Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The researcher began this study with the goal of learning how students best understand
informational text and how the educator can best facilitate the process. What the researcher
learned reinforced the trends in test results: students are not as successful when working with
informational text as they are working with narrative text. The researcher has now
In a world with unlimited access to informational text, students must develop the skills to
comprehend and, perhaps more importantly, analyze that specific type of text. The ability to do
both impinges on our students success in life. Even knowing this, teachers are still only
spending an average of 3.6 minutes per day on informational text instruction (Duke, 2000). With
our students future in the balance, the importance of focusing on informational text
comprehension could not be more imperative. The results of this study (in particular the pre-test)
prove why informational text comprehension became a focus of the Common Core. The results
of the current study gave the researcher determination to close the gap between fiction and
Because of this action research study, the researcher has a proactive way of
approaching informational text. First, the researcher incorporated a variety of informational text
to the daily curriculum. Since the research suggests students will not improve their informational
text comprehension by simply reading the text (Baker et al. 2011), the researcher must employ
meaningful, explicit text structure instruction. Students must be allotted time to dismantle
specific informational text structures and analyze them. When students are given direct
instruction in how to appropriately use graphic organizers, they could better comprehend and
organize informational text. This information is valuable for future educators so they become
aware that informational text structure can be comprehended when students are given explicit
Lessons Learned
The lessons the researcher learned throughout this research study were impacted in some
way by the studys limitations. The researcher conducted the study for only nine weeks. If
allowed more time, the researcher may have been able to introduce more graphic organizers in
order to compare and contrast the results. This extended period of time could have given the
researcher more data points to gather and analyze. Another limitation for the researcher was the
participants varied reading and writing abilities. The researcher learned that in order to
accommodate all levels, there should be no time constraint for students to complete the reading
and graphic organizer. Even though the sample of students was confined to one class with one
teacher, the researcher believed that because of the integrity of the study, she was able to see with
fresh eyes the strengths and weaknesses of her students, her teaching, and her materials.
The researcher has learned both about her impact as an educator as well as how her
students learn best. This study first shaped the researcher into a better educator by learning about
Understanding and applying the knowledge gleaned from the literature review allowed the
researcher to avoid missteps and provided meaningful instruction that would benefit student
learning. The researcher learned the importance of infusing informational text into her students
reading repertoire. In addition to immersing the students into informational texts, the researcher
learned that the text structures used in informational writing are often difficult and students need
a way to organize the information learned. Explicit instruction on how to use graphic organizers
was important for students in order for them to categorize the most important information.
Graphic organizers presented at the end of reading gave students an opportunity to visually
organize the information from the text. The addition of clearly organized graphic organizers,
such as the bubble map increased student growth because students has a set amount of
Future Implications
comprehension of informational text inspired her to continue her study. With an alarming trend
plans on sharing results gathered from this study with her peers and sharing effective strategies
for student improvement. She is interested in repeating the study, but increasing the length of
time so that the results analyzed can include state standardized tests. In addition to working with
the compare and contrast text structure, the researcher would introduce cause and effect,
Students are fully immersed in this Age of Information. At stake are their abilities to
understand a complex world of forms, policies, procedures, instructions, and news reports. The
inundation of information makes it more important than ever for students to understand what
they read. Will they miss graduating because they did not understand the directions for a final
exam? Will a low ACT score from the predominantly non-fiction reading section prevent them
from admission to college? Will they lose out on a scholarship because they misread the essay
prompt? Will intimidation of legal jargon blind them from their rights? Will an inability to
educators to mold our students into citizens that are able to live, work, and learn with success. It
is now more important than ever to work with informational text in the classroom, so that
learning can be transferred into the real world and that the real world can be the classroom of
their future.