BAGONG POOK ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN/ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MONITORING TOOL

(Elementary)

1. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES

a. Enrolment
ENROLMENT SCHOOL YEAR
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012- 2013
M F T M F T M F T M F T
Pre-School 8 10 18 18 12 30 24 11 35 24 24 48
Grade I 26 30 56 37 25 52 29 22 51 43 26 69
Grade II 17 17 34 24 27 57 23 22 45 29 20 49
Grade III 30 26 56 20 18 38 21 20 45 18 20 38
Grade IV 19 19 38 29 24 53 18 16 34 20 24 44
Grade V 16 19 35 19 21 40 27 22 49 19 17 36
Grade VI 21 18 39 16 20 36 17 20 37 28 20 50
TOTAL 137 139 276 153 147 300 159 137 296 181 149 334
SPED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SSES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM (ALS)

Programs and Projects Enrolment
2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 2013
Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed
Basic Literacy Program None None None None None None
(BLP)
Accreditation and None None None None None None 2
Equivalency Program
(A&E)
Other Programs/Projects None none none none none none

b. Performance Indicators
INDICATORS 2009 - 2010 2011 - 2011 2011 2012
1. Completion Rate 96% 64% 64%
2. Drop-out Rate 3% 0% 0%
3. Retention Rate 91% 91% 91%
4. Repetition Rate 3% 3% 3%
5. Promotion Rate 90% 90% 91%
6. Graduation Rate 100% 100% 100%
7. Failure Rate 8% 8% 8%
8. Cohort-Survival Rate 53% 52% 55%
 c. Intermediate Indicators
1. School Nutritional Status
Grade Severely Wasted Wasted Normal Overweight
Grade I 10 23 31 1
Grade II 8 9 39 0
Grade III 6 9 22 0
Grade IV 9 12 23 0
Grade V 6 4 24 0
Grade VI 11 12 27 0
TOTAL 55 87 191 1

2. Textbook-Pupil Ratio
Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Grade I 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade II 1:2 1:2 1:1
Grade III 1:2 1:2 1:1
Grade IV 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade V 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade VI 1:2 1:2 1:2
TOTAL 1:2 1:2 1:2

3. Teacher-Pupil Ratio
Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Grade I 1:28 1:26 1:25
Grade II 1:34 1:51 1:45
Grade III 1:56 1:38 1:45
Grade IV 1:38 1:52 1:34
Grade V 1:35 1:40 1:49
Grade VI 1:39 1:36 1:37
TOTAL 1:36 1:37 1:42

D. SBM Level of Practice(on separate sheet)

Dimension 1 Dimension 2 Dimension 3 Dimension 4 Dimension 5 Dimension 6
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Total 12 0 0 10 0 0 4 0 0 11 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0
Grand
Total 12 0 0 10 0 0 4 0 0 11 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0

SBM Level of Practices: 45/31%

II. SIP/AIP IMPLEMENTATION

A. EQUITABLE ACCESS

1. Personal
P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1 HT-III HT-II HT-I TIC MT-2
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MT-1 T-3 T-2 T-1 Pre-School Non- Total

Teaching
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 1 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 8

2. Learning Materials and Equipment

a. Facilities
Classroom/Furniture Actual Needs
Classroom(Instructional) 4 3
H.E. 1 1
I.A. 0 1
Laboratory Room 0 1
Canteen 1 1
Library 0 1
Tables 9 0
Chairs 98 0

B. Textbooks( Elementary)
GRADE
I II III IV V VI
Actual Needs Actual Needs Actual Needs Actual Needs Actual Needs Actual Needs
English 40 29 119 0 73 0 35 9 35 0 32 18
Mathematics 38 10 51 0 63 0 61 23 61 0 7 43
Science 42 0 28 21 28 18 63 0
Sibika/HKS 50 20 29 39 0 43 0 43 0 35 15
EPP 4 22 4 32 5 45
IA 0 44 0 36 0 50
MSEP 0 44 0 36 6 50
CE/sP 6 6 38 6 30 8 42a
3. Physical and Ancillary Facilities

a. ICT Facilities

No. of Internet No. of Computers Used in No. of

Computers Instruction Computers
With Without Actual Needs
1 / 0 1 15

B. QUALITY AND RELEVANCE

1. Learner Performance

a. National Achievement Test (NAT)

GRADE III

Subjects 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Intervention Done to Raise

Academic Standards
English (Reading) Reading ABRC, story books
English (Grammar) Remedial Classes
Filipino (Reading) Reading story books
Filipino (Grammar) Remedial Classes
Mathematics Reciting Multiplication Table
Science Remedial Classes
Average

Grade VI
Subjects 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Intervention Done to Raise
Academic Standards
English Reading ABRC, story books
Mathematics Reinforcement Activities
Science Remedial Classes
Filipino Remedial Classes
Hekasi Reciting Multiplication Table
Average

b. Periodic Test Result Use another Sheet for the result of and item analysis by subject area)

c. NCBTS/TSINA

1. Competency and Level of Teachers

Competency Level of Teachers Teachers professional Development Index

Level No. of Teachers Index No. of Teachers
1. High 1. Expert
2. Satisfactory 7 2. Experienced
3. Fair 3. Developing 7
4. Low 4. Beginning
C. MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
1. Stakeholders Participation
Activities No. of Level of Participation
Stakeholders Attended/Participated Participants Poor Satisfactory Very Outstanding
(0-25) (26-50) Satisfactory (76- )
(51-75)
PTA/Parents/ Brigada Eskwela 276 /
teachers/Pupils
Parents/Teachers Assembly on K to 12 78 /
Parents HRPTCA Meetings 201 /
Parents/Teachers General Assembly 168 /

2. Stakeholders Contribution/Assistance
STAKEHOLDERS NATURE OF CONTRIBUTION EXTENT OF INVOLMENT
P S VS O

3. Grants/ Fund Assistance Received(3/ys

Grants/ Fund Assistance Amount Amount Amount If not Where Utilized
Received Utilized Liquidated liquidated
Why?
SBM Grant 2009 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 Supplies
LSB 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 Repair
MOOE 28,232.00 28,232.00 28,232.00 Repair, Supplies,
electricity
SBM Grant 2010 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 Repair, Supplies
LSB 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 Repair H.E Building
MOOE 28,232.00 28,232.00 28,232.00 Repair, Supplies,
electricity
SBM Grant 2011 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 Feeding

With the gratitude received, please answer the following.

a. was the school project implemented As planned?(If Yes/no, state why?)___Yes, the school project was implemented
as planned because the school head followed the guidelines of these grant/fund assistance. Priorities in the SIP were
always considered in spending such grants._
b. Was the school project implemented on time?___Yes_________________________________________
c. Did the school spend the grant funds per guidelines?__Yes, funds were utilized to where they were needed most.
e. Did the project attain the stated component objectives and/or purpose of the school? If Yes/no, state
why?)___Yes, School needs/targets_were met and the school was able to cope with its needs without making parents
contribute or conduct fundraising ._
f. What were the major challenges? What solutions were taken? _Insufficiency.. grant/ fund assistance did not meet
exact value /amount of what the school needs_ but through fund management , help from other stakeholders and
continuity of such MOOE/LSB-SEF), school projects were completed.
g. Did the school project contribute to the achievement of SIP objective?___Yes______________________
h. Did the exercise of the school project using SBM grant improve the SBM Practice of the school? (If Yes/no, state
why?)____Yes, SBM grant is utilized based on SIP and contained in the AIP were SBM is included.
i. What are the chances that the school will continue the project mainstream in the school operations the project
initiative/s. If yes, what are the exercise that will be sustained? If no, why?__Yes, with continued support
/assistance from the government and from the different stakeholders
4. Instructional Supervision (Current S/Y)
Subject No. of Times Observation Done by School Head by Subject Area/Grade Level
I II III IV V VI
English 1 1
Math 1 1
,Science
Sibika/HKS 2
Filipino 2 1
EPP 1
MSEP

h. Did the use of SBM grant for school project improve the SBM practice of the school? If yes/no state why.

___________________________________________________________________________________.

4. Instructional Supervision ( Current SY )

Observation/by Grade and by subject area
Grade I Grade II Grade Grade IV Grade V Grade VI
III
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
English 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
Mathematics 2 2 3 1 1 1 2
Science 1 1
Sibika/HKS 1 1 1
Filipino 2 1
EPP
MSEP/MAPEH
MTBMLE 2
EsP

C. Training/Competency Needs(Based on TSINA)

ICT TRAINING
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4. Staff Development
A. Trainings Attended(S/Ys 2010-2012)
Target EFA Goal/ Outcome Hindering Factor/s for not
Date Title of Training Objective Expected Actual achieving Expected Output
1/29-10- Oral English Enhancement and Public
2/01/10 Speaking

2/19/10 Basic Training Course for Kawan Leaders

4/28/10- Workshop Seminar on Populaton and
5/2/10 Housing
District Trainings of Teachers and School
6/02-4/10 Head for Learning Technologies in the
Classrooms
7/19-23/10 Division Training in Campus Journalism
for School Paper Adviser
10/2-29/10 Division Skill Development Trainings on
Arts and Crafts
1/24-26/11 Division Seminar Workshop in
 Mathematics

7/21/11 Orientation Workshop on Breakfast

Feeding Program
7/30-31/11 Division Training in Campus Journalism
8/6-7/11 (Photojournalism and Layouting)
4/11/12 Seminar workshop sa Pagtuturo sa
Unang Wika(Mother Tongue) Based
Multilingual Education) sa Bagong K to
12 Kurikulum
Division Training For Grade I teachers
5/13-18/12 on the K to 12 Curriculum
Municipal Action Team(MAT) Training
5/16-18/12 Orientation
7/19/12 Orientation Workshop on DOST OL trap

B. Trainings Conducted(S/Ys 2010-2012

Target EFA Outcome Hindering Factor/s for not
Date Title of Training Goal/ Expected Actual achieving Expected Output
Objective
Inset Training
Computation of Grade using Computer literacy in Needs Lack of computer to
computer computation of Improvment practice.
grade.

C. Scholarship Grants(S/Ys 2008-2012)

Name of Title of Scholarship grant Duration Outcome Hindering Factor/s for not
recipient (State date) Expected Actual achieving
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D. Research Conducted
Outcome Hindering Factor/s for not
Research Title Conducted By Expected Actual achieving
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

E. Time on Task (Current S/Y)

Month No. of School Days Actual No. of Days Hindering Factors for not conducting classes
Classes Held
June 21
July 22
August 21
September 20
October 23
November 19
December 15
January 23
February 19
March 17
April 0
Total 200
 D. Others
1. Programs and Projects
Programs/Projects Target Restricted Year Status Outcome Reasons Why
EFA In SIP Started Expected
Goals (Y/N) Outcome Not
Achieved
Expected Actual
Rehabilitation of
Electrical Wiring 2012
Water Supply
Connection 2012
Grass Cutting 2012
Repairing of
Principals office
ceiling 2012
Acquiring of
Office Furniture
(Sofa) 2012

2. Best Practices/Awards

A. Reviewing of NAT
B. Peer-Teaching
C. Peer-Reading
D. MTAP Classes

Prepared by:

AL EUSEBIO L. JONSON
Head Teacher III

Noted:

LORETA S. ESGUERRA
District Supervisor