Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
v.
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
MEMORANDUM DECISION
B E E N E, Judge:
2
MINCH v. AZBN
Decision of the Court
DISCUSSION
A. Jurisdiction
3
MINCH v. AZBN
Decision of the Court
B. Due Process
9 Minch argues she was denied due process because the ALJ
who presided over the case did not draft the recommended decision.
4
MINCH v. AZBN
Decision of the Court
4 Minch raised this issue before the Board, which could have rejected
or modified the recommended decision or granted her request for
rehearing. See A.R.S. 41-1092.08(B), -1092.09; see also A.A.C. R4-19-
608(B)(1), (C) (2017); compare Ritland, 213 Ariz. at 192, 16 (several members
of the medical board expressed reservations about credibility of witnesses
despite ALJs finding the witnesses were credible).
5
MINCH v. AZBN
Decision of the Court
CONCLUSION
13 Because Minch has not shown the Board erred in placing her
license on probation, we affirm.