Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APPENDIX A
1. V-101
Costing
Taking into consideration of other factors such as corrosion, erosion etc. material
factor, Fm = 3.67 for solid stainless steel 316.
Assumptions,
Vertical vessel
L/D ratio is 4
Co = $ 1000
Lo = 4 ft
Do = 3 ft
= 0.81
= 1.05
Hence C = $ 1,042.782
In reference to Table 22.6 in Seider et al (2010), the base cost index is taken from
Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, year 195-1959 at 100 while 2006 = 500 to
calculate update factor. Thus update factor, UF = 500/100 = 5.
APPENDIX A - 3
To calculate bare cost module CBM, the following formula is used with MF taken
from Table 4.11 of Biegler et al. (1997) at 4.23.
= ()( + 1) =
= $ 36,260.66
$ 26,913.35 = 108,541.54
Costing
Taking into consideration of other factors such as corrosion, erosion etc. material
factor, Fm = 3.67 for solid stainless steel 316.
Assumptions,
Vertical vessel
L/D ratio is 4
Co = $ 1000
Lo = 4 ft
Do = 3 ft
= 0.81
= 1.05
Hence C = $ 1,150.217
APPENDIX A - 5
In reference to Table 22.6 in Seider et al (2010), the base cost index is taken from
Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, year 195-1959 at 100 while 2006 = 500 to
calculate update factor. Thus update factor, UF = 500/100 = 5.
To calculate bare cost module CBM, the following formula is used with MF taken
from Table 4.11 of Biegler et al. (1997) at 4.23.
= ()( + 1) =
= $ 42,995.22
$ 26,913.35 = 173,399.72
3. V-002 (purge)
Costing
Taking into consideration of other factors such as corrosion, erosion etc. material
factor, Fm = 3.67 for solid stainless steel 316.
Assumptions,
Vertical vessel
L/D ratio is 4
Co = $ 1000
Lo = 4 ft
Do = 3 ft
= 0.81
= 1.05
Hence C = $ 487.68
APPENDIX A - 7
In reference to Table 22.6 in Seider et al (2010), the base cost index is taken from
Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, year 195-1959 at 100 while 2006 = 500 to
calculate update factor. Thus update factor, UF = 500/100 = 5.
To calculate bare cost module CBM, the following formula is used with MF taken
from Table 4.11 of Biegler et al. (1997) at 4.23.
= ()( + 1) =
= $ 18,229.48
4. Compressor
Cp = FD.FM.CB
550
Base cost, CB = 500 exp {7.9661 + 0.8 (lnPC)}
550
= 500 exp {7.9661 + 0.8 (ln 4425)}
550
= 500 exp {7.9661 + 6.716}
= 550 $ 2,378,784.02 )
500
= $ 2,616,662.42
Thus,
= $ 8,177,070.07
APPENDIX A - 9
Based on Biegler et al., (1997) Table 4.2, 4.11 while Seider et al., (2010) based cost
is at 100 for year 1957 while the present cost index of year 2006 is 500 (from
Chemical Engineering Index).
From Table 4.2 of Biegler, our safety pressure is lower than recommended 50 psig
hence pressure factor, FP is 1. Considering the operating pressure and taking into
account corrosion and other factors, we decided to use solid stainless steel 316 with
material factor, FM = 3.67.
MPF = FP FM = 3.67.
From Table 4.11, and using the formula provided, where from table;
Co = US$ 690
Lo = 4 ft,
Do = 3 ft
= 0.78
= 0.98
D = 2.8 m = 9.186 ft
APPENDIX A - 10
L = 11.2 m = 36.745 ft
= $ 11,651.50
= ()( + 1)
= $ 364,109.375
Total cost for all reactor is as following and based on an exchange rate of RM 4.033
per US$.
$ 364,109.375 = 1,468,453.11
APPENDIX A - 11
6. Mixer - 100
Volume, V = 223.38 m3
Diameter, D = 7.528 m
Height, H = 11.292 m
From Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design Biegler et al (1997), pp. 134.
Co = $ 1,000
D = 7.528 m or 24.698 ft
H= 11.292 m or 37.047 ft
Therefore,
= 1,000 (37.047/4.0)0.81(24.698/3.0)1.05
= $ 55,505.87
MF = 4.23
APPENDIX A - 12
Uninstalled cost,
$ = (BC) (MPF)
= $ 55,505.87 2.0
= $ 111,011.74
Installation,
$ = BC (MF-1)
= $ 55,505.87 (4.23 1)
= $ 179,283.96
$ = BC (MPF + MF 1)
= $ 290,295.7
7. Mixer - 101
Volume, V = 669.096 m3
Diameter, D = 10.852 m
Height, H = 16.278 m
From Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design Biegler et al (1997), pp. 134.
Co = $ 1,000
D = 10.852 m or 35.6 ft
H= 16.278 m or 53.405 ft
Therefore,
= 1,000 (53.405/4.0)0.81(35.6/3.0)1.05
= $ 109,576.63
MF = 4.23
APPENDIX A - 14
Uninstalled cost,
$ = (BC) (MPF)
= $ 109,576.63 2.0
= $ 219,153.26
Installation,
$ = BC (MF-1)
= $ 109,576.63 (4.23 1)
= $ 353,932.51
$ = BC (MPF + MF 1)
= $ 573,085.77
8. Mixer - 102
Volume, V = 764.694 m3
Diameter, D = 11.346 m
Height, H = 17.019 m
From Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design Biegler et al (1997), pp. 134.
Co = $ 1,000
D = 11.346 m or 37.224 ft
H= 17.019 m or 55.836 ft
Therefore,
= 1,000 (55.836/4.0)0.81(37.224/3.0)1.05
= $ 119,047.11
MF = 4.23
Uninstalled cost,
$ = (BC) (MPF)
= $ 119,047.11 2.0
= $ 238,094.22
Installation,
$ = BC (MF-1)
= $ 119,047.11 (4.23 1)
= $ 384,552.17
$ = BC (MPF + MF 1)
= $ 622,616.39
9. HX-01
Purchased cost, CP = FP FM FL CB
CB = $5345301
FP only applicable when the design pressure is in between 100 to 2000 psig.
Therefore, FP is ignored.
FM = a + (A/100)b
Where,
FM = 1
Therefore,
Cbm = CP X Fbm X UF
10. HX-02
Purchased cost, CP = FP FM FL CB
CB = $326279.2
FP only applicable when the design pressure is in between 100 to 2000 psig.
Therefore, FP is ignored.
FM = a + (A/100)b
Where,
FM = 1
Therefore,
Cbm = CP X Fbm X UF
11. HX-03
Purchased cost, CP = FP FM FL CB
CB = $370380.4
FP only applicable when the design pressure is in between 100 to 2000 psig.
Therefore, FP is ignored.
FM = a + (A/100)b
Where,
FM = 1
Therefore,
Cbm = CP X Fbm X UF
12. HX-04
Purchased cost, CP = FP FM FL CB
CB = $133661.5
FP only applicable when the design pressure is in between 100 to 2000 psig.
Therefore, FP is ignored.
FM = a + (A/100)b
Where,
FM = 1
Therefore,
Cbm = CP X Fbm X UF
13. HX-05
Purchased cost, CP = FP FM FL CB
CB = $68177.6
FP only applicable when the design pressure is in between 100 to 2000 psig.
Therefore, FP is ignored.
FM = a + (A/100)b
Where,
FM = 1
Therefore,
Cbm = CP X Fbm X UF