Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15-20
Preliminary note
Abstract: Many engineering applications involve the problem of a dynamic loading property which is often hard to
track and critical in design analysis. The winch-lift design learning software developed in this work incorporates the
graphical display of dynamic loading on the cable or rope of the winch lift within the first seconds of its operation. The
learning software allows the user to generate a profile of this load and its acceleration against time in order to obtain
the maximum value of the load to be borne by the whole unit. This feature is underplayed in most engineering software
which usually uses the static total nominal load for simplicity.
The overall program flow is in three sections based on the software architecture. They are the study, practice and the
assessment sessions. At the validation stage, the results generated were compared with those obtained by numerical
procedures in literature. The results were in the same range with differences in values of the order 0.1%. In conclusion,
a learning software for exploring motorized winch systems has been developed in this work.
Key words: Winch Lift, Dynamic Loading, Learning Software, Results Validation
Suspended
Winch Lift
Distance
Center
00
Rope
Worm gear
Rope
Winch
Load y2 W
drum Hook
Figure
Fig.1.1:Motor
MotorDriven
Driven Winch
WinchLift
Lift Mechanism
Mechanism
Dav c
Gr = (8) Once it is recognized that for any value of time t, and
Ns m
16
Emmanuel Simolowo, Adeboye Gbadebo: Developing a Dynamic Load-Tracking Learning-Software for Winch Lift Design;
Machine Design, Vol.4(2012) No.1, ISSN 1821-1259; pp. 15-20
k c c
are constants and constant coefficients B = and H = ( D) + (( ARG )( D1));
m m 2m
k c
C= ; then equation (11) is rewritten as equation (12) H 1 = ( D1) + ( ARGxD) ;
m 2m
c
&y&2 + B. y2 + C. y& 2 = D(t ) (12) D = ( A) + (( ARG )( B ));
2m
c
c k D1 = ( B) (( ARG )( A))
D(t ) = . y&1 + . y1 + g (13) 2m
m m
The solution to equation (12) is however dependent on Expressions for the arbitrary constants A and B are
one major assumption: The rope spring K is constant computed based on the initial conditions as
over the period for which the vibration exists. This is not cg
the case in reality as the rope is being coiled up during {( ) v}
mg
this period thereby reducing its length. In reality, the rope A= ; B = 2k . At this point a complete
k ARG
would have to be treated as a collection (n number) of
springs in series such that for springs of constant k, the expression for the acceleration &y&2 in terms of time t alone
k is available. A plot of values of the &y&2 against t is used to
overall spring constant would be k = . This would
n obtain the maximum value of &y&2 . Then the maximum
allow the designer to account for the coiling up of the load (force) and thus maximum drum torque are found by
rope by removing successive springs from the series applying Newtons 1st law as.
based on the speed of coiling. The spring constant would
k k Fmax = m &y&2 (17)
thus change from at the start to at some later time
n m
Tmax = Fmax Dsr (18)
where m is number of springs in the series at that time.
The assumption is however a reasonable one since the The plot of &y&2 and Fmax are displayed in Figure 5. Dsr is
time period under consideration is small (of the order of a the Drum Sheave Radius. These maximum values set the
few seconds) and thus the amount of rope coiled up is requirements which the worm gear set must meet in order
fairly negligible. A complementary solution to the to lift the load. The maximum load must not exceed the
corresponding homogenous equations maximum permissible load on the rope in order to prevent
&y&2 + B y2 + C y& 2 = 0 with constant coefficients is rope failure and the maximum drum torque must be met
found. The complementary solution is or exceeded by the worm set output torque value in order
for the winch to operate at all [14]
c
y 2 = exp( t ){ A Cos (( ARG )(t )) + B Sin (( ARG )(t ))} (14)
2m 2.2. Tribo-element Design for Winch
This design stage involves using models of each part of
Where, ARG = ( ) 2 , A and B are arbitrary
k c the winch lift and appropriate functions to calculate the
m 2m required parameters [15]. Examples of such parameters
constants. A particular solution to equation (12) is then are forces, moments, torques, deflections of particular
found based on the form of the right hand side. Since the sections and adequate safety factors based on material
c k choices. This forms the main area in which the iterative
right hand side is of the form D(t ) = y&1 + y1 + g , procedure is employed. The main design includes the
m m
sizing of the worm set speed reducer, the shaft carrying
we expect a particular solution of the form y2 = (d . t) + e.
the drum and the bearings within which it rotates.
The particular solution is found using the initial
The complete design of a worm set is herein performed
mg based on design information or parameters obtained from
conditions to be y2 = (v t ) . The general solution
k the lift mechanism design. Parameters include the
is obtained as a sum of complementary and particular required Torque (M1), input speed (N1) and output speed
solutions to give. (N2). The selection of material for worm/wheel and
diameter factor (q) is based on standard tables [12]. The
c
y 2 = exp( t )[ A Cos(( ARG)(t )) + B Sin(( ARG)(t ))] + (15) gear ratio Rg can be obtained using equation (19), while
2m the center distance (a) between worm and wheel is an
mg assumed parameter at commencement of design. The
Where = (v t ) number of treads on worm (Z1) and wheel (Z2) are
k
obtained by equations (20) and (21) respectively where m
&y&2 is written as is the axial module. The pitch diameters for worm (d1)
and wheel (d2) are calculated using equations (22) and
c
&y&2 = exp( t )[H Cos (( ARG )(t )) + ] (16) (23). The lead angle ( ) ensuring self locking capability
2m
is calculated employing equation (24) in terms of the
Where = H 1 Sin( ARG )(t )) worm diameter (dw), worm gear diameter (dg), number of
worm teeth (nw), number of worm gear teeth (ng).
17
Emmanuel Simolowo, Adeboye Gbadebo: Developing a Dynamic Load-Tracking Learning-Software for Winch Lift Design;
Machine Design, Vol.4(2012) No.1, ISSN 1821-1259; pp. 15-20
Px
M = (26)
n1d1
Vt = (27)
60
The tangential load factors based on materials (Cs), size
ratio (Cm) and friction (Cv). Subsequently the tangential
load (Wtg), friction force (Wf), rated power output ( o ),
power loss ( L ), rated power input ( ), efficiency of
worm set ( ) and rated output torque (To) are calculated
by equations (28), (29), (30), (31), (32), (33) and (34)
respectively. The coefficient of friction is .
Wtg = 0.0132 Cs Cm Cv ba d20.8 (28)
Wtg
(29)
Cos( n )Cos( )
n1Wtg d 2
o = (30)
Rg
L = VtW f (31)
= o + L (32)
o
= (33)
Table 1. Sample Numerical Design the functionality of the developed software algorithm
include (i) On-design graphical simulation of a dynamic
Specifications for case study design
property. (ii) Two-way interactive and flexible capability.
Design Values and Status of
S/N
Parameters specifications Parameter
1. Items 100 4. VALIDATION OF SOFTWARE RESULTS
2. Time 2000 seconds
3. Height 7.3152 m The sample design presented in Table 1 was repeated
4. Item Weight 22.2109 Kg Given values using the developed learning software. By comparing the
49905.21 N/m2 based on values in Table 1 and those obtained from developed
Spring constant design learning software, the results are correct and accurate.
5. (based on
K
material) requirements Shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5 are the results compared for
the lifting and gearing designs
6. Rope Diameter 0.025 m
7. Power Source Motor
8. Dead Load 222.486 N
9. Items per Lift 2
Sheave Assumed
10. 0.25 m
Diameter values
Lift Time
11. 0.3
fraction
Lifting Mechanism design
40 seconds per
12. LR
cycle
12 seconds per
13. ALT
lift
14. AVL 0.6069 m/s
15. LL 435.7 N Results
16. TNL 658.2 N obtained
17. MDL 3261.2 N Fig.3. Validation of results for Lift Mechanism
18. PR 0.6019 KW
19. DAV 2.438 RAD/SEC
20. GR 1 : 75
Worm gear set design
Re-design and
Parameters Initial Results
final results
21. a 0.139 m 0.150
22. Rg 1 :75 1 :75
23. d1 0.0511 m 0.0546 m
24. d2 0.2269 m 0.2454 m
25. 0.0592 rad 0.0598 rad
26. ba 0.0342 m 0.0366 m
Fabrication.
27. Chilled casting Chilled casting
Type
28. Cs 1000 1000
29. Cm 0.6256 0.6526 Fig.4. Validation of results for Worm gear design
30. Cv 0.2723 0.2621
31. Vt 4.6143 m/s 4.9323 m/s
32. Wtg 6156.7 N 6744.8 N
33. n 200 200
34. m 0.022 0.0211
35. Wf 142.65 N 151.42 N
36. o 1682.4 W 1993.22 W
37. L 658.22 W 746.88 W
38. 2340.64 W 2740.10 W
39. 0.711 0.727
40. To 698.5 Nm 827.55 m
19
Emmanuel Simolowo, Adeboye Gbadebo: Developing a Dynamic Load-Tracking Learning-Software for Winch Lift Design;
Machine Design, Vol.4(2012) No.1, ISSN 1821-1259; pp. 15-20
Fig.6. Interface for Design of lifting Mechanism showing the graphical display of dynamic force (----) and acceleration
of load (-----) during design process.
20