Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of
Floating Structures
s e s!
po
TEXTBOOK d uca t io n al
t e
p u
d!
r
fo r e o hi b i
nly p r
u s edo er u se
o b e n y o th
T A Robert Bronsart
Hydrostatic and Stability
of
Floating Structures
TEXTBOOK
Robert Bronsart
4
All rights reserved: no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval sys-
tem, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
or otherwise without the prior written permission the Publisher.
Regrettably for some of the material taken from other sources the copyright holder is not
known. If you happen to know the copyright holder of material which is not accredited to
someone, please inform us about the original source. In case you are the copyright holder, we
would very much appreciate your permission to continue to use the material in this textbook.
Picture credit title page: Dick Knight under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
4 Trim 61
4.1 Trim Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.2 Moment to Alter Trim one Unit Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.3 Change of Local Draft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.4 Exercises and Sample Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.5 Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
i
ii
6 Inclining Test 91
6.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
6.2 Floating Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
6.3 Ship Condition during Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
6.4 Test Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
6.5 Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
6.6 Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
14 Summary 311
14.1 Archimedes Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
14.2 Small Changes in Floating Position: Buoyancy and Gravity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
14.3 Trim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
14.4 Stability Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
14.5 Inclining Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
14.6 Cross Curves of Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
14.7 Righting Arm Curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
14.8 Heeling Moments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
14.9 IMO Intact Stability Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
14.10 Hull Form Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
Bibliography 321
A Appendix 323
A.1 Density of Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
A.2 Examples of Ship Hull Form Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
A.3 Beaufort Wind Force Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
A.4 Wind Force and Moment Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
A.5 Example of Loading Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Index 365
This page intentionally left blank
List of Figures
v
vi LIST OF FIGURES
10.1 Selected IMO Regulations for Ship Safety, Status 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
10.2 IMO IS-Code: General stability criteria based on GZ-curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
10.3 IMO IS-Code: Severe wind and rolling criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
10.4 Modern ship hull form with large stern overhang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
10.5 Definition of parameter for calculating corrected depth D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
10.6 Ship with timber load on deck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
10.7 Offshore supply vessel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.8 Mobile offshore drilling unit types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
10.9 Mobile Offshore Units: Upsetting and righting arm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
10.10 Examples of ice formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
10.11 Geographical areas of icing conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
10.12 Righting arm curve dependent on wave profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
10.13 German Navy stability criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
10.14 UK Navy stability standard: beam wind criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
10.15 Upsetting moment criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
10.16 Breaking wire criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
10.17 U.S. Navy stability standard: wind heel criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
10.18 Weight lifting criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
10.19 Towline pull heel criterion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
10.20 Weight of ice load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
13.5 Odd number of pairwise equally spaced offsets to be integrated by Simpsons Rule . . . . . 283
13.6 Geometrical interpretation of Simpsons First Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
13.7 Four equally spaced offsets to be integrated by Simpsons Second Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
13.8 Integration of one interval: Simpsons Third Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
13.9 Reference axis for moments of a region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
13.10 Reference axis through centroid of area: xs , ys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
13.11 Region G bounded by f 1 ( x ), f 2 ( x ), x1 and x2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
13.12 Waterline to be integrated with help of Simpsons Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
13.13 First and second order moment (Mx , Ix ) about the y-axis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
ix
x LIST OF TABLES
For a comprehensive list of symbols used in naval architectural calculations refer to the ITTC
document ([13]).
xi
xii List of Symbols and Acronyms
H L wave height
H L vertical centre of lateral area above water surface
h L water depth;
local change of fluid surface;
height above water surface;
distance between two adjacent offsets
I L4 water plane moment of inertia about -axis
I S L4 water plane moment of inertia about the principle -axis
I L4 water plane moment of inertia about -axis
I S L4 water plane moment of inertia about the principle -axis
I L4 water plane product moment of area,
in - coordinate-system
IS L4 water plane product moment of area, about principle - co-system
IFys L4 moment of inertia of free fluid surface in transverse direction
Ix L4 water plane moment of inertia about y-axis
Ix S L4 water plane moment of inertia about the principle y-axis
Ixy L4 product moment of water plane area,
IxyS L4 product moment of water plane area in principle x - y co-system
Iy L4 water plane moment of inertia about x-axis
Iy S L4 water plane moment of inertia about the principle x-axis
in x-y coordinate-system
IL L4 water plane longitudinal moment of inertia
IT L4 water plane transverse moment of inertia
IMO International Maritime Organization
IS-Code Intact Stability Code of the International Maritime Organization
K Keel point: the intersection of centre line CL and base line BL in a station view
KB L vertical distance of B from K, position of vertical centroid of buoyancy
KG L vertical distance of G from K, position of vertical centroid of mass
KM L vertical distance of M from K, (transverse) metacentre
KM L L vertical distance of M L from K, longitudinal metacentre
KN ( ) L cross curve of stability (= B ( ))
k L heeling, upsetting arm, generally function of (Mk ( )/B)
k L roll radius of gyration
L L ship length, not further specified
LA L distance between aft and forward draft marks,
measured in the ship longitudinal direction
LCW L L ship length at design draught TCW L
L pp L ship length between perpendiculars
Loa L ship length over all
Lwl L ship waterline length (= f ( T ))
LCB L longitudinal centroid of buoyancy
LCF L longitudinal centre of floatation,
centroid of water plane area
LCG L longitudinal centre of gravity, centroid of mass
LLC International Load Line Convention, IMO Safety Regulation
l L transverse distance, suspension length
lw{1,2} L wind heeling lever, defined in IS-Code weather criterion
M (transverse) metacentre, location on centre line
M L4 vertical moment of displaced volume ( M = B )
MA ML2 /T 2 heeling moment due to anchor cable
MB{ x,y} ML2 /T 2 moment of buoyancy force about y-axis, about x-axis
MB{, } ML2 /T 2 moment of buoyancy force area about -axis, about -axis
List of Symbols and Acronyms xv
Acknowledgements
Many people helped in writing this textbook and I am grateful to all of them. Without their
valuable contributions I would not have been able to finish the work. Many of the chapters
are based on Heinrich Sdings work, which was first published in 1975 as Report No. 11:
Schwimmfhigkeit und Stabilitt von Schiffen of the Lehrstuhl und Institut fr Entwerfen
von Schiffen und Schiffstheorie at the University of Hannover.
The shipyards Flensburger Schiffbau-Gesellschaft, Aker Yards and Volkswerft Stralsund con-
tributed to the textbook by supplying data, documents and pictures from selected ships they
have designed and successfully delivered to their customers.
Eva Binkowski, Lutz Kleinsorge, Gernot Knieling, Jonas Wagner and Michael Zimmermann
helped to improve the document by proofreading and giving many suggestions to make the
textbook clearer and more useful. Some of the exercises were supplied by them, knowing how
students are best aided to understand the topics. Sebastian Nostheide helped to typset the
document with LATEX.
To improve the understanding for the reader, Michael Vogt from the research group Instruc-
tion and Interactive Media of the University of Gieen thoroughly reviewed some of the
chapters based on his didactic background.
Robert Bronsart
June 2015
xviii
Preface
Hydrostatic and Stability play an utmost important role for all floating objects Naval Ar-
chitects and Ocean Engineers design and Mariners operate. Whereas the term Hydrostatic
stands for the effects of forces acting on floating objects, sometimes yielding to moments which
can cause considerable changes of e.g. heel, the term Stability is related to ship safety in that
conditions are dealt with which might cause catastrophic accidents if not handled carefully.
This textbook covers the topics of hydrostatic and intact stability of floating structures which
are taught in the course Ship Hydromechanics I of the undergraduate programme in Me-
chanical Engineering at the University of Rostock. Students who seek a professional career in
the maritime industry are strongly recommended to take this course. The fundamental prin-
ciples are discussed in a way being applicable to any floating object irrespectively how these
objects are called according to e.g. the function they serve. In a second step, the special con-
ditions which can be applied for intact ships are derived. This approach serves to develop a
sound understanding of the mechanical basics and at the same time to understand what ships
and offshore structures makes special in this context.
The reader is offered a set of questions for each chapter which he/she should answer to fully
understand the corresponding topics dealt with. The given exercises, some of them with ex-
ample solution, also serve to better understand the different aspects which are relevant for all
floating structures. According to the experience made over the last two decades, students are
highly encouraged to carefully study the textbook before signing up for an exam!
In some chapters reference is made to regulations each ship or offshore structure has to comply
with in operation and which have to be checked in the design process already. As these regula-
tion are subject to changes, potentially more frequently than new versions of this textbook will
be released, the reader is encouraged to always refer to the actual official documents which are
made available by IMO or by the related national bodies.
Document Structure
The document is structured in a sequence of 13 modules, each addressing special aspects
which are relevant in the context of ships and floating structures hydrostatic and stability
characteristics (see also the outline on the title page). Whereas the first ten chapters deal with
different hydrostatic and stability topics, the last three chapters were added to describe some
basics about ship hull form properties relevant for the evaluation of the vessels hydrostatic
characteristics. Additionally some basic mathematical methods for performing the numerical
interpolation and integration to derive these values are shown. In the appendix, examples of
ship hull forms with corresponding hull form properties are given. Furthermore wind force
coefficients for selected ships are presented.
In Chapter 1 the Archimedes Principle is introduced which represents one of the most impor-
tant physical laws relevant in ship design. Furthermore two coordinate systems are introduced
which are used throughout the whole document. In Chapter 2 it is shown how forces and mo-
ments due to buoyancy acting on a floating object change when the initial floating position of
the object is changed. The equations developed are based on the assumption that the changes in
floating position are small. The term small is discussed and by this it is shown that specially
modern ship hull forms do not justify this assumption in any case.
xix
In Chapter 3 the investigations on forces and moments due to changes in floating position are
completed in that the gravity force and moments due to gravity are also considered. The result
is the hydrostatic matrix applicable for any floating object which relates forces and moments to
changes in the three relevant degrees of freedom namely change in draught and rotation about
the two principle coordinate axes defining a plane parallel to the undisturbed fluid surface and
vice versa. In a following step the hydrostatic matrix is discussed for symmetrically shaped
objects (which might be called ships) with which the set of three equations can be decoupled
with respect to the three relevant degrees of freedom. The naval architectural terms are intro-
duced, among them the metacentre which plays an utmost important role in the hydrostatic
stability characteristics of ships. A method to calculate the changes in floating position without
the requirement of these being small is described. The effect of moments about the transverse
principle axis which lead to trim is discussed in Chapter 4.
Stability criteria for floating objects are derived in Chapter 5 leading to a set of three equations
and three inequations which hold for all objects being in a stable equilibrium state. It is shown
how these criteria can be interpreted for ships yielding to the important statement that the
initial metacentric height has to be larger than zero. Special aspects like fully submerged
objects and stability during docking or when grounded are shown. The importance of the
vertical centre of gravity on the stability is underlined leading to the discussion of the inclining
test in Chapter 6. Based on a protocol of an inclining test for a real ship, the procedure is
described and the results achieved are discussed.
In Chapter 7 forces and moments due to buoyancy are described which act on a ship being
afloat at a heeling angle of any value. It is shown how the cross curves of stability are being
calculated and which special conditions hold for fully submerged objects. The righting lever
expressing the ships capability to withstand an upsetting moment is introduced in Chapter 8 in
which all aspects of the righting arm curve are described. The VASA accident is discussed as
an example showing the righting and upsetting moments acting on a ship over a large range of
heel. The influence of the ship hull form on the righting arm curve is shown which is specially
to be considered when taking waves into account. As a result, the stability criteria developed in
Chapter 5 are updated. The effect of dynamic aspects due to roll motions is explained, by this
the relevance of the righting arm curve for the evaluation of the ship stability characteristics
becomes obvious.
Upsetting, heeling moments are discussed in Chapter 9. Formulae are given which serve to
calculate the moments due to the shifting of the centroid of gravity as well as environmental
and operational aspects. Furthermore the important effect of free surfaces of partially filled
tanks on the initial stability is derived. Stability criteria as defined in the IMO Intact Stability
Code and for the German, UK and U.S. navies are discussed in detail in Chapter 10.
In Chapter 11 it is shown how the relevant characteristics of ship hull forms with respect to
the hydrostatic and stability performance can be calculated as a function of draught or loading
condition. The principal methods applied for this are described in the following two Chapters
12 and 13 in which numerical interpolation and numerical integration methods are developed.
The final chapter 14 summarises important equations and functions in form of a formulary.
In the appendix water density data as well the Beaufort Wind Scale are given. Exemplary ship
station plans are shown with corresponding offset tables and hull form properties as function
of draught. Wind loading coefficients are tabulated for selected ships. The discussion of sec-
tions of an example stability booklet shows how the compliance with IMO stability criteria is
documented for a ship.
Hydrostatic of Floating Objects -
1
Archimedes Law
The fundamental physical law of the static behavior of an object, wholly or partially immersed
in a fluid, is known as the Archimedes Law or Archimedes Principle. Archimedes (287 BC
212 BC) was a Greek mathematician, physicist, engineer, astronomer and philosopher born in
the Greek seaport colony of Syracuse. He is considered by some math historians to be one of
historys greatest mathematicians, along with possibly Newton, Gauss and Euler.
The reader learns which basic conditions have to be fulfilled for an object in a freely floating
equilibrium condition. The principle difference between the two fundamental co-ordinate sys-
tems (one related to the floating object, the other related to the water plane) is discussed. The
pressure distribution in a fluid at rest and the buoyancy force is introduced. Different prin-
ciples of lift generation are discussed with help of corresponding actual ship designs. The
Archimedes Principle is derived leading to one of the most important equations in Naval Ar-
chitectural calculations. The influence of the water density on the floating condition is shown.
Special conditions for submarines and objects resting on ground are described.
1
Changes of Floating Position
2
In this chapter, the six degrees of freedom in ship motions are introduced. It is discussed which
degrees are relevant for the investigations of the static behavior of floating objects. Subse-
quently it is shown how small changes with respect to three degrees of freedom influence B,
MB or MB . Finally a matrix is derived which allows for the calculation of changes of buoy-
ancy and moments for any combination of changes in floating position. These formulae are
later used to calculate changes in floating position if external forces act on a floating object. The
term small change is discussed showing that for modern ship hull forms the assumptions
made are in many cases not met.
The reader understands that small changes to an initial floating position result in changes to
the buoyancy as well as in moments with respect to the chosen coordinate system axis. She/he
is capable to calculate the buoyancy and moments of the buoyancy with respect to the two
coordinate axis which are either parallel to or even in the water surface. She/he is able to judge
the results achieved with respect to the assumptions made that small changes formulae can
be applied.
Key Words
An object freely floating on the surface of a fluid might encounter six different changes in its
floating position (6 DOF), see Figure: 2.1.
27
Buoyancy and Gravity
3
In chapter Small Changes of Floating Position the changes of buoyancy and corresponding
moments with respect to small changes in the three relevant degrees of freedom T, and
where derived. In this chapter, the changes of forces and moments due to buoyancy and
gravity are discussed. This leads to a set of equations for static ship motions which can be
used to solve two principally different problems: Forces and moments can be calculated acting
on a floating object when the floating position is changed. The resulting changes of the initial
floating position can be solved when external forces and/or moments act on the floating object.
In a second part, the derived equations are discussed for floating object shaped like ships.
The effect of symmetry is considered which simplifies the set of equations. Furthermore the
decoupling of the three equations to calculate the changes in the three degrees of freedom is
shown. The naval architectural notation is introduced.
The reader will be capable to calculate the changes in floating position under the assumption
that the change is small. She/he will be able to discuss achieved results with respect to the
small condition. She/he will be able to use important naval architectural terms in the discus-
sion of ship static motions.
Key Words
39
Trim
4
In the chapter Small Changes of Floating Position the changes of buoyancy and correspond-
ing moments with respect to small changes in the three relevant degrees of freedom T, and
where derived. In chapter Buoyancy and Gravity a set of equations for static ship motions
was derived to calculate forces and moments acting on a floating object when the floating po-
sition is changed. Also the resulting changes of the initial floating position can be solved when
external forces and/or moments act on the floating object.
In this chapter, special focus is on the rotational movement of the ship about a transverse coor-
dinate axis through the centroid of the water plane area. For this, the naval architectural terms
trimand moment to alter trim one metre are introduced.
The reader will be capable to calculate the rotational change in floating position under the
assumption that the change is small. He/she will be able to calculate changes in draught due
to trim at any longitudinal position of the ship.
Key Words
trim
moment to alter trim one unit lenth
The trim (t) defines the inclination of the ship in longitudinal direction, the rotation about the
principle coordinate axis passing through the centroid of the water plane area (LCF) for which
the moment of inertia of the water plane area has a maximum value. It may be expressed as the
angle between the baseline and the water plane () but is usually expressed as the differences
in draught at the bow and at the stern, see Figure 4.1.
61
Stability Criteria for
5
Floating Structures
In this chapter, criteria are developed which have to be fulfilled by objects to be in a stable
floating position. These criteria are defined that stability does exist in case a change in any of
the three relevant degrees of freedom or any combination thereof requires a positive amount of
work to be applied. Based on the related naval architectural notation stability criteria to be met
by ships are derived which yield to three equations and three inequalities to be satisfied by all
ships floating in a stable equilibrium position.
The reader will be capable to check a floating position with respect to stability characteristics.
He/she will be able to observe these criteria in the ship design process which have a great
influence on the hull form parameters as well as on the load and lightship weight distributions
and loading capacities.
Key Words
A freely floating object is assumed to be in an equilibrium state which means that all resulting
forces and moments acting on the object have to be zero:
(5.1) R = R = R = 0
71
Inclining Test
6
Stability criteria were derived which are a function of the immersed hull form, the weight of
the floating object as well as its centroid of mass in vertical direction. Whereas all relevant
parameters of the hull form can be calculated very accurately for any shape in the early design
stage, this does not hold for the light ship weight as well as the corresponding vertical location
of the centre of mass (KG). Therefore Naval Architects have to make assumptions for these
two properties which substantially influence ship stability characteristics. Before the ship is
delivered to the owner/operator and certified to operate according to all legal requirements,
the light ship weight and its vertical centre of mass have to be checked for the actual values,
the as-built condition. This is done with help of the inclining test which is performed for
every ship operating under commercial conditions. The protocol of the test is an important
part of the delivery documents, a copy is kept on board the ship.
The reader will learn how the inclining test is performedand which calculations yield to the
results of this test. He/she will be capable to calculate the light ship weight and its vertical
centre of mass based on the measurement protocol of an inclining test.
Key Words
Inclining test
Inclining test protocol
Hogging floating condition
Sagging floating condition
Heeling moment
KG
Light ship weight
Deadweight
91
Cross Curves of Stability
7
In the preceding chapters, changes of floating position were regarded being small. What is
meant by small was discussed in chapter Small Changes of Floating Position while empha-
sis was put on the amount of change and the fact that even small changes in floating position
might result in larger changes of the relevant ship hull form parameters (Aw , Mw, , I, ). In the
following, the heeling angle is not limited to be small but can be of any value. As ships are
very sensitive to rotational movements about the longitudinal axis, the transverse shift of the
centroid of displaced volume (B ) for large angles of heel will be looked at. It is shown that for
modern ship hull forms a heeling also results in some trim, the two degrees of freedom can not
considered as being decoupled. The effect of the ship hull form (below and above the initial
water plane) on the transverse shift of centroid of the displaced volume is discussed.
The reader will learn that for larger heeling angles, the vertical position of the metacentre
(KM = KB + BM) is not relevant as the buoyancy force vector passes through the centroid
of displaced volume which has to be calculated as function of the heeling angle. This leads to
the definition of the cross curves of stability.
Key Words
In the preceding discussions, all changes in floating position were regarded as being small,
the term small was discussed in the chapter Small Changes of Floating Position where
101
Righting Arm
8
In the preceding chapter the cross curve of stability was discussed. The changes of floating
position namely heel were regarded as being of any value causing a transverse shift of the cen-
troid of the displaced volume. In this chapter, the righting arm is introduced which represents
the righting moment due to the weight and buoyancy forces acting on a floating object. The
righting arm is a function of the hull form, the actual loading condition which yields the float-
ing position and the heeling angle resulting in the righting arm curve. The characteristics of
the righting arm curve will be discussed. Stability criteria are formulated which add to those
requirements derived for the initial stability.
Even though the righting arm curve is calculated for static heeling, the righting arm curve
serves to discuss dynamic aspects also. This yields to the basics of static and dynamic ship
stability criteria to be met.
The reader will learn how to calculate and utilise the righting arm curve for a vessel under
specific loading conditions. She/he will be capable to judge upon the stability characteristics of
a certain vessel under a specified configuration applying a quasi static view. Dynamic aspects
like temporarily acting external forces are also considered which result in e.g. heeling moments
acting only for a short period of time but potentially causing large heeling angles.
Key Words
115
Heeling Moments
9
Ships like any floating objects are exposed to heeling moments due to different phenomena. A
classification of forces resulting in heeling moments is given. Vessels have to withstand these
moments to operate safely. Three categories distinguish between moments due to cargo, the en-
vironment and operation. Where relevant the influence on stability as well as the righting arm
curve is discussed. For all heeling moments the functional dependency on the heeling angle is
given which can serve to find the equilibrium floating position under a specific configuration.
Measures are indicated to minimize heeling moments and therefore to improve safety.
The effect of partially filled tanks on the initial stability GM is derived which leads to a formula
for the correction of the metacentric height under the presence of free surfaces of fluids.
The reader will learn how to calculate heeling moments due to different effects. She/he will be
capable to judge upon the stability characteristics of a vessel under a specified configuration
and operational condition.
Key Words
heeling moment
shifting, loading, unloading of cargo, suspended loads
crowding people
bulk cargo
liquids in tanks, free surface correction, GM reduction
wind, icing, turning, towing, anchoring
In the chapter on the righting arm curve, it was shown that heeling moments, whether acting
statically or dynamically, are balanced with the uprighting moment resulting in a heeling angle.
The acceptance of the resulting heeling angle can be expressed by the requirement that the
149
Standards for
10
Ship Intact Stability
In the preceding chapters, criteria were derived for an object to be in a stable floating condition.
These criteria were related to the initial stability as well as to requirements with respect to the
righting and heeling arm curves, also taking dynamic effects into account.
In this chapter the reader will learn how these criteria are translated to national and interna-
tional regulations, the latter under the umbrella of the International Maritime Organization
(IMO). The International Maritime Organization, formerly known as the Inter-Governmental
Maritime Consultative Organization, was established in 1948 through the United Nations to
coordinate international maritime safety and related practices. The regulations of the IS-Code
have to be fulfilled by basically all commercially operating vessels.
The pros and cons are discussed with respect to the formulation of the criteria and the safety
level achieved therewith. The assumptions made in defining the criteria are described which
allows the reader to understand the potential for improvements.
Many of the following text related to the IS-Code is taken from the corresponding document
and adjusted to the layout and structure of this document. To ease the reading and to focus on
the essentials, only relevant parts of the original document are cited and discussed here. The
original version is far more comprehensive consisting of many more chapters and paragraphs
while e.g. addressing additional ship types.
Please pay attention that the regulations of the IMO Intact Stability Code will be updated
to the actual state of knowledge when consensus is achieved in the Maritime Safety
Committee (MSC) on an international level! The criteria discussed in this document express
the status as of May 2013. Even though this textbook will be updated regularly to reflect the
state of the art, it can not be guaranteed that some of what is described here is outdated already
when referred to after the date of printing!
183
Ship Hull Form Properties
11
The shape (form) of the ship hull substantially influences the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic
performance of the vessel. Traditionally, the relevant values were calculated or measured and
plotted for a number of draughts each with a floating condition with no heel and trim (even
keel condition). Today computer programs are used to calculate the required values for actual
floating conditions. For this, numerical interpolation and, more important, integration methods
are utilised.
In this chapter, formulae are derived which are used to calculate the different properties needed
in hydrostatic calculations. After introducing values related to the water plane area, which
is exactly defined by the ship hull form and the floating position, volumetric properties are
discussed. It is shown how the caculated values have to be modified to take the shell plating
into account. Hull form coefficients are introduced which serve as global hull form parameter in
many naval architectural calculations. Empirical formula can serve to estimate major properties
in case the lines plan is not available yet and the properties have to be known in the design
process. Examples of hull form data are given for different ship hull forms.
The reader will be capable to calculate all form data based on a lines plan or an offset table
representing the ship hull form. With this she/he will be able to perform some of the most
important calculations in the ship design process. As today these calculations are in any case
done by computer applications, the reader will gain sound knowledge to judge the results of
these automated calculations.
Key Words
Bonjean Curves
Displaced volume
Block coefficient
Longitudinal centre of displaced volume
Area coefficient of immersed main station
Water plane (Waterline) area
239
Numerical Interpolation
12
The derivation of a function which exactly fits a given set of data or other defined properties
such as the derivative at certain locations or even the area or moments under a curve is called
interpolation. This is a very common task performed in naval architectural calculations. Geo-
metrical, functional or statistical relationships might serve as examples.
For simplicity reasons the representation of intersection curves (geometry) between the hull
form and major internal structural elements like decks, bulkheads etc. can be expressed with
help of interpolated functions defined by a set of points in 3D coordinate space, see Figure 12.1.
The required power to run at a certain speed is an example for a functional correlation between
two very important properties of a vessel, see Figure 12.2. The increase of loading capacity of
container vessels, measured in twenty foot container (Twenty Foot Equivalent Unit: TEU) over
years is a correlation of statistical nature and is shown in Figure 12.3.
For each of these examples, a correlation function can be derived applying interpolation meth-
ods. These interpolated functions then allow to calculate any corresponding functional value
in the definition ranges.
259
Numerical Integration Methods
13
Often the need arises to evaluate integral values of a function that has no explicit analytical
representation or for which such a representation is not easily obtained. An example is the
calculation of the water plane area for which the boundary is defined by the intersection curve
of a horizontal plane and the hull form. In many cases this curve can not be described exactly
by an analytical formula. Instead it is possible to calculate the local breadth (y-co-ordinate) at
given longitudinal positions (x-co-ordinate), e.g. station positions. In a following step an inter-
polation function representing this curve is interpolated which then can be used to calculate
the area.
In this chapter, different methods for the integration of a function based on a given set of data
are introduced. Examples show how these methods can be applied for problem solving in naval
architecture calculations. It is described how the resulting error can be minimized by choosing
an appropriate integration approach. The reader will be capable to select a suitable method for
a given integration problem and to calculate the functional values which include the area and
moments of higher order about any axis e.g. for a water plane of a ship.
Key Words
Rectangular Rule
Trapezoidal Rule
Simpsons Rules
Tchebycheffs Rule
Gaussian Quadrature
Properties of Regions: area, moments of higher order, centroid
Steiners Theorem
Symmetry
277
Index
365
366 Index
RoPax, 79 submarine, 13
RoRo, 79 superstructure, 189
rotation surge, 28
about axis, 32 SWATH vessel, 5
about axis, 30 sway, 28
symmetry, 43, 120
sailing yacht, 134
canting keel, 134 TCF, 244
capsized, 120 Tchebycheffs Rules, 285
sea climate, 138, 215 tension leg platform, 12
sea spray icing, 166 TEU, 269
sea water, 342 timber deck cargo, 200, 214
section area curve, SAC, 246 towing, 168
set of linear equations, 262 pulling force, 168
shell plating correction, 243, 245 transverse centre
ship aging, 221 waterline, 244
ship hull form data transverse moment of inertia, 47, 250
cross curves of stability, 328 empirical formulae, 251
curves of form, 328 trapezoidal rule, 279
KN curves, 328 Trapezoidal Rule, 294
knuckle, 331 trim, 28, 61, 312
LCB, 247 monogram, 64, 67
LCF, 104 trim due to heeling, 103
symmetrical shape, 104 trim moment, 251
ship hydrostatic matrix, 42, 312 trough, 136, 215
ship motions: degrees of freedom, 28 tug, 230
side wall craft, 188 turning, 167, 217, 223, 231
Simpsons Rule, 281
3/8 Rule, 285 U.S. Navy Stability Standard, 227
exercise, 294 crowding of personnel, 232
moment Mx , 292 high speed turning, 231
moment of inertia Ix , 292 icing, 231
third order parabola, 283 righting moment, 228
small changes in floating position, 43, 312 towing pull criterion, 230
SOLAS, 185 towline pull for tugs, 230
special purpose ship, 187 upsetting moments, 228
specific weight, 3 weights, 229
stability wind heeling, 228
criteria, 71, 127, 313, 351, 354 UK Navy Stability Standard, 221
docking, 81 beam wind criterion, 223
during dry docking, 225 bollard pull, 227
grounded, 83 bow or body lifts, 226
harbour conditions, 225 crowding of passengers, 224
instable, 74 high speed turning, 223, 224
neutral, 74 icing, 222
range, 118, 316 lifting of heavy weights, 224
stable, 74 righting moment, 221
stability criteria, 219 ship aging, 221
static heeling angle, 131, 132 upsetting moments, 222
static lift, 7 wind heeling, 222
station uprighting moment, 78
area, 242
moment, 242 Vasa, 123
station flare, 137 VCG, 46
Steiners Theorem, 290 vertical centre
370 Index
buoyancy, 248
displaced volume, 248
empirical formulae, 251
mass, 46
vertical moment, 106
volume above the water plane, 103
superstructure, 103
watertight, 103
yawing, 28