Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mrs. Barnes
English 112
15 November 2016
Annotated Bibliography
Context,ink.galegroup.com/apps/doc/PC3021900041/OVIC?
This source provides much information on the very opposing side of evolution, being
creationism, which is the belief that a supernatural being created all aspects of the earth.
Creationists dont take the bible as a myth or fiction, but instead follow nearly everything
it states. This also talks about many modern christians and people of other religion
believe that God helped assist the forces of evolution, but still put him as the center of the
Earths existence. It also explains examples of the events where creationists fought to
keep the theory of evolution from being taught in schools, trying to pass laws banning it
and convicting teachers who dont follow it. This source would be great for me to give
information on the opposing side of only teaching evolution in schools. It was published
Context,ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?
disableHighlighting=true&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&scanId=&query=
&prodId=OVIC&search_within_results=&p=OVIC
%3AGIC&mode=view&catId=&limiter=&display-
query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE
%7CPC3010999287&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentar
y=true&source=Bookmark&u=mass12242&jsid=b49a88dcd37a560c64e9e270426d65b7.
Within this article, the process of evolution is explained, along with different pieces of
evidence that its believers use to support this theory. The contradicting sides of evolution are
also explained along with the belief in the bible, and its importance to those who believe
religion overpowers any theory. Information for my side of the argument is present and it also
gives the reasons behind the opposing sides. The article briefly explains how evolution is taught
in schools today. This would be helpful for an introduction paragraph and general information
regarding the whole project. Since this was found on Gale, it is a reliable database source with its
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010129260/OVIC?u=mass12242&xid=a286ca6f.
Accessed 11 Jan. 2017. Originally published as "NSTA Position Statement: The Teaching
of Evolution,".
This source provides the reader with reasons supporting the teaching of evolution to be
required without equal time for creationism. It gives past legal issues on events where courts
across the country ruled that teaching creationism in schools is a form of forcing religion and is
therefore unconstitutional. The National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) also give reasons
why they believe evolution should not be banned, saying it would deprive children of their
knowledge towards the Earth and of science in itself. Some legislators still argue that there
should be a form of a disclaimer before teaching evolution, stating it is only a theory, which
Rich, Alex K., and Matt Donnelly. "Counterpoint: Evolution Should Be The Only Theory Taught
vid=3&sid=e38acf95-60eb-47a7-ab1a-
297edece2966%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4201&bdata=JnNpdGU9cG92LWxpdmU
%3d#AN=26608262&db=pwh
This article's main focus was on the reasons why evolution is a reliable and well
developed theory. It gives components of the theory of evolution and different variations of it.
This article explains why evolution is the only credible explanation for the creation of the world,
and therefore should be the only thing taught in schools. Evolution is a theory that is in hundreds
experiments, and events. This particular article would be great for factors of my main argument.
It was written by Alex K. Rich, who is an American biologist and biophysicist. He was also a
"Science Classes Do Not Need Disclaimers that Evolution Is Only a Theory." School Policies,
edited by Jamuna Carroll, Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints
in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010509211/OVIC?u=mass12242&xid=a32cb627.
Accessed 12 Jan. 2017. Originally published as "Selman v. Cobb County School District, Amicus
This article explains why evolution should not be dismissed as just an idea. It also states
how it should not need a disclaimer in order to teach in it schools. This source gives
many facts to back up why evolution is a reliable fact and is not just an idea. Evolution is
backed up by hundreds of years of facts. It also states what evolution is not, a conclusion
that explains why everything was formed and the origin of everything. By giving a
disclaimer on evolution when taught it makes students question pure facts, and doesnt
allow them to think critically and fully understand the factors of science. I would use in