Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By JOSEPH T. MENKE
Chemical Engineer
U.S. Army
Rock Island, IL
I
n the past, paint-based zinc phos- coating such as paint, dry film lubri-
phate coating to Federal Specifica- cant or adhesive.
tion TT-C-490, Revision C (March The specification has a require-
85) required a minimum coating weight. ment for preproduction process ap-
Amendment 1 (June 87) to the C revi- proval for the zinc phosphate coat-
sion cited a limited coating weight range. ings (Types I and V). Numerous ob-
Relief from the narrow coating weight servations have been made over the
requirement was provided in Amend- past two years as to the variety of
ment 2 (June 90). Recently, the D Revi- coverage and crystal structures that
sion was published and a new require- can be obtained when applying Type
ment has been added for process con- I coatings.
trol, grain refinement. Ever since the coating weight re-
The TT-C-490 document is some- quirement was 300 mg per sq ft mini-
what different than most other military mum, many applicators have provided
specifications. The document contains coating weights in the 1,000 to 2,000
a distinct combination of cleaning meth- mg per sq ft range. After all, if a little bit
ods for most metals, various types of is good, a whole lot must be better. And
phosphate coatings and paint applica- only one tank and one solution were
tion requirements. This combination necessary to meet the requirements of a
creates some confusion, since most speci- heavy phosphate coating.
fications address specific processes. In Unfortunately, this didnt work when
essence, the specification starts with a the Army switched to epoxy primers
substrate material (steel, zinc, cadmium and urethane topcoats. The shrinkage
or aluminum) and prepares the surface of the epoxy upon curing left the phos-
for application of some supplemental phate/paint interface in shear stress,
56 PRODUCTS FINISHING JANUARY, 1994
1. X-RAY ANALYSIS of phosphate coating with 4. X-RAY ANALYSIS of phosphate coating on the
poor coverage ground surface
2. FLAT PLATELETS and nodular structure 5. X-RAY ANALYSIS of the phosphate coating on a
machined surface
3. X-RAY ANALYSIS of phosphate coating formed 6. X-RAY ANALYSIS of the phosphate coating
on a machined surface on the as-formed surface
and articles exhibited poor adhesion The approach that followed re-
in the field. As a result, subsequent sulted in applicators reducing the
specification revisions placed a maxi- phosphating time in an attempt to
mum limit on the coating weight. get the coating weight down. This
JANUARY, 1994 PRODUCTS FINISHING 57
FOCUS: Pretreatment for Painting/Powder Coating
7. X-RAY ANALYSIS of the phosphate coating 9. X-RAY ANALYSIS of the phosphate coating
after alkaline cleaning and one min in the after alkaline cleaning and one min in the
phosphating solution at 130F phosphating solution at 153F
8. X-RAY ANALYSIS of the phosphate coating 10. X-RAY ANALYSIS of the phosphate coating
after abrasive blasting and one min in the after abrasive blasting and one min in the
phosphating solution at 130F phosphating solutions at 153F