM about 76%. Total AUM comprised:
Following a period of investment underperformance during the global financial crisis, 3i embarked on a strategic
restructuring of the business in June 2012. This included (a) streamlining the private equity business by refocusing on
its core markets and improving its investment and asset management controls and processes; (b) increasing operating
cash profitability by reducing operating expenses; and (c) growing fee income through increased third-party AUM.
3i continues to focus on mid-market companies in its core region of Northern Europe--with a country/region bias
toward Germany, France, Benelux, the Nordics, and the U.K.--and North America, and a reducing focus on
Asia-Pacific, Brazil, and Southern Europe (see chart 1). As of March 31, 2015, 89% of the private equity portfolio by
value was headquartered in 3i's focus areas, primarily due to realizations combined with value increases in core areas.
Chart 1
3i is the group holding company and is listed on the London Stock Exchange, with its shares widely held. 3i is not
regulated, but some of its subsidiaries, including 3i Investments PLC (an investment manager, not rated) are regulated
by the Financial Conduct Authority. 3i is, however, subject to regulatory requirements under the European Alternative
Investment Fund Managers Directive as of July 2013. As a U.K. investment trust, 3i's capital gains are exempt from
tax.
We note that 3i has largely completed the key phases of its strategic plan. Accordingly, the group has reduced its
private equity portfolio and made significant cost savings, in part led by reductions in headcount, and in the number of
global offices to eight from 19 previously. Finally, monthly dashboards now facilitate the monitoring and tracking of
performance to enable the timely escalation of issues, in addition to more comprehensive bi-annual portfolio company
reviews. 3i's strategic imperatives for 2016 are to (a) invest in the private equity franchise by way of new investment
and continue the strong run of realizations; (b) grow the debt management and infrastructure businesses; and (c)
maintain strong cost discipline and low leverage.
We consider the debt management and infrastructure businesses as key to 3i's objective of growing third-party fee
income in the absence of near-term private equity fundraising. We note that increased AUM in debt management and
infrastructure offset the net divestment in private equity and roll-off of legacy debt management funds during the
financial year ended March 31, 2015 (financial 2015). 3i successfully raised 2.4 billion in gross new money. The net
effect was growth in net AUM of 4% to 13.5 billion on March 31, 2015. The debt management business closed six
new CLOs, three in Europe and three in the U.S., raising 2.2 billion in AUM. We also understand that the business had
the first close of a European third-party mid-market loan fund at 250 million, with a view to diversifying its product
offering.
3i has a long track record of managing its portfolio companies and we consider that its long-term track record of
cash-on-cash returns is generally satisfactory. Moreover, we consider the quality of the group's investment portfolio to
be adequate and the overall portfolio as defensively positioned from a sector perspective (see chart 2). However, these
strengths are offset by the facts that the majority of investments comprise companies that might typically be rated in
the 'B' category and that 3i generally holds either the riskier equity portion or shareholder loans in the capital structure.
Chart 2
There were 457 million of new investments during financial 2015, 369 million of which were proprietary capital.
However, 3i is currently a net divestor, and investment activity in private equity remains measured. In keeping with its
strategy to make the private equity portfolio more manageable, 3i reduced the portfolio to 65 investments by the end
of March 2015, from 81 in 2014. We understand that the group may reduce the number of investments in the portfolio
further over the coming two years. Thus, the portfolio has become more concentrated by number of investments and
investment size than historically. On March 31, 2015, the 10 largest investments (excluding the group's investment in
3i Infrastructure PLC) represented about 48% of the direct portfolio, compared to typically below 20% historically.
We note 3i's commitment to achieving operating efficiency, demonstrated by a run-rate operating cost reduction of
70 million since 2012, surpassing its target of 60 million. Increased fee income, driven by the closing of new CLO
deals, combined with higher cash income from dividends and interest has supported the group's cash profitability,
allowing it to cover its operating expenses with stable cash and portfolio income for the first time in over a decade at
year-end March 2015.
Nonetheless, we consider 3i's profitability to be "below average," reflecting an adjusted EBITDA margin of below 20%,
excluding volatile revenue items, such as realized and unrealized gains/losses and performance fees, because data net
of compensation expense is not available. We also view 3i's earnings (total return) volatility as a ratings weakness,
driven by realized and unrealized returns that are inextricably linked to market conditions.
Table 1
3i Calculation Of Net Debt To Adjusted Total Equity, March 31, 2015
March 31, 2015 March 31, 2014
+ Loans and borrowings 815 849
+ Residual B shares liabilitiy 0 6
= Non-current liabilities 815 855
+ Derivative financial instruments 0 4
= Current liabilities 0 4
Gross debt 815 859
- Surplus cash after 25% haircut 648 523
Net debt 167 336
Reported equity 3806 3308
- intangibles 19 26
- proposed dividend 190 126
- equity in structured vehicles 169 52
Table 1
3i Calculation Of Net Debt To Adjusted Total Equity, March 31,
2015 (cont.)
Adjusted total equity 3428 3104
Net debt to ATE (x) 0.05 0.11
Historically, 3i's permanent capital base, which we view as a rating strength, has been offset by relatively high gross
leverage. However, as a result of management initiatives over the past three years, the group has tempered its leverage
appetite relative to historical levels. We note that the company was successful in achieving its target of gross debt of
less than 1 billion by June 2013. On March 31, 2015, gross debt stood at 815 million, down 50% from 1.6 billion at
end-March 2012. Consequently, interest expenses have fallen to 49 million at end-March 2015, 18% below the target
of 60 million. As a result, our calculation of debt to ATE has improved substantially.
3i's consistent policy to hold adequate liquidity--which has increased on the back of recent divestments and operating
cash income--and its well-spread debt maturity profile extending to 2032, lead us to apply a haircut of 25% to 3i's cash
balances to arrive at net debt, rather than the 50% that is typical for alternative asset managers. Net debt to ATE, by
our measures, has trended from 0.3x at year-end March 31, 2012, to 0.05x at year-end March 31, 2015. We consider
both these ratios to be comfortably in the "minimal" leverage category.
Chart 3
We consider 3i's cash flow coverage of gross interest costs to be weak compared to peers with similar leverage
profiles. When calculating EBITDA, we exclude non-cash and more volatile revenue items such as realized and
unrealized gains, and place a greater focus on stable cash flows, such as portfolio income and fee income after
operating expenses to gross interest payable. We note that portfolio income mainly comprises income from loans and
receivables, a large proportion of which is in the form of payment in kind, a non-cash item that we exclude from the
calculation. Considering the modest role of recurring fee and portfolio income in 3i's earnings, EBITDA coverage of
interest expense has historically been negative and is currently marginally positive. This metric turned positive at
year-end March 31, 2014, and improved to 1.4x at end-March 2015, supported by the group's increased focus on
annual operating cash profit. However, we assess 3i's leverage as "modest" to reflect our expectation that despite
ongoing improvements in coverage, the ratio will remain weak relative to what we expect and typically observe for
rated peers with "minimal" leverage assessments.
Liquidity: Strong
We assess 3i's liquidity as "strong" under our criteria. We view the group's policy and track record of maintaining
adequate cash balances as positive for the ratings. We consider this policy to be appropriate given the illiquid nature of
3i's investments and the fact that the portfolio may at times have limited investments suitable for harvesting. The
group also maintains cash to give it the flexibility to invest opportunistically, but carefully monitors its pipeline of
expected investments and divestments to ensure that adequate cash is always maintained. Cash is conservatively
invested with well-rated banks rated 'A' or higher and with 'AAA' rated money market funds.
Covenant analysis
The 350 million committed facility has no financial covenants.
Financial risk: Modest, due to weak cash flow coverage of gross interest expense
Cash flow/Leverage: Minimal
Anchor: bbb-
Modifiers
Diversification/Portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
Capital structure: Neutral (no impact)
Liquidity: Strong (no impact)
Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
Management and governance: Satisfactory (no impact)
Comparable rating analysis: Positive (+1)
Additional Contact:
Financial Institutions Ratings Europe; FIG_Europe@standardandpoors.com
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part
thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval
system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be
used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not
responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for
the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING
WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no
event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential
damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by
negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and
not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase,
hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to
update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment
and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does
not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be
reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain
regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P
Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any
damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective
activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established
policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P
reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,
www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com
(subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information
about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.