BAGONG POOK ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN/ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MONITORING TOOL

(Elementary)

1. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES

a. Enrolment
ENROLMENT SCHOOL YEAR
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012- 2013
M F T M F T M F T M F T
Pre-School 8 10 18 18 12 30 24 11 35 24 24 48
Grade I 26 30 56 37 25 52 29 22 51 43 26 69
Grade II 17 17 34 24 27 57 23 22 45 29 20 49
Grade III 30 26 56 20 18 38 21 20 45 18 20 38
Grade IV 19 19 38 29 24 53 18 16 34 20 24 44
Grade V 16 19 35 19 21 40 27 22 49 19 17 36
Grade VI 21 18 39 16 20 36 17 20 37 28 20 50
TOTAL 13 13 276 15 14 300 159 13 296 18 149 33
7 9 3 7 7 1 4
SPED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SSES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM (ALS)

Programs and Enrolment
Projects
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 2013
Enroll Pass Enroll Passe Enroll Passe Enroll Passe
ed ed ed d ed d ed d
Basic Literacy None None None None None None
Program (BLP)
Accreditation and None None None None None None 2
Equivalency
Program (A&E)
Other None none none none none none
Programs/Projects

b. Performance Indicators
INDICATORS 2009 - 2010 2011 - 2011 2011 2012
1. Completion Rate 96% 64% 64%
2. Drop-out Rate 3% 0% 0%
3. Retention Rate 91% 91% 91%
4. Repetition Rate 3% 3% 3%
5. Promotion Rate 90% 90% 91%
6. Graduation Rate 100% 100% 100%
7. Failure Rate 8% 8% 8%
8. Cohort-Survival 53% 52% 55%
 Rate

c. Intermediate Indicators
1. School Nutritional Status
Grade Severely Wasted Normal Overweight
Wasted
Grade I 10 23 31 1
Grade II 8 9 39 0
Grade III 6 9 22 0
Grade IV 9 12 23 0
Grade V 6 4 24 0
Grade VI 11 12 27 0
TOTAL 55 87 191 1

2. Textbook-Pupil Ratio
Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Grade I 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade II 1:2 1:2 1:1
Grade III 1:2 1:2 1:1
Grade IV 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade V 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade VI 1:2 1:2 1:2
TOTAL 1:2 1:2 1:2

3. Teacher-Pupil Ratio
Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Grade I 1:28 1:26 1:25
Grade II 1:34 1:51 1:45
Grade III 1:56 1:38 1:45
Grade IV 1:38 1:52 1:34
Grade V 1:35 1:40 1:49
Grade VI 1:39 1:36 1:37
TOTAL 1:36 1:37 1:42

D. SBM Level of Practice(on separate sheet)

Dimension Dimensio Dimensio Dimensio Dimensio Dimensio
1 n2 n3 n4 n5 n6
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Total 12 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0
0 1
Grand
Total 12 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0
0 1

SBM Level of Practices: 45/31%

II. SIP/AIP IMPLEMENTATION

A. EQUITABLE ACCESS

1. Personal
P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1 HT-III HT-II HT-I TIC MT-2
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MT-1 T-3 T-2 T-1 Pre- Non- Total

School Teaching
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 1 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 8

2. Learning Materials and Equipment

a. Facilities
Classroom/Furniture Actual Needs
Classroom(Instructional) 4 3
H.E. 1 1
I.A. 0 1
Laboratory Room 0 1
Canteen 1 1
Library 0 1
Tables 9 0
Chairs 98 0

B. Textbooks( Elementary)
GRADE
I II III IV V VI
Actu Need Actu Nee Actu Need Actu Nee Actu Nee Actu Nee
al s al ds al s al ds al ds al ds
English 40 29 119 0 73 0 35 9 35 0 32 18
Mathemati 38 10 51 0 63 0 61 23 61 0 7 43
cs
Science 42 0 28 21 28 18 63 0
Sibika/HKS 50 20 29 39 0 43 0 43 0 35 15
EPP 4 22 4 32 5 45
IA 0 44 0 36 0 50
MSEP 0 44 0 36 6 50
CE/sP 6 6 38 6 30 8 42a
3. Physical and Ancillary Facilities

a. ICT Facilities

No. of Internet No. of Computers Used in No. of

Computers Instruction Computers
With Without Actual Needs
1 / 0 1 15

B. QUALITY AND RELEVANCE

1. Learner Performance

a. National Achievement Test (NAT)

GRADE III

Subjects 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Intervention Done to

Raise Academic
Standards
English (Reading) Reading ABRC, story
books
English (Grammar) Remedial Classes
Filipino (Reading) Reading story books
Filipino (Grammar) Remedial Classes
Mathematics Reciting Multiplication
Table
Science Remedial Classes
Average

Grade VI
Subjects 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Intervention Done to
Raise Academic
Standards
English Reading ABRC, story
books
Mathematics Reinforcement Activities
Science Remedial Classes
Filipino Remedial Classes
Hekasi Reciting Multiplication
Table
Average

b. Periodic Test Result Use another Sheet for the result of and item analysis by subject area)

c. NCBTS/TSINA

1. Competency and Level of Teachers

Competency Level of Teachers Teachers professional Development Index

Level No. of Teachers Index No. of Teachers
1. High 1. Expert
2. Satisfactory 7 2. Experienced
3. Fair 3. Developing 7
4. Low 4. Beginning

C. MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES

1. Stakeholders Participation
Activities No. of Level of Participation
Stakeholders Attended/Participated Participants Poor Satisfactory Very Outstanding
(0-25) (26-50) Satisfactory (76- )
(51-75)
PTA/Parents/ Brigada Eskwela 276 /
teachers/Pupils
Parents/Teachers Assembly on K to 12 78 /
Parents HRPTCA Meetings 201 /
Parents/Teachers General Assembly 168 /

2. Stakeholders Contribution/Assistance
STAKEHOLDERS NATURE OF CONTRIBUTION EXTENT OF INVOLMENT
P S VS O

3. Grants/ Fund Assistance Received(3/ys

Grants/ Fund Assistance Amount Amount Amount If not Where Utilized
Received Utilized Liquidated liquidated
Why?
SBM Grant 2009 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 Supplies
LSB 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 Repair
MOOE 28,232.00 28,232.00 28,232.00 Repair, Supplies,
electricity
SBM Grant 2010 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 Repair, Supplies
LSB 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 Repair H.E Building
MOOE 28,232.00 28,232.00 28,232.00 Repair, Supplies,
electricity
SBM Grant 2011 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 Feeding

With the gratitude received, please answer the following.

a. was the school project implemented As planned?(If Yes/no, state why?)___Yes, the
school project was implemented as planned because the school head followed the guidelines of
these grant/fund assistance. Priorities in the SIP were always considered in spending such grants._
b. Was the school project implemented on time?
___Yes_________________________________________
c. Did the school spend the grant funds per guidelines?__Yes, funds were utilized to where
they were needed most.
e. Did the project attain the stated component objectives and/or purpose of the
school? If Yes/no, state
why?)___Yes, School needs/targets_were met and the school was able to cope with its needs
without making parents contribute or conduct fundraising ._
f. What were the major challenges? What solutions were taken? _Insufficiency.. grant/ fund
assistance did not meet exact value /amount of what the school needs_ but through fund
management , help from other stakeholders and continuity of such MOOE/LSB-SEF), school
projects were completed.
g. Did the school project contribute to the achievement of SIP objective?
___Yes______________________
h. Did the exercise of the school project using SBM grant improve the SBM Practice of
the school? (If Yes/no, state why?)____Yes, SBM grant is utilized based on SIP and
contained in the AIP were SBM is included.
i. What are the chances that the school will continue the project mainstream in the
school operations the project initiative/s. If yes, what are the exercise that will be
sustained? If no, why?__Yes, with continued support /assistance from the government and from
the different stakeholders

4. Instructional Supervision (Current S/Y)

Subject No. of Times Observation Done by School Head by Subject
Area/Grade Level
I II III IV V VI
English 1 1
Math 1 1
,Science
Sibika/HKS 2
Filipino 2 1
EPP 1
MSEP

h. Did the use of SBM grant for school project improve the SBM practice of the school? If
yes/no state why.

___________________________________________________________________________________.

4. Instructional Supervision ( Current SY )

Observation/by Grade and by subject area

Grade I Grade Grade Grade Grade

II Grade III IV V VI
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

English 2 1 1 1 1 1 2

Mathematics 2 2 3 1 1 1 2

Science 1 1

Sibika/HKS 1 1 1

Filipino 2 1

EPP

MSEP/MAPEH

MTBMLE 2
EsP

C. Training/Competency Needs(Based on TSINA)

ICT TRAINING
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4. Staff Development
A. Trainings Attended(S/Ys 2010-2012)
Target EFA Outcome Hindering Factor/s for
Date Title of Training Goal/ Expect Actual not achieving Expected
Objective ed Output
1/29-10- Oral English Enhancement and
2/01/10 Public Speaking

2/19/10 Basic Training Course for Kawan

Leaders
4/28/10- Workshop Seminar on Populaton
5/2/10 and Housing
District Trainings of Teachers and
6/02-4/10 School Head for Learning
Technologies in the Classrooms
7/19- Division Training in Campus
23/10 Journalism for School Paper
Adviser
10/2- Division Skill Development
29/10 Trainings on Arts and Crafts
1/24- Division Seminar Workshop in
26/11 Mathematics
7/21/11 Orientation Workshop on
Breakfast Feeding Program
7/30- Division Training in Campus
31/11 Journalism (Photojournalism and
8/6-7/11 Layouting)
4/11/12 Seminar workshop sa Pagtuturo
sa Unang Wika(Mother Tongue)
Based Multilingual Education) sa
Bagong K to 12 Kurikulum
Division Training For Grade I
5/13- teachers on the K to 12
18/12 Curriculum
Municipal Action Team(MAT)
5/16- Training Orientation
18/12
7/19/12 Orientation Workshop on DOST
OL trap

B. Trainings Conducted(S/Ys 2010-2012

Target EFA Outcome Hindering Factor/s for
Date Title of Training Goal/ Expect Actual not achieving
Objective ed Expected Output
Inset Training
Computation of Grade Computer Needs Lack of computer to
using computer literacy in Improvment practice.
computation of
grade.

C. Scholarship Grants(S/Ys 2008-2012)

Name Title of Scholarship grant Duration Outcome Hindering Factor/s for
of (State date) Expect Actual not achieving
recipie ed
 nt
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D. Research Conducted
Outco Hindering Factor/s for not
Research Title Conducted By me achieving
Expect Actual
ed
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

E. Time on Task (Current S/Y)

Month No. of School Days Actual No. of Days Hindering Factors for not conducting
Classes Held classes
June 21
July 22
August 21
September 20
October 23
November 19
December 15
January 23
February 19
March 17
April 0
Total 200

D. Others
1. Programs and Projects
Programs/Proj Target Restrict Year Status Outcome Reasons
ects EFA ed Started Why
Goals In SIP Expected
(Y/N) Outcome
Not
Achieved
Expecte Actual
d
Rehabilitation
of 2012
Electrical
Wiring
Water Supply
Connection 2012
Grass Cutting 2012
Repairing of
Principals
office ceiling 2012
Acquiring of
 Office
Furniture 2012
(Sofa)

2. Best Practices/Awards

A. Reviewing of NAT
B. Peer-Teaching
C. Peer-Reading
D. MTAP Classes

Prepared by:

AL EUSEBIO L. JONSON
Head Teacher III

Noted:

LORETA S. ESGUERRA
District Supervisor