STFFD P1 004107 C06 0001 Rev B Design Calculations - CL C1

SU TU TRANG FULL FIELD
DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 PROJECT
VENDOR FRONT SHEET
DOCUMENT TITLE
Design Calculation (Baseplate)
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES
31
(INCLUDING FRONTSHEET)
VENDOR'S ORDER NO.

CS150107A-1, 2
VENDOR'S OWN DOCUMENT NO REV. NO DATE VENDOR'S APPROVAL
CS150107A-M12 A 21-09-2015 DAREK PLAZA
CS150107A-M12 B 11-12-2015 DAREK PLAZA
Submitted For :
SU TU TRANG FULL FIELD
REVIEW APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT - PHASE 1
INFO FINAL DOCS
PROJECT
REVIEW DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF
VENDOR
CLYDEUNION CANADA LTD.
DESIGN DETAILS, CALCULATIONS, TEST METHODS OR

NAME:
MATERIALS DEVELOPED OR SELECTED BY VENDOR
NOR DOES IT RELIEVE VENDOR FROM FULL
COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTUAL OR OTHER
PACKAGE
OBLIGATIONS.
OH2, 10 X 10 X 15A
DESCRIPTION:
1. ACCEPTED
PO/LOI NO: PO-15145SPX REV.1
2. ACCEPTED, PROCEED WITH WORK AND
INCORPORATE COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT
TAG NOS./PO ITEM NOS:
PBE-4915A/B
3. NOT ACCEPTED.
REVISE AND RE-SUBMIT.
4. FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
SEQUENCE
DE PTSC CLJOC PACKAGE NO. VDRL CAT.

REV.
NO.
Name:
Le Trong Quang
Date:
STFFD-P1-
C06,C13 0001 B
004107
Sign:
28-Dec-15
VENDOR DATA COMMENTS/RESPONSES
PROJECT TITLE: SU TU TRANG FULL FIELD DEVELOPMENT - PHASE I

PREPARED BY: J. Doorlag
RFQ NO.: STFFD-P1-101001

SIGNED BY:
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION: Cooling Water Circulation Pump (Items PBE-4915 A/B)

REV.: 1
PO/CONTRACT NO.:
DATE: 29-Oct-15
VENDOR: ClydeUnion Pumps / an SPX Brand
ITEM DATA
DOCUMENTS TITLE REV. PTSC/CLJOC COMMENTS VENDOR PROPOSALS PTSC RESPONSES CLJOC RESPONSES REMARKS
NO.
CODE
STFFD-P1-150107-
page 11, provide sling loads, or spreader bar
1
C06,C13-0001-CALC- A not in SPX scope. Lifting method and design responsibility is with customer.
calcs
BASEPLATE (M12)
calc will simulate single point lift only as the worst case scenario, verifying the lifting lugs. Lifting
2 A 2.4.1, add slings/spreader bar
apparatus is not in SPX scope, responsibility of customer.
3.2.1, we have very small safety margin here.

3 A base if already figured with S.F., design load as stated in calc. It's acceptable as within limits.
Please double check and provide reinforcement
4 A last page, add plot for lifting analysis plot to be added verifying lifting lugs, from single point lift perspective as this is worst case scenario.
Page 4, 2.1.2, what is material grade, vendor to

show section properties of primary and secondary Material grade to be added, From FEA perspective no problem.Mesh statistics added. Section
5 A
beam support of rotor and pump pedestal,vendor properties may be refered from GA drawings or baseplate drawing.
to show mesh statistics
6 A page 5,Transportation case loads and BC's Added BC's and loading details on page 5 & 6. Inertial loads are removed from In-place condition.
Page 6, Add load as symbol B, C ,D. Page 7 This

Added table 2 with loads breakup on page 7. Removed intertial loads from inplace condition on page
7 A
load for transportation not for inplace analysis.

7
8 A Page 10, delete transporation loads Deleted, and load combinations reduced appropriately
Reactions during lifting conditions is the sling load,pls refer page 19.spreader bar not considered in
A page 10, Slings loads
FEA
Necessary changes made, earth gravity is considered along with lift acceleration. No load
A Page 11 lifting analysis details
combinations ,only single point hook lifting.
Revised doc has sufficient margin due to removal of transportation loads from inplace condition.
Dynamic forces would be very less. As per previous FEA, Dynamic force is the unbalance force
A Page 13, very small margin
coming from impeller and shaft, this will have minimal value and negligible effect on baseplate and
foundatation.
A Page 16, Deflection limits Added
A Page 18,other types of stresses and sling load Tension, shear and vonmises stresses added. Sling load is given on page 19(lifting reactions)
A Last page,lifting plots Already added on page 16,17,18
Structural Analysis of Base Frame
REPORT OF STRCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BASE FRAME
Customer: TOAN THANG ENGINEERING CORP

Customer PO: 151455PX
Service: COOLING WATER CIRCULATION
Location: VIETNAM
Item No.PBE-4915 A/B
INDEX DATE WRITTEN BY MODIFICATIONS

A 10/09/2015 Shreenidhi Dharwadkar A
A 12/08/2015 Shreenidhi Dharwadkar B
Client: Cuu Long JOC
Project: Su Tu Trang Full Field Development - Phase 1
1/29
E Compliance Policy CLYDEUNION has sole ownership of this document
be duplicated or scanned without authorization of his compliance officer
Content
1. General
1.1 Document Scope

1.2 Reference documentation
2. Methodology and criteria

2.1 FE modelling and Analysis
2.2 Transportation Analysis
2.2.1 General considerations
2.2.2 Loads and Boundary conditions
2.3 Inplace Analysis
2.4 Lifting Analysis
3 Results and conclusions
2/29
1. General
1.1 Document Scope
The scope of this report is to verify the structural integrity of the base frame
structure for the following design conditions
In- place loading condition
Transportation condition
Lifting condition
1.2 Reference documents

The following Company general specifications and standard codes are used for
evaluating the base structure.

2014-4889-6L-0005
AISC 13th steel construction manual 2005 edition
API610 11th edition
ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile OffShore Drilling Units-2001.
DNV-OS-C101 Design of Offshore Steel Structures
2. Methodology and criteria

2.1 FE Modelling and Analysis
All analyses of the base skid structure have been performed using ANSYS 15
software.
3D models of pump, motor are considered along with base plate skid for
Transportation & in-place analysis
The base skid has been modelled as a 3D structure using Solid works software
and transferred to ANSYS using inbuilt importing facilities without any
geometric losses.
FEA model assumes that fillet welds are adequate to support the loads.
Hence all connections are considered as bonded connections.
2.1.1 FE model:
The model has been meshed (As shown in Fig 1) using higher order elements which
are available in Ansys software. The below FE model is used of transportation and in-
place analyses.
3/29
Fig1: FE Mesh
2.1.2 Material Properties:

Casing: A216 WCB
Yield stress: 250 MPa
Ultimate stress: 483 MPa
Baseplate: Structural steel
Yield stress: 250 MPa
Ultimate stress: 400 MPa
Allowable stress: 0.6xYield = 0.6x250=150 MPa (AISC steel construction
manual)
Motor is modelled using structural steel material and adjusted in its density
to get actual weight.

Anchor bolt is assumed to be A193 B7 Material during foundation load
calculations.
Materials for all other components are assumed as structural steel.
2.2 Transportation Analysis

2.2.1 General consideration
Base plate skid with all weights are properly secured in the cellar deck by means
of Foundation bolts in such a way to avoid movement in any direction.

Foundation holes are restrained in all directions at bolt holding contacts as
boundary conditions as shown in fig 2.
4/29
The transportation analysis is carried out for the combination of loads as given
below:
Standard earth gravity
Inertial loads in Sway, Surge & Heave directions as per Doc No: 2014-
4889-6L-0005. With loading combination as shown in below table 2.
Fig: Boundary conditions for transportation conditions
5/29
Fig: Inertia loads on base frame during transportation condition
2.3 In Place Analysis

Base plate skid with all weights are properly secured in the cellar deck by means
of Foundation bolts in such a way to avoid movement in any direction.

Foundation holes are restrained in all directions at bolt holding contacts as
boundary conditions as shown in section 2.3.2.

As shown in Table1, The In place analysis is carried out for the combination of
loads as given below:

Standard earth gravity
Nozzle loads (2XAPI)
Wind Loads
Motor start up torque
2.3.2 Loads and boundary conditions

The connection between base skid and foundation is considered as fixed at
foundation bolt location (As shown in fig 2).
6/29
Fig 2: Boundary conditions for in-place conditions
Table 1: Dead Weights

Components Weight, Kg
Pump (fluid filled) 822
Motor 2200
Base plate 1400
Others 150
Total 4522
Table 2: Loads
Components Value
A- Earth gravity 9.81m2/sec
Fx =10680
B-Discharge force, N Fy =8900
Fz =13340
Fx =13340
C-Suction force, N Fy =10680
Fz =8900
Fx =10040
D-discharge moment, N-m Fy =4880
Fz =7600
Fx =10040
E- Suction moment, N-m Fy =4880
Fz =7600
F- Motor torque, N-m T=2122
wind load,Pa 1200
7/29
Start-up motor torque (2xrated torque) is calculated based on motor power 200
KW and rated speed 1800 RPM.

Dead weights, Nozzle Loads and Motor Torque are shown in Fig 3.
Nozzle loads considered as per 2X API 610 11th edition for respective nozzle sizes
of discharge (10 inch) & suction (10 inch).
Fig 3: Dead weight, Nozzle Loads and Motor Torque
Wind Pressure is calculated based on the wind velocity based on design storm
condition as per Doc: 2014-4889-6L-0005.

The wind pressure is calculated as shown below as per ABS rules for building and
classing mobile offshore drilling units.

Wind Pressure (Design storm) applied in all load cases are shown in fig 4.
8/29
Fig 4: Wind pressure on Base frame structure
9/29
Table 3: Load combinations
2.4 Lifting Analysis

Baseplate along with Pump and Driver is considered for the Lift analysis.
Pump and Driver are represented as point mass at their respective COG
locations.
Structural Steel is taken as a material for the baseplate.
Straight vertical sling lifting is considered throughout this analysis.
Dynamic lift factor of 2 factoring to static lift weight of the structure is
considered.
Total weight of the equipment is as given in table 1, Dead weights.
Reaction loads/sling loads are as given in below section 3.3.4.
10/29
2.4.2 Loads and boundary conditions

vendor to advise the size of
sling and shackle to be used.
Fig 6: Loads and boundary conditions for lifting analysis
Remote displacements are used as boundary conditions with fixity maintained
remotely at hook point. Self-weight is considered with Dynamic lift factor of 2 is used
for factoring static lift weight of the structure. Pump and motor is modelled using
point mass at their respective COG locations. FE mesh for lifting condition is as
shown in below figure 7.
Fig 7: FE Mesh
11/29
3. FE Results & Discussion

3.1 Transportation Analysis:
3.1.1 Deflection:
Max rotor misalignment during transportation is close to 0.23mm. The result plot of
all the load steps are shown in Appendix I. From the above values of deformation, it
is evident that deformation inside the casing is still lesser and well within the design
clearances.
3.1.2 Von-Mises Stress
Max von mises of baseplate during transportation is close to 44 MPa < 150 MPa
which is observed on secondary beams below the motor. The result plot of all the
load steps are shown in Appendix I. From the above values of deformation, it is
evident that deformation inside the casing is still lesser.
12/29
3.1.3 Foundation Bolt Reactions(N)
Max foundation reaction during transportation condition is close to 20kN in shear and
tension for load case 5 and 8 respectively.
3.2 In place Analysis:

3.2.1 Deflection:
Max misalignment of rotors during in-place condition is close to 0.332mm which is
less than allowable limit 0.38mm, API 610 11th edition. The result plot of all the load
steps are shown in Appendix II.
13/29
Fig 8: Load case 4- Casing distortion
From above figure the max relative displacement inside the casing is close to 0.014
mm, which is less than 35% diameteral clearance. For this pump, minimum wear ring
diametral clearance is close to 0.584 mm.35 % diametral clearance = 0.204mm. Thus
no contact observed between stationary and rotating parts.
3.2.2 Von-Mises Stress
Max von mises of baseplate during transportation is close to 34 MPa < 150 MPa
which is observed on main beams below towards pump side. The result plot of all
the load steps are shown in Appendix I.
14/29
3.2.3 Foundation Bolt Reactions
Max foundation reaction during Inplace condition is close to 25.5kN in shear & 30 KN in
tension for load case 7 and 8 respectively.
15/29
3.3 Lifting Analysis:

3.3.1 Deflection:
Fig 9: Deformation during lifting

Max deflection of 0.56mm is observed at the motor pedestal. Deflections on the
primary beams and secondary beams are close to 0.3mm and 0.55 mm respectively
which is less in compared to the length of the respective beams. Allowable
deflections during lifting is L/350. L =1371/350 =3.91mm. Thus deflections are
within limits.
16/29
3.3.2 Von-Mises Stress plot
Fig 10: Von mises stress during lifting

Max von mises stress observed is close to 100 MPa < 150 MPa on lifting lug close to front
end toward motor side. Von mises stress on the primary beam and secondary beam is close
to 12 MPa & 30MPa respectively and within the allowable limit. Max loaded lug is sub-
modelled by transferring displacements from actual model to the refined model around the
max loaded lifting lug. The sub-modelling results are as shown in Fig 11.
17/29
Fig 11: Sub modelling & Von mises stresses
Von mises stress in the lifting lug is close to 123 MPa < 150 MPa. Max Principal stress 120
MPa< 150MPa subsides into the weld material. Max shear stress on lifting hole is close to 68
MPa < 90MPa. Thus lifting lugs are safe to withstand the specified dead loads and lifting
factors.
18/29
3.3.3 COG estimation
Fig 12: Equipment COG location

3.3.4 Lifting lug Reactions
Fig 12: Lifting lugs
From Above table max loaded lug (38250 N) is towards driver side.
19/29
3.4 Anchor bolt loading analysis

Baseplate anchor bolt layout:
Fig 13: Anchor bolt layout

3.4.1 In place Analysis:
The bolt reactions for in place analysis is higher than the transportation condition. So the
foundation bolt calculations is performed for in place analysis. From above calculation
sheet, a bolt size of 7/8 UNC is required to take up the above specified loadings for in-place
condition with minimum pretension of 600 N-m. The max direct tensile stress due to pullout
load for a 7/8 UNC with minor diameter of 18.75mm is 108 MPa < 172 MPa (ASME bolt
allowable stress), thus safe.
20/29
3.4.2 Summary & Conclusions
Transportation Analysis
Max rotor misalignment during transportation is close to 0.23mm.
Max von mises of baseplate during transportation is close to 44 MPa < 150
MPa which is observed on secondary beams below the motor.

Max foundation reaction during transportation condition is close to 20kN in shear
and tension for load case 5 and 8 respectively.

In place Analysis
Max misalignment of rotors during in-place condition is close to 0.33mm
which is less than allowable limit 0.38mm, API 610 11th edition.
Max relative displacement inside the casing is close to 0.014 mm, which is
less than 35% diameteral clearance. Thus no contact observed between
stationary and rotating parts.

Max von mises of baseplate during in place condition is close to 34 MPa <
150 MPa which is observed on main beams below towards pump side.
Max foundation reaction during Inplace condition is close to 25.5kN in shear & 30
KN in tension for load case 7 and 8 respectively.
Lifting Analysis
Max deflection of 0.56mm is observed at the motor pedestal. Deflections on
the primary beams and secondary beams are close to 0.36mm and 0.52 mm
respectively which are less in compared to the length of the respective
beams.
Max von mises stress observed is close to 100 MPa < 150 MPa on lifting lug
close to front end toward motor side.

For sub modelled lifting lug, Max Von mises stress is close to 123 MPa <150
MPa. This stress exists at the corner between lifting lug and main beam
which sub sides in to the weld material. Von mises stress in the lifting lug is
close to 100 MPa < 150 MPa. Thus lifting lugs are safe to withstand the
specified dead loads and lifting factors.
Anchor bolt Analysis
A bolt size of 7/8 UNC is required to take up the above specified loadings for
in-place condition. The max direct tensile stress due to pullout load for a 7/8
UNC with minor diameter of 18.75mm is 108 MPa < 172 MPa (ASME bolt
allowable stress), thus safe.
21/29
Appendix I
I.1 Transportation Analysis Deformation plots
Load case 1 Load case 2
22/29
I.2 Transportation Analysis Von mises stress plots
Load case 1
Load case 2
23/29
Load case 3
Load case 4
24/29
Load case 5
Load case 6
25/29
Load case 7
Load case 8
26/29
Appendix II
II.1 In place Analysis Deformation plots
Load case 6
Load case 5
27/29
II.1 In place Analysis Von mises stress plots
Load case 8
Load case 7
28/29

STFFD P1 004107 C06 0001 Rev B Design Calculations - CL C1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

STFFD P1 004107 C06 0001 Rev B Design Calculations - CL C1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SU TU TRANG FULL FIELD

DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 PROJECT

VENDOR FRONT SHEET

TOTAL NO. OF PAGES

VENDOR'S ORDER NO.

VENDOR'S OWN DOCUMENT NO REV. NO DATE VENDOR'S APPROVAL

CS150107A-M12 A 21-09-2015 DAREK PLAZA

CS150107A-M12 B 11-12-2015 DAREK PLAZA

SU TU TRANG FULL FIELD

INFO FINAL DOCS

REVIEW DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF

CLYDEUNION CANADA LTD.

DESIGN DETAILS, CALCULATIONS, TEST METHODS OR

MATERIALS DEVELOPED OR SELECTED BY VENDOR

NOR DOES IT RELIEVE VENDOR FROM FULL

COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTUAL OR OTHER

2. ACCEPTED, PROCEED WITH WORK AND

INCORPORATE COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT

TAG NOS./PO ITEM NOS:

REVISE AND RE-SUBMIT.

4. FOR INFORMATION ONLY.

DE PTSC CLJOC PACKAGE NO. VDRL CAT.

PROJECT TITLE: SU TU TRANG FULL FIELD DEVELOPMENT - PHASE I

RFQ NO.: STFFD-P1-101001

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION: Cooling Water Circulation Pump (Items PBE-4915 A/B)

VENDOR: ClydeUnion Pumps / an SPX Brand

2 A 2.4.1, add slings/spreader bar

apparatus is not in SPX scope, responsibility of customer.

3.2.1, we have very small safety margin here.

Please double check and provide reinforcement

Page 4, 2.1.2, what is material grade, vendor to

Page 6, Add load as symbol B, C ,D. Page 7 This

load for transportation not for inplace analysis.

A page 10, Slings loads

combinations ,only single point hook lifting.

A Page 16, Deflection limits Added

A Last page,lifting plots Already added on page 16,17,18

Structural Analysis of Base Frame

REPORT OF STRCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BASE FRAME

Customer: TOAN THANG ENGINEERING CORP

INDEX DATE WRITTEN BY MODIFICATIONS

A 12/08/2015 Shreenidhi Dharwadkar B

Client: Cuu Long JOC

Project: Su Tu Trang Full Field Development - Phase 1

1.1 Document Scope

2. Methodology and criteria

3 Results and conclusions

1.2 Reference documents

evaluating the base structure.

2. Methodology and criteria

and transferred to ANSYS using inbuilt importing facilities without any

Hence all connections are considered as bonded connections.

2.1.2 Material Properties:

to get actual weight.

2.2 Transportation Analysis

of Foundation bolts in such a way to avoid movement in any direction.

boundary conditions as shown in fig 2.

Fig: Boundary conditions for transportation conditions

Fig: Inertia loads on base frame during transportation condition

2.3 In Place Analysis

of Foundation bolts in such a way to avoid movement in any direction.

boundary conditions as shown in section 2.3.2.

loads as given below: