1 Ge DBR 7002 R0 20130614

STUP Consultants P.
Ltd
Plot No 22-A, Sector 19-C
Palm Beach Marg, Vashi, Navi Mumbai 400 705
Tel. : 7896241/42/43/44/45 Fax : (91-22) 7896240
Email: navimumbai@stupmail.com
OFFICE OF ORIGIN
VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI
OWNER
DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD
CLIENT
TATA PROJECTS LTD - ALDESA JV
PROJECT
DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR - EASTERN CORRIDOR,
BHAUPUR TO KHURJA CONTRACT C 101, 102 & 103
TITLE
DESIGN BASIS REPORT STRUCTURE FOUNDATIONS
Date Rev Modifications/ Purpose of Issue Prepared Checked Approved

No
Name Sign Name Sign Name Sign
14.06.13 A For Approval PSB ASG SKP
This note is the property of Date Pages Note No Rev

STUP Consultants P.Ltd. It
should not be used, copied 14.06.2013 01 + 37 = 038 1 / GE / DBR - 7002 No
or reproduced without their
written permission.
A
Date : 14.06.13 Note No: 1 / GE / DBR - 7002 (A)
STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 1
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. DESIGN PRINCIPLE 3
3. DESIGN METHOD 3
3.1 Identification of Geotechnical Investigation Results 4
3.2 Analysis 4
3.2.1 Bearing Capacity 4
3.2.2 Pile Capacity 5
3.2.3 Deformation Analysis 9
3.2.4 Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential 11
4. PERMISSIBLE INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE 11

5. SOIL PROFILE 12
5.1 LOT 101 Group 1 12
5.2 LOT 101 Group 2 13
5.3 LOT 101 Group 3 13
5.4 LOT 101 Group 4 13
5.5 LOT 101 Group 5 13
5.6 LOT 101 Group 6 14
5.7 LOT 101 Group 7 14
5.8 LOT 102 Group 1 14
5.9 LOT 102 Group 2 15
5.10 LOT 103 Group 1 15
5.11 LOT 103 Group 2 15
5.12 LOT 103 Group 3 16
5.13 LOT 103 Group 4 16
5.14 LOT 103 Group 5 16

5.15 LOT 103 Group 6 16
5.16 LOT 103 Group 7 17
6. RECOMMENDATIONS 17
6.1 LOT 101 Group 1 18
6.2 LOT 101 Group 2 19
6.3 LOT 101 Group 3 20
6.4 LOT 101 Group 4 21
6.5 LOT 101 Group 5 22
6.6 LOT 101 Group 6 23
6.7 LOT 101 Group 7 24
6.8 LOT 102 Group 1 25
6.9 LOT 102 Group 2 26
6.10 LOT 103 Group 1 27
6.11 LOT 103 Group 2 28
6.12 LOT 103 Group 3 29
6.13 LOT 103 Group 4 30
6.14 LOT 103 Group 5 31
6.15 LOT 103 Group 6 32
6.16 LOT 103 Group 7 33
7. TYPICAL CALCULATIONS 34
7.1 Safe Bearing Capacity 34
7.2 Pile Axial Capacity 36
8. REFERENCE CODES AND STANDARDS 37

Design and Construction of Civil, structures and Track Works for Double Line Railway
involving formation, track works, bridges, structures, buildings including testing and
commissioning on Design-Build lump sum basis for Bhaupur Khurja section of Eastern
Dedicated Freight Corridor
1. Introduction
The work on eastern section of the Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) between Khurja and
Bhaupur is to be constructed as an electrified double track railway capable of operating at a
maximum train speed of 100 km/h.
The report covers the design basis for the geotechnical aspects of design of foundations for
structures. This document highlights the general requirements, design methods, codes and
standards used in design.
2. Design Principle
The foundations shall be designed as per the TOR as agreed upon between DFCCIL and TATA
Projects Ltd and Aldesa JV and as per the guidelines given in Indian Railway Standard Code of
Practice for the Design of Sub-Structures and foundations of Bridges and Manual on the
Design and Construction of Well and Pile Foundations.
In general, the type of foundation shall be as below
Major Bridges / RFO / Major RUBs Bored Cast-in-situ Piles of diameter 1000 mm
(PSC Box Girder or Steel Bridges) or 1200 mm
Minor Bridges / Minor RUBs Raft Foundation
(Box Type Structures)
3. Design Method
The design shall be in following steps

1. Identification of Geotechnical Investigation results
2. Stability Analysis
a) Bearing Capacity
b) Pile Capacity Lateral and Axial
c) Deformation Analysis
d) Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential
3.1 Identification of Geotechnical Investigation Results
Based on the RFP data the sub-surface layers are identified and the details of engineering
properties of layer; ground water table etc is given for different sections in para 5.0.
The design parameters shall be referred as per para 5.0.
3.2 Analysis
3.2.1 Bearing Capacity
As per cl 5.1.2 of IS 6403, the ultimate bearing capacity for c- soil shall be calculated as -
qult = [ c Nc sc dc ic ] + [ q (Nq-1) sq dq iq] + [ 0.5 B N s d i Rw] (T/m)
Where,
qult : Ultimate bearing capacity based on shear strength parameters of soil
B : Width of footing (or least dimension) in (m)
L : Length of footing in (m), if Footing is rectangular type
D : Depth of footing below ground level in (m)
: Submerged Density of soil (T/m)
c : Cohesion of soil (T/m), as per test data
= qu/2 and qu = 10 12 N kN/m as per Section 3-8 of Foundation Analysis and
Design by J E Bowles to be adopted in absence of test results.
N : corrected SPT value. Corrections of SPT to be carried out as per IS: 2131
: Angle of Friction of soil (Deg) as per Fig 1 of IS: 6403 based on corrected N value;
restrict to 36 deg.
q : Effective surcharge at base level of footing in (T/m)
Nc , Nq, N: Bearing Capacity Factors depends on c & of soil as per Table 1 of IS: 6403
sc , sq, s : Shape Factors
dc, dq, d : Depth Factors as per Table 2, clause 5.1.2.2 & 5.1.2.3 as per IS: 6403
ic, iq, i : Inclination Factors
Rw : Correction factor for water table as per clause 5.1.2.4 of IS: 6403.
: Inclination of load to the vertical (in Degrees)
The allowable bearing capacity shall be minimum of
1. Net ultimate bearing capacity as determined above divided by factor of safety 2.5 (as
per 706.3.1.1 of IRC 78-2000); and
2. the net soil pressure that can be imposed on the base without the settlement
exceeding the permissible value of 75 mm
Depending on the type of soil the appropriate terms related to cohesion and friction angle
shall be considered
3.2.2 Pile Capacity
Pile shall be designed as Bored Cast-in-situ Piles as per IS 2911 Part 1 Sec 2 2010.
3.2.2.1 Piles in Soil with cohesion and friction angle
In stratified Soil / c- soil the ultimate load capacity of pile shall be determined by calculating
the skin friction and end bearing in different strata by using the appropriate equations given
in 3.2.2.2 and 3.2.2.3.
The safe load capacity of pile shall be the ultimate load capacity of pile divided by the factor
of safety as 3.0 as per the IRS code for Pile foundations.
However, this capacity derived from the soil properties shall be compared with the structural
capacity and the minimum shall be considered as Design Pile Capacity.
3.2.2.2 Piles in Cohesionless Soil
The ultimate load bearing capacity of single pile in cohesionless soil shall be calculated as
n
( )
Qu = Ap 1 DN + PD N q + K i PDi tan i Asi
2 i =1
where,
Qu : Ultimate Load Capacity of Pile in kN
Ap : Cross section area of pile tip in m
D : Diameter of Pile in meter
: Effective Unit Weight at Pile Tip in kN/m
: In the absence of data the value shall be considered as per table 1.11.1 of Foundation
Design Manual by N. V. Nayak
N : Bearing Capacity Factors depends on of soil as per IS: 6403
: In absence of data shall be read from Fig. 1 of IS 6403 corresponding to N-value
PD : Effective overburden pressure at pile tip in kN/m
: The maximum effective overburden at pile tip shall be corresponding to critical depth
which will be 15 D for < 30 and increasing to 20 D for > 40
Nq : Bearing Capacity Factors depends on of soil as per Fig 1 of IS 2911 Part 1 sec 2
Ki : Coefficient of earth pressure applicable for the ith Layer
: For Piles in loose to dense sand with varying between 30 to 40 Ki shall be in the
range of 1.0 to 1.5.
PDi : Effective overburden pressure for the ith layer in kN/m
i : Angle of wall friction between pile and soil for the ith layer
: Shall be considered equal to friction angle of soil around pile stem
Asi : Surface area of Pile in ith layer in m
3.2.2.3 Piles in Cohesive Soil
The ultimate load bearing capacity of single pile in cohesive soil shall be calculated as
n
Qu = AP N c cP + i ci Asi
i =1
Where,
Qu : Ultimate Load Capacity of Pile in kN
Ap : Cross section area of pile tip in m
Nc : Bearing Capacity Factor shall be considered as 9
cP : Average Cohesion at Pile Tip in kN/m
: In the absence of data, cP = qu/2 and qu = 10 12 N kN/m as per Section 3-8 of
Foundation Analysis and Design by J E Bowles to be adopted in absence of test results.
i : Adhesion factor for the ith layer depending on the consistency of soil
: The value shall be considered from Fig 2 of IS 2911 Part 1 sec 2
ci : Average Cohesion for ith layer in kN/m
: In the absence of data, cP = qu/2 and qu = 10 12 N kN/m as per Section 3-8 of
Foundation Analysis and Design by J E Bowles to be adopted in absence of test results.
Asi : Surface area of pile shaft in the ith layer in m
3.2.2.4 Lateral Capacity of Piles
The deflection of the pile due to lateral load shall be determined as per Reese and Matlock
method. The safe lateral resistance of single pile shall correspond to deflection at scour level
not greater than 1.0 % of pile diameter as per IRC 78 amendment No 6 effective from June
2009.
3.2.2.4.1. Piles in Granular soil

The deflection, slope, bending moment, shear force and soil reaction at various depth in soil
shall be determined by below equations given by Reese and Matlock method as per 6.3.4 of
Pile Design and Construction Practice by M J Tomlinson.
A] For Free Head Pile
Ay HT 3 By M tT 2
Deflection, y = +
EI EI
As HT 2 Bs M tT
Slope = +
EI EI
Bending Moment = Am HT + Bm M t
Bv M t
Shear Force = Av H +
T
AP H BP M t
Soil Re action = +
T T2
Where
Ay, By, As, Bs, Am, Bm, Av, Bv, Ap and Bp are coefficients as per Fig 6.37 a to 6.38 e of Pile
Design and Construction Practice by M J Tomlinson.
H : Horizontal Load at Pile Head
Mt : Moment at Pile Head
B] For Fixed Head Pile
Fy HT 3
Deflection, y =
EI
Bending Moment = Fm HT
FP H
Soil Re action =
T
Fy, Fm, and Fp are coefficients as per Fig 6.39 a to 6.39 c of Pile Design and Construction
Practice by M J Tomlinson.
T : Characteristic length of the soil-pile system
EpI p
T =5
h
Where
h : Constant of modulus of horizontal sub grade reaction
h : For Pile foundation - Shall be as per Bowels formulae (Page no. 504, 933)
k =As + Bs Zn
Where,
As = C (c Nc Sc + 0.5 B N S)
Bs = C ( Nq Sq)
C = 40 in SI units; and n = 0.5
3.2.2.4.2 Piles in Cohesive soil
For use in cohesive soil Davisson and Gill have modified the Reese and Matlock theory
and the deflection and bending moment shall be as per 6.3.4 of Pile Design and
Construction Practice by M J Tomlinson.
For Moment, M on Pile head
BendingMoment = MM m
R2
Deflection = Mym
EI
For Horizontal Load, H on Pile head
BendingMoment = HM h R
R3
Deflection = Hyh
EI
Where
EpI p
R=4
k
k : Modulus of sub grade reaction
k : For Pile foundation - Shall be as per Bowels formulae (Page no. 504, 933)
k =As + Bs Zn
Where,
As = C (c Nc Sc + 0.5 B N S)
Bs = C ( Nq Sq)
C = 40 in SI units; and n = 0.5
3.2.3 Deformation Analysis
The raft foundation shall be checked for the deformations of the sub-soil.
The deformation / settlement shall comprise of immediate settlements (for Cohesionless or
-soils) and consolidation settlements (for cohesive or c-soils). The settlements shall be
computed as per IS 8009 Part I.
The total settlement, St will be
St = Si + S c
Si : Immediate Settlement
Sc : Consolidation Settlement = Soed
: Factor depending on type of clay (for over-consolidated clay shall be 0.50)
Soed : Shall be estimated as given below.
The immediate settlements shall be calculated as
S i = p B
(1 ) I
2

E
Where,
: Poissons ratio (Shall be taken as 0.50 for clays / cohesive soils and 0.30 for sands /
cohesionless soils)
p: net pressure at centre of pressure bulb (zone)
B : Width of the embankment at base
E : Modulus of Elasticity Weighted average of E within the influenced zone i.e. upto depth
of pressure bulb.
Modulus of Elasticity shall be considered as per Table 5.6 of Foundation Analysis and Design
by J E Bowles.
E = 500 (N+15) kPa for Normally Consolidated Sand
E = 300 (N+ 6) kPa Silts / Sandy Silts / Clayey Silts
The long term or consolidation settlements shall be calculated as below.
For Normally Consolidated / Unconsolidated Clays the settlement shall be as follows.
Cc p + p
S oed = H log 0
(1 + e0 ) p0
Cc : Compression index as per consolidation test report. In absence of test data it will be
considered as per clause 9.2.2.2 of IS: 8009 (Part I) i.e.
Cc = 0.009 (LL 10)
e0 : Void ratio as per test report and in absence of test data the same will be calculated as
below:
Cc = 0.30 (e0 0.27)
p: net pressure at centre of pressure bulb (zone)
P0 : Initial Pressure
B : Width of the embankment at base
E : Modulus of Elasticity Weighted average of E within the influenced zone i.e. upto depth
of pressure bulb.
For over-consolidated Clay the settlement shall be calculated as
Sc = p mv H
In absence of consolidation test data mv shall be as per Table 2.11 of Foundation Design and
Construction by M J Tomlinson.
In absence of consolidation data, the state of soil shall be as per Soil Mechanics &
Foundation Design by K R Arora as below
If Liquidity Index = (NMC - PL) / PI is 0.00 to 0.60 Clay is over-consolidated

If Liquidity Index = (NMC - PL) / PI is 0.60 to 1.00 Clay is normally-consolidated
The permissible post construction settlements shall be 75 mm as per IS 1904.
3.2.4 Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential
The evaluation of Liquefaction potential shall be carried out as per Appendix G of IITK-RDSO
guideline.
4. Permissible increase in Allowable Bearing Pressure
When the foundation are checked for combinations of loads the allowable bearing pressures
on foundations shall be increased as per 6.7 of IRS code for Pile foundations
Combination I DL + LL + Dynamic Augment (I) + Longitudinal Nil
forces (LF) + Forces due to curvature and
eccentricity of track (CF) + Earth Pressure (EP) +
Forces due to water current (WC) + Buoyancy (B)
Combination II DL + LL + Dynamic Augment (I) + Longitudinal 33 1/3 %
Forces due to water current (WC) + Buoyancy (B) +
Wind Load (WL)
Combination III DL + LL + Dynamic Augment (I) + Longitudinal 33 1/3 %
Seismic Forces (SF)
Combination IV DL + LL + Dynamic Augment (I) + Longitudinal 40 %
Wind Load (WL) + Seismic Forces (SF)
5. SOIL PROFILE
Soil Profile for various sectors and zones is classified as per the data provided in RFP and shall
be revised if required depending on the data obtained during detailed investigation.
The engineering properties of the various sectors are described in below sections. In absence
of the test data following guidelines are followed to determine the engineering properties.
: Effective Unit Weight Weighted average in kN/m
: In the absence of data the value shall be considered as per table 1.11.1 of Foundation
Design Manual by N. V. Nayak
ka : Coefficient of lateral earth pressure determined as (1 sin ) / (1 + sin )
: Angle of wall friction between pile and soil
: Shall be considered equal to friction angle of soil
E : Modulus of Elasticity Weighted average of E in kN/m
: Modulus of Elasticity shall be considered as per Table 5.6 of Foundation Analysis and
Design by J E Bowles.
E = 500 (N+15) kPa for Normally Consolidated Sand
E = 300 (N+ 6) kPa Silts / Sandy Silts / Clayey Silts
5.1 LOT 101 Group 1
Section Bhaupur Parallel Section Chainage 1040 - 1109

Layer Description Depth BGL N C Ka E
(m) (kPa) (deg) (kN/m) (deg) (kPa)
1 Very Stiff Silty Clay 0.00 - 4.90 28 140 21.00 1.000 0 10200
2 Very Stiff Clayey Silt 4.90 - 8.50 32 36 22.50 0.260 36 23500
3 Hard Silty Clay 8.50 - 11.40 36 180 22.50 1.000 0 12600
4 Hard Clayey Silt 11.40 - 18.00 45 36 22.50 0.260 36 30000
5 Hard Silty Clay 18.00 - 23.50 64 320 24.00 1.000 0 21000
6 Very Dense Sandy 23.50 - 30.00 61 36 24.00 0.260 36 38000
Silt
The ground water table shall be considered at 5.60 m depth below EGL.
5.2 LOT 101 Group 2

3 Hard Clayey Silt 8.40 - 12.00 39 36 22.50 0.260 36 27000
5.3 LOT 101 Group 3
Section Achalda Detour Chainage 1115 1119

5.4 LOT 101 Group 4
Section Achalda Barthana Parallel Chainage 1119 - 1131

1 Stiff to Very Stiff 0.00 - 5.10 22 34 21.00 0.283 34 18500
Clayey Silt
3 Very Stiff to Hard 8.80 - 11.20 33 36 22.50 0.260 36 24000
Clayey Silt
4 Hard Silty Clay 11.20 - 12.00 39 195 22.50 1.000 0 13500
5.5 LOT 101 Group 5
Section Barthana Detour Chainage 1131 - 1140

5.6 LOT 101 Group 6
Section Barthana Etawah Parallel Chainage 1140 - 1147

1 Stiff to Very Stiff 0.00 - 9.20 19 33 21.00 0.295 33 17000
Clayey Silt
Silty Clay
Clayey Silt
4 Very Stiff to Hard 19.00 26.40 37 185 22.50 1.000 0 12900
Silty Clay
5 Hard Clayey Silt 26.40 30.00 45 36 22.50 0.260 36 30000
The ground water table was not met with in this section.
5.7 LOT 101 Group 7
Section Etawah Detour Chainage 1147 - 1170

1 Stiff Silty Clay 0.00 - 5.60 16 80 21.00 1.000 0 6600
3 Hard Silty Clay 10.60 - 14.50 35 175 22.50 1.000 0 12300
4 Dense Clayey Sand 14.50 - 16.10 40 36 22.50 0.260 36 27500
5 Hard Silty Clay 16.10 - 30.00 48 240 22.50 1.000 0 16200
5.8 LOT 102 Group 1
Section Makhanpur Parallel Section Chainage 1170 - 1195

1 Stiff Clayey Silt 0.00 - 7.80 14 31 21.00 0.320 31 14500
5.9 LOT 102 Group 2

1 Stiff Clayey Silt 0.00 - 5.60 12 31 21.00 0.320 31 13500
5.10 LOT 103 Group 1
Section Barhan Hathras Parallel Section Chainage 1266 - 1290

2 Hard/ Very Stiff Silty 6.50 - 9.60 37 185 22.50 1.000 0 12900
Clay
3 Hard Silty Sand 9.60 - 12.00 40 36 22.50 0.260 36 27500
Section Hathras Detour Chainage 1290 - 1299

2 Hard Silty Clay 9.60 - 12.90 29 145 21.00 1.000 0 10500
3 Medium Dense 12.90 - 17.20 37 36 22.50 0.260 36 26000
Clayey Sand
4 Dense Clayey Sand 17.20 - 26.00 55 36 24.00 0.260 36 35000
5 Very Dense Silty 26.00 - 30.00 72 36 24.00 0.260 36 43500
Sand
Section Hathras Aligarh Parallel Section Chainage 1299 - 1302

2 Hard Silty Clay 6.90 - 9.80 38 190 22.50 1.000 0 13200
3 Hard Silty Sand 9.80 - 12.00 45 36 22.50 0.260 36 30000

1 Very Stiff to stiff 0.00 - 6.00 20 100 21.00 1.000 0 7800
Silty Clay
2 Hard Silty Sand 6.00 - 10.30 30 36 21.00 0.260 36 22500
3 Silty Sand 10.30 - 12.00 36 36 22.50 0.260 36 25500
Section Aligarh Detour Chainage 1319 1328 (0000 9000)

1 Stiff Silty Clay 0.00 - 4.90 15 75 21.00 1.000 0 6300
3 Medium Dense Silty 7.50 - 10.90 32 36 22.50 0.260 36 23500
Sand
4 Dense Silty Sand 10.90 - 12.00 37 36 22.50 0.260 36 26000

1 Stiff to Very Stiff 0.00 - 5.60 18 90 33 21.00 0.295 33 7200
Silty Clay
2 Medium Dense 5.60 - 9.70 27 35 21.00 0.271 35 9900

Clayey Sand
3 Medium to Dense 9.70 - 14.20 35 36 22.50 0.260 36 12300
Silty Sand
4 Very Dense Silty 14.20 - 30.00 45 36 22.50 0.260 36 15300
Sand
Section Aligarh Khurja Parallel Section Chainage 1345 - 1368

1 Grayish to Brownish 0.00 - 9.50 21 33 21.00 0.295 33 8100
Medium Dense Silty
Fine Sand
2 Grayish to Brownish 9.50 - 12.70 35 36 22.50 0.260 36 12300
Dense Silty Fine
Sand
3 Grayish very Dense 12.70 - 30.00 56 36 24.00 0.260 36 18600
Silty Fine Sand
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the engineering properties defined in para 5, the safe bearing capacity for different
foundation sizes and corresponding settlements; pile capacity is determined and is reported
in following sections.
The typical Calculations for determining the Safe Bearing Capacity and Pile Axial Capacity are
given in para 7.0.
6.1 LOT 101 Group 1

Safe Bearing Capacity
Based on the above parameters the safe bearing capacity for this section shall be as below
Depth Safe Bearing Capacity in T/m (Shear Criteria) for size of footing (m)*
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 38 38 38 38 38 38
1.50 39 39 39 39 39 39
2.00 40 40 40 40 40 40
* : Length of footing is considered as 13.50 m (width of double track)
Settlements
The settlement of the soil due to above applied load will be
Depth Settlement in mm for size of footing (m)
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 183 156 171 186 223 260
1.50 143 158 173 188 226 264
2.00 145 160 175 190 229 267
: Consolidation settlement is calculated assuming soil is over-consolidated.

Pile Axial Capacity (For RFO / Major RUB)
Length of Pile BEGL(m) Safe Pile Capacity** in Tons for dia of Pile (m)
1.00 1.20
10.00 60 80
20.00 90 120
**: Pile capacity for piles in river will be calculated based on design scour obtained from
hydraulic design carrying out the design of the substructure and foundation for each Major
Bridge.
6.2 LOT 101 Group 2

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 43 57 66 73 91 108
1.50 51 64 71 78 96 113
2.00 59 68 76 83 100 118
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 168 211 276 340 530 762
1.50 164 235 295 362 558 796
2.00 190 252 315 384 586 831

1.00 1.20
10.00 150 220
Bridge.
6.3 LOT 101 Group 3
Section Achalda Detour Chainage 1115 1119

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 29 29 29 29 29 29
1.50 29 29 29 29 29 29
2.00 30 30 30 30 30 30
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 119 131 144 156 187 219
1.50 120 133 146 158 190 222
2.00 122 135 147 160 192 224

1.00 1.20
10.00 130 190
Bridge.
6.4 LOT 101 Group 4
Section Achalda Barthana Parallel Chainage 1119 - 1131

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 43 57 65 72 89 107
1.50 51 62 69 77 94 112
2.00 59 67 74 81 99 117
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 261 191 249 311 496 724
1.50 146 209 266 331 522 757
2.00 169 224 284 351 549 791

1.00 1.20
10.00 140 190
Bridge.
6.5 LOT 101 Group 5
Section Barthana Detour Chainage 1131 - 1140

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 30 30 30 30 30 30
1.50 31 31 31 31 31 31
2.00 31 31 31 31 31 31
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 130 145 160 175 212 249
1.50 132 147 162 177 215 253
2.00 134 149 164 180 218 256

1.00 1.20
10.00 60 80
Bridge.
6.6 LOT 101 Group 6
Section Barthana Etawah Parallel Chainage 1140 - 1147

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 37 49 61 73 103 133
1.50 44 56 69 81 111 141
2.00 52 64 76 88 118 149
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 172 180 255 343 618 974
1.50 139 205 284 376 662 1029
2.00 160 230 313 410 707 1085

1.00 1.20
10.00 30 40
20.00 60 80
Bridge.
6.7 LOT 101 Group 7
Section Etawah Detour Chainage 1147 - 1170

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 22 22 22 22 22 22
1.50 22 22 22 22 22 22
2.00 23 23 23 23 23 23
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 193 93 101 108 126 144
1.50 87 94 102 109 127 146
2.00 88 95 103 110 129 148

1.00 1.20
10.00 70 90
20.00 120 160
Bridge.
6.8 LOT 102 Group 1

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 28 36 40 45 56 67
1.50 34 39 43 48 59 70
2.00 38 42 47 51 63 74
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 63 67 101 140 262 419
1.50 42 73 109 150 278 440
2.00 48 80 118 161 294 463

1.00 1.20
10.00 100 150
Bridge.
6.9 LOT 102 Group 2

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 28 37 41 46 57 68
1.50 34 40 45 49 60 72
2.00 39 44 48 53 64 75
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 143 175 224 279 442 642
1.50 136 191 242 299 468 675
2.00 159 206 260 320 495 709

1.00 1.20
10.00 60 80
Bridge.
Section Barhan Hathras Parallel Section Chainage 1266 - 1290

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 33 33 33 33 33 33
1.50 33 33 33 33 33 33
2.00 34 34 34 34 34 34
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 135 146 157 168 195 222
1.50 137 148 159 170 198 225
2.00 139 150 161 172 200 228

1.00 1.20
10.00 80 100
Bridge.
Section Hathras Detour Chainage 1290 - 1299

Depth Safe Bearing Capacity in kN/m (Shear Criteria) for size of footing (m)*
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 27 27 27 27 27 27
1.50 28 28 28 28 28 28
2.00 28 28 28 28 28 28
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 183 167 176 186 210 234
1.50 159 169 179 188 213 237
2.00 161 171 181 191 215 240

1.00 1.20
10.00 70 90
15.00 260 360
Bridge.

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 38 38 38 38 38 38
1.50 39 39 39 39 39 39
2.00 40 40 40 40 40 40
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 163 174 186 198 227 256
1.50 165 177 188 200 230 259
2.00 167 179 191 203 233 263

1.00 1.20
10.00 80 100
Bridge.

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 27 27 27 27 27 27
1.50 28 28 28 28 28 28
2.00 28 28 28 28 28 28
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 124 116 127 138 166 193
1.50 106 117 128 140 168 196
2.00 107 119 130 142 170 199

1.00 1.20
10.00 150 200
Bridge.

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 21 21 21 21 21 21
1.50 21 21 21 21 21 21
2.00 21 21 21 21 21 21
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 85 78 86 94 114 134
1.50 71 79 88 96 116 136
2.00 72 80 89 97 117 138

1.00 1.20
10.00 150 200
Bridge.

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 25 25 25 25 25 25
1.50 25 25 25 25 25 25
2.00 25 25 25 25 25 25
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 124 101 112 123 149 176
1.50 92 103 113 124 151 178
2.00 93 104 115 126 153 181

1.00 1.20
10.00 130 180
15.00 270 390
Bridge.
Section Aligarh Khurja Parallel Section Chainage 1345 - 1368

BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 37 49 61 67 82 97
1.50 44 56 66 72 87 102
2.00 52 64 70 76 91 106
Settlements
BEGL(m)
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
1.00 84 75 124 170 312 492
1.50 45 86 133 181 328 514
2.00 52 97 141 195 345 537

1.00 1.20
10.00 90 130
15.00 190 280
Bridge.
7. Typical Calculations
The typical for determining Safe Bearing Capacity and Pile Axial Capacity are given below.
7.1 Safe Bearing Capacity
1 Basic Data
Location LOT 101 / Group 1
Bhaupur Parallel Section
Chainage: 1140 - 1109
Layer No 1
Description Very Stiff Silty Clay
Depth (From - To) 0.00 - 4.90 m
Average Field 'N' value 28
Cohesion, c 140 kN/m
Friction Angle, 0.00 Deg
Density, 21.00 kN/m
Ground Water Table 5.60 m BEGL
2 Determine Ultimate Bearing Capacity

As per IS 6403, the ultimate bearing capacity for soil can be claculated as -
qult = [ c Nc sc dc ic ] + [ q (Nq-1) sq dq iq ] + [ 0.5 B N s d i Rw] (T/m)
Where,
qult : Ultimate bearing capacity based on shear strength parameters of soil
B : Width of footing (or least dimension) in (m) = 2.00 m
L : Length of footing in (m), if Footing is rectangular type = 13.50 m
D : Depth of footing below ground level in (m) = 1.00 m
: Density of soil (T/m) = 2.10 T/m
c : Cohesion of soil (T/m) = 14.00 T/m
: Angle of Friction of soil (Deg) = 0.00 Deg
q : Effective surcharge at base level of footing in (T/m)
Nc , Nq, N : Bearing Capacity Factors depends on c & of soil
sc , sq, s : Shape Factors
dc , dq, d : Depth Factors
ic , iq, i : Inclination Factors
Rw : Correction for water table
: Inclination of load to the vertical (Deg) = 0.00 Deg
Now, consider
Soil Type C Soil
Shape of footing Rectangular
N = tan [ 45 + /2] = = 1.00

Nc = (Nq - 1) cot = = 5.14
( tan )
Nq = tan [ /4 + /2] e = = 0.00
N = 2 * (Nq + 1) tan = = 0.00
sc = = 1.03
sq = = 1.03
s = = 0.94
dc = = 1.28
dq = = 1.00
d = = 1.00
ic = = 1.00
iq = = 1.00
i = = 0.00
Rw = = 1.00
q= 'D= = 1.10 T/m
[ c Nc sc dc ic ] = = 95.05 T/m
[ q (Nq-1) sq dq iq ] = = 0.00 T/m
[ 0.5 Bg Ng sg dg ig Rw] = = 0.00 T/m
qult = 95.05 + 0.00 + 0.00

qult = 95.05 T/m
3 Determine Safe Bearing Capacity
Consider Factor of Safety = FOS = 2.50

Hence,
Safe Bearing Capacity = qs = qult / FOS = 95.05 / 2.50 = 38.02 T/m
say, Safe Bearing Capacity as 38.00 T/m at 1 m Depth BEGL

7.2 Pile Axial Capacity

Slice / Lot No 101
Section From To
Chainage From 1109.00 To 1115.00
Ground Water Table 4.30 m BEGL
Pile Diameter 1.00 m
Ultimate Capacity for Piles in cohesionless soil -

Qu = Ap ( 0.5 D N + Pd Nq ) + Ki Pdi tan i Asi
Ultimate Capacity for Pile in Cohesive Soil -
Qu = Ap Nc Cp + i Ci Asi
Depth
Soil As Skin Cum Ap End Total

(kN/m)
c (kN/m)
(kN/m)
Pdi-mid
(Deg)
(Deg)
pdi
Type (m) Friction Skin (m) Bearing Ultimate

Ncr
Nq
Nc
N
N
(kN) Friction (kN) Capacity

(kN)
(kN)
0
1 Sand 23 19 33 33 18.0 1.2 4.0 4.0 0 0.00 3.14 9.38 9.38 0 48 35 0.79 400 409
2 Sand 23 19 33 33 18.0 1.2 4.0 12.0 0 0.00 3.14 9.38 18.77 0 48 35 0.79 701 720
3 Sand 23 19 33 33 18.0 1.2 4.0 20.0 0 0.00 3.14 9.38 28.15 0 48 35 0.79 1003 1031
4 Sand 23 19 33 33 18.0 1.2 4.0 28.0 0 0.00 3.14 9.38 37.54 0 48 35 0.79 1304 1342
5 Clay 29 22 34 34 18.0 0 4.0 36.0 110 0.45 3.14 155.51 193.05 9 0 0 0.79 778 971
6 Clay 29 22 34 34 18.0 0 4.0 44.0 110 0.45 3.14 155.51 348.56 9 0 0 0.79 778 1126
7 Clay 29 22 34 34 18.0 0 4.0 52.0 110 0.45 3.14 155.51 504.07 9 0 0 0.79 778 1282
8 Clay 29 22 34 34 18.0 0 4.0 60.0 110 0.45 3.14 155.51 659.57 9 0 0 0.79 778 1437
9 Clay 29 22 34 34 18.0 0 4.0 68.0 110 0.45 3.14 155.51 815.08 9 0 0 0.79 778 1593
10 Sand 39 27 35 35 18.0 1.3 4.0 76.0 0 0.00 3.14 11.00 826.08 0 60 48 0.79 3921 4747
Safe Pile Capacity at 10 m depth = 158 Tons

8. REFERENCE CODES AND STANDARDS
The design and construction of the structural components shall confirm to the specifications
laid down in the following latest Indian Railway Standard and other relevant codes
Indian Railway Standard (IRS) Codes
1. IRS Bridge Rules & Substructure Code

Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Codes
1. IS 2911 Part 1 sec 2 Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Bored cast-in-situ
Concrete Pile Foundations
2. IS 6403 Code of practice for Determination of Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
3. IS 8009 (Part 1) Code of Practice for Calculation of Settlements of Foundations
1. IRC 78 Code of Practice for Road Bridges Foundations and sub-structures
Other codes
1. Foundation Analysis and Design by J E Bowles

2. Principles of Foundation Engineering by Dr. B M Das
3. Foundation Design and Construction by M J Tomlinson
4. Advanced Soil Mechanics by Dr B M Das.
5. Soil Mechanics & Foundation Design by K R Arora
6. Foundation Design Manual by N. V. Nayak
7. Pile Design and Construction Practice by M J Tomlinson
8. Technical literatures/papers, codes of other nations
Notes:
a) Where there is a conflict between IRS & IS specifications, IRS specifications will prevail.
b) Where there is no provision of specifications in IRS, the relevant guideline of IRC / IS will
be followed.

1 Ge DBR 7002 R0 20130614

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Ge DBR 7002 R0 20130614

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STUP Consultants P.

Date Rev Modifications/ Purpose of Issue Prepared Checked Approved

Name Sign Name Sign Name Sign

14.06.13 A For Approval PSB ASG SKP

This note is the property of Date Pages Note No Rev

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 1

4. PERMISSIBLE INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE 11

5.2 LOT 101 Group 2 13

5.3 LOT 101 Group 3 13

5.4 LOT 101 Group 4 13

5.5 LOT 101 Group 5 13

5.6 LOT 101 Group 6 14

5.7 LOT 101 Group 7 14

5.8 LOT 102 Group 1 14

5.9 LOT 102 Group 2 15

5.10 LOT 103 Group 1 15

5.11 LOT 103 Group 2 15

5.12 LOT 103 Group 3 16

5.13 LOT 103 Group 4 16

5.14 LOT 103 Group 5 16

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 2

5.15 LOT 103 Group 6 16

5.16 LOT 103 Group 7 17

6.2 LOT 101 Group 2 19

6.3 LOT 101 Group 3 20

6.4 LOT 101 Group 4 21

6.5 LOT 101 Group 5 22

6.6 LOT 101 Group 6 23

6.7 LOT 101 Group 7 24

6.8 LOT 102 Group 1 25

6.9 LOT 102 Group 2 26

6.10 LOT 103 Group 1 27

6.11 LOT 103 Group 2 28

6.12 LOT 103 Group 3 29

6.13 LOT 103 Group 4 30

6.14 LOT 103 Group 5 31

6.15 LOT 103 Group 6 32

6.16 LOT 103 Group 7 33

7.2 Pile Axial Capacity 36

8. REFERENCE CODES AND STANDARDS 37

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 3

The design shall be in following steps

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 4

d) Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential

3.1 Identification of Geotechnical Investigation Results

3.2.1 Bearing Capacity

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 5

3.2.2 Pile Capacity

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 6

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 7

3.2.2.4.1. Piles in Granular soil

H : Horizontal Load at Pile Head

Mt : Moment at Pile Head

B] For Fixed Head Pile

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 8

T : Characteristic length of the soil-pile system

h : Constant of modulus of horizontal sub grade reaction

3.2.2.4.2 Piles in Cohesive soil

For Moment, M on Pile head

STUP Consultants P.Ltd By: PSB Sheet No: 9

For Horizontal Load, H on Pile head

k : Modulus of sub grade reaction

3.2.3 Deformation Analysis