Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ecological
Bundlethe more deforestation and global climate change disrupt nutrient cycles
books you buy, and ecological system homeostasis. Data are examined to
the greater your
Homeostasis
determine effects of deforestation on nutrient cycling. Increas-
discount! ing atmospheric carbon dioxide and global climate change are
disrupting ecological systems homeostasis, and several stud-
THE CONTENT ies are used to show how this is happening, including changes
Energy Physics in primary production, temperature and precipitation patterns.
Engineering This book also discusses the role of individual species in filter-
Biotechnology ing contaminants and pollutants from ecological systems.
Biology
Christopher J. Paradiseis professor of biology and environ-
Mathematics
mental studies at Davidson College. He teaches introductory
Chemistry
biology, ecology, entomology, and topical seminars on ecotoxi-
cology and renewable natural resources. He also occasionally
THE TERMS
leads a study abroad program in India. His research evaluates
Perpetual access
anthropogenic factors that influence insect biodiversity at a
for a one time fee
variety of scales. His current research interests include effects of
No subscriptions or
land use patterns on pollinator communities in parks.
access fees
Unlimited A. Malcolm Campbellteaches biology at Davidson College,
concurrent usage NC. He received national and international education awards:
Downloadable PDFs Genetics Society of America (2013); American Association for the
Free MARC records Advancement of Science (2012); and American Society for Cell
Biology (2006). He was the founding co-editor in chief of CBE Life
For further information, Sciences Education; founding director of Genome Consortium
a free trial, or to order,
contact: for Active Teaching (GCAT); and member of the American Soci- Christopher J. Paradise
sales@momentumpress.net ety for Cell Biology governing council (20122014).
A. Malcolm Campbell
Ecological Homeostasis
Ecological Homeostasis
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Keywords
nitrogen cycle, assimilation, decomposition, nitrogen fixation, ecological
system, nutrient dynamics, biomass, nutrient regeneration, pollutants,
contaminants, hyperaccumulators, tragedy of the commons, greenhouse
gas, carbon sink, carbon source, net primary production, gross primary
production, respiration, ecological mismatch, positive feedback
Contents
Preface...................................................................................................ix
Acknowledgments....................................................................................xi
Introduction.........................................................................................xiii
Chapter 1 Nutrient Cycling Is a Mechanism of Homeostasis
for Ecological Systems........................................................1
Ethical, Legal, Social Implications: The Gulf
of Mexico Dead Zone Is Related to Increased
Nutrient Input..............................................................14
Chapter 2 Ecological Systems Can Filter Wastes Like Individual
Organisms........................................................................19
Ethical, Legal, Social Implications: Pollution Is a
Tragedy of the Commons.............................................24
Chapter 3 Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Can Disrupt
Ecological Systems...........................................................27
Ethical, Legal, Social Implications: There Is a
Difference Between Weather and Climate.....................40
Conclusion............................................................................................43
Glossary................................................................................................45
Index....................................................................................................47
Preface
This book about ecological system homeostasis is part of a thirty book
series that collectively surveys all of the major themes in biology. Rather
than just present information as a collection of facts, the reader is treated
more like a scientist, which means the data behind the major themes are
presented. Reading any of the thirty books by Paradise and Campbell
provides readers with biological context and comprehensive perspective
so that readers can learn important information from a single book with
the potential to see how the major themes span all size scales: molecular,
cellular, organismal, population and ecologic systems. The major themes
of biology encapsulate the entire discipline: information, evolution, cells,
homeostasis and emergent properties.
In the twentieth century, biology was taught with a heavy emphasis
on long lists of terms and many specific details. All of these details were
presented in a way that obscured a more comprehensive understanding.
In this book, readers will learn about several examples of ecological system
homeostasis and some of the supporting evidence behind our understand-
ing. The historic and more recent experiments and data will be explored.
Instead of believing or simply accepting information, readers of this book
will learn about the science behind ecological system homeostasis the way
professional scientists dowith experimentation and data analysis. In
short, data are put back into the teaching of biological sciences.
Readers of this book who wish to see the textbook version of this
content can go to www.bio.davidson.edu/icb where they will find
pedagogically-designed and interactive Integrating Concepts in Biology
for introductory biology college courses or a high school AP Biology
course.
Acknowledgments
Publishing this book would not have been possible without the generous
gift of Dr. David Botstein who shared some of his Breakthrough Prize
with co-author AMC. Davids gift allowed us to hire talented artists (Tom
Webster and his staff at Lineworks, Inc.) and copyeditor Laura Loveall.
Thanks go to Kristen Mandava of Mandava Editorial Services for project
management and guidance. In particular, we are indebted to Katie Noble
and Melissa Hayban for their many hours and attention to detail.
Kristen Eshleman, Paul Brantley, Bill Hatfield and Olivia Booker
helped us with technology at Davidson College. We are grateful to
administrators Tom Ross, Clark Ross, Carol Quillen, Wendy Raymond,
Verna Case, and Barbara Lom who had confidence in us and encouraged
us to persist despite setbacks along the way.
Thanks to my wife Amy Brooks for her constant support during the
development of this textbook, and my daughter Evelyn for her endless
energy. Thanks to Malcolm Campbell for his steadfast resolve and opti-
mism. Without him, this book would not exist. Thanks to collaborator
Laurie Heyer for taking my sometimes half-baked math ideas and turning
them into powerful and elegant Bio-Math Explorations. I learned a lot
from both of them. While the math is largely absent from this book, our
collaboration with her made this a better book. Nancy Stamp at Bing-
hamton University, and Bill Dunson and Richard Cyr at The Pennsyl-
vania State University influenced me greatly in how I think as a scientist
and approach my teaching. Finally, I thank my students in Integrated
Concepts in Biology II, who enthusiastically participated in our experi-
ment to redesign introductory biology, starting with the text and ending
with a new approach to teaching biology.
Introduction
For most people, it is difficult to think of an entire ecological system,
comprised of a multitude of species, maintaining homeostasis. But if one
thinks of a forest, one that they had visited year after year, they may realize
that it has not changed much over the years. In this book, negative feed-
back mechanisms that operate at the level of the ecological system will be
examined. A possible exception to maintenance of homeostasis is when
an ecological system is subjected to a large scale disturbance, which has
disrupted homeostasis. Think about coastal ecological systems buffeted by
hurricanes. It may take much time and energy for processes acting in eco-
logical systems to return the system to its original state. Alternatively, as
with populations, changes in the environment can trigger changes in the
stable state that had been maintained by negative feedback mechanisms.
The larger size of these systems and their environment influence how they
address physical and chemical challenges. Emergent properties play a key
role in maintaining homeostasis in ecological systems; the mechanisms
may be caused by individual species maintaining their populations or
individuals gathering energy and nutrients. Because life requires energy
and nutrients, a lot can be learned about ecological system homeostasis by
examining nutrient cycling.
CHAPTER 1
Nutrient Cycling Is a
Mechanism of Homeostasis
for Ecological Systems
In one step of the nitrogen cycle, molecular nitrogen moves from the
atmosphere to Rhizobium bacteria, which convert it to ammonia and
then incorporate it into their amino acids and provide it to legumes.
Assimilation by organisms, which results in production of organic forms
of nitrogen (proteins and DNA), and decomposition, which reverses
assimilation, further move nitrogen through the cycle. Nitrogen fixation,
assimilation, and decomposition are the mechanisms that cycle nitrogen
through ecological systems.
More generally, nutrient cycles describe the mechanisms by which
nutrients are altered and transferred between parts of ecological systems.
These parts are broadly considered compartments in ecological systems.
A compartment is a part or space into which an ecological system is sub-
divided. The biotic compartment consists of all the biological organisms
in the ecological system, although biologists are often interested in the
nutrients that flow between individual species or from primary producers
to herbivores. Other compartments include the soil, water, and air. Move-
ment often includes transformation of the element, from one form to
another. For instance, the mechanism of photosynthesis simultaneously
moves carbon from the atmosphere to the primary producers and changes
the form of carbon from carbon dioxide to a carbohydrate.
Some studies have examined the role of individual species in nutri-
ent cycles. Michael Vanni and his colleagues studied nutrient dynamics
in Tuesday Lake in Michigan (Vanni et al., 1997). Nutrient dynamics
are the changes in nutrient concentrations in compartments over time.
2 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
100
200
Vanni and his colleagues found that fish increased phosphorus in the
water column. Part of that was due to fish losing mass in enclosures.
However, the researchers found fish lost less relative to the amount of
body mass lost, indicating that fish can conserve phosphorus under the
conditions that caused the loss of body mass. This may be important to
maintaining their individual homeostasis.
The proportion of total phosphorus present as particulates also tended
to be higher in fish presence. At the end of the second year experiment,
zooplankton constituted a smaller part of the particulate phospho-
rus in the low and high fish treatments than in the no fish treatment.
The smaller particles separated from zooplankton constituted a greater
Nutrient Cycling Is a Mechanism of Homeostasis 5
= sedimentation
= assimilation rock
= erosion
= regeneration
= excretion
= decomposition
fish
carnivores
zooplankton
herbivores
algae
plants
water
terrestrial
sediment soil
growing on the walls. It enters the water column through fish excretion.
These are three steps involved in the phosphorus cycle illustrated by Vanni
and his colleagues experiment.
Phosphorus budgets were found to be closely balanced in enclosures
with fish. The sum of losses from wall growth and sedimentation plus
gains from fish yielded a predicted value that was very close to the actual
change in water column phosphorus (see Figure 1). However, the budget
for fishless enclosures was highly imbalanced, perhaps due to an underes-
timation of phosphorus sinks. The predicted water column phosphorus
decline based on sedimentation and wall growth is only 57% of the actual
water column decline.
The researchers concluded that large zooplankton, more prevalent
in the no fish treatment, could more easily escape the sampling devices.
If more large zooplankton had been caught, the actual change in water
column phosphorus would have been less. Additionally, the amount of
phosphorus that accumulated on walls may have been underestimated in
no-fish enclosures. The scientists observed loosely attached algal growth
on walls of those enclosuresmuch more so than on fish enclosures.
These growths may have sloughed off as the plastic strips used to assess
wall growth were sampled. Despite these potential biases, results from
enclosure studies reveal it is possible to account for nutrients in such
experiments and can help scientists understand the role of individual spe-
cies in maintaining homeostasis in ecological systems.
The results of this experiment, as well as many others, indicate that fish
can have significant effects on the phosphorus cycle in lakes. In addition
to the steps described earlier (assimilation, sedimentation, and excretion),
there are other important steps in the phosphorus cycle (see Figure2).
The ultimate source of phosphorus is rock, which erodes and adds new
phosphorus to water and soil, replacing that which is lost due to sedimen-
tation from the water column and leaching from the soil. Decomposition
is another major process, where phosphorus is removed from dead organ-
isms and assimilated by decomposers. Regeneration occurs when phos-
phorus lost to the sediment is released by decomposers in inorganic form
and reenters the water column. Nutrient regeneration is the recycling and
release of nutrients from organic matter by decomposer organisms. This
brief overview of the phosphorus cycle shows the inputs and outputs of
8 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
400
annual particulate matter export (kg dry mass per ha) = undisturbed-organic
= undisturbed-inorganic
= undisturbed-total
= clearcut-organic
300 = clearcut-inorganic
= clearcut-total
200
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
year from time of clearcut
120
= undisturbed-OPM
= undisturbed-IPM
= undisturbed-DC
100 = clearcut-OPM
= clearcut-IPM
mean annual export (kg per ha)
= clearcut-DC
80
60
40
20
0
A Ca N
30
25
mean annual export (kg per ha)
20
15
10
0
Fe Mg P K Na
B elemental nutrient
the soil, input from precipitation, ease with which an element cycles and
accumulates in biological systems, and solubility. Biogeochemistry is the
study of the cycles of chemical elements between the living and nonliving
parts of an ecological system. Losses of calcium (Ca) and nitrogen (N)
were extremely large in the clearcut watershed and were mostly lost as
dissolved ions in the water. Magnesium, potassium, and sodium were also
mostly lost from the clearcut watershed as dissolved ions, but losses were
less than calcium and nitrogen losses. Iron was mostly lost in inorganic
particulate matter, and losses of magnesium, potassium, and sodium were
all higher in inorganic particulate matter from the clearcut watershed
than from the undisturbed watershed.
The elements lost as dissolved substances tend to have ionic forms that
dissolve readily in water and can be leached from particulate matter dur-
ing rain events or when particulate matter enters streams. Some elements
that may be found in inorganic material (such as, iron, calcium, magne-
sium, potassium, and sodium) will be found in higher concentrations in
inorganic particles matter, but the latter four can also be leached from
inorganic material and end up as dissolved ions in the water. Nitrogen
may be more likely leached from organic particulate matter.
Nutrients cycle in ecological systems and individual animals and plants
are involved in the cycling of those nutrients. Individual fish maintain
homeostasis of phosphorus, as well as other nutrients and energy, in their
bodies, and this illustrates the organization and energy-dependence of
life. The sum total of all the activities of all the fish in a population exerts
an effect on homeostasis of the ecological system; nutrient cycling is an
emergent property. Abiotic processes also play critical roles in cycling of
nutrients. Movement of nutrients involves feedback mechanisms, which
is a theme in homeostasis. Each nutrient cycle illustrates homeostasis of
ecological systems. At the large and complex ecological system level, pro-
cesses that maintain homeostasis operate over a long time and large spatial
scales, often taking years for a forest to return to homeostasis after a dis-
ruption (such as, clearcutting) that affects ecological system homeostasis.
Nutrients cycle, but other matter also moves through ecological systems.
In the next chapter, what happens to wastes in ecological systems and how
these wastes affect homeostasis will be explored.
14 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
New
Oleans
Terrebonne bay
DO (mg/L)
7
source area for the seafood industry. The Midwest produces most of the
over 330 million tons of corn grown by US farmers every year. The US
is the largest exporter of corn with 60% or more of all corn exports com-
ing from the US. Much of the corn is fed to livestock, but corn is also
used to make a variety of food and non-food products, as well as ethanol
for automobile fuel. The Gulf of Mexico supplies 72% of US harvested
shrimp, 66% of harvested oysters, and 16% of commercial fish. Both the
16 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
Bibliography
Bormann FH, Likens GE, Siccama TG, et al.: The export of nutrients
and recovery of stable conditions following deforestation at Hubbard
Brook, Ecol Monographs 44(3):255277, 1974.
Nutrient Cycling Is a Mechanism of Homeostasis 17
Bibliography
De Young R: Tragedy of the commons. In Alexander DE, Fairbridge RW,
editors: Encyclopedia of environmental science, Hingham, MA, 1999,
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
De Young R: Tragedy of the Commons (website): http://www-personal
.umich.edu/~rdeyoung/tragedy.html. Accessed July 24, 2014.
Hardin G: The tragedy of the commons, Science 162:12431248, 1968.
Jaffr T, Brooks RR, Lee J, et al.: Sebertia acuminata: a hyperaccumulator
of nickel from New Caledonia, Science 193(4253):579580, 1976.
Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, et al.: A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic,
Nature 409:579, 2001.
Wang J, Zhao F-J, Meharg AA, et al.: Mechanisms of arsenic hyperac-
cumulation in Pteris vittata. Uptake kinetics, interactions with phos-
phate, and arsenic speciation, Plant Physiology 130:15521561, 2002.
CHAPTER 3
Increasing Atmospheric
Carbon Dioxide Can Disrupt
Ecological Systems
Mean global temperatures are rising, due in part to human activities that
have led to increases in levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Yet
global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions have stalled in part
because of how climate change science is often manipulated by policy-
makers. Carbon dioxide concentrations can be altered by photosynthesis.
In examining the efficiency of energy transfer in ecological systems, it can
be quickly seen how energy flow and the carbon cycle are linked. Ecologi-
cal systems affect and are affected by the global carbon cycle, greenhouse
gases, and solar energy. These ideas will be explored further in this chapter,
with a focus on how increasing greenhouse gases, and the climate changes
that result, affect homeostasis of ecological systems.
Trees photosynthesizing in Brazils tropical rainforests affect glaciers of
Greenland through their effects on atmospheric CO2 concentrations. A
rainforest actively photosynthesizing acts as a carbon sink, whereas one
that is cut down by humans could be a carbon source. A carbon sink
is a reservoir that accumulates and stores carbon-containing chemicals,
while a carbon source is a reservoir that releases carbon-containing chemi-
cals. Other carbon sources are also related to human activities. Besides
deforestation, forest ecological systems may be affected by changing envi-
ronmental factors, including rising CO2 and temperatures, and changes
in precipitation patterns associated with global climate change. Richard
Norby and colleagues from several research institutions compiled data
from experiments on the effects of elevated CO2 on growth and produc-
tivity of forests (Norby et al., 2005).
28 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
FACE plots
loblolly
pine forest
tall, long-lived plants (such as, trees) to be measured. Norby and his col-
leagues analyzed net primary production (NPP) data from four long-
term FACE experiments, in Wisconsin, North Carolina, Tennessee, and
Italy. The goal was to assess how increased levels of CO2 over long periods
of time affect forest ecological systems and through that determine how
the global carbon cycle might be affected, as forests dominate global NPP.
FACE experiments are all conducted in temperate zone forests, yet
the forests represent a broad range of productivity, climatic conditions,
and diversity of tree species. Mean annual precipitation ranged from
810 (Wisconsin) to 1390 (Tennessee) mm/yr and mean annual tempera-
ture ranged from 4.9 (Wisconsin) to 15.5 (North Carolina). Growing
seasons ranged from 150 (Wisconsin) to 247 (Italy). The North Carolina
FACE was dominated by loblolly pine, Wisconsin by aspen, maple, and
birch, Tennessee by sweetgum, and Italy by poplar.
For the experiments, the average atmospheric carbon dioxide concen-
tration ([CO2]) in the ambient CO2 plots across all of the years assessed
was 376 ppm, whereas the elevated CO2 FACE plots had an average
[CO2], across all experiments and sites, of 550 ppm, which is a level cho-
sen based on projections of atmospheric [CO2] anticipated for 2050.
The FACE approach permits the study of processes under elevated
CO2 that was previously impossible or intractable in forest ecological sys-
tems. As with any experiment, experiments in ecological systems require
adequate controls, and the FACE experiments included two controls. The
first control was the use of FACE arrays that blew ambient, or current,
CO2 into plots. This control is necessary to test for the effects of elevated
carbon dioxide relative to current levels. The second control of plots mon-
itored over time, but with no arrays, is necessary to insure that plots with
FACE arrays do not suffer any effects due to the array itself, regardless of
the air that is pumped into the plot. To test for any array effect, scientists
would compare the two kinds of control plots, with and without arrays.
Estimates of annual increases in biomass of plant tissues are an esti-
mate of NPP, equal to gross primary production (GPP) minus respira-
tion. The scientists made estimates of biomass increases of stem wood
and large woody roots using periodic measurements of the diameter of
trees in different plots. Leaf tissues were harvested to estimate biomass
of leaves. The scientists estimated growth increases of small root biomass
30 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
from known growth rates for particular species and through experiments
where growth of small roots was monitored over time. The scientists used
these estimates of individual stems, leaves, and roots to estimate biomass
increases for entire plots. The scientists collected and estimated the pro-
duction of leaf litter using litter baskets, which collected leaves over a
certain period of time.
NPP was expressed as grams of carbon fixed per square meter of land
per year (g C m22 yr21). It was calculated as annual carbon increases
in wood, leaf, and root tissue, plus the major inputs to detritus, leaf litter,
and fine root turnover. The biomass estimates were converted to carbon
units by using the known carbon content of different tissues, which were
found to vary between 0.4 and 0.5. Thus the scientists converted accumu-
lated biomass to carbon dioxide fixed into organic carbon, which became
their estimate of NPP.
Norby and his colleagues analyzed NPP based on all years and plots
for which they had data and for which the tree canopy was fully devel-
oped; in other words, they excluded years and plots with younger, rapidly
growing trees. They compared NPP in plots with elevated CO2 to that in
plots with current CO2 for each tree species or tree species combination.
The scientists wanted to understand the response of forests with fully
developed canopies, which they reasoned would be informative of global
forest responses.
Norby and his colleagues also measured absorbed photosyntheti-
cally active radiation (APAR, or the light energy absorbed by the can-
opy) by taking the difference of the amount of light energy at the top
of the canopy and that striking the forest floor. These values were then
integrated over the entire growing season to yield the total light energy
absorbed per unit area per year for each tree species combination. The sci-
entists compared APAR in plots with elevated CO2 to that in plots with
current CO2. If elevated CO2 plots were absorbing more light than in the
current CO2 plots, then a best-fit line for all plots would be greater than
a 1:1 relationship line.
Norby and his colleagues found a strong linear relationship between
NPP in elevated CO2 and that in current CO2 plots that rose at a rate
significantly greater than a slope of 1 (P <0.0001). The conclusion of the
scientists was that there was a significant effect of elevated CO2 on NPP,
INCREASING CARBON DIOXIDE CAN DISRUPT ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 31
and an estimated 23% increase in forest NPP would result from atmo-
spheric CO2 increases to 550 ppm over the next few decades. However,
APAR in elevated CO2 plots was not different from APAR in current
CO2 plots. When all FACE plots were graphed, the slope of the best-fit
line was not significantly different from one. Thus, APAR did not increase
faster in elevated CO2 plots relative to current CO2 plots, as NPP did.
Norby and his colleagues compared the NPP response to any potential
change in the light energy absorbed by the plants to determine whether
changes in NPP were related to changes in APAR. They examined this by
standardizing the NPP and APAR values to the maximum values observed
for each plot. The scientists then calculated the ratio of the change in
APAR between elevated and current CO2 plots to the change in NPP
between elevated and current CO2 (APAR/NPP). They plotted this
against the maximum leaf area index (LAI) for each year. LAI is the ratio
of total upper leaf surface area divided by land surface area, and typically
ranges from 0 for bare ground to 7 for a dense forest.
The scientists might have predicted that APAR would be higher in
elevated CO2, because higher NPP should lead to more leaves to absorb
more light energy and might show the same trend across FACE plots as
NPP did. Because this did not occur, Norby and his colleagues hypoth-
esized that higher light-use efficiency caused the increased productivity.
They estimated this by calculating the fraction of the standardized gain
in NPP that was attributable to a gain in APAR. If the standardized ratio
of the change in APAR to the change in NPP is equal to one, then both
parameters are increasing equally, and the increase in NPP is due to an
increase in APAR. However, if the ratio is close to zero, then increases in
NPP are due to higher light-use efficiency.
Norby and his colleagues found that the change in APAR from cur-
rent to elevated CO2 in dense forests is close to zero. In forests with dense
canopies, very little of the gain in NPP was associated with increased
absorbed light energy, whereas in the forest stands with lower peak LAIs,
60% to 90% of the gain in NPP with CO2 fertilization was associated
with increased absorbed light energy. When the canopy is sparse and CO2
is elevated, plants can respond by absorbing more light energy, whereas
when the canopy is dense, the plants in elevated CO2 are converting more
light energy to organic matter per unit energy captured.
32 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
61years and included 74 annual biological events, such as arrival dates for
migratory birds and dates of first bloom of spring flowers. The scientists
estimated that recorded events were accurate to within 4 days during the
first 11-year period and 2 days during the later 22-year interval. Events
may be missed due to the recorder not being on the farm constantly, poor
weather conditions, or a missed event, which is later recorded on a dif-
ferent date.
Although many records were kept, the researchers limited their analy-
sis to biological events that typically occur before the end of June. They
used only events for which they had at least six annual records in each of
the two recording intervals. Fifty-five biological events fit those criteria.
The scientists next plotted the day of the year (the ordinal date, or num-
ber of days since January 1st for any year) that an event occurred over all
years for which they had data. They used regression analysis and fit best-fit
lines to the data to determine whether the day of the year changed as the
years progressed. The slope of the line, if statistically significant, would
provide information on the rate of change occurring over time.
The records of biological events on the farm collected by Leopold
and Bradley did not include consistent temperature data. As a proxy for
temperature change over the years, Bradley and her colleagues used the
ordinal date of ice-melt in a nearby lake and studied it using the same
regression analysis used for biological events on the farm. A proxy is a
variable that stands in for another variable. Ice-melt data were obtained
from the Wisconsin State Climatology Office. Most of the melt-dates
occurred in March, so the scientists also plotted the ordinal melt dates
against the mean March temperature, which was data they obtained from
the National Climatic Data Center. Both of these regressions had slopes
that were significantly less than zero (0.123 day per year and 2.72 days
per o C of March mean temperature), indicating that ice melt was occur-
ring earlier and temperatures were becoming warmer as time progressed.
There was some overlap in the ranges of slopes that are significantly
different from zero and those that are not. A slope of 0.231 was found to
be statistically significant for the arrival of cowbirds; they arrived on aver-
age 0.231 days earlier each year over the 61 years of recordkeeping. The
slope of 0.244 is a larger value, yet it was not statistically significant. This
indicates that the latter data probably has more scatter around the best-fit
34 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
line, which decreases the probability that the slope is statistically different
from a slope of zero. Large slopes are not always statistically significant,
and small slopes may be significantly different from zero if the scatter
around the line is minimal, as it is for the rose-breasted grosbeak.
If the day of first blooming of a flower species or the day when first
migrants of a bird species return, varies from year to year that indicates
that some environmental factor that also varies from year to year may be
controlling blooming or migration. This will cause scatter in a plot of
ordinal day of year against year. Although temperature has been increas-
ing over the past decades, it does vary from year to year on any particular
ordinal date, and these two observations can cause the patterns observed
by the scientists. If the return is less variable, then something that does
not vary from year to year on a particular day, such as the length of day-
light, might be the cue that causes blooming or migration. If this is the
case, not only would there be less variation from year to year, but the
slope of the line would be zero. There may still be some variation caused
by individuals who vary in their genomes responding differently to the
same invariant signal, but one might predict less variation than if the cue
were changing over time.
The scientists documented 18 out of 55 (32.7%) biological events with
significantly earlier springtime occurrence from about a week to almost a
month earlier over 61 years. Fourteen out of 55 (25.4%) events occur earlier,
although not significantly, according to Bradley and her colleagues. Over
the same period, the surface temperatures of the planet have warmed. These
trends should suggest a connection between first occurrence of biological
events and global climate change, and the ice melt data serve as a useful
substitute for the lack of temperature data from the farm. Ice-melt is
occurring earlier, Wisconsin spring temperatures are rising, and species are
responding to warming by migrating or blooming earlier in the year. This is a
finding that other scientists have found elsewhere for other biological events.
Less than half of the events on the farm did not change when they
first occur, and one occurs significantly later. Many biological events have
been found to be controlled by photoperiod. Among the species that do
not show adaptability to climate change are the species in which seasonal
changes are regulated by photoperiod or possibly some other genetic reg-
ulatory system.
INCREASING CARBON DIOXIDE CAN DISRUPT ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 35
There are at least two implications to the fact that some events are
occurring earlier, some are not changing, and some are occurring later.
First, some species may not be as adaptable as others, and these species
may not survive or may experience greater stress during climate change.
Second, for pairs of species that interact with one another where one
changes its phenological patterns and the other does not, an ecological
mismatch may occur. An ecological mismatch is a change in one species,
but not in an interacting species, during climate change. If a migrating
bird arrives at its breeding ground earlier as the climate warms and its
main food source (critical for rearing offspring) are insects that have not
changed their hatching time, the birds may fledge fewer offspring, lead-
ing to a lower population size over time. Altered interactions could cause
a disruption of ecological system homeostasis as species that interacted
previously do not continue to interact as strongly when their activities no
longer occur in sync.
Global climate change disrupts ecological systems through changes in
temperature, but as temperatures increase, other aspects of climate also
change. For instance, tropical equatorial forests at high altitudes could
be experiencing more dramatic climate change than tropical forests close
to sea level. These tropical cloud forests, or high elevation moist forest
with persistent clouds in the tree canopy, contain species adapted to live
in conditions where clouds persistently form in tree canopies. In other
words, they live in very moist conditions with near constant clouds and
mist. Theoretical models predict that even a slight rise in greenhouse gas
concentrations will increase the altitude at which clouds form in tropical
mountains, up to 200 meters higher. Global climate change has warmed
the sea surface, and this leads to increasing evaporation from oceans. The
water vapor climbs to higher altitudes, as warm air rises, and when the
vapor cools and condenses, latent heat is released. The regional cycling of
water will then be altered in such a way that the amount and frequency of
inputs of mist (low-intensity wind-blown precipitation) will be reduced.
Water in clouds that condenses on vegetation will also be reduced.
Nalini Nadkarni and Rodrigo Solano studied the responses of epi-
phytes in cloud forest to the predicted drier conditions under global cli-
mate change (Nadkarni and Solano, 2002). Cloud forest epiphytes dwell
in the canopy and have no connections to the ground. These plants play
36 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
a critical role in cloud forests, because they retain mist and cloud water
and capture both water and nutrients that are cycled throughout the rest
of the forest ecological system.
The researchers set up their study in the Monteverde Cloud For-
est Reserve (MCFR) in Costa Rica, where total annual precipitation is
between 2,000 to 2,400 mm. The canopy there is exposed to frequent
wind and mist throughout much of the year. The researchers used an
existing gradient of cloud water and mist across an elevation gradient,
taking advantage of the fact that moisture conditions at lower elevations
are similar to what is predicted for high elevations under future global
climate change. Because epiphytes often grow together in mats on tree
limbs, the researchers could transplant pieces of epiphyte mats from one
tree limb to another. These mats consist of interwoven roots, bark, and
decaying organic matter up to 25 centimeters thick, and they support
many epiphyte species. The mats can be peeled off and rolled up like a
carpet, so plants and the canopy soil remain intact.
Nadkarni and Solano first tested for any effects of transplantation by
transplanting mats within the upper site and found no statistically signifi-
cant differences in leaf production or leaf or plant mortality between con-
trol and transplanted mats. They concluded that transplantation does not
affect the viability or growth of epiphytes. This allowed them to proceed
to transplant mats to other sites. Differences found in transplant experi-
ments should then be due to site differences, not transplantation effects.
For the transplant experiment, Nadkarni and Solano established
three study sites along an elevation gradient of 150 meters. Cloud water
progressively declined during the dry season from the high elevation site
(1,480 m) to the two transplant sites, the midpoint of the gradient site
(1,410 m) and the low elevation site (1,330 m).
The researchers moved epiphytes from the high elevation site (where
cloud water is frequent throughout the dry season) to trees growing at
the two lower elevation sites, both of which had longer dry seasons. The
researchers climbed trees in the high elevation site, cut 75 centimeter
epiphyte mats, transported them to mid and low elevation sites, and tied
them to branches of three to four trees at those sites. Control mats were
set up at the high elevation site.
INCREASING CARBON DIOXIDE CAN DISRUPT ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 37
embedded in the blocks, and these could be checked from the ground
with wires that ran from the ground up to each block. Moisture levels
were checked every 3 to 4 days.
Measurements of canopy moisture input and moisture content of
epiphytes were important for two reasons. It linked elevations to mois-
ture, and it confirmed that epiphyte mats received progressively less water
across the elevation gradient. The elevation gradient was an adequate
substitute for moisture inputs. The measurements revealed that the low
elevation cloud water collectors received less than one-third of the total
water collected at the high elevation site with an intermediate amount in
the mid elevation site. The moisture content of the epiphyte mats paral-
leled the inputs of water. These results allowed the researchers to conclude
that moisture differences played a part in the responses of transplanted
epiphytes relative to control epiphytes.
Epiphyte mats contain a diverse seed bank, which is the natural stor-
age of seeds within most ecosystems, containing both ground and epi-
phytic species. Nadkarni and Solano set up a greenhouse experiment to
determine what would happen in mats if existing epiphytes at high eleva-
tion sites began to suffer higher mortality. They collected 24 epiphyte
mats from trees in the high elevation forest. The researchers pruned off all
of the stems of epiphytes from half of the mats. All mats were placed in a
greenhouse with an automatic misting system so that mats were watered
twice per day. Temperature conditions were kept close to the temperature
of the high elevation site. Over the course of 1 year, the researchers identi-
fied the species of each emerging seedling, measured its height, and tallied
the numbers of each species (Table 2).
3
1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
year
change. However, one weather event cannot be used to deny the existence
or support the reversal of a long-term climate trend (Figure 7). The fig-
ure shows a summer cooler than the average in Charlotte, NC, in 1968,
which is circled in blue. That is an example of a weather event.
Figure 7 also shows the deviation of mean summer temperature for
each year from a 30-year mean summer temperature for Charlotte, NC.
The 30-year mean is from 1961 to 1990, a standard reference range often
used in such studies. The data show a lot of variation, but a best-fit line
indicates that the average deviation in 1880 was less than zero (less than
the 1961 to 1990 average, which is 24.51o C) to well over zero by 2010.
The deviations become more positive over time. The temperature pre-
dicted by the best-fit line for 1880 is 24.35 and that for 2010 is 24.87,
which means that average temperatures have increased by 0.52o C over
the 130-year time period, which is in line with global data (an estimated
increase of 0.76 C (0.19 C)). This is an example of climate.
42 ECOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS
The effects of global climate change are serious and may pose seri-
ous threats to many aspects of human civilization and ecological systems,
including biodiversity, ecosystem services, availability of natural resources,
food and fiber production, economic development, and human health.
Using individual weather events as evidence for climate change is not
good science. Cold temperatures are not proof that there is no such thing
as global warming.
Bibliography
Bradley NL, Leopold AC, Ross J, et al.: Phenological changes reflect cli-
mate change in Wisconsin, Proc Nat Acad Sci 96:97019704, 1999.
IPCC: Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M,
et al., editors: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribu-
tion of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovern-
mental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and
New York, NY, 2007, Cambridge University Press.
Masek JG: Stability of boreal forest stands during recent climate change:
evidence from Landsat satellite imagery, J Biogeography 28(8):967976,
2001.
Nadkarni NM, Solano R: Potential effects of climate change on canopy
communities in a tropical cloud forest: an experimental approach,
Oecologia 131(4):580586, 2002.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather
Service: Charlotte area detailed climate information, National Weather
Service Forecast Office (website): http://www.erh.noaa.gov/gsp/climate/
cltcli.htm. Accessed May 19, 2011.
Norby RJ, DeLucia EH, Gielen B, et al.: Forest response to elevated CO2
is conserved across a broad range of productivity, Proc Nat Acad Sci
102(50):1805218056, 2005.
Conclusion
Large, complex systems can maintain homeostasis or have it disrupted by
external forces. Even ecological systems can maintain or return to constant
internal conditions in the face of a varying external environment, which is
a definition of homeostasis. Ecological systems, like individual organisms,
have internal conditions and are connected to other biological systems,
meeting the conditions of the definition. Throughout several books in
this series, the concept of homeostasis at various levels of the biological
hierarchy has been explored, and with this book, the examination is com-
plete. As with biological systems at lower levels of the hierarchy, such as
populations, individuals, and cells, ecological systems use negative feed-
back mechanisms to maintain homeostasis. The processes investigated
that regulate ecological systems are time- and energy-dependent, and the
processes in large ecological systems not unique to ecological systems. In
fact, many of the processes are used by biological systems at lower levels,
and those processes affect properties and conditions of ecological systems,
an example of emergent properties.
Glossary
assimilation. Assimilation is the process of absorbing nutrients and incorporating
them into the body.
biogeochemistry. The study of the cycles of chemical elements between the living
and nonliving parts of an ecological system.
biomass. The total amount of organic matter in an organism, population, or
other ecological system after water is removed.
carbon sink. A reservoir that accumulates and stores carbon-containing chemicals.
carbon source. Any natural or human source of carbon dioxide emissions, includ-
ing decomposition, ocean release and respiration (natural) and cement produc-
tion, deforestation, or burning fossil fuels (human).
compartments. A part or space into which an ecological system is subdivided.
contaminants. A potentially harmful or undesirable substance that makes a place
or substance impure when it is added, usually of human origin.
decomposition. The decay into constituent parts by physical, chemical, or bio-
logical processes.
discharge. The volume of water in a river flowing past a point during an interval
of time.
ecological mismatch. A change in one species, but not in an interacting species,
during climate change.
ecological system. An ecological community together with the abiotic environ-
ment, usually considered to function as a unit.
enclosure. A device, fence, or container that maintains certain species within an
ecological system.
endemic. A species that is found in one and only one particular geographic location.
epiphytes. Plants that live on other plants, but are not parasitic.
eutrophication. Eutrophication is extreme productivity from addition of nutri-
ents in a body of water, frequently due to runoff from the land, which causes
dense vegetation and death of animals from lack of oxygen.
fronds. The leaves of a fern.
greenhouse gas. A gas that contributes to the greenhouse effect by absorbing
infrared radiation, such as carbon dioxide.
greenhouse gas emissions. Releases of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
gross primary production. The amount of organic chemical energy as biomass
that primary producers create in a given length of time.
homeostasis. Maintain internal conditions within a range of acceptable extremes.
46 GLOSSARY
hydrologic cycle. The circulation of water throughout ecological systems and the
atmosphere through evaporation, transpiration, and precipitation.
hyperaccumulators. A plant that accumulates trace elements from its environ-
ment in concentrations higher than those found in the environment.
leaf area index. The ratio of total upper leaf surface area divided by land surface
area.
net primary production. The amount of gross primary production minus respira-
tion in a given length of time.
nitrogen cycle. The nitrogen cycle describes the circulation and chemical reac-
tions of nitrogen in ecological systems.
nitrogen fixation. Nitrogen fixation is the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen
(N2) to ammonia (NH3)
nutrient dynamics. The changes in nutrient concentrations in compartments
over time.
particulate matter. Living or nonliving material suspended in the water column.
phenological. Periodic biological phenomena that occur seasonally or annually.
photosynthesis. The process by which carbon dioxide and water are converted
into carbohydrates by green plants, algae, and certain bacteria using energy from
the sun.
photosynthetically active radiation. The amount of light available for photosyn-
thesis, in the 400 to 700 nanometer wavelength range.
pollutants. A human-produced or natural substance or condition that contami-
nates air, water, or soil.
positive feedback. Amplification of an effect by its own influence on the process
that gives rise to it.
proxy. A variable that stands in for another variable.
regeneration. The recycling and release of nutrients from organic matter by
decomposer organisms.
respiration. Cellular respiration is a process in organisms involving the trans-
duction of energy, typically with the intake of oxygen and the release of carbon
dioxide from the oxidation of complex organic substances.
seed bank. The storage of seeds, usually dormant, within the soils of most ecosystems.
seston. Minute living and non-living particulate matter suspended in the water
column.
tragedy of the commons. A phenomenon where individual users acting indepen-
dently and rationally in their own self-interest behave contrary to the common
good of all users by depleting or polluting a resource.
water column. Open water between the surface and the sediment.
xylem. Xylem is supporting and water-conducting tissue, which brings water and
nutrients from the roots to the rest of the plant.
zooplankton. Plankton, or drifting organisms, consisting of small animals and
the immature stages of larger animals.
Index
Absorbed photosynthetically active Free-Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment
radiation (APAR), 3031 (FACE), 2829, 31
Accumulators. See Hyperaccumulators
Acid precipitation, 24 Global carbon cycle, 27
Arsenic contamination Global climate change, 27, 32, 34,
in fronds, 2223 35, 3942
in roots, 2223 Global temperatures, 27, 32
in soils, 22 Global warming, 42
Arsenic toxicity, 23 Greenhouse gas emissions, 27
Assimilation, 1, 5, 8 Gross primary production (GPP), 29
Atmospheric carbon dioxide, 39 Gulf of Mexico dead zone, 14, 15
The Momentum Press digital library is very affordable, with no obligation to buy in future
years.
For more information, please visit www.momentumpress.net/library or to set up a trial in the
US, please contact mpsales@globalepress.com.
EBOOKS Ecological Homeostasis
FOR THE Christopher J. Paradise A. Malcolm Campbell
APPLIED BIOLOGY COLLECTION
Individual organisms contribute to nutrient cycling in ecologi-
SCIENCES
cal systems, which is shown to be a mechanism of homeosta-
LIBRARY
sis at that level. The phosphorus and nitrogen cycles are used
Create your own to illustrate effects of changes in populations or communities
Customized Content on the cycling of these nutrients. Major disturbances such as
Ecological
Bundlethe more deforestation and global climate change disrupt nutrient cycles
books you buy, and ecological system homeostasis. Data are examined to
the greater your
Homeostasis
determine effects of deforestation on nutrient cycling. Increas-
discount! ing atmospheric carbon dioxide and global climate change are
disrupting ecological systems homeostasis, and several stud-
THE CONTENT ies are used to show how this is happening, including changes
Energy Physics in primary production, temperature and precipitation patterns.
Engineering This book also discusses the role of individual species in filter-
Biotechnology ing contaminants and pollutants from ecological systems.
Biology
Christopher J. Paradiseis professor of biology and environ-
Mathematics
mental studies at Davidson College. He teaches introductory
Chemistry
biology, ecology, entomology, and topical seminars on ecotoxi-
cology and renewable natural resources. He also occasionally
THE TERMS
leads a study abroad program in India. His research evaluates
Perpetual access
anthropogenic factors that influence insect biodiversity at a
for a one time fee
variety of scales. His current research interests include effects of
No subscriptions or
land use patterns on pollinator communities in parks.
access fees
Unlimited A. Malcolm Campbellteaches biology at Davidson College,
concurrent usage NC. He received national and international education awards:
Downloadable PDFs Genetics Society of America (2013); American Association for the
Free MARC records Advancement of Science (2012); and American Society for Cell
Biology (2006). He was the founding co-editor in chief of CBE Life
For further information, Sciences Education; founding director of Genome Consortium
a free trial, or to order,
contact: for Active Teaching (GCAT); and member of the American Soci- Christopher J. Paradise
sales@momentumpress.net ety for Cell Biology governing council (20122014).
A. Malcolm Campbell