Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARCHITECTS
GUIDELINES
STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
METHODSOF COMPENSATION
& SCHEDULE OF FEES
UAP DOC. 208-A
ARCHITECTS
GUIDELINES
STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
& SCHEDULE OF FEES
(UAP DOC. 208-A)
ON THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Introduction
without avarice;
in receiving gifts,
with dignity
I shall work with the general objective that my duty is not only to myself, but also to
my country and God.
I shall uphold the ideas and follow the norms of conduct of a noble profession and
endlessly endeavour to further its just ends.
I shall humbly seek success not through the measure of solicited personal publicity, but
by industrious application to my work, strive to merit a reputation for quality of service
and for fair dealing.
I shall ask from all, fair remuneration for my service while respecting and asking no
profits from any other source.
I shall hold the interest of my Client over and above any self-interest for financial
returns.
I shall avoid any private business investments or venture which may tend to influence
my professional judgment to the detriment of the trust placed upon me.
I shall inspire by my behaviour the loyalty of my associates and subordinates and take
upon me the mentorship of the aspirants to the profession.
I shall confine my criticisms and praises within constructive and inspirational limits and
never resort to these means to further malicious motives.
I shall dedicated myself to the pursuits of creative endeavour towards the goal of
enlightened Art and Science, generously sharing with colleagues, friends and strangers
alike the benefits of my experience and expertise.
PREFACE
On October 25, 1965, the Architects National Code was approved and adopted by the
three (3) architectural organizations existing at that time, namely; the Philippine Institute
of Architects (PIA), the League of Philippine Architects (LPA) and the Association of
Philippine Government Architects (APGA).
On January 15, 1975, the three (3) architectural organizations were integrated intoone
association called the United Architects of the Philippines (UAP).
The UAP, in response to the need to review and update the documents in order to be
more responsive to the practice of the Profession in the Philippines prepared and
divided the Architects National Code into two divisions namely:
1. Code of Ethical Conduct
and
2. Standards of Professional Practice
On July 21, 1979, the Architects National Code was approved by the UAP National
Board of Directors and on September 24, 1979, the Professional Regulation
Commission (PRC) through the Board of Architecture (BOA), adopted the Architects
National Code as part of the Rules and Regulations to which all practicing architects
shall conform in the performance of their duties and obligations.
After 28 years on August 18, 2007, the UAP National Board of Directors headed by
Archt. Medeliano T. Roldan, Jr., FUAP then UAP National Presidentpassed a Board
Resolution approving the UAP Proposal No.04 with the intent of creating a Special
Committee to handle all matters relating to the compilation, review, evaluation,
amendments and revision of the Documents on Standards on Professional Practice
and related UAP Documents including Guidelines on Corporate Practice of
Architecture. Subsequently on August 21, 2007, Executive Order No. 0708-006 was
passed creating and establishing a Special Committee on Standards of Professional
Practice to comply with the provisions of Republic Act 9266 (the Architecture Act of
2004) and Batas PambansaBlg. 68 (the Corporate Code of the Philippines) and other
related rules, regulations and codes, and to respond to the increasing public and users
demand, the evaluation of new standards of regulated professional practice, the
advancement of technology and the enactment of new laws.
To effectively respond to the present needs and demands of the profession, the
Committee had prepared the ARCHITECTS GUIDELINES, defining the rules and
regulations to be followed in implementing the provisions on METHODS OF
COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE OF FEES UAP DOC. 208-A.
The UAP National Board of Directors in their last regular meeting held on June 26,
2010 at UAP National Headquarters in Quezon City, approved Board Resolution 09-10
No. 7-16 for adoption the ARCHITECTS GUIDELINES on Standards of Professional
Practice, METHODS OF COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE OF FEES, UAP DOC.
208-A.
The Architects Guidelines will be the official IAPOA issuance to be observed by all
IAPOA members
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Executive Directors
Commission on Professional Practice Daniel C. Go, FUAP
Commission on Education Gloria B. Teodoro, FUAP
Commission on Governmental Corazon C. Adivoso, UAP
& External Affairs
Commission on Internal Affairs Pamela N. Amador, FUAP
Center for Filipino Architecture Robert Benedict C. Hermoso, FUAP
Professional Development Commission Gerald Rey A. Lico, PhD, UAP
Commission on Conventions, Roger T. Ong, UAP
Exhibits & Area Assemblies
Executive Directors
Commission on Professional Practice Bibiano A. Luzante, Jr., FUAP
Commission on Education John Joseph T. Hernandez, UAP
Commission on Governmental Ma. Benita O. Regala, UAP
& External Affairs
Commission on Internal Affairs Domingo LL. Tablizo, Jr., FUAP
Center for Filipino Architecture Gerald Rey A. Lico, PhD, UAP
Professional Development Commission Leah M. Punongbayan-Dela Rosa, UAP
Commission on Conventions, Roger T. Ong, UAP
Exhibits & Area Assemblies
Executive Directors
Commission on Professional Practice Abelardo E. Firmeza, FUAP
Commission on Education John Joseph T. Fernandez, UAP
Commission on Governmental Mohammadsarfraz A. Uttoh, UAP
& External Affairs
Commission on Internal Affairs Antonio A. Valdez, UAP
Center for Filipino Architecture Gerard Rey A. Lico, PhD, UAP
Professional Development Commission Leah M. Punongbayan-dela Rosa, UAP
Commission on Conventions, Roger T. Ong, UAP
Exhibits & Area Assemblies
Special thanks to Archt. Prosperidad C. Luis, FUAP, Apec Architect for making this document possible.
There are architects all over the Philippines practising in the seventeen (17) regions of
the country. However, at this point in time, they are uncertain and confused as to what
standards of fees and what manner of payments would apply to the various types of
projects they undertake. To complicate the situation, technology has evolved so fast
that the classification of types of buildings has becomecomplex, and numerous types of
structures have made their appearance in the planning, design and construction scene,
which makes the calculation of charges for professional fees more complicated.
Thus, the United Architects of the Philippines is publishing this document entitled UAP
Doc. 208-A: Architects Guidelines on Standards of Professional Practice,
Methods of Compensation and Schedule of Fees, on how Architects would charge
their Clients for services rendered, in order to provide a convenient consolidated
reference for the use of Architects. This document consolidates in onereferencethe
methods of compensation of services found and discussed in the other UAP
documents.
RULE I
SECTION 1: TITLE
SECTION 2: RATIONALE
2.1 The urgent need to set the parameters on Architects Guidelines on Methods of
Compensation and Schedule of Fees is paramount to the Architect in the
practice of his profession. This will standardize the ranges for which the Client
will compensate an Architect in direct relation to the value of services that the
Architect provides.
2.2 The professional competence of the Architect must be well established and
adequate to meet the Clients needs and requirements.In order to grow and
progress in his career the Architect must possess the appropriate knowledge
and skills needed to be proactive,he must gained the training, exposure and
relevant experience in order to deliver the project at par to the satisfaction of the
Client.
3.1By law, the Architect must first belicensed and registered by the PRC and UAP-
IAPOA respectively. As such, the standards andparameters, to which the
Architect who offer and/or make his services available, are adhered to in order to
develop and nurture the competencies, credibility and integrity of the Architect in
the practice of his profession.
3.3Integrity, good performance and deliveryof the project on time to the satisfaction
of the Client maintains a long-term Architect-Client relationships that will lead to
the success of the Architect in the practice of his profession.
Architects should perform professional services only when they are qualified by
education, training and or experience in the specific technical areas involved and duly
registered by the PRC-BoA.
Vision
A National Code for Architects relevant to the times, setting the standards for the
proper maintenance of ethical and professional conduct in the practice of architecture.
Mission
To achieve the desired high degree of professionalism in line with R.A. No.
9266, to enhance the standards for global competitiveness and to formulate guidelines
and policies for the protection of life, health and property.
As used in this UAP DOC. 208-A, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
a) Salary Cost
b) Living and travelling expenses of employees,
partners, and principals when away from the
home office on business.
c) Identifiable communication expenses, such as
long-distance telephone, telegraph, internet,
short messaging system (SMS), cable, express
charge, postage, etc.
d) Services directly applicable to the work, such
as special legal and accounting expenses,
computer rental and programming costs,
special consultants, borings, laboratory
charges, commercial printing and bindings and
similar costs that are not applicable to general
overhead.
e) Identifiable expenses for supplies and
materials charged to the project at hand, as
distinguished from such supplies and expenses
applicable to two or more projects.
f) Identifiable reproduction costs applicable to the
work, such as blue-printing, mimeographing,
printing, etc.
8. Prime Professional
An Architect having a contract directly with the
Client/Owner for professional services and
responsible for directing the team of Consultants.
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SECTION 1: CRITERIA
The criteria for computing the Architects compensation should be based on mutual
evaluation of the amount of the Architectural firms talents, skill, experience,
imagination, effort and time available for, and required by the project.
a. Be fair to the Architect in that it should permit him to recover his costs and
net him an adequate profit, provided he is reasonably efficient.
b. Be fair to the Client and the Architect by reflecting the value of the
Architects services.
c. Be flexible to protect the Architect from cost increases because of changes
or the scope of the commission.
d. Not create legal problems for the Architect.
e. Encourage the Client to be cooperative and supportive.
f. Provide incentive for the Architect to produce the highest design quality.
g. Be easy to understand and simple use.
h. Provide a basis for the Client to pre-determine his costs for architectural
services, and be otherwise acceptable to him.
i. Encourage the Architect to develop a solution which will result in the lowest
possible construction cost consistent with the Clients requirements.
j. Not focus the Clients attention on price, but rather on the quality and
performance of the Architects services.
k. Protect the Architect against the rising costs of providing services during the
course of a commission.
1.2. The computation of the compensation of fees shall depend on the type of
services to be rendered and the conditions under which they are to be
performed. Compensation for services that require only one kind of expertise or
related types of expertise shall be treated differently from those services that
require the use of more than one type of expertise.
When such services are furnished, the Architect is compensated for all
the time he devotes to the work, including travel time. The per diem basis
charge should be based on the complexity of the work involved and the
extent of his experience/specialization. In addition to the compensation
based on per diem basis, his expenses for travel, subsistence, and other
out-of-pocket expenses incurred while away from his home/office shall be
reimbursed by the Client.
This method of remuneration is best suited for projects whose costs are
difficult to predetermine, or in cases where it may become necessary to
undertake additional experimental or investigative work, the result of
which may further alter the scope of the project. For example, this method
is applied on Pre-Design Services.
At the start of the commission, the Architect shall make known to the
Client the rate of professionals and personnel who will be assigned to the
Project and the multiplier that has to be applied before agreeing to this
method of compensation.
This method is based on the total rate cost of Architect, Consultantand his
staff multiplied by a factor from 1.5 to 3.0 as a multiplier plus cost of
certain items that are reimbursable to the Architect classified under
Direct Cost or Reimbursable Expenses.
Assume:
T= Rate per hour of Technical Staff, Researchers and other involved in the
Project
N= No. of hours
Multiplier - from 1.5 to 3.0 depending on office set-up of Architect and complexity
of the Project.Multiplier to take care of overhead and reasonable profit.
These two methods are frequently used concurrently with one serving as
a check to the other.
(h) Unit Cost Method The remuneration under this method is based on
cost per square meters of the project such as room, store, buildings or
other unit. Example, office planning and interior design which is the same
unit used in lease rates and tenant allowances in commercial building.
Other like hotel projects is often based on cost per square meter.
However, unit cost estimating requires accurate and timely data on the
cost of providing services for each unit and renovation of unit requires
more service effort than those new unit.
NOTES:
2) Owner/Client shall make payments upon request of the Architect within seven
(7) calendar days from the submission of the statement of the account.
4) The Architect is the prime professional for having a contract directly with the
Client/Owner for professional services and responsible for directing the team
of the Allied Professional/ Specialist Consultants.
The entire range of the Architects services is divided into ten (10)major services
as follows:
Each of these ten (10) major services can be contracted separately to the
Architect depending upon the desire and needs of the Client.The terms and
conditions for the delivery of theseArchitects Services are stipulatedon each
Architects Guidelines on Standards of Professional Practice Documents.
MATRIX OF SERVICES
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
PROFESSIONAL FEE
PERCENTAGE FEE
FEES
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SECTION 1. PRE-DESIGN
Prior to the start of any
SERVICES Pre-Design Services, a
(UAP DOC. 201) Professional Service
agreement between
Owner/Client and
1.1 Consultation Architect is necessary.
The Architect should
request for a 5%
1.2 Pre-Feasibility Studies mobilization fee upon
signing of the agreement.
1.3 Feasibility Studies (Please refer to Rule III
Group 10 for added
1.4 Site Selection and Analysis information)
1.5 Site Utilization and Analysis Different Methods of
Compensation are being
1.6 Architectural Research applied on the Pre-
Design Services as the
volume and range of
1.7 Architectural Programming works varies on each
services.
1.8 Space Planning Client shall make
payments upon request
1.9 Space Management Studies of the Architect within
seven (7) calendar days
1.10 Value Management from the submission of
the statement of the
account.
1.11 Design Brief Preparation
1.12 Promotional Services
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
PROFESSIONAL FEE
SERVICES
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
2.6)Remaining 15% of
RBF is broken as
follows:
2.6 Supervision and Architects a. 10% for Architects
Liability Liability under the
Civil Code and
b. 5% for Periodic
visit during
construction
SCHEDULE OF REGULAR BASIC FEES (RBF)
Group 1
Buildings of the simplest utilization and character, which are without complication of plan/design
or detail and which require only a minimum of architectural finishes, engineering and allied
architectural elements:
Libraries Supermarkets/Hypermarts
Group 3
Breweries Mortuaries
Gymnasiums Stadia
Group 4
Group 5
Monumental buildings and other facilities requiring consummate design skill and much precise
detailing.
& Monuments
Group 6
When the plan/design and related Contract Documents are re-used for the repetitive
construction of similar buildings without amending the drawing and the specifications, the
Architects fee is computed as follows:
First (1st) Building RBF for type of building RBF for type of building
Second (2nd) Building 80% of RBF for type of building 80% of RBF for type of building
Third (3rd) Building 60% of RBF for type of building 60% of RBF for type of building
Succeeding Buildings 40% of RBF for type of building 40% of RBF for type of building
Group 7
When the Architect is engaged to undertake a Housing Project involving the construction of
several residential units on a single site with the use of one (1) set of plans/design,
specifications and related documents, the Architects Fee chargeable shall conform with the
following:
Eleven (11) units and above Fee for 10 units plus 30% of Fee for 10 units plus 18% of
basic fee for each additional unit basic fee for each additional
unit
Group 8
Projects involving extensive detail such as designs for built-in components or elements, built-in
equipment, special fittings, screens, counters, architectural interiors, and development planning
and/or design.
Group 9
Group 10
Where the Architect is engaged to render opinion or give advice, clarifications or explanation on
technical matters pertaining to his profession, (also refer to Pre-Design ServicesUAP Doc.201
under Consultation) the chargeable RBF shall not be less than One thousand Pesos
(P1,0000.00) per hour (at June 2010 price levels) subject to increase depending on the extent
and coverage of service required and the location where the Architect shall render his services.
When rendering services as an expert witness, the Architects fee shall notbe less than Five
Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00) per appearance (at June 2010 price levels) regardless as to
whether the scheduled hearing took place or not.
All references to fixed amount shall refer to the value of the Philippine Peso as of June 2010.
Adjustment of the price shall be made at the time of the signing of the Architects contract of
service. The amount excludes the cost of transportation and accommodations when and where
required. Another sixty percent (60%) of the amount (at June 2010 price levels) shall be
charged for the travel period in case of locations that are in excess of fiftykilometers (50.0 km,
air, straight line or radial distance) of the Architects office (as stated in his letterhead).
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
PROFESSIONAL FEE
PERCENTAGE FEE
FEES
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SECTION 3. SPECIALIZED
ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 203)
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
a) Framework Development
Plan (FRDP). The
professional fee shall be
3.5 Site and Physical Planning 30% of RPAF.
b) Conceptual Master
(including Master Development
Development Plan (CMDP).
Planning and Subdivision The professional fee shall be
Planning) Services 30% of RPAF.
c) Preliminary Master
Development Plan (PMDP).
The professional fee shall be
20% of RPAF.
d) Detailed Master
Development Plan (DMDP).
The professional fee shall be
20% of RPAF.
Detailed Master Development Plan (DMDP) means the outline footprint of the buildings,
developed surroundings and site topography
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
PERCENTAGE FEE
SERVICES
FEES
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
3.6 Comprehensive Development PER DIEM
Planning
3.7 Historic and Cultural Heritage
Conservation and Planning Basic compensation for the
foregoing Specialized
3.8 Security Evaluation and Planning Architectural Services, all of
which are classified as
3.9 Building System Design additional or extra services,
shall be through man-
3.10 Facilities Maintenance Support months i.e. 22 man-days
multiplied by 8 man-hours,
3.11 Building testing and and multiplied by a factor to
Commissioning cover other direct and
3.12 Building Environment indirect costs e.g. overhead,
Certification etc.
MIXED METHOD
SERVICES FEES
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SECTION 4. FULL-TIME
SUPERVISION
(UAP DOC. 204-A)
Recommended Percentage
Fee of 1% to 1-1/2% of the
Project Construction Cost or
Rate Cost times a multiplier
plus reimbursable expenses
MIXED METHOD
SERVICES SCHEDULE OF
FEES
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SECTION 5. CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
(UAP DOC. 204-B)
SERVICES SCHEDULE OF
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SECTION 6. POST
CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 205)
.
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
PROFESSIONAL FEE
MIXED METHOD
RATE COST
RETAINER
SECTION 7. COMPREHENSIVE PER DIEM
ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 206)
MIXED METHOD
FEES
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SECTION 8. DESIGN-BUILD
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 207)
MIXED METHOD
FEES
RATE COST
RETAINER
SECTION 10. PROFESSIONAL PER DIEM
ARCHITECTURAL
CONSULTING
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 209)
10.3Specialized Architectural
Services (UAP DOC. 203)
10.4 Full-Time Supervision
(UAP DOC. 204-A)
a) Construction
1.1 The National Board of Directors of the United Architects of the Philippines
shall have the sole power to regulate, interpret and implement the
provisions of the Architects Guidelines on Standard of Professional
Practice,Methods of Compensation &Schedule of Fees, UAP Doc. 208-A
(as approved by the UAP National Board of Directors in its Board
Resolution 09-10 No. 7-16 Series of 2010).
RULEV
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.2 Furthermore, fees for services that require inputs of an artistic, innovative
and creative endeavour shall not be determined in the same manner as
services that involve purely technical and scientific undertakings.
2.1 It shall be unlawful for any unlicensed and unregistered person to collect a
fee on architectural services exceptfor employees of a Registered and
Licensed Architect.
4.1 The Architect shall be entitled to interest at the prevailing rate set by the
BangkoSentralngPilipinas (BSP) in additional to a percentage as may be
determine by the UAP-IAPOA unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by
the Architect and his client, on all fees, other charges and reimbursements
due and not paid within thirty (30) days from receipt of billing.
SECTION 5: Payment Schedules
5.1.2 Upon completion of Project Definition Phase Services, but not more
than seven (7) days after the submission of the Project Definition to
the Owner, a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the Basic Fee,
computed upon a reasonable estimated construction cost of the
structure.
5.1.3 Upon the completion of the Schematic Design Services, but not
more than seven (7) days after the submission of the Schematic
Design to the Owner, a sum equal to twenty five percent (25%) of
the Basic Fee, computed upon a reasonable estimated
construction cost of the structure.
5.1.4 Upon the completion of the Design Development Services, but not
more than seven (7) days after submission of the Design
Development to the Owner, a sum sufficient to increase the total
payments on the fee to twenty five percent (25%) of the Basic Fee
computed upon the same estimated construction cost as in (5.1.2).
5.1.5 Upon the completion of the Contract Documents Services but not
more than seven (7) days after submission of the Contract
Documents to the Owner, a sum sufficient to increase the total
payments on the fee to twenty percent (20%) of the Basic Fee,
computed upon reasonable estimated construction cost of the
structure as in (5.1.2).
5.1.6 Within seven (7) days after the awards of Bids, the payment to the
Architect shall be adjusted to a sum of equivalent to eighty five
percent (85%) of the Basic Fee, computed upon the winning Bid
Price.
5.1.7 The remaining fifteen percent (15%) of his work is broken down as
follows:
a. ten percent (10%) for the Architects liability under the Civil
Code and
b. fivepercent (5%) for the construction phase service which
includes preparation of contract document forms and periodic
visits during the construction.
5.2 Upon Completion of the construction work, the balance of the Architects
Fee, computed on the Final Project Construction Cost of the structure shall
be paid.
6.3 The Owner shall make partial payments during each of the various stages of
the Architects work, upon request of the Architect, provided that such
payments are within the framework of the manner of payments outlined
above.
6.3 Arrange and pay for such legal, auditing and any other fees for services as
may be required for the project.
6.4 Pay for all reimbursable expenses incurred in the project as called for in
Section 7Other conditions on Services and all taxes (exclude income tax)
that the government may impose the Architect as a result of the services
rendered on the project whether the services were performed as an
individual practitioner, as a partnership or as a corporation.
6.5 Informs the Architect ifthe Client observes or otherwise becomes aware of
anything that may impair the successful implementation of the project, he
shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Architect.
The Architect may make and include miniature models of his design as part
of his preliminary work if he so deems it to be necessary but no extra
charge for such miniature models shall be made by the Architect. However,
if the Client desires to have a miniature model of the final and approved
design for exhibition and display purposes, the Client shall pay for the cost
of said miniature model.
This also applies to 3-D Model and Animation of the final approved
designfor presentation and exhibition, the Client shall pay for the cost of
production. Such services shall be subject to a coordination fee payable to
the Architect.
The Architect shall furnish the Client seven (7) sets of Drawings,
Specifications and other pertinent Contract Documents. Costs of printing or
reproduction of extra sets of Contract Documents when required by the
Client or his representative is to be charged and paid by the Client.
TEN PERCENT (10%) for the Architects liability under the Civil Code and
FIVE PERCENT (5%) for the construction phase service which includes
preparation of contract document forms and periodic visits during the
construction.
When the Client therefore fails to implement the plans and documents for
construction as prepared by the Architect, the Architect is entitled to receive
as compensation the sum of EIGHTY FIVE PERCENT (85%) of his fee.
7.6 Different period of Construction
This is in pursuance with pertinent provision of R.A. No. 9266 under Rule
IV Section 33. Ownership of Plans, Specifications and Other Contract
Documents and R.A. No. 8293- Intellectual Property Code issued on June
6, 1997.
10.1 The Architect is legally and professionally responsible before the State and
civilly liable on the architectural design part of the projectbefore responsible
for the conduct and performance of his services to their clients, whether in
the government, private sector or civil society.
10.3 Legal liabilities of the Architect shall be based on the Civil Code of the
Philippines.
11.1 In case of any dispute arising from the implementation of these guidelines,
the same shall be resolved by a Board of Arbitration. The Decisions Board
shall be formed with the Architect and the Client each appoints one
member and these members shall appoint a third member to act as the
chairman. No one with financial interest in the subject under arbitration will
be permitted to serve on this board. This board may engage experts to act
in an advisory capacity. Minutes shall be kept of all the meetings and
signed by all members of this board. Decisions of the board shall require
only a simple majority and all interested parties shall be informed thereof.
Expenses of the board shall be paid in accordance with the agreement set
forth before the proceedings of the board.
Comparative Estimates between Percentage on Regular Basic Fee and Basic Fee on per
sq. meter basis
Example: A Client wants to build a Shopping Center(commercial building) in the amount of
P 100 million (Project Construction Cost)
Schedule of Regular Basic Fee (Integrated Basic Fee on per square meter basis
Architectural & Engineering Services - A&E) (P1,000.00 per sq. to P1,500.00 per sq. meter)
This will fall under Group 2 7% of Probable Project
Construction Cost (PPCC). Based on current valuation of Project Construction Cost
the amount is P20,000.00 per sq. meter. Thus the area
Based on current valuation of Project Construction Cost of the building with a Project Construction Cost of P100
the amount is P20,000.00 per sq. meter. Thus the area million will be 5,000 sq.meters.
of the building with a Project Construction Cost of P100
million will be 5,000 sq.meters. Particular:
NOTES:
The Comparative Estimates between the Percentage on Regular Basic Fee is within the range on the
Basic Fee per sq. meter basis as shown.
However the computation of Basic Fee per sq.meter is possible only on the current valuation of Project
Construction Cost of the Buildingas of 2011. Thus the increase on Project Construction Cost must be
proportional to the amount ofBasic Fee per sq. meter.
Comparative Estimates between Percentage on Regular Basic Fee and Basic Fee on per
sq. meter basis
Example: A Client wants to build a Shopping Center(commercial building) in the amount of
P 20 million (Project Construction Cost)
Schedule of Regular Basic Fee (Integrated Basic Fee on per square meter basis
Architectural & Engineering Services - A&E) (P1,000.00 per sq. to P1,500.00 per sq. meter)
This will fall under Group 2 7% of Probable Project
Construction Cost (PPCC). Based on current valuation of Project Construction Cost
the amount is P20,000.00 per sq. meter. Thus the area
Based on current valuation of Project Construction Cost of the building with a Project Construction Cost of P20
the amount is P20,000.00 per sq. meter. Thus the area million will be 1,000 sq.meters.
of the building with a Project Construction Cost of P20
million will be 1,000 sq.meters. Particular:
P 50 million and 7%
less
P20 million 7% P1,400,000,00
Project Const.
Cost
NOTES:
The Comparative Estimates between the Percentage on Regular Basic Fee is within the range on the
Basic Fee per sq. meter basis as shown.
However the computation of Basic Fee per sq. meter is possible only on the current valuation of Project
Construction Cost of the Building as of 2011. Thus the increase on Project Construction Cost must be
proportional to theamount of Basic Fee per sq. meter.
RECOMMENDED FEE FOR TOWN PLANNING SPECIALIZED ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 203)
Area Basic Fee Amount
(Architectural Fee Site and Physical Planning
only)
(including Master Development
Basic rate for the Planning and Subdivision Planning)
first 5 hectaresor Services
less
1 hectare (10,000 P5.00 per sq. meter P50,000.00
sq.m.) The Recommended Professional Architectural Fee
(RPAF) is a minimum of P50,000.00 per hectare net to
Over 5 hectares up P4.00 per sq. meter P250,000.00 + the architect
to 10 hectares P40,000.00 per
hectare in
excess of 5
hectares
Over 10 hectares P3.00 per sq. meter P450,000.00 +
up to 50 hectares P30,000.00 per
hectare in
excess of 10
hectares
Over 50 hectares P1.50 per sq. meter P1,650,000.00
and above + P15,000.00
per hectare in
excess of 50
hectares
FOREWORD