Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syllabus
I. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
A. Governing Laws
1. New Civil Code
2. Warsaw Convention
3. Code of Commerce
4. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
5. Salvage Law
6. Public Service Act
7. Article XII, Sec. 11 on operation of public utility
B. Concept of public Utility & public service (Sec. 13, Public Service Act)
C. Constitutional limitations on operation of public utilities (Art. XII, 1987 Constitution)
D. Regulatory Agencies
E. Concept of franchise and certificate of public convenience
CASES:
National Development Company vs. CA, August 19, 1998;
Tatad vs. Sec. Garcia, April 16, 1995;
Radio Communication of the Phils, Inc. NTC, 150 SCRA 450
CASES:
Spouses Dante Cruz and Leonora Cruz vs. Sun Holidays, Inc., G.R. No. 186312, June
29, 2012;
A.F Sanchez Brokerage, Inc. vs. CA G.R. No. 147079, December 21, 2004;
Crisostomo vs. CA, August 25, 2003, GR No. 138334;
De Guzman vs. CA, Dec. 12, 1988;
First Phil. Industrial Corp. vs. CA, Dec. 29, 1998;
1
Erezo vs. Jepte, Sept. 30, 1957;
Lim vs. CA, Jan. 16, 2002;
Lita Enterprises vs. IAC, April 27, 1984;
Teja Marketing vs. IAC, 148 SCRA 347;
Nostradamus Villanueva vs. Domingo, G.R. No. 144274, September 20, 2004;
Spouses Hernandez et al vs. Spouses Dolor et al, GR No. 160286, July 30, 2004;
FEB Leasing and Finance Corporation (now BPI Leasing Corp.) vs. Sps. Sergio P.
Baylon and Maritess Villena Baylon, et al., G.R. No. 181398, June 29, 2011);
Spouses Teodoro and Nanette Perena v. Spouses Nicolas and Teresita L. Zarate, G.R.
No. 157917, August 29, 2012
2
Edgar Cokaliong Shipping Lines vs. UCPB General Insurance Company, June 25, 2003;
Eastern Shipping Lines vs. IAC, 150 SCRA 469;
Bascos vs. CA, Apr. 7, 1993;
Ganzon vs. CA, May 30, 1988; Philamgen vs.
MCG Marine Services, March 8, 2002;
Calvo vs. UCPB General Insurance 379 SCRA 510;
Belgian Overseas Chartering vs. Phil. First Insurance Co., 383 SCRA 23
A. Safety of Passengers
1. Duty to observe utmost diligence (Art. 1755, NCC).
2. Duration of liability
3. Presumption of negligence (Art. 1756, NCC)
4. Liability for acts of employees (Art. 1759, NCC)
5. Liability for acts of strangers (Art. 1763, NCC)
6. Effect of stipulation on liability (Art. 1757, 1758,1760, NCC)
CASES:
Aboitiz Shipping Corporation vs. CA, 179 SCRA 95;
Dangwa Transportation vs. CA, 202 SCRA 574;
LRT vs. Navidad, Feb. 6, 2003;
La Mallorca vs. CA, July 27, 17 SCRA 739;
Japan Airlines vs. CA, Aug. 7, 1998;
Phil. Airlines vs. CA, 226 SCRA 423;
Gacal vs. PAL, 183 SCRA 189;
Fortune Express, Inc. vs. CA, March 18, 1999;
Pilapil vs. CA, Dec, 22, 1989;
Maranan vs. Perez, 20 SCRA 412;
Singapore Airlines vs. Andion Fernandez, 10 December 2003;
Fortune Express vs. CA, March 18, 1999;
Bachelor Express vs. CA, July 31, 1990;
De Gillaco vs. Manila Railroad Company, G.R. No. L-8034, Nov. 18, 1955;
Cathay Pacific Airways vs. CA, March 5, 1993;
Mapa vs. CA, July 8, 1998
3
B. Payment of freight (Art. 374 & 375, CC)
C. Liability for demurrage
CASES:
Isaac vs. A.L. Ammen Transportation, 101 Phil 1046;
Compania Maritima vs. CA, Aug. 29, 1988;
PNR vs. CA, Oct. 4, 1985
CASES:
Standard Vacuum Oil vs. Luzon Stevedoring, April 18, 1956;
Planters Products, Inc. vs. CA, Sept. 15, 1993;
Mecenas, et al. vs. CA, 180 SCRA 83;
Brinas vs. People of the Phils., Nov. 25, 1983;
BLTB vs. IAC, Nov. 14, 1988;
Batangas Transportation Company vs. Caguimbal, et al, Jan. 24, 1968;
Mallari vs. CA, Jan. 31, 2000;
Nocum vs. Laguna Tayabas Bus Company, Oct. 31, 1969;
PAL vs. CA, Sept. 15, 1993;
Vda. De Abeto vs. PAL, July 30, 1982;
Japan Airlines vs. Michael Asuncion et al, G.R. No. 161730, January 28, 2005
VII. BILL OF LADING AND OTHER FORMALITIES
A. Definition of bill of lading
B. Classes of bill of lading
C. Nature of bill of lading (Art. 353, 709 CC; Sec. 3[4] and [5], COGSA)
1. as a contract
a. Basic stipulations in a bill of lading (Art. 350, 707-718, CC; Sec. 4[5] COGSA)
4
b. Prohibited stipulations (Art. 1745, NCC)
2. as a document of title (Art. 1508, 1509, 1510, 1513, 1515 NCC)
3. as a receipt
D. Relevant provisions of the Warsaw Convention (Art. 17-19, 22, WC)
CASES:
HE Heacock Company vs. Macondray, Oct. 3, 1921;
Ong Yiu vs. CA, June 29, 1979;
Sea-Land Service vs. IAC, Aug. 31, 1987;
Citadel Lines vs. CA, Apr. 25, 1990;
Everett Steamship Corporation vs. CA, Oct. 8, 1998;
Saludo, Jr. vs. CA, 207 SCRA 498;
Northwest Airlines vs. Cuenca, Aug. 31, 1965;
Alitalia vs. IAC, Dec. 4, 1990;
Pan American World Airways vs. IAC, Aug. 11, 1988;
China Airlines vs. Daniel Chiok, July 30, 2003;
Santos III vs. Northwest Airlines, June 23, 1992;
United Airlines vs. Willie Uy, Nov. 19, 1999
5
2. exceptions to the rule
3. Abandonment
C. Vessels
1. Acquisition
a. by prescription (Art. 573 & 575, CC)
b. by sale (Art. 576-578, CC)
c. registration (Sec. 810, Tariff and Customs Code)
d. ships manifest (Sec. 906, TCC)
2. Mortage of vessels (See relevant provisions of the Ship Mortgage Decree or PD 1521)
D. Persons who take part in Maritime Commerce
1. Shipowners and shipagents (Art. 586-588, CC)
a. Rules in case of part-owners (Art. 589-594, CC)
b. Rules in case of shipagents (Art. 595-602, CC)
2. Captains and masters of vessels
a. Qualifications (Art. 609, CC)
b. Powers and functions (Art. 610-612, CC)
c. Discretion powers
3. Pilot
a. Concept
b. Relationship to master and shipowner
4. Officers and crew of the vessel
E. Charter Parties
1. Concept
2. Kinds: bareboat and contract of affreightment
3. Persons qualified to make charter
4. Requisites of a valid charter (Art. 652, CC)
5. Concept of and liability for demurrage
6. Rights and obligations of charter parties
G. Averages
1. Concept (Art. 806, CC)
2. Classes of average and the persons liable
a. Simple average (Art. 809-810, CC)
b. General average (Art. 811, 812-813, 816-818, 732, 859-861, CC)
H. Collisions
1. Definition
6
2. Zones in collision (see: doctrine of error in extremis)
3. Rules on liability (Art. 826-832 CC; see: doctrine of inscrutable fault)
4. Limited liability rule (Art. 837, CC)
J. Salvage
1. Definition
2. Rights and obligations of salvors and owners (See relevant provisions of the Salvage
Law)
CASES:
Aboitiz Shipping Corporation vs. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance
Corporation, 217 SCRA 359;
Chua Yek Hong vs. IAC, Dec. 14, 1988;
Monarch Insurance vs. CA, 281 SCRA 534;
PhilAmGen vs. CA, 273 SCRA 262;
Vasquez vs. CA, 138 SCRA 553;
Abueg vs. San Diego, 77 Phil 730;
Luzon Stevedoring vs. CA, Dec. 3, 1987;
Yangco vs. Laserna, Oct. 29, 1941;
Yu Con vs. Ipil, G.R. No. L-10195, Dec. 29, 1916;
Inter-Orient Maritime Enterprises vs. CA, 235 SCRA 267;
Far Eastern Shipping vs. CA, Oct. 1, 1998;
Caltex Phils. vs. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., 315 SCRA 709;
Planters Products vs. CA, 226 SCRA 478;
Magsaysay, Inc. vs. Agan, Jan. 31, 1955;
Macondray vs. Provident Insurance Corporation, GR No. 154305, December 9, 2004