Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANTENTOP is FREE e- magazine, made in Preview: Some articles from "cooking" issue will be
PDF, devoted to antennas and amateur radio. pasted for preview on this site, others no. Because,
Everyone may share his experience with others as I think, it must be something mysterious in every
hams on the pages. Your opinions and articles are issue.
published without any changes, as I know, every
your word has the mean. Publishing: If you have something for share with
your friends, and if you want to do it FREE, just send
Every issue of ANTENTOP is going to have 100 me an email. Also, if you want to offer for publishing
pages and this one will be paste in whole on the site. any stuff from your website, you are welcome!
Preview's files will be removed in this case. I do not
know what a term for one issue will need, may be 8- Your opinion is important for me, so,
10 month or so. A whole issue of ANTENTOP hold contact if you want to say something!
nearly 10 MB.
I do not know, why the owners do not response me. Are they still alive? Do their companies are a
bankrupt? Or do they move anywhere? Where they are in the end?
Business Advertising: ANTENTOP is not a and, they will do this work, and we will see lots
commercial magazine. Authors and I (Igor interesting articles there.
Grigorov, the editor of the magazine) do not get any So, if you want to put a commercial advertisement in
profit from the issue. But off course, I do not mention ANTENTOP, please contact with me. A commercial
from commercial ads in ANTENTOP. It allows me to advertisement will do ANTENTOP even greater
do the magazine in most great way, allows me to pay interesting and various! I hope, readers do not
some money for authors to compensate their hard mention against such commercial ads.
work. I have lots interesting stuff in Russian, and Book Advertising: I do not think, that Book
owners of the stuff agree to publish the stuff in Advertising is a commercial advertisement. So,
ANTENTOP but I have no enough time to translate Book Advertising is FREE at ANTENTOP. Contact
the interesting stuff in English, however I may pay with me for details.
money to translators,
Email: igor.grigorov@gmail.com subject: NB: Please, use only plain text and mark email
igor_ant subject as: igor_ant. I receive lots spam and viruses,
so, I delete ALL unknown me messages without
reading.
http://www.antentop.org/ Editorial
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
2 Practical Design of a small sized two Directional Helical Antennas for the 20- 34- 37
meters Band.
Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters With Rectangular UR0GT- Match :
By: Nikolay Kudryavchenko, UR0GT
40- 41
4 It is an alternative way (compare to DEWD) to design a broadband antenna-
use so called "UR0GT- Match." The match was offered by UR0GT at 2004 at
HZ- Forum. The match was used to feed VHF- Antennas, but it works at HF
too.
Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters With Triangular UR0GT- Match: By:
5 Nikolay Kudryavchenko, UR0GT
42- 43
It is an alternative way (compare to DEWD) to design a broadband antenna-
use so called "UR0GT- Match." The match was offered by UR0GT at 2004 at
HZ- Forum. The match was used to feed VHF- Antennas, but it works at HF
too.
Page 1 http://www.antentop.org/
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching: By: Nikolay
Kudryavchenko, UR0GT
6 44- 45
It is just a variant of a DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with Stub Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters - Pass Band and Efficiency.
Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching: By:
7 Nikolay Kudryavchenko, UR0GT
46- 47
It is just a variant of a Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with Stub
Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters - Pass Band and Efficiency.
Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an Inductance Matching:
By: Nikolay Kudryavchenko, UR0GT 48- 49
8
It is just a variant of a Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an
Inductance Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters - Pass Band and Efficiency.
Super Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with A Stub Matching:
By: Nikolay Kudryavchenko, UR0GT
9 50- 51
It is just a variant of a Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an
Inductance Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters - Pass Band and Efficiency.
Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz: By: Vladimir Kononov, UA1ACO, St.-
Petersburg
11 56- 60
Some days I heard 10- MHz. Good propagation conditions, lots stations but no
antenna. Only 42- meters length of wire was connected to my ICOM-7000
through ICOM AT-180. So, I decided to make EH-Antenna for the band. To
avoid too much job with cylinders (that are commonly used at EH- Antenna) I
made a Flat EH- Antenna from stuff from my scrap- box. It takes only 3- 4 hours
for making and tuning of the antenna.
Page 2 http://www.antentop.org/
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz in the Winter: By: Vladimir Kononov,
UA1ACO, St.-Petersburg
12
61- 62
In three weeks the winter came in my town. I made more the 100 QSOs with 25
countries using power 30- Wtts. Antenna was covered by snow but it is worked.
I did lots QSOs with the snow- EH-Antenna. As rule I could make QSO with any
station that I heard.
Regenerative Receivers
However, one friend of mine, old ham (he was at the times in his forties) told me
about my converters:- "Good job! But.. what I would like to say all the stuff
(converter and receiver) you may change for one tube receiver. It would get the
same reception."
Another day he gave me an old soviet magazine "Radio" with the schematic.
When the receiver was made and tuned, I discovered that the one- tube receiver
really worked almost similar to converter with "Muromets."
Page 3 http://www.antentop.org/
ANTENTOP- 01- 2009, # 011 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
An 80 m CW Valve Transceiver :.: by Igor Grigorov, RK3ZK
17 80
It is possible to build this transceiver in one evening using surplus parts. It has a
sensitivity of near 5- microV and output power on 3.5- 3.6- MHz near 1-Wtts.
PA
18 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B: By: Nikolay Kisel, UA3AIC, 81- 86
Moscow
Just photos and steps how to do a simple PA on a power tube GU-43B
The PA is designed for ham bands 160- 10- meters. It provides 200 Wtts
19 CW/ 500 Wtts PEP SSB. Efficiency of the PA is 65- 70% in depend on 87- 88
used r\band.
Patents
89- 100
20 Ground and/or feedline independent resonant feed device for coupling
antennas and the likes.
Just a description of the patent
USB- TUBE
Page 4 http://www.antentop.org/
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part I I
Dear friends, I would like to give to you an interesting and reliable antenna theory. Hours searching in the web
gave me lots theoretical information about antennas. Really, at first I did not know what information to chose for
ANTENTOP. Finally, I stopped on lectures Modern Antennas in Wireless Telecommunications written by Prof.
Natalia K. Nikolova from McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Well, I have read many textbooks on Antennas, both, as in Russian as in English. So, I have the possibility to
compare different textbook, and I think, that the lectures give knowledge in antenna field in great way. Here first
lecture Introduction into Antenna Study is here. Next issues of ANTENTOP will contain some other lectures.
I.G.
My Friends, the above placed Intro was given at ANTENTOP- 01- 2003 to Antennas Lectures.
Now I know, that the Lecture is one of popular topics of ANTENTOP. Every Antenna Lecture
was downloaded more than 1000 times!
Now I want to present to you one more very interesting Lecture - it is a Lecture Aperture
Antennas Part II. I believe, you cannot find such info anywhere for free! Very interesting and
very useful info for every ham, for every radio- engineer.
I.G.
www.antentop.org Page-5
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-6
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-7
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-8
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-9
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-10
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-11
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-12
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-13
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-14
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-15
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-16
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-17
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-18
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-19
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-20
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-21
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-22
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-23
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-24
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-25
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-26
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-27
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-28
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-29
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-30
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-31
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-32
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Aperture Antennas Part II
www.antentop.org Page-33
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Directional Helical Antennas
I..Kapustin, UA0RW
Radio # 7 1958, pp.: 34-35.
Directional Dipole Helical Antenna was tested compare At 1-km to the South from the tested antennas was
with WINDOM for the 20- meters Windom had overall installed a receiver with S-Meter. Table 1 shows the
length 10-m. The WINDOM had maxima radiation to the Data obtained from the test.
South.
www.antentop.org Page-35
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Directional Helical Antennas
Column S- Meter shows normalized level Helical Figure 5 shows the design of the Four- Wire Line.
Antenna/WINDOM. For example, digit 2 shows that The Four- Wire Line was placed onto insulators
level from the Helical Antenna is in 2 times more under the square wood stick. The Small Directional
(according to the S- meter of the receiver) compare the Dipole Helical The small sized Antenna at the test
level from the WINDOM showed that this one worked similar to the helical
antenna shown on the Figure 1.
It was tested Directional Dipole Helical Antenna with
reduced sizes. Length between the Helical Dipoles was However, the Small Directional Dipole Helical
lambda/8, or 2.6-m for the 20- Meters Band. However Antenna was more complicated in the tuning
there was used Four Wire Open Line between the compare to Antenna from the Figure 1. The
Dipoles. Figure 4 shows the design of the Small antennas were fed by 500- Ohm two- wire line with
Directional Dipole Helical Antenna. length 15.6-m (3/4- Lambda).
The antennas were fed by 500- Ohm two- wire line with 2. TX is tuned to the middle of the 20- meter
length 15.6-m (3/4- Lambda). Band and its PA is tuned to the resonant
Tuning of the Directional Dipole Helical Antenna (for with the line.
both antennas- Figure 1 and Figure 4):
3. First dipole is connected to the feeder. Tune
1. Two wire feeder line (with length 15.6-m) the dipole to the resonant (using only the
disconnected from the antenna and turn on to tuning strand wire at the dipole, do not
TX (CAREFUL: To a Tube TX! May be used change tuning at the PA). (Figure 6B)
semiconductor PA with ATU). (Figure 6A)
www.antentop.org Page-36
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Directional Helical Antennas
4. If the dipole is loaded too much the feeder, 6. If the dipole is loaded too much the feeder,
change distance between wires of the Two- change distance between wires of the phase
Wire Line. line.
5. Second dipole with the phase open wire line 7. Connect the antenna to the feeder. (Both
connected to the feeder. (First dipole is dipoles, as shown on the Figure 1 and Figure
disconnected!) Tune the dipole to the resonant 4) (Figure 6D) Antenna should not detune the
(using the tuning strand wire). (Figure 6C) feeder. If it is, repeat tuning process from
paragraph 1.
www.antentop.org Page-37
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters
It is a variant of a Narrow DEWD Dipole The MMANA model of the antenna may be loaded:
(distance between wires- 10- cm) with four
equal wires (each wire is in 19.0- meter long). http: // www.antentop.org/012/narrow_dewd_012.htm
However, the antenna has enough good
parameters compare to usual DEWD antennas
(that were described at Antentop-01- 2009).
Figure 2 Z of the Narrow DEWD Dipole (20- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 38
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters
Figure 3 SWR of the Narrow DEWD Dipole (20- m above the real ground)
Figure 3 DD of the Narrow DEWD Dipole (20- m above the real ground)
It is an alternative way (compare to DEWD) The match may be used at all antenna types
to design a broadband antenna- use so dipoles, verticals, YAGI- either symmetrical or
called UR0GT- Match. The match was asymmetrical.
offered by UR0GT at 2004 at HZ- Forum.
The match was used to feed VHF- The MMANA model of the Dipole Antenna for the
Antennas, but it works at HF too. 80- meters with rectangular UR0GT- Match
may be loaded:
http: // www.antentop.org/012/r_ur0gt_012.htm
Figure 1 Design of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with rectangular UR0GT- Match
Figure 2 Z of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with rectangular UR0GT- Match
(30- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 40
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters
With Rectangular UR0GT- Match
Figure 3 SWR of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with rectangular UR0GT- Match (30- m
above the real ground)
Figure 4 DD of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with rectangular UR0GT- Match (30- m
above the real ground)
It is an alternative way (compare to DEWD) The match may be used at all antenna types
to design a broadband antenna- use so dipoles, verticals, YAGI- either symmetrical or
called UR0GT- Match. The match was asymmetrical.
offered by UR0GT at 2004 at HZ- Forum.
The match was used to feed VHF- The MMANA model of the Dipole Antenna for the
Antennas, but it works at HF too. 80- meters with triangular UR0GT- Match
may be loaded:
http: // www.antentop.org/012/t_ur0gt_012.htm
Figure 1 Design of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with triangular UR0GT- Match
Figure 2 Z of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with triangular UR0GT- Match
(30- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 42
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters
With Triangular UR0GT- Match
Figure 3 SWR of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with triangular UR0GT- Match (30- m
above the real ground)
Figure 4 DD of the Dipole Antenna for the 80- meters with triangular UR0GT- Match (30- m above
the real ground)
It is just a variant of a DEWD Dipole for the 80- The MMANA model of the antenna may be loaded:
meters with Stub Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters http: // www.antentop.org/012/stub_dewd_012.htm,
Pass Band and Efficiency. file: Broadband 80m.5
Figure 1 Design of the DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with Stub Matching
Figure 2 Z of the DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 44
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters
Figure 3 SWR of the DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
Figure 4 DD of the DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
It is just a variant of a DEWD Dipole for the 80- The MMANA model of the antenna may be loaded:
meters with Stub Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters http: // www.antentop.org/012/n_dewd_012.htm, file
Pass Band and Efficiency. Broadband 80m.6
Figure 1 Design of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
Figure 2 Z of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 46
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with
a Stub Matching
Figure 3 SWR of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
Figure 4 DD of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
It is just a variant of a DEWD Dipole for the 80- The MMANA model of the antenna may be loaded:
meters with Stub Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters http: // www.antentop.org/012/nl_dewd_012.htm, file
Pass Band and Efficiency. Broadband 80m.7
Figure 1 Design of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an Inductance Matching
Figure 2 Z of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an Inductance Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 48
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with
an Inductance Matching
Figure 3 SWR of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an Inductance Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
Figure 4 DD of the Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with an Inductance Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
It is just a variant of a DEWD Dipole for the 80- The MMANA model of the antenna may be loaded:
meters with Stub Matching.
The antenna has enough good parameters http: // www.antentop.org/012/sn_dewd_012.htm, file
Pass Band and Efficiency. Broadband 80m.8
Figure 1 Design of the Super Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
Figure 2 Z of the Super Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 50
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Super Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters
with A Stub Matching
Figure 3 SWR of the Super Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
Figure 4 DD of the Super Narrow DEWD Dipole for the 80- meters with a Stub Matching
(30- m above the real ground)
Credit Line:
http: //
www.hamradio.cmw.ru/antenna/kusok.htm
UA6HJQ
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 52
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Simple Field One- Wire- Length HF Antennas
Expedition antenna for the bands should have length Wire in length 20-meters would work efficiency on 7- and
not less the 9 meter and no more the 21 meter. Why? 14- MHz as well as at 18- 28- MHz. The antenna
Because we need antenna that would be work without provides local QSO at the 3.6- MHz. However at good
counterpoises, so, the antenna should have length propagation and if the end of the antenna is hanged up
lambda or lambda/2. Shorten antenna has low at 10 and more meters the antenna allows to make DX-
efficiency, long- high weight. QSO on the 3.6- MHz.
Wire in length 10-meters would be enough if you would
How would it hang up?
like to use bands 14- 28- MHz at the expedition.
Antenna with such length is suitable for local and DX- Classical mountain expedition antenna is Sloper. Figure
QSO on 14- MHz and has good efficiency on 18- 28- 1 shows the antenna. Use any natural support- tree,
MHz. Such antenna still is working on 7-MHz stone, etc., to install the antenna.
(lambda/4 length).
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 53
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Simple Field One- Wire- Length HF Antennas
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 54
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Simple Field One- Wire- Length HF Antennas
5. In the forest use antenna shown in the Figure 5. Figure 6 Helical Vertical Antenna
6. Protect antenna tuner (MFJ-902) from rain and
snow. You may just install the tuner inside a tent.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 55
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 56
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz
Below it is the Parts List for the EH- Antenna. For 6. Two caps for the Coupling.
reference see Figure 1. 7. Length of plastic water pipe, dia 32-mm and length 100-
mm.
1. Two copper plate in dimension 180x315- mm and 8. RF Socket, I used Female SO- 239.
thickness not less the 1- mm. 9. Insulated wire 0.85-mm (AWG-20) OD, near 8-meters
2. Wood or plastic plate in dimension 150x400- mm length.
and thickness near 10- mm. 10. Glue- Gun.
3. Plastic plate in dimension 150x320- mm and 11. Soldering Iron.
thickness near 3- 4- mm.
4. Tens screw (M3- M4). Figure 2 shows the antenna draft. In Blue there are shown
5. Plastic Coupling (dia near 50-mm) for water item 2 and item 4.
pipers.
How to Do Take item 2. Put it on a desk. Take item 1 and put it above
item 2 according the draft (Figure 2). Put item 3 above
1. Prepare the EH- Antenna work-piece. item 1. Fasten the sandwich (item 2 to item 1 to item 3)
with help of item 4. 50% of the job is done.
http://ehant.qrz.ru/
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 57
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz
2. The next step is to make inductor. Inductor is wound at the item 7. Divide wire (item 9) in two
lengths by 4- meters each. Twist the wire, 2-3 twist on
The inductor will be placed inside of the item 5. It centimeter. Then one end of the Wire is fastened to the
needs to save the inductor from atmospheric form (item 7) leaving 100- 150- mm of the wire free.
influence- rain, snow, etc. At first prepare low cap
(one of item 6). Install at centre of the item 6 the RF- Coil 39 turns and second end of the wire is fastened to the
Socket (item 8). At the second cap (one of item 6) form. Beginning and ending parts of the inductor is coiled
make two holes in dia 2- 3-mm for wires going from with some gap. Do tap from 5.5- turn from the bottom. It is
the inductor to the EH- Antenna. Note, that after tuning tap. Antenna is tuned by the tap (choosing the tap
antenna tuning, the holes should be covered with from the inductor) or moving coils coiled with gap between
glue from Glue Gun. each other. The inductor is fastened with help of Glue- Gun
at the bottom cap. Figure 3 shows inductor installed on
the coupling cap.
3. Antenna tuning
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 58
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 59
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz
It was a lots deal to do at that day (when I made the Near the antenna was installed RF- Choke- several turns
antenna), so at last I just measured the antenna of coaxial cable around of a ferrite ring. The choke is
parameters but not tested the antenna in the Air. visible on the Figure 5.
Figure 6 shows the parameters of the EH- Antenna.
The antenna has band- pass in 930-kHz (at SWR The next day a rain was coming. Water dropped from the
less the 2). antenna and I thought that no chance the antenna alive.
Figure 7 shows the antenna into the rain.
I turned on the EH-Antenna instead of my 42- meters So, I decided do not remove the EH- Antenna and tested it
wire Noise (compare to 42-m- LW, the antenna in next days. For me it was interesting how the antenna
installed from another side of my home) dropped would be worked at show conditions.
down but stations went up. First QSO was with
UA0AV, Sergey, Krasnoyarsk- 599. Next ones- .
M0IOW, RK4HE, SP3OOC and VK3XQ, Australia, 73!
my rapport 539, I heard him 56/79. May be good Vladimir, UA1ACO
propagation anyway, for small EH-Antenna placed
at 2- meters above the ground- it is very good. Then St. Petersburg, October- 2009
I had QSOs with OK1HAJ, RV3QX, SP9FVO, YU5R,
GM0IXO, ON3URT, OZ1HVL, UA4SKW, SP4NDV,
UT0EG, DR600UL, RA9FFF, UN1L, RA9JAT,
RM9WK, ON3WP/qrp, LA9SN, RD3BD, RV3SBS
Tube M89
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 60
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz in the Winter
Snow fall, then thawed, and again fall down. Antenna Conclusion- simple Glue- Gun sealing cannot provide
was still working. However I decided to bring the full hermetic. After the antenna was fully dried, I
antenna indoor and checked it. Antenna begun to thaw checked the antenna parameters (they were
out and water was coming from the antenna. From unchanged). Then the antenna was assembled again,
hermetic (as I believed) coupling water begun to drop. I covered protected bag and installed at the old place.
remove caps from the coupling and discovered there Figure 10 shows new installed Flat EH- Antenna.
near 10 grams of water. Figure 9 shows water dropping
from the coupling.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 61
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Flat EH- Antenna for 10- MHz in the Winter
I checked the antenna in the Air- working excellent. Table 1 Theoretical Data of the Inductor for the 7, 10,
OK, I will test the antenna further. 14 and 18- MHz Band.
Flat EH- Antenna may be tuned on to others bands. Band Theoretical Data for Inductor
Design of the antenna is leaved the same only
numbers of coils are changed in the inductor. Table 7 MHz 60 turns
1 shows the Theoretical Data for the others bands.
73! 10 MHz 39 turns
Vladimir, UA1ACO
St. Petersburg, November- 2009 14 MHz 24 turns
18 MHz 17 turns
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 62
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
After having monitored, and occasionally I've always been fascinated by regenerative receivers, with
participating, in the discussions on the Yahoo my first one being built from an article in "Popular
Regenerative Receiver Newsgroup, I thought it might Mechanics," using a 1T4 and the usual "ticker" coil
be of interest to throw in both some of my Armstrong design. In this paper, tutorial, or what you might
experiences, and professional thoughts. I suffer from want to call it, I'd like to look at some of the general design
being an E.E. by training, having grown up at the tail issues. Some of this is based on a discussion of general
end of the vacuum tube era, as well as having held receiver design considerations that I gave recently before
an amateur radio license for half a century. the Nanticoke Amateur Radio club in Seaford, Delaware,
as well as discussions with members of the Yahoo
Regenerative Receiver group.
In no way is this paper comprehensive. A Google
search will turn up all sorts of things. The purpose of
this paper is to provide a starting point for discussion
and experimentation for the person new to the field
of regenerative receivers, who may be utterly
overwhelmed by the plethora of information.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 63
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Note I.G.: On the base of the Regenerative Receiver Armstrong patented several so called Tickler
Oscillator.
Figure Credit Line: Wiki
Everybody is likely familiar with the original Early vacuum tubes were expensive, and parts generally
Armstrong design -- tickler coil for feedback, difficult to come by, and expensive as well. Also, simplicity
"throttle" with a variable capacitor RF bypass from was a major consideration, as the more complex
plate to ground, etc., etc., etc. Keep that in mind, as something is, the lest reliable it will tend to be.
this discussion progresses. If you aren't familiar with As a consequence, there were some design compromises
the basic design -- grid lead detector, "tickler" that we've been working to overcome over the years.
feedback and regeneration control with a variable
capacitor, look this up. Actually, Armstrong's original The following discussion applies to vacuum tube designs
circuit was slightly more complicated, but the as well as their modern cousins with bipolar and field effect
scheme I've mentioned covers the basic design. devices. They really differ only in the details. Every person
has their "pet" designs, of course, as do I. Well, here
One needs to keep firm in mind that early receivers, goes...
as well as transmitter designs were governed
strongly by cost and complexity considerations. Classic Colpitts regenerative receiver may be found:
http://www.antentop/012/regen_rx_012.htm
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 64
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Effectively increases the "Q" of the tuned 2. There is massive interaction with tuning as a function of
circuit by the concept of "negative regeneration setting. If there is a way to separate detection
resistance." Any circuit that accomplishes from regeneration, this problem can be addressed. One
this will do the trick. Typically, an oscillator typical vacuum tube design uses a Colpitts oscillator in
circuit, such as a Hartley, Colpitts, or the like parallel with a plate or grid leak detector (my favorite for
is chosen. One then sets the loop gain of the vacuum tube designs). Another alternative (my Senior EE
oscillator circuit by some means to be just project in 1960!) was to insert a cathode follower between
below the point of oscillation. Later, it will be the tuned circuit and the detector/feedback vacuum tube).
seen that there are some clear design
advantages to some circuits over the others.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 65
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Note from Wiki: The Hartley oscillator was invented by Ralph V. L. Hartley while he was working for the
Research Laboratory of the Western Electric Company. Hartley invented and patented the design in
1915 while overseeing Bell Systems transatlantic radiotelephone test. It was awarded patent number
1,356,763 on October 26, 1920.
Figure Credit Line: Wiki
3. Smooth regeneration. This is the hard nut to There is no need to have this front end tuned, but just to
crack. There is no really good answer here, in my keep the antenna interactions from the detector, and
opinion. This , plus the interaction problem was one reduce or partially prevent radiation from the oscillating
of the major reasons for the decline in popularity of detector from producing QRM for other radio users in the
the regenerative receiver, as well as reduced vicinity.
component costs which made superhetrodyne
receivers practical. However, a well regulated power When running in "oscillation" mode, or close to it, a
supply to the regeneration stage helps a great deal. regenerative detector is its own little QRP transmitter! For
A Zener or comparable regulator in transistor domestic and neighborhood tranquility, the isolation
circuits, or gas discharge tube for vacuum tubes will amplifier greatly reduces radiation back into the antenna. It
work well. I note that one commercial regenerative is not perfect, and my two commercial kit regenerative
receiver simply uses a separate 9 volt battery for the receivers make an impromptu signal generator in the ham
detector, and a second for the audio amplifier. shack when needed. An "RF" gain control can be easily
Now, keeping in mind the "simplicity" issue, we can introduced to reduce the strength of incoming strong
see where these fit into our design process. signals, such as some of the major SW stations, like Radio
Havana, or the PRC stations.
The decoupling of the tuned circuit from the antenna
serves two purposes. First, it reduces the interaction Along with the simplicity issue, the design for convenient
of your antenna with the detector tuned circuit. If you band switching of the detector's tuned circuit is a hassle. If
have ever hooked an antenna analyzer to a random the "tickler" design of the classic Armstrong set is used,
wire antenna, the impedance is all over the place. then there are either two or three coils that have to be
Investment in a good antenna tuner, such as the switched. This means at least a three-pole n-throw switch if
MFJ-16010 is money well spent. Of course, a home- there is a "primary" coil to the antenna. Three of the six coil
brewed tuner is also feasible, either built-in to the points are "ground" for RF, so only a three pole switch is
receiver, or as a separate unit. Any of the the "QRP" needed. If a coupling adjustment capacitor is placed on the
designs will do the trick. The coupling of a resonant primary side to ground, then at least four points are "hot"
antenna into the detector can often lead to "dead" for RF. These switches are not only complex, but they are
spots in tuning. Hence, the advantage of isolating expensive and add a large measure of complexity and
the antenna from the detector with a "front end." increased size to the receiver. There are at least two
common alternative solutions:
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 66
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Torn.E.b
KUB- 4M
Regenerative Receiver for professional communication KUB- 4 was designed in 1930 in
Kozitskiy plant, Leningrad, USSR. The receiver was used everywhere where HF- communication
was used- in military and civil. Later, for marine use was designed KUB- 4M. The receiver was
used at marine and submarine ships. The receivers were in use up to 1945.
KUB- 4 and KYB- 4M had Plug- In Coils
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 67
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Plug-in coils -- the classic solution, but clumsy to do, A design that uses only a single coil in the tuned circuit
and you have to have some place to conveniently such as the Colpitts design is one such solution that
store the un-used coils. My own early sets used greatly reduces the complexity of band switching. Of
these, mostly because I could buy a nice set of short course, a Hartley oscillator design uses a single tap on the
wave and broadcast band coils, versus winding my coil, but again, this is an additional source of complexity
own coils. If you note pictures of early commercial due to the tap on the coil. The Colpitts design does
sets for marine use, there was a coil box near the require a DC return for the cathode in the case of vacuum
receiver. The "Sierra" QRP transceiver suffers from tubes or source in the case of FET designs.
this problem.
By the way, FETs have an advantage as they are To save money, an alternate approach is to use some sort
high input impedance devices like vacuum tubes, of mechanical vernier reduction drive, such as the MFJ-
and do not load the tuned circuit to any degree. Both 8100. With varactor tuning, a secondary variable voltage
of the two commercial regenerative receivers I have source with a smaller voltage variation range serves the
use FETs in the detector and isolation amplifier. The same purpose. Kitchin used a combination of varactor
MFJ-8100 has a series of inductors in series with a (fine) and variable capacitor (coarse) tuning in one of his
simple single pole selector switch. The Ten-Tec designs.
1253 uses nine separate inductors, but switches
them with a clever PIN diode and counter circuit. If we are willing to accept a modest degree of increase in
Both of these designs use an isolation "front end," complexity, the so-called "Regenodyne" receiver is a good
which eases the complexity of coupling into the choice as a solution to the difficulties of developing a wide
tuned detector circuit. coverage receiver. A Google search will turn up some
extensive discussions of this concept.
It is generally agreed that designing a receiver for a
single or small range of frequencies is much easier The idea here is to have a regenerative receiver of
than developing a general coverage receiver. If you modest tuning range as a "back end" to a superhetrodyne
can get a 10:1 range of capacitance change with a front end, which converts a series of band segments with
variable capacitor, for example, then you can expect a crystal oscillator with a series of switched crystal
about a 3:1 tuning range (square root of the ratio of frequencies. A somewhat similar line of attack was used
the maximum to minimum capacitance). This with the "Q Multiplier" tuned/regenerative IF system on
problem rears its ugly head especially in the case of early vacuum tube general coverage receivers. This was
varactor tuning, where the capacitance change available from Heathkit. I had one on a Hallicrafters S-
range is more modest. More about this later, with a 20R, which was quite effective. The front end can be
couple of "real life" receiver designs. pretty broad, and only need remove the image response.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 68
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Hallicrafters S-20R
In the 1960s, the ARRL handbook showed an Again, due to the various interactions, and a desire to get
interesting receiver along these lines. It used a 1700 smooth transition into regeneration, some sort of good
kHz IF frequency with the local oscillator between voltage regulation for the detector stage is essential. This
the 40 and 80 meter ham bands. The 1700 kHz IF doesn't add any great complexity to the design with the
had good selectivity with a half-lattice crystal filter. availability of nice integrated circuit voltage regulator
The front end was tuned to either 40 or 80 meters, chips. Kitchin uses a simple string of diodes to get around
as desired. 1.5 volts for the detector.
As to controlling the regeneration, any scheme that Now, for an analysis of a couple of current commercial kit
allows you to control the feedback will work. The designs. Where I live in rural "Slower Lower" Delaware, it
more common themes: is hard to get electronic parts other than at the local Radio
Shack, unless I do a lot of mail ordering. As a
Armstrong "RF" throttle - another expensive consequence, getting back into radio after a 30+ year
variable capacitor, plus frequency issues. hiatus, I opted to go the kit route for my initial efforts in
regenerative receivers. There are a couple of clear
Variable resistor across the tickler coil -- "kill" advantages to kits -- all the parts were there, and the
some of the feedback signal. My original 1T4 design was liable to work the first time round. Any
regenerative receiver used this scheme. modifications on my part could be done with ease, either
during construction, or later, as I might choose.
Change filament voltage! Used in many of
the early directly heated filament tubes. For my first regenerative receiver kit, I chose the Ten-tec
1253. As I mentioned, the band switching scheme is quite
Change the screen voltage in a Pentode. clever -- it uses a series of inductors switched by PIN
Probably one of the cleanest strategies. This diodes and a counter. It also has nine bands. This is
is used in the World War II Paraset design. mostly due to the rather limited tuning range with the
varactor diode, but nine bands is pretty cool. It covers
Change the coupling between the tickler and from the low end of the 160 meter band up through 13
tuning coil mechanically. meters with a few unimportant gaps. The upper
frequencies are a bit problematical, but this is typical of
Add a variable resistor in the emitter circuit both vacuum tube and solid state regenerative receivers.
(Kitchin's design, who uses a Hartley If you want to go to higher frequencies, and use a
oscillator, and he also uses a separate diode regenerative detector, then the Regenodyne approach is
detector). This reduces the loop gain of the a good bet.
oscillator.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 69
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Ten-Tec 1253
Paraset
Note from Credit Line: The PARASET is a small British "Spy set" transceiver supplied during the WW2 to
the Resistence forces mainly in France, Belgium and Netherland.
It uses 3 metal tubes :
1) 6SK7 - Detector
2) 6SK7 - AF Amplifier
3) 6V6 - Cristall Oscillator/P.Amplifier
The range covered from the receiver is 3.2 - 8 MHz on AM and CW modes.
The transmitter is cristall controlled and works on the same receiver range.
The power output is around 5-7 W on CW mode only.
The set were supplied by a 6 Vdc vibrator type PSU.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 70
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Some Thoughts on Regenerative Receivers
Fine tuning on the Ten-Tec 1253 is done with an MJF-8100 uses a nice variable capacitor with a vernier
additional voltage control on the tuning varactor. This reduction drive for tuning. This "feels" better than the
is a quite satisfactory solution, in my opinion. You potentiometer used in the Ten-tec 1253. The tuning is a
just have to remember to return the fine tuning little "fast" on the upper bands, but acceptable. I admit to
control to the center position before you move up or being a tradtionalist on the issue of real variable
down the band when scanning for additional stations. capacitors. I am not sure God intended us to tune circuits
with varactors. The MFJ-8100 has five bands to cover
The only clear problems that I experienced with the most of the same range as the Ten-tec 1253, but this is
Ten-tec 1253 were: due to using a variable capacitor instead of a varactor.
Ugly tuning knob - a trip to Radio Shack Lack of external power supply connection. A
fixed this. power jack from Radio Shack and a SPDT toggle
switch took care of this. I can use an external 9
I added the "enhanced sensitivity option." I volt battery. There are eight screws to remove to
might want to re-think this. With it, the get the case apart to change the battery, so an
regeneration setting is somewhat "twitchy." external battery is handy.
The second regenerative receiver kit I built was the Headphone only operation. A small external
MFJ-8100. They take a slightly different tack in the speaker/amplifier from Radio Shack took care of
design. They use a series of inductors with a simple this. I might add a more robust internal AF
multi-position switch to tap into the inductor string for amplifier, as there is plenty of room in the case. A
band switching. They, as do Ten-tec, use simple small speaker could be fitted as well. A project for
ferrite miniature inductors, except for one that is a the future...
toroid that you have to wind. All the inductors in the
Ten-tec 1254 design are miniature ferrite inductors.
MFJ- 8100
The RF gain control is internal. At some The seminal article by Charles Kitchen is to be found in
point, I might put a 10K Ohm potentiometer the November/December 1998 QST. He has an extensive
on the back panel to replace the internal discussion, and shows both photos and schematics of an
control, which is accessed through a small excellent complete solid-state regenerative receiver.
hole with a screwdriver. However, I find that
with either the Ten-tec 1253 and MFJ-8100 Also, some very nice material on direct conversion and
that I rarely have to adjust the RF gain Wheatstone bridge regenerative receivers can be found
control unless I have a very strong station. at:
Both receivers benefit from the use of an antenna I look forward to hearing from other members of the group
tuner to optimize the matching between the antenna for their insights on a always fascinating topic.
and the receiver input impedance.
73
For further reading and study, Google is your friend. /paul w. ross
A very good discussion of regenerative receivers can W3FIS
be found in the paper by Ramon Vargas at
http://cidtel.inictel.gob.pe/cidtel/contenido/Pu
blicaciones.php?autor=rvargas
V. Egorov, UA3AB
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 71
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Simple Short Wave Receiver
Schematic For pictorial view some parts are shown in drawn view.
It is a regenerative receiver assembled on a double L1C2 is input circuit. Antenna is connected through a small
triode tube. One triode is a regenerative stage capacitor C1. High- Ohmic headphones is directly
another is an audio stage. Figure 1 shows connected to plate circuit of the triode.
schematic of the receiver.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 72
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Simple Short Wave Receiver
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 73
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Simple Short Wave Receiver
Power Supply
Adjustment
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 74
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 A Multi Band Tube 10 w QSK Transceiver
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 75
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 A Multi Band Tube 10 w QSK Transceiver
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 76
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 A Multi Band Tube 10 w QSK Transceiver
Tuning and Adjustment In my case the shift was near 300- Hz at 160 and 80-
meters and more the 1000 Hz at 10- meters. You may
Transceiver made from right parts should work install the shift by playing with C7, C14 and C16.
straight away. You need only to tune (by GDO or
RF- Voltmeter) the plug-in inductors for the needed *Note from I.G.: At the old times, when the transceiver
frequencies. At self-exciting of the RF-Amplifier at was made (80- 90s) I had a box with headphones. There
the any band vary the value of the R4 that is were old headphones (from 1941- to 1980) from receivers
installed at plug- in inductor. C24 can adjust and phone systems. The headphones were made in
amplification of the audio amplifier. The audio different countries- Russia, German, Britain and Poland
amplifier works well only with high- ohmic and may be in some others. I tested the phones at first with
headphones. a simple crystal (diode) receivers then with DC- receivers
and choose most sensitivity ones. With such phones I
The transceiver has no special circuit for frequency could receive very weak stations that at less sensitivity
shift at RX/TX mode. The shift occurs automatically headphones were not unheard. If you have box with high-
because of a difference in parameters cold and ohmic head phones (or several samples anyway) try to find
hot V5. mostly sensitivity ones from them.
L3 - - 28 18 15 15 15 14 11 1
* 120/30 70/20 - - - - - - - 2
L2 - - 25 19 15 14 11 10 10 1
L5
L6
L7 120/20 60/20 - - - - - - - 2
*
C4, 200 200 180 150 120 100 100 91 62 pF
C7
C9,
C16
C32 2000 2000 1500 1200 1000 600 600 500 300 pF
C26 1500 1000 1000 1000 470 470 390 300 300 pF
Note 1. Inductors made on Russian resistors MLT-2 (value more the 100- kOhm), winding on all the length.
Figure 2 shows the resistor.
Note 2. Inductors made on Russian resistors WS- 2 (value more the 100- kOhm), winding on all the length.
Figure 3 shows the resistor.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 77
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 A Multi Band Tube 10 w QSK Transceiver
Parts Design
At the transceiver I used Russian tubes. Table 1 Transceiver was made on a chassis with dimensions 200 x
shows their international alternatives (thanks to 240 x 40- mm made from two- sided copper plate PCB.
G3FCK) Pattern of the parts at the chassis the same as the pattern
at the Figure 1. Plug- in inductors was made on the base
Table 2 shows data for inductors. Values of from old octal tubes. Figure 4 shows the design. It is
capacitors C31 and C32 are real for specific possible to add some modifications to the transceiver-
impedance of your antenna. If you would like use milliampermeter for metering plate current at the V6 and
several antennas with different impedances you install variable capacitors instead fixed C31 and C32.
need use plug- in inductor (L8C26C31C32) for each Dimensions of the transceiver would be increased but
antenna (or use variable C31 and C32). operation in the Air improved.
It is a variant of a simple DC transceiver. Transistor Inductor L4 has 18 turns of wire in 0.6-mm (23-AWG)
of PA works like a mixer in receiving mode. So, there diameter, winding length is 12- mm, coiled on a form of 8-
is no any commutation in the RF circuits. The mm diameter. L3 has 9 turns of wire in 0.25- mm (30-
transceiver has output power 0.35- Wtts, shift AWG) diameter, coiled on a ferrite ring 10 mm OD x 5-
TX/RX- 400-Hz, RX sensitivity 2 microV. Power mm ID x- 10- mm- H with permeability 50, tap made from
voltage is 15-V, current at RX/TX 30/120-mA. 6-turn from cold end. L2 has 3 turns of wire in 0.25- mm
(30- AWG) diameter, coiled above L3. Inductor L1 has 10
turns of wire in 0.6-mm (23-AWG) diameter, winding length
Figure 1 shows schematic of the transceiver. VFO is
is 14- mm, coiled on a form of 10-mm diameter, tap made
made on V2. C6C7L4C8C9C10 is tuned on 14-MHz.
L3C4 is tuned on 28- MHz. When key (connected to from 3-turn from cold end. L5 has inductance 0.15- H. It
is possible to use collectors coil from an output
X2) is down (TX- mode) relay K1 provides plus 15-
transformer from any transistor radio.
V onto transistor V1. At RX mode the transistor
works like a mixer. Audio signal (at RX-mode) goes
through filter C3L5C11 (3- kHz cutoff frequency) Credit Line: V. Polyakov. Transivery pryamogo
onto audio amplifier made on V4,V5,V6 preobrazovania, Moscow, DOSAAF, 1984
(amplification factor more the 10000). High-Ohmic (DC- Tranceivers, Moscow, P.H.: DOSAAF, 1984)
headphones (3- 4-kOhm at DC, old military ones)
are used with the amplifier. The phones are
connected to X3. Low Ohmic phones does not work
good with the amplifier.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 79
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 An 80 m CW Valve Transceiver
Parts:
RL1 and RL2: Old Telephone (60- V) Relays
TR1: Audio Transformer from old broadcast receiver
L1: 40 turns 0.5mm wire on 20-mmformer, winding
length 20mm
L2: 20 turns 0.7mm wire on 20mm former, winding
length 20mm
L1 and L2 were wound on old plastic shotgun
cartridges
L3: 17 turns 1mm wire on 50mm former, winding
length 50mm
L3 was wound on a glass
RFC1: 400 turns 0.2mm wire on an old plastic pencil
8mm diameter
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 80
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B
Photo # 1
Photo #2
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 81
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B
Photo # 3
Photo #4
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 82
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B
Photo # 5
Photo # 5. Here is shown tube socket. Grids ring are One inductor has diameter 45- mm another one 32- mm.
used from original socket. Cathode and heater is Box- it is capacitor at antenna terminal. It was used old
made by myself. I made it from phosphor bronze in German Capacitor 3x 495- pF. Green resistor is antistatic
0.35- mm thick. resistor 30- kOhm x 2-Wtts that is connected to bridge to
Photo # 6. Tube Inductor wound from copper wire in antenna. White wire is high- voltage wire to the RF- Choke.
diameter 3.6- mm (7 AWG). It was used main
electric wire (plastic insulation was removed).
Photo # 6
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 83
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B
Photo # 7
Photo # 8
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 84
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B
Photo # 9
Photo # 10
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 85
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Practical Photos for P.A. on Tube GU-43B
Photo # 11
Photo # 12
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 86
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Linear Power Amplifier on G811
S. Bunin, L. Yailenko
TX: Grids of the tubes are connected to the ground Chokes L7 and L8 is commercial made from old military
by pedal S1, antenna through contacts of Relay K1 equipment. May be used any suitable chokes.
goes to PA output.
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 87
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Linear Power Amplifier on G811
http://www.antentop.org/ Page 88
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-89
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-90
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-91
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-92
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-93
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-94
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-95
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-96
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-97
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-98
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-99
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012 Ground and/or feedline independent
resonant
www.antentop.org Page-100
ANTENTOP- 01- 2010, # 012
ANTENTOP is FREE e- magazine, made in PDF, I do not know, why the owners do not response me.
devoted to antennas and amateur radio. Everyone Are they still alive? Do their companys are a
may share his experience with others hams on the bankrupt? Or do they move anywhere? Where they
pages. Your opinions and articles are published are in the end?
without any changes, as I know, every your word has
the mean. I have a big collection of pictures, I have got the pictures
in others way, from FREE websites, from commercial
A little note, I am not a native English, so, of CDs, intended for FREE using, and so on... I use to the
course, there are some sentence and grammatical pictures (and seldom, some stuff from closed websites)
mistakes there Please, be indulgent! in ANTENTOP. If the owners still are alive and have the
right, please, contact with me, I immediately remove any
Publishing: If you have something for share with Copyright stuff, or, necessary references will be made
your friends, and if you want to do it FREE, just send there.
me an email. Also, if you want to offer for publishing
any stuff from your website, you are welcome! Business Advertising: ANTENTOP is not a
commercial magazine. Authors and I (Igor Grigorov,
Copyright: Here, at ANTENTOP, we just follow the editor of the magazine) do not receive any profit from
traditions of FREE flow of information in our great the issue. But off course, I do not mention from
radio hobby around the world. A whole issue of commercial ads in ANTENTOP. It allows me to do the
ANTENTOP may be photocopied, printed, pasted magazine in most great way, allows to pay some money
onto websites. We don't want to control this process. for authors to compensate their hard work. I have lots
It comes from all of us, and thus it belongs to all of interesting stuff in Russian, and owners of the stuff
us. This doesn't mean that there are no copyrights. agree to publish the stuff in ANTENTOP but I have no
There is! Any work is copyrighted by the author. All enough time to translate the interesting stuff in English,
rights to a particular work are reserved by the author. however I may pay money to translators, and they will do
Copyright Note: Dear friends, please, note, I this work, and we will see lots interesting articles there.
respect Copyright. Always, when I want to use some
stuff for ANTENTOP, I ask owners about it. But So, if you want to put a commercial advertisement in
ANTENTOP, please contact with me. A commercial
sometimes my efforts are failed. I have some very
advertisement will do ANTENTOP even greater
interesting stuff from closed websites, but I can not
interesting and various! I hope, readers do not mention
go to touch with their owners as well as I have no
response on some my emails from some owners. against such commercial ads.
BEWARE: