Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
OAN COPY: Rl
AFWL [Wr
Ii
\\ I
-+
0354990
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
I 1 1 1 1 1.1 I I I
t h e s e r e s u l t s may be combined w i t h e x i s t i n g methods of s e l e c t i n g optimum com-
b i n a t i o n s of loadings. To i l l u s t r a t e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e method and t o point
out c e r t a i n f e a t u r e s of wings with curved o r cranked l e a d i n g edges, a set of
examples a r e presented. The p r i n c i p a l checks on t h e v a l i d i t y of t h e method are
made through comparisons with r e s u l t s f o r arrow- o r delta-wing planforms using
t h e e s t a b l i s h e d methods of reference 2.
SYMBOLS
Ai load s t r e n g t h f a c t o r
wing span
l o c a l wing chord
s e c t i o n drag c o e f f i c i e n t
s e c t i o n moment c o e f f i c i e n t
section l i f t coefficient
drag c o e f f i c i e n t
drag-due-to-lift factor
l i f t coefficient
l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t of i t h loading
pre s sure c o e f f i c i e n t
l i f t i n g pressure c o e f f i c i e n t
2
I!'
k constant
M Mach number
S wing area
ZC camber surface o r d i n a t e
p =/ri
h Lagrange m u l t i p l i e r
Subscripts:
min minimum
max maximum
3
NUMERICAL CALCULATION METHOD
z
BY-. t X
4
can be t r e a t e d according t o t h e concept of t h e g e n e r a l i z a t i o n of t h e Cauchy
p r i n c i p a l value, which i s discussed and explained i n s e c t i o n 3 of reference 7
and a l s o i n reference 6. The i n t e g r a l i s t h u s g e n e r a l l y found t o be convergent
a t p o i n t s x , y on a wing surface, although regions of nonconvergence e x i s t i f
t h e r e are values of y f o r which t h e spanwise d e r i v a t i v e of t h e chordwise
integral
where t h e f u n c t i o n R i s defined as
5
1 2 3 7
4- 4
3- 3
2- 2
I - I I
I
I
0- I
I 0 N*,N
L
/ \
-I - \
\ -I
- . L
\
-2 - \
-2
-3 - \
\
\ -3
-4 - -4
1 I I 1 -1 . L J .- L ._-Ap-- d
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
x,
Figure 2.- G r i d coordinate system.
6
with (L* -L + 0.5) r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e value of x - 5 a t t h e midpoint of t h e
element. On i n t e g r a t i o n t h e expression t a k e s t h e form
P72
F(L*-L, p-N)
=
(L* - L + 0.5)/(L* - L + 0.5)2 - P2(y - q)2
(7 )
(L* - L + 0.5)2P(Y - tl)
Pq1
and with Py = N*, f3ql = N - 0.5, and Pq, = N + 0.5 (see f i g . 2), t h e influ-
ence f a c t o r 5 becomes
E(L*-L,@-N) =
/(L* - L + 0.5)2 (p- N - 0 . 5 ) 2 -
(L* -
L + o.5)(P - N 0.5) -
- /(L* - L + 0.5)2 -
(p - N + 0.5)2
(L* - L + o . ~ ) ( N +- N + 0.5)
A g r a p h i c a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h i s f a c t o r i s shown i n f i g u r e 3 . Note t h e r a t h e r
s m a l l v a r i a t i o n s of t h e f a c t o r i n t h e x- o r L-direction contrasted with t h e
0
K
-I
-2
-3
-4
Figure 3 . - D i s t r i b u t i o n of E function.
7
d r a s t i c v a r i a t i o n s i n the y- o r N-direction. For a given L* - L set of ele-
ments, t h e sum of t h e E values i s zero, the s i n g l e negative value a t
- -
fl N = 0 balancing a l l t h e o t h e r s . A t L* L = 0 where t h e r e i s only one
element i n t h e summation region, t h e E value of the element i s zero.
A(L,N) = o (L - XZe 5 0) 1
A(L,N) = L - xZe (0 <L - XZe < 1)
} (9)
A(L,N) = 1
The wing surface slope a t a point represented .by L* and N)c may now be
found by a summation of t h e contributions of each of t h e elements within t h e
influencing region which i s expressed as:
8
where x t a k e s on only i n t e g e r values. Equation (11) gives a zero camber
o r d i n a t e along t h e wing leading edge. I n reference 2 it i s pointed out t h a t
such an a r b i t r a r y choice of t h e leading-edge z,-value does not influence t h e
t h e o r e t i c a l wing c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .
c2 = -
C L*Fd
cm = -
1
C2
> (L* - 0 . 5 ) AC,(L*,P), A(L*,P) B(L*,N~)
L*=l+
c
XIe]
where
9
Wing t o t a l l i f t , drag, and pitching-moment c o e f f i c i e n t s a r e obtained by
spanwise summations of t h e s e c t i o n d a t a .
CL c2
CD
10
and may be evaluated as an extension of t h e present numerical system.
11
- +
+ c~,3~A3& . . .
I l l u s t r a t i v e Examples
1.0r ,
/
/ Y
/
LE
.8
.6
-
BY
I
.4
.2
0 1c
1
Figure 4.- Planform and pressure Figure 5.- Camber s u r f a c e for wing of
d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r wing of example 1. example 1. Camber o r d i n a t e s adjusted
t o give a wing leading edge coinci-
dent with t h a t f o r example I1 of
reference 2 .
12
program u t i l i z i n g equations ( 8 ) , ( 9 ), (lo), and (11). The numerical method
presented herein does not evaluate t h e upwash f i e l d ahead of t h e wing leading
edge as does t h e method of reference 2. Thus t o make t h e s e r e s u l t s d i r e c t l y
comparable with t h e r e s u l t s of reference 2, t h e o r d i n a t e s of f i g u r e 5 were mod-
i f i e d through t h e a d d i t i o n of a set of incremental zc values t o make t h e
leading edges coincident. Camber surface o r d i n a t e s as i n f i g u r e 5 may be shown
i n parametric form, s i n c e zc i s d i r e c t l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e wing l e n g t h , t h e
l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t , and t h e Mach number term p . These results apply f o r a range
of Mach numbers and planforms, provided t h a t yze and y t e a r e proportional
to l/p. Note i n f i g u r e 6 that near t h e midspan t h e wing camber surface t a k e s
on i n c r e a s i n g l y l a r g e negative values. T h i s condition occurs because a t y = 0
t h e i n t e g r a l of equation (1) i s not convergent. This s i n g u l a r i t y a t y = 0
does not i n v a l i d a t e t h e r e s u l t s f o r t h e major outboard area of t h e wing span.
An optimum combination of
loadings f o r an "Ogee" type plan-
-i[/--
-.2
-.3 "ax =20
form i s t r e a t e d i n t h e second
example. The wing planform and
t hr ree e
a i l lsuesl tercat teedd componknt 7. Cam-
i n f i g u r e loadings
Xl -
-_
2![
-.30
/I .2 4
-
Y
b/2
.6
A
.8
""=40
I.o
u r e s 8, 9 , and 10. I n t h e v i c i n i t y
of y = 0 t h e s a m e type of singu-
l a r i t y appears as i n t h e f i r s t
give a negative
example. s i n gau l aand
Loadings, r i t y , cand
loading b with ACp p r o p o r t i o n a l
t o l y l gives a p o s i t i v e singu-
larity.
-If/-'
--.50
4
.2 .4 .6 .8
I
I.o
V
Figure 7.- Planform and component loadings Figure 8.- Camber surface f o r wing
f o r wing of example 2. of example 2 with component
loading ( a ) , NP,l = kl.
z, - _ I
BC, 1
"1 \
-.2
-.3
-4 ,
- .5 I , I -.50 .2 4 .6 .8I 11.0
0 .2 4 .6 .8 1.0
-
X -
X
I
I
3 Ir
.2-
.I - 1
BC,I
Troiliyg edg;
-4
-,31
-.5 , ,
0 .2 4 .6 .8 1.0
Figure 9.- Camber surface f o r wing Figure 10.- Camber surface for
of example 2 with component wing of example 2 with compo-
loading ( b ) , N p , 2 = k 2 J y J . nent loading ( c ) , N P , 3 = k3x'.
14
The drag c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e i n t e r f e r e n c e between p a i r s of loadings com-
puted through use of equation (19) are as follows:
.I - /
/
/
0
- Mach line
-.2- -
-.3-
0 b/2 ?
-A -
I I 1 1
2.0 r
1.6 1
z, I.2 1.0 &,
B CLI
-.2 .e
-.3
.4
, I
.2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 '0 .2 A .6 .E 1.0
- -
X
b/2 1
/
/
/
/
/
/
-,2L!L
- .30 .2 AI
-7.
.6 I .8
I 1I.0
-
X
I
-..
2.0r
I .6
I.2
-
OCP
- .I cL .E
.4
-.2
I I '0 -2 4 .6 .E 1.0
.2 .4 .6 .E I.o -
X
I
Y
m
Figure 14.- Planform and pressure
Figure 13.- Camber surface f o r d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r wing of
wing of example 3 . example 4.
16
/
/
/
+I
-.30 .2
I '2A
4
+
.16 .I8 11.0
r 2'ol
I.6
-
X
-Y 1
b/2
Figure 16.- Planform and pressure
Figure 15.- Camber s u r f a c e f o r d i s t r i b u t i o n for wing of
wing of example 4. example 5 .
I n f i g u r e 14 i s shown t h e planform of an
M wing (example 4) which has t h e s a m e spanwise
chord d i s t r i b u t i o n as t h e arrow wing. The
pressure d i s t r i b u t i o n i s s i m i l a r t o t h a t of
t h e arrow wing i n t h a t t h e spanwise load d i s -
t r i b u t i o n i s preserved. The r e s u l t a n t surf ace
shape ( f i g . 15) f o r t h i s planform and load
d i s t r i b u t i o n r e q u i r e s l a r g e l o c a l angles of
I d
a t t a c k d i r e c t l y behind t h e leading-edge break
.2 .4 .6 .8 ID at
-
X
= 0.2. The drag-due-to-lift f a c t o r
I b/2
f o r t h e wing i s 0.228.
1. Brown, Clinton E . , and McLean, Francis E.: The Problem of Obtaining High
Lift-Drag Ratios at Supersonic Speeds. Jour. Aero/Space S e i . v o l . 26, ,
no. 5 , May 1959, pp. 298-302.