The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD window,

achieving the desired window

requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to
maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection
rates (both liquid and gas) and surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be
implemented. All the previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be
controlled are mainly reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in
UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow
models are either mechanistic or empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several
authors2,3,4 developed several UBD flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first
mechanistic flow models for UBD operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow
parameters. Lage et al6,7 proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and
Perez-Tellez9 presented a mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models.
The static models can be used in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various
injection rates and choke pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better
understanding of such complex phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time
using the latest mechanistic models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as
interaction between the formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other
features, it has been extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict
several processes such as changes in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe
injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16 proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations.