November 7, 2007

Peter Van Loan MP

Van Loan, Peter - Assistant 1 [VanLoP0@parl.gc.ca]

Re: Government corruption, conspiracy Frank Gallagher

34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
Dear Assistant 1 L4P 2P8

As you know Peter Van Loan is my representative to the Federal Government and I have been e-mailing
him about some very serious issues which need addressing.

My records show you have been reading the e-mails but I have had no response from his office.

Due the seriousness of the issues and his failure to respond I am endeavoring to document as to why he
has not responded.

I do not know what qualifications you have to assess the information I have been sending Mr. Van Loan
over the passed couple of years and whether or not he receives everything I send so I am going to ask you
a few questions regarding your part in this and expect you to respond to me FFF. Forthright, Forthcoming,
Forthwith.

(1) Have you seen to it that Peter Van Loan is in receipt of the documents that you have read since
November 1 2007?

(2) Has he been informed of my web sites that I have referenced in my e-mails?
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

(3) Has he been informed that the issues to be addressed are to be found on these web sites and the other 8
web sites referenced to on these web sites?

(4) Has he been informed that the irrefutable evidence of the government conspiracy is to be found on
these web sites?

When answering the above 4 questions please do so to include the following information

(a) The procedure from the time you read the information I send and to when he receives it.
(b) Do you inform him directly and does he acknowledge receipt to you?
(c) Are you aware as to the serious nature of the issues
(d) At this time I won’t mention any names but over a year ago a girl from his office phoned me
asking what she was supposed to do with a 271 page fax I sent Mr. Van Loan’s office.
I said read it and she said she wasn’t used to this.
With some persuasion suggesting that if she didn’t give it to Mr. Van Loan as she was inclined
not to do my records will show that and having convinced her of the seriousness finally
promised to see Mr. Van Loan received it.
 With this in mind I request you describe a little about your position.

Do you study the material sent you and make decisions as to whether or not to forward it on to
Peter?

What qualifications do you have to determine whether or not the material should be of importance to
Peter.

Please provide your name and anything else that would be helpful in this initiative.

Presuming you have read the information which I have sent, you will know the serious nature of the
issues and you are involved, like it or not and I recommend you be FFF in your response.

This would be a good time to demonstrate your usefulness to the tax payer.

Thank you

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher