Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EGP.EEC.C.24.MX.P.92105.00.301.00
PAGE
File: EGP.EEC.C.24.MX.P.92105.00.301.00
EGP VALIDATION
Name (EGP) Name (EGP) Name (EGP)
COLLABORATORS VERIFIED BY VALIDATE BY
PROJECT / PLANT
EGP CODE
Don Jose GROUP FUNCION TYPE ISSUER COUNTRY TEC PLANT SYSTEM PROGRESSIVE REVISION
EGP EEC C 2 4 M X P 9 2 1 0 5 0 0 3 0 1 0 0
CLASSIFICATION For Validation UTILIZATION SCOPE Detailed Design.
This document is property of Enel Green Power S.p.A. It is strictly forbidden to reproduce this document, in whole or in part, and to provide to others any related information
without the previous written consent by Enel Green Power S.p.A.
CODICE CODE
EGP.EEC.C.24.MX.P.92105.00.301.00
PAGINA - PAGE
2 di/of 5
Engineering & Construction
INDEX
PAGINA - PAGE
3 di/of 5
Engineering & Construction
The rated current for each winding and for each tap positions can be deduced by the following table:
H X Y H Line in : H1-H2-H3
OLTC Taps VOLT Ampere Ampere
kVA ONAN 165000 82500 82500 ONAN ONAF
kVA ONAF 215000 107500 107500
Voltage (V) 230000 34500 34500 1 253000 376,5 490,6
N step + 10 2 250700 380,0 495,1
N step - 10 3 248400 383,5 499,7
% step 1 4 246100 387,1 504,4
5 243800 390,7 509,1
X Y 6 241500 394,5 514,0
7 239200 398,3 518,9
Line in : X1-X2-X3 Y1-Y2-Y3 8 236900 402,1 524,0
Volt 34500 34500 9 234600 406,1 529,1
10 232300 410,1 534,4
Ampere ONAN 1381 1381 11A 230000 414,2 539,7
Ampere ONAF 1799 1799 11B 230000 414,2 539,7
11C 230000 414,2 539,7
12 227700 418,4 545,1
13 225400 422,6 550,7
14 223100 427,0 556,4
15 220800 431,4 562,2
16 218500 436,0 568,1
17 216200 440,6 574,1
18 213900 445,4 580,3
19 211600 450,2 586,6
20 209300 455,1 593,1
21 207000 460,2 599,7
CODICE CODE
EGP.EEC.C.24.MX.P.92105.00.301.00
PAGINA - PAGE
4 di/of 5
Engineering & Construction
a) according to its rating power, the transformer is classified as category III (above 100.000 kVA).
b) the symmetrical short-circuit current is calculated taking into account the relationship Xcc/Rcc,
where Xcc (Rcc) is the sum of the reactances (resistances) of the transformer and the system
Xt+Xs (Rt+Rs).
c) the transformer have two LV winding overlapped (X and Y) with the same voltage, rating power (half
compared to HV) and value of short circuit impedance versus HV winding, therefore it is comparable
to transformers only with one LV winding.
d) for transformers with two separate windings, only the three-phase short circuit is taken into account,
as the consideration of this case is substantially adequate to cover also the other possible types of
fault.
- tap changer position: is fixed to no.21 (max current for HV winding and minimum impedance)
- ratio X/R: is fixed equal to >14, than , according to standard IEC 60076-5 section 4.2.3, the peak
value of the short circuit current is equal to:
I ccpeak 2.69
2.69 and consequently ka 1.9
I ccrms 2
CODICE CODE
EGP.EEC.C.24.MX.P.92105.00.301.00
PAGINA - PAGE
5 di/of 5
Engineering & Construction
To the aim of calculation of the short circuit currents of the windings, we have adopted following reference
circuit, that take into account three-phase short circuit at LV terminals feeding HV terminals:
Vpg (HV)
GRID
ZGR_HV ZTR_H-L
SYMMETRICAL CURRENT