Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION, RACKETEERING, AND CORRUPTION VICTIMS
13. With particularity, the Plaintiff Government corruption victims defend their unimpeachable
and free and clear record real property title, riparian Gulf-front Parcel and/or S.T.R.A.P. #
12-44-20-01-00015.015A as perfectly conveyed and legally described in reference to the
1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25, against,
e.g., extortion, retaliation, fraud, fraud on the Courts, deprivations, oppression, bribery, et
al.
PLAINTIFFS’ “EX RELATIONE” APPEARANCE IN COURT
14. The Plaintiffs also appear in U.S. Court “ex rel.” on behalf of the United States and the
Federal Government, the State of Florida, and the People of Florida and/or the United States.
15. Under express public policy, the interests to be free of Government corruption, crimes,
and oppression as advanced by Dr. Busse and Prescott are similar to the interests of the
Government.
16. The practice of using private parties to prosecute criminal offenses is derived from English
common law. Traditionally, English criminal procedure relied heavily on a system of private
prosecution. Said traditional English system of private prosecution has been supplemented by
public intervention. The public prosecutor has no greater advantages than any private party.
PROSECUTION OF PANDEMIC PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN FLORIDA
17. Under Florida and Federal law, private individuals may prosecute in the interest of the
People. The Plaintiff private prosecutors seek legal remedies to free the People of the State of
Florida and/or United States of endemic and pandemic public corruption in Florida.
FLORIDA STATEWIDE GRAND JURY ON PUBLIC CORRUPTION
18. The Governor of the State of Florida called to convene a statewide grand jury on
public corruption, because “too many cases of corruption have occurred in Florida, and
our goal will be to hold government accountable.”
19. The State and U.S. Courts in Florida have not been in any position to exercise fair-minded
judgment and therefore fixed Plaintiffs’ Cases in exchange for bribes. As a result, the People
and Plaintiffs continue to suffer injuries from the publicly recorded Government
falsifications of, e.g., “writ of execution” (Doc. ## 434, 432, 422, 424, 386, 365, 386, 87,
25), “judgment”, “land parcels”, a “park”, et al.
JURISDICTION AND PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO DEF. U.S. ATTORNEY
20. The Defendant U.S. Attorney asserted prosecution and jurisdiction under civil RICO on or
around 06/30/2010:
“The only other vehicle for charging essentially criminal conduct in a civil forum is a
suit under the civil provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (“civil RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c).”
See Case 2:2010-cv-00089, Doc. # 29, p. 4…