Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.crs.gov | 7-5700
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
because trade with Canada and Mexico account for a small NAFTA has spurred greater economic integration among
percentage of U.S. GDP. Most economists contend that the the three countries. Much of the trade between the United
claims on both sides of the NAFTA debate were overblown. States and its NAFTA partners occurs in the context of
It did not cause the job losses feared by the critics or the production sharing, as manufacturers source components
employment gains predicted by the proponents. Not all from all three countries. An estimated 40% of the content of
changes in trade and investment patterns within North U.S. imports from Mexico and 25% of the content of U.S.
America can be attributed to NAFTA, especially since there imports from Canada are of U.S. origin. This type of trade,
were other liberalization efforts at the time. Trade also has however, requires a border infrastructure that facilitates
been affected by factors such as currency fluctuations and commerce while maintaining security objectives.
economic conditions. Job gains and losses since NAFTAs
entry into force may not be totally attributable to the Issues for Congress
agreement. Trade and employment levels tend to increase
during cycles of economic growth and tend to decrease as The rising number of bilateral and regional trade
growth declines. agreements throughout the world could have implications
for U.S. trade policy with its NAFTA partners. Some trade
Although the net economic effect was positive, there were policy experts contend that a deepening of economic
worker and firm adjustment costs as many industries relations with Canada and Mexico will help promote a
adapted to the more open and competitive trade common trade agenda with shared values and that it would
environment. These losses tended to be more concentrated have positive implications for competitiveness, corporate
in specific industries, such as the apparel industry in the governance, worker rights, the environment, and
United States or the agricultural sector in Mexico. democratic governance. However, labor groups and some
Industries tend to be concentrated in certain geographical consumer-advocacy groups argue that the agreement needs
regions, making some communities more vulnerable than to be reconsidered because it has resulted in U.S. job losses,
others to adverse employment effects. In contrast, the gains outsourcing, lower wages, and job dislocation in Mexico,
from trade tend to be more widespread. especially in agriculture.
Figure 1. U.S. Merchandise Trade with NAFTA Both proponents and critics of NAFTA agree that policy
Partners makers could consider ways in which to work with NAFTA
partners to address issues related to trade facilitation,
worker rights, environmental conditions, competitiveness,
and trade relations. Policy makers could consider measures
such as strengthening institutions to protect the
environment and worker rights; considering the
establishment of a border infrastructure plan, including
more investment in infrastructure to make border crossings
more efficient; increasing regulatory cooperation;
promoting research and development; and/or creating more
efforts to lessen income differentials.
www.crs.gov | 7-5700