LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF, OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES OF LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES August 7, 2017

STAN J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-327-1566
AUGUST 7, 2017
BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF,

OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES
40 EAST KING STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17602
re: PAYMENT NOTICE: Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Wilson,
Again, it is with regret that I must correct you, your staff, regarding the
attempted EXTORTION OF MY MONIES. I HAD MANY ISSUES WITH YOUR OFFICE OVER
THE YEARS FOR SIMILAR EXTORTION TACTICS. The following is from my letter to Ms.
Pfurisch, CLERK OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS of August 7,
2017:
Ms. Pfurisch, this is the second NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT that
your office refused to send up to the SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. I filed this
NOTICE OF APPEAL on June 26, 2017. Last OCTOBER I sent you another NOTICE OF
APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT complete with a $75.00 MONEY ORDER and In Forma
Pauperis Application for CASE NO. Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016. I NEVER
RECIEVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE FROM YOUR OFFICE OR FROM SUPERIOR COURT.
YOU JUST FLAT OUT EXTORTED THE $75.00 MONEY ORDER AND OBSTRUCTED MY RIGHT
TO APPEAL - TWICE!
COINCIDENTLY, OR NOT, THE SAME DAY I RECIEVED YOUR LETTER, SATURDAY

AUGUST 5, 2017 I RECIEVED A PAYMENT NOTICE FROM THE COLLECTIONS
ENFORCEMENT UNIT OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR
$654.85 FOR Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016! ANOTHER INSTANCE OF EXTORTION!
THIS IS CRIMINAL EXTORTION, ANY WAY YOU PARSE IT!
LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 1 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION
MAY I bring to your attention the following case law:
PRO SE & IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Commonwealth v. Haggentstaller, 699 A. 2d 767 (Pa Superior, 1997), Pro Se
Appellant sought review of Conviction for violation of County for violation of County
ordinance with Rule of Appellant Procedure, court conducted a thorough,
independent review of the record, and found sufficient evidence to sustain the
conviction.
Hempfield Township v. Hapchuck 153 Pa. Comwlth. 173620 A. 2d. 668 (1993) Pro
Se Brief failed to comply with Pa. Rules of Appellate Procedure, but the failure to
comply did not substantially impede the Courts ability to review the issues
presented and therefore considered the merits of the case.
Pa. R. App. P. Rule 552, 561 Indigent 16.2 In Forma Pauperis, Griffen v. Illinois,
351 U.S. 12, 76 S. Ct. 585, 100 L. Ed. 891 (1956) states Indigent has right to free
Trial Transcript for Appeal of Right.
In Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, the courts interpreted due
process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due process means.
Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d.
644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of unfairness can result in
a defendant being deprived of his due process rights.
The first issue to address is that of the Plaintiffs right to due process, as
prescribed by law. In Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, the
courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what
due process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v.
Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d. 644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of
unfairness can result in a defendant being deprived of his due process rights.
CIVIL RIGHTS
1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying
purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of
constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of
serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for
purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local
government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const.
Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed.
Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
In Ascolese v. Southeastern Turnpike Authority, C 925 F. supp. 351, the case

supports the notion that One of the principal purposes of 1983 was to give
remedy to parties deprived of Constitutional Rights, privileges, and immunities by
Officials abuse of his or her position, that is to provide remedy against individual
officials who violate Constitutional Rights, 42 U.S.C.A. 1983.
CIVIL CONSPIRACY
Rico 263 42 1985 (2) Persons Involved In Litigation To Be Free From
Conspiracy In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal
responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:

Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in

an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core
conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which involves
different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This
illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up my International
Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
Under Pennsylvania Law, conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence

that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an inference that the
unlawful combination has been in front of facts formed for the purpose charged.
See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the
following was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga)
and its police officers were acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose
of violating arrestees constitutional rights by subjecting him to unreasonable force,
arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two (2) or more officers acted
together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5th, 2006 and August 4th, 2006)
and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The
preceding pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under
Pennsylvania Law, a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree
orcombine with lawful intent to do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act
by unlawful means, with proof of malice with intent to injure the person, his/her
property and or business. In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d.
338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:
Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in
an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core
conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which involves
different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan.
1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying
purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of
constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of
serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for
purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local
government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const.
Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed.
Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Respectfully,
_______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-327-1566

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASESACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-01233 Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No.
17-0867 Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650,
08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA
2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-
03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS



DOCUMENT DIVIDER


COMMONWEALTH OF OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PENNSYLVANIA
JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD Recd:

Pennsylvania Judicial Center
601 Commonwealth Ave., Suite 3500 JCB No:
P.O. Box 62525
Harrisburg, PA 17120-0901 County:
(717)-234-7911
CONFIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION

INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print. If you wish to provide documents to support your allegations, please attach copies of those
documents. We cannot return documents. The Boards jurisdiction extends only to Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices, Superior
and Commonwealth Court Judges, Common Pleas Court Judges, Philadelphia Municipal and Traffic Court Judges and Magisterial
District Judges. Once completed, you must sign and return this form to the address above.
NOTICE: The Judicial Conduct Board has no authority to change a Judges decisions or rulings. Our jurisdiction extends only to
conduct that violates the Code of Judicial Conduct or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, which
may be found at our website at www.jcbpa.org.
Your Information:
Name: Stan J. Caterbone
Address: 1250 Fremont Street Telephone:

( 717 ) 598-2200
City: Lancaster State: PA Zip: 17603
( )
Judicial Officers Information:
Name: President Judge Dennis Reinaker Type of Judicial Officer:
Magisterial District Judge
County: Lancaster
Judge
Case Information: (If misconduct allegations relate to Court Proceedings.) Case Has Been Appealed
Case Name: Commonwealth v. Stanley J. Caterbone Case Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Your Attorney: Opposing Attorney: Witness:
Name: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Name: Name: Stan J. Caterbone
Address: same as above Address: Address:
Phone: same as above Phone: Phone:
I certify that I have read the information concerning the Judicial Conduct Boards function, jurisdiction, and
procedures included in the accompanying brochure. I further swear (or affirm) that the above information is true
and accurate. The statements in this complaint are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904 (relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities).
Date:_December 9, 2016________ Your Signature:___________________________________________
Please explain your complaint on the reverse of this form.

JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.1 10
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
Please use this page to explain your complaint, providing as much detail as possible.
Attach additional pages if needed.
Please note, it is not required that you present your grievance to the Board in person. Personal interviews are not required and are
not usually necessary for our preliminary review, investigation, and understanding of grievances. If we need further information
relative to your grievances, you will be contacted by phone or letter and arrangements will be made for an interview if deemed
necessary.
1. On October 28, 2016 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, mailed a NOTICE OF APEAL TO SUPERIOR
COURT via USPS Priority Mail Tracking No. 9405 5036 9930 0417 6700 86 to the CLERK OF
COURT of LANCASTER COUNTY. The tracking delivery confirmation reads Your item has been
delivered and is available at a PO Box at 8:28 am on October 31, 2016 in LANCASTER,
PA 17608. In it contained the NOTICE, an In Forma Pauperis Application, and a Money
Order for $75.00 from PNC Bank on Duke Street, across the street from the Lancaster
County Courthouse, No. 00677971.
2. On December 7, 2016 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se did an audit of Pennsylvania MDA Superior
Court cases and found no docket number for the filed appeal. A call was made to the
Prothonotary at Superior Court and the clerk also did an audit and confirmed there was no docket
number for the filed appeal.
3. On December 8 and December 9 I, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, made repeated calls to the
Lancaster County Clerk of Court with no answer. I also requested the clerk at Superior Court to
inquirer, however they instructed me to make the calls.
4. This is not an isolated case, as you are aware. I have had many problems in the past with the
Clerk of Courts, in fact Ryan Aument, former Clerk of Courts, had to enlist the services of Mr.
Frankhouser, Attorney from Underhill and Brubaker, to defend against similar complaints. You
have copies of the correspondence in other case numbers.
5. This act amounts to extortion and theft by deception of the $75.00 of real monies.
6. This act amounts to a Civil Rights Violation of Obstruction of Justice for not granting me my
Constitutional Right To Appeal.
7. SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR YOUR REVIEW.
Dated: December 9, 2016 _________________________________

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Revised: 06/01/2009
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.2 11
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
Appellate Courts Docket Sheets
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which
can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act (18 Pa.C.S. Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
The webpage you are viewing is operated and maintained by Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System as a source of public information. The webpage
is not affiliated with any search system for public records provided by private organizations for which fees may be incurred. The ability to search for
and review information contained in these web docket sheets is a free public service.
Select a Docket Sheet Search Type from the dropdown (default search type is by Docket Number)
Search Type:
Enter the desired search criteria and click Search (available search criteria changes based upon the type selected above)
* Court Name:
and any combination of
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Attorney First Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through
Click the Print Preview icon to display the report

Docket Number Short Caption Case Status Filing Date
1219 MDA 2016 Caterbone, S. v. Lancaster City Bureau of Police Active 07/27/2016
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.3 12
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:15 AM
Search Type:
* Court Name:
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through
No Records Found
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.4 13
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:16 AM
Search Type:
* Court Name:
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through

1461 MDA 2006 Caterbone, S. et al v. Southern Reg. Police et al Closed 08/30/2006
1462 MDA 2006 Caterbone, S. v. Dept. of Transportation Closed 08/30/2006
1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Caterbone, S. Closed 08/30/2006
950 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. v. Totaro, D. et al Closed 05/24/2007
951 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. v. Totato, D. et al Closed 05/24/2007
1103 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. v. Com of PA/Dept Trans Closed 06/12/2007
125 MDA 2007 Com. v. Caterbone, S. Closed 01/19/2007
1097 MDA 2007 Com v. Caterbone, S. Closed 06/15/2007
First Previous 1 2 Next Last
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.5 14
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:17 AM
Search Type:
* Court Name:
District:
Docket Type:
Case Category:
Case Type:
Agency:
Organization Name:
Party Last Name:
Party First Name:
Attorney Last Name:
Trial Court County:
Trial Court Judge:
Case Status:
Date Filed: through

1565 MDA 2007 Caterbone, S. et al v. Lancaster General et al Closed 09/10/2007
234 MDA 2008 In Re: Petition for Review Closed 01/24/2008
783 MDA 2010 In Re: S. Caterbone Closed 05/12/2010
784 MDA 2010 In Re: S. Caterbone Closed 05/12/2010
1915 MDA 2015 Caterbone, S. & Adv. Media Grp. v. Lanc. Police Closed 11/02/2015
1561 MDA 2015 Caterbone, S. v. Residents of Lancaster County Closed 09/16/2015
First Previous 1 2 Next Last
JUDICIALTO
LETTER CONDUCT
BRETT I. BOARD
COLE COMPLAINT Page
Page
No.6 15
of 37
of 59 Friday
MondayDecember
August 9,
7, 2016
2017
1 of 1 12/7/2016 5:17 AM
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

CRIMINAL DIVISION CLERK OF COURT
___________________________________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone :
APPELLANT : CASE NO. Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
:
:
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, on this 28th day of October, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro se,
do hereby file this NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA as per the
ORDER of October 5, 2016 and do file the attached APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA
PAUPERIS. Attached is also a Money Order for the $75.00 filing fee as per your previous
instructions.
Dated October 28, 2016
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT I. COLE NOTICE OF APPEAL
Page
Page
No.1 16
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
ACTIVE COURT CASES

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.2 17
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
ISSUES TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL

1. Judicial Misconduct
2. Selective and Retaliatory Discrimination under the 1990 Disabilities Act
3. Not Considering the MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Docketed on September 30, 2016 as
seen in the Court Record
4. By Not Considering the Motion For Continuance in Advance the APPEALLANT was not given
the opportunity to attend the HEARING and was maliciously found GUILTY IN ABSTENTIA
as the APPEALLANT used his PaeDock Mobile App to check the Court Record Daily waiting
for a RULING on the MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE.
5. Using the Courts for Political Vendettas
6. Attempted Extortion of Real Monies
7. Libel and Slander
8. Collusion of COINTELPRO-LIKE Tactics with Law Enforcement
Date: October 28, 2016
___________/S/____________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.3 18
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED

On August 3, 2016 the APPELLANT received a phone call from a Loan Representative of
Huntington Bank, Columbus, Ohio concerning the APPELLANT'S auto loan for his 2007 Honda CRV.
The APPELLANT as 11 phone calls back and forth up to and including yesterday, August 30, 2016.
In June of 2015 the APPELLANT borrowed some $12,000 for the auto, a 100,000 mile warranty
and GAP Insurance. On December 8, 2015 the APPELLANT was rear ended in Carlisle,
Pennsylvania in a suspicious incident. The APPELLANT fixed all repairs for a nominal cost of $300
to a minimum degree noticeability. On May 7, 2016 the APPELLANT FINALLY received the payout
from NATIONWIDE insurance and accepted full liability, documented the Honda CRV as Totaled.
On May 10, 2016 three days later the APPEALLANT'S front end was demolished, again by a
suspicious incident causing the APPELLANT'S insurer to pay over $5,000 in repairs. In August
Huntington Bank tried to convince the APPEALLANT that payment was due for July and August, yet
in July of 2016 there was not one communication from Huntington Bank. On or about August 18,
2016 the APPEALLANT gave the Huntington Bank Loan Officer a routing number and account
number to a checking account with over $9,000 in available cash to make a payment. The
Huntington Bank Loan Officer refused to process the payment and instead, as usual KEPT
HARASSING the APPEALLANT. On Sunday, August 20, 2016 the APPEALLANT cleaned out the car
in anticipation of a repossession and REFUSED FURTHER NEGOTIONS REGARDING
ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS AND HARASSMENT. On Sunday, August 28, 2016 another
suspicious incident occurred and left the front end severely damaged. On Monday the
APPEALLANT drove the Honda CRV to a parking garage in Harrisburg, notified
Huntington Bank and took a train home to Lancaster. The APPEALLANT has a bike.
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.4 19
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
AFFIDAVIT THAT COMPLIES WITH RULE 24(A)(1)

In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In
Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis
Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice.
The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond.
This was an outright effort to extort monies from the APPELLANT and in the long term make
service of the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma
Pauperis Status, by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S.
Marshalls. This tactic, in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the
APPELLANT. The Judges used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the
illegal tactic, however, attached are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United
States District Court with financial affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts
exceeding $10,000.00, all prior to 2015.
This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the
complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to
support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court
with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the
Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-
23059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings,
however this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in
the government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back
to the days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC)
Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons
under oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating to U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that no medical reports
or physicians were reported in the entire application process and there was never a psychiatric
evaluation for the same said purposes. I am receiving a net monthly benefit of $1330.00 and
have been since April of 2008 and was declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said
month that I reported that I became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other
related symptoms and illnesses.
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.5 20
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
If the Court would consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities and
the Federal False Claims Act filing of the APPELLANT as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The APPELLANT wil argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the APPELLANT In Forma Pauperis Status. The
APPELLANT has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad. Therefore any
attempt to subject the APPELLANT to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.
Consideration should be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,
where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals. The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.
The prosecutorial misconduct the the APPELLANT has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the APPELLANT
from completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and
18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.6 21
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
The attached 29 False Arrests, which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that
may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant
an inference that the unlawful combination has been in front of facts formed for the purpose
charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following
was supported: Arrestees allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were
acting in concert and conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights
by subjecting him to unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two
(2) or more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August
4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding
pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to
strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.7 22
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a

performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1

Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
brought before the courts. These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of
limitations has run out.
1References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December

2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregon-
riaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
Case
LETTER
No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Page
Page
No.8 23
of 23
of 59 Monday
FridayAugust
October
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS Rights
OF CIVIL Violation and
CONSPIRACY TOJudicial
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Civil Rights Violation and Judicial Misconduct
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
No.CORRUPTION- Clerk
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
TO BRETT COLE of Courts
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
Prothonotary
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
No.20
918
18
24
ofof
of
of128
23
of85
89
59 Monday
FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
17,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OFCivil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET
Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Page 1 of 5
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned: Date Filed: 07/07/2016 Initiation Date: 07/07/2016
OTN: LOTN: Originating Docket No: MJ-02301-TR-0000861-2016
Initial Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert Final Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert
Arresting Agency: East Hempfield Twp Police Dept Arresting Officer: Keen, Christopher Michael
Complaint/Incident #: E 0007452-4
Case Local Number Type(s) Case Local Number(s)
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status: Closed Status Date Processing Status Complaint Date: 05/10/2016
10/05/2016 Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
10/05/2016 Awaiting Sentencing
07/07/2016 Awaiting Original Papers
07/07/2016 Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth: 07/15/1958 City/State/Zip: Lancaster, PA 17603
Alias Name
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
Caterbone, Stanley Joseph
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type Name
Defendant Caterbone, Stanley J.
CHARGES
Seq. Orig Seq. Grade Statute Statute Description Offense Dt. OTN
1 1 S 75 3322 Vehicle Turning Left 05/09/2016
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event Disposition Date Final Disposition
Sequence/Description Offense Disposition Grade Section
Sentencing Judge Sentence Date Credit For Time Served
Sentence/Diversion Program Type Incarceration/Diversionary Period Start Date
Sentence Conditions
Guilty by Trial (Lower Court) Defendant Was Present

Lower Court Disposition 06/10/2016 Not Final
1 / Vehicle Turning Left Guilty by Trial (Lower Court) S 75 3322
Albert, Scott E. 06/10/2016
Guilty
CPCMS 9082 Printed: 10/14/2016
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 -Pennsylvania
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 11
12
15
313
10 13who
of
of
25of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
8959not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Civil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
DOCKET
Traffic
Page 2 of 5
v.
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event Disposition Date Final Disposition
Sequence/Description Offense Disposition Grade Section
Sentencing Judge Sentence Date Credit For Time Served
Sentence/Diversion Program Type Incarceration/Diversionary Period Start Date
Sentence Conditions
Summary Appeal Trial 10/05/2016 Final Disposition
1 / Vehicle Turning Left Guilty S 75 3322
Totaro, Donald R. 10/05/2016
No Further Penalty
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION ATTORNEY INFORMATION

Name: Name:
Supreme Court No: Supreme Court No:

Rep. Status:
Phone Number(s):
ENTRIES
Sequence Number CP Filed Date Document Date Filed By
1 07/07/2016 Caterbone, Stanley J.

Notice of Summary Appeal Filed
1 09/06/2016 Lancaster County District Attorney's

Office
SA Hearing Notice Sent
Caterbone, Stanley J.
09/06/2016 First Class/Certified
Lancaster County District Attorney's
Office
09/06/2016 Hand Delivered
1 09/30/2016 Caterbone, Stanley J.

Motion for a 30-Day Continuance
1 10/05/2016 Totaro, Donald R.

Guilty
2 10/05/2016 Totaro, Donald R.

Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 12
13
16
414
11 14who
of
of
26of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Civil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
DOCKET
Traffic
Page 3 of 5
v.
ENTRIES
Sequence Number CP Filed Date Document Date Filed By
1 10/13/2016 Pfursich, Jacquelyn E.

DL-21S to be Prepared
2 10/13/2016 Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster

County
Penalty Assessed
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 13
14
17
515
12 15who
of
of
27of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Civil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
DOCKET
Traffic
Page 4 of 5
v.
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Last Payment Date: Total of Last Payment:
Caterbone, Stanley J. Assessment Payments Adjustments Non Monetary Total
Defendant Payments
Costs/Fees
ATJ $4.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.00
CAT/MCARE/General Fund $45.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45.00
CJES $2.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.25
Clerk Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211 $27.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27.50
(Lancaster)
Clerk of Court Auto Fee-Costs $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5.00
6593AAB1211 (Lan)
Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167 $8.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.55
of 1992)
County Court Cost (Act 204 of 1976) $21.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21.40
DA Administration Fee - $25.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25.00
6421AB130019021 (Lan)
DA Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211 $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00
(Lancaster)
Emergency Medical Services (Act 45 of $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00
1985)
JCPS $21.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21.25
Judicial Computer Project $8.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.00
Sheriff Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211 $2.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.00
(Lancaster)
State Court Costs (Act 204 of 1976) $8.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.55
Hearing Costs $8.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.00
Prosecution Cost - 6411AB1211 $6.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.68
(Lancaster)
Costs/Fees Totals: $213.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $213.18
Fines
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License $12.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.50
Fund)
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License $12.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.50
Fund)
Fines Totals: $25.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25.00
Grand Totals: $238.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $238.18
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 14
15
18
616
13 16who
of
of
28of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Civil
Rights
Civil
CIVILRights
Violation
Rights Violation
CONSPIRACY and
and
TOJudicial
JudicialMisconduct
COMMIT Misconduct
EXTORTION
DOCKET
Traffic
Page 5 of 5
v.
** - Indicates assessment is subrogated
PUBLIC
Public
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
Case
LETTER
No. only
TObeBRETT
Corruption
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTIONprovided
CORRUPTION by
- ClerkI.- the
Clerk
- of
Clerk
COLE Judge
Clerk
Courts State
ofofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&Courts
NOTICE Police.
Totaro
Prothonot
OF Moreover
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
APPEAL an
Page
P employer
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
age No. 15
16
19
717
14 17who
of
of
29of
of
ofdoes
61
69
82
of128
2383
85
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
MondayHistory
Friday
Monday Record 15,
October
October
August
October 14,
16,
17,
7, 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28,
20172016
Civil
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 23
No.21
15 of
30of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 24
No.22
16 of
31of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 25
No.23
17 of
32of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Civil
COMMITMisconduct
EXTORTION
Public
PUBLIC
Case Corruption
LETTER
I.- Clerk
of Courts
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& Prothonot
NOTICE& Prothonot
OF APPEAL Page
Page
Page
P age 22
No.20
18 of
33of
of 128
of
2389
59 FridayAugust
Monday October 21,
7, 28,
20172016
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 CivilCivil
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Lancaster
July 7, 2016
XXXXXXXXXX October 28, 2016
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
APPLICATION Page No.134
Page ofof5 59 Monday
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page57
36
44
66
58
60
64of
1 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
Lancaster
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page58
37
45
67
59
61
65of
2 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page59
38
46
68
60
62
66of
3 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
REPOSESSED
See Attached Docket
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page60
39
47
69
61
63
67of
4 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016
Rights
Civil Rights
Violation
Rights Violation
and
and
Judicial
JudicialMisconduct
Misconduct
October 28, 2016
XXXXXXXXX
LETTER
IN FORMA TOPAUPERIS
BRETT I. COLE
Friday August28,
October 7, 2016
2017
PUBLIC
Public
INPUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
Corruption
FORMACORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
Appeal
- Clerk
PAUPERIS MDJ
- Clerk
- of
Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Courts
APPLICATIONofAlbert
ofCourts
ofD.
Courts
&
Courts
Totaro
Prothonot
&&Prothonot
Prothonotary
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page61
40
48
70
62
64
68of
5 of
of
of5
61
69
82
7128
83
85
89 Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday
Thursday
Friday
October
October
July15,
14,
16,
7,
17,
October 21,
17,
2015
2016
2016
28, 2016








DOCUMENT DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
MARCH 21, 2017
STAN J CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS
7 SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, March 13, 2017
84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, February 14,

2014


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

ACTIVE COURT CASES

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., Preliminary
Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No.
16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, March 8, 2017.
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Appeal from 17-10615
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA
2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-
03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

STAN J. CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
_________________________
1. STAN J. CATERBONE'S WEBSITE www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
2. STAN J. CATERBONE'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL -

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWqz_swlj5dsEvufnsJjRSQ
3. STAN J. CATERBONE'S TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/SCaterbone
4. STAN J. CATERBONE'S SCRIBD PAGE FOR DOCUMENTS -

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
5. STAN J. CATERBONE'S LINKDIN PAGE - https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?

id=429457751&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile_pic
6. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON YOURLISTEN.COM

http://yourlisten.com/Stan.Caterbone
7. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON SOUNDCLOUD -

https://soundcloud.com/stan-caterbone?
utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=twitter

23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS
1. Case No. 17-cv-867-EGS Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief MOTION TO

FILE EXHIBIT TITLED LETTER TO HUNTINGTON BANK ANDREW GRIMMIT re
Liquidation Offer March 21, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/342581480/Case-No-17-cv-867-EGS-Preliminary-
Injunction-for-Emergency-Relief-MOTION-TO-FILE-EXHIBIT-TITLED-LETTER-TO-
HUNTINGTON-BANK-ANDREW-GRIMMIT-re-Liquidati
2. LETTER to HIGH INDUSTRIES re MARRIOTT BAR THREATS, HARASSMENT, THEFT

OF MONIES March 13, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341731227/Letter-to-
High-Industries-Re-MARRIOTT-HOTEL-BAR-Threats-Harassment-Theft-of-Monies-
March-13-2017
3. FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL NOTARIZED COMPLAINT Filed in U.S. EASTERN

DISTRICT COURT March 12, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341681228/FEDERAL-PRIVATE-CRIMINAL-
NOTARIZED-COMPLAINT-Filed-in-U-S-EASTERN-DISTRICT-COURT-March-12-
2017
4. History of the Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group
March 12, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341681178/History-of-the-Internet-
DARPA-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-and-Advanced-Media-Group-March-12-2017
5. WIKILEAKS CIA DATA DUMP re 100 NAMED TARGETED INDIVIDUALS OF MIND

CONTROL https://www.scribd.com/document/341681162/TARGETED-INDIVIDUAL-
TESTIMONIES-AND-LISTS-Our-Selected-Witnesses-by-WIKILEAKS-March-10-2017
6. CHAPTER 11 CASE No. 10615 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO JUDGE RICHARD FEHLINGS

ORDER OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/341519915/Chapter-11-17-10615REF-NOTICE-OF-
APPEAL-TO-U-S-DISTRICT-COURT-FOR-THE-EASTERN-DISTICT-OF-
PENNSYLVANIA-OF-JUDGE-RICHARD-FEHLINGS-ORDER-of-February-28
7. 02101-NT-000214-2016 ORDER BY LANCASTER COUNTY COMMON PLEAS JUDGE

MERRIS SPAHN GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
https://www.scribd.com/document/341298288/STAN-J-CATERBONE-MJ-02101-NT-
0001214-2016-re-NOISE-TOO-LOUD-ORDER-by-JUDGE-MERRILL-SPAHN-IN-
FORMA-PAUPERIS-GRANTED-APPEAL-DOCKETED-February-22-201
8. STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP INVOICES AND STATEMENTS

OF MARCH 8, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341298279/Advanced-Media-
Group-INVOICES-and-STATEMENTS-for-March-8-2017
9. NOTARIZED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE MARCH

5, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341018022/NOTARIZED-ENOUGH-IS-
ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-on-March-2-2017-and-Case-No-CI-16-08472-
EMERGENCY-INJUNCTION-FOR-PAIN-MEDICATIONS-March-5-2017
10. LETTER TO MATHEW HAVERSTICK, ATTORNEY FOR SCOTT MARTIN re MARTINE v.

LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF MARK REESE FOR IMPEACHMENT

https://www.scribd.com/document/340996107/Stan-J-Caterbone-LETTER-to-Matthew-H-
Haverstick-re-MARTIN-v-Reese-CI-17-04626-March-5-2017
11. STAN J. CATERBONE NEW CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN EASTERN
DISTRICT CASE No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., PRELIMINARY INJUCTION
FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF https://www.scribd.com/document/340923402/STAN-J-
CATERBONE-NEW-CASE-Case-No-17-cv-00867-EGS-Preliminary-Injunction-for-
EMERGENCY-RELIEF-in-U-S-EASTERN-District-of-Pennsylvania-March-4-20
12. KATHLEEN KANE APPEAL CASE IN SUPERIOR COURT OPINION OF MONTGOMERY

COUNTY COURT OF MARCH 2, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823932/Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-
3575-EDA-2016-MONTGOMERY-COUNTY-OPINION-AND-STAN-J-CATERBONE-
AMICUS-March-2-2017
13. STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-

STALKING PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF MARCH 3, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823930/STAN-J-CATERBONE-LETTER-
TO-THE-PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-March-3-2017
14. STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re LAMBERT BOOK
https://www.scribd.com/document/340736354/LANCASTER-COUNTY-COURT-
OF-COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-BROWN-et-al-re-
AFFIDAVIT-of-ENOUGH-IS-ENOUGH-March-2-2017
15. NOTORIZED DECLARATION TITLED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH BY STAN J. CATERBONE

ON MARCH 1, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340618722/ENOUGH-is-
ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-on-March-1-2017
16. LETTER TO TARGETED INDIVIDUAL ABBE EDISON OF PITTSBURG, PA re ADVISE

ON COUNTER TECHNIQUES https://www.scribd.com/document/340479872/LETTER-
TO-ABBE-EDISON-February-27-2017
17. CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASE No. 17-10615 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF JUDGE RICHARD FEHLINGS DISMISSAL OF FEBRUARY 26, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340479838/Chapter-11-17-10615REF-MOTION-FOR-
RECONSIDERATION-OF-JUDGE-FEHLINGS-ORDER-OF-FEBRUARY-16-2017-
February-26-2017
18. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101

re GEICO COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340354393/PENNSYLVANIA-DEPARTMENT-OF-
INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-CLAIM-NUMBER-
055746172-0101-030-with-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-2017
19. STAN J. CATERBONE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE No.
CI-08-13373 PREACIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS MASON PFLUMM et.al., February
25, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340354387/Lancaster-County-Court-Case-
No-08-CI-13373-re-PRAECIPE-TO-ADD-DEFENDANTS-February-25-2017

20. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101

re GEICO COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017 WITH NOTARIZED
AFFIDAVIT https://www.scribd.com/document/340278864/PENNSYLVANIA-
DEPARTMENT-OF-INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-
CLAIM-NUMBER-055746172-0101-030-with-NOTARIZED-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-20
21. STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re REQUEST FOR
APPEARANCE AND AMICUS BRIEF
https://www.scribd.com/document/339729747/STAMPED-VERSION-LANCASTER-
COUNTY-COURT-OF-COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-BROWN-
et-al-REQUEST-FOR-APPEARANCE-and-AMICUS-BRIEF-Febr
22. STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-

STALKING PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF FEBRUARY 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339421116/STAN-J-CATERBONE-LETTER-TO-THE-
PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-February-15-2017
23. STAN J. CATERBONE'S PHOTO INVENTORY OF 1250 FREMONT STREET HOME,

LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA OF FEBRUARY 14, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339337180/STAN-J-CATERBONE-1250-
FREMONT-STREET-LANCASTER-PA-INVENTORY-February-14-2017

84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE OF ALL CLAIMS
1. ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft.
Lauderdale Shooter, INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-
Defender-for-Esteban-Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-
SCHEDULE-January-20-2017
2. STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of

Pennsylvania Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-
AMICUS-FOR-KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-
2016-FRIDAY-JANUARY-20-2017
3. WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of

Electronic Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-
STEWART-AND-STAN-CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-
Protocols-January-11-2017
4.The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking

Program
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-
program-stan-caterbone
5. Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass
Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-
on-cointelpro-history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/
6. Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the
Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pa
rdon.html
7. Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-
Soviet-Microwave-Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017
8. Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important

https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-
Pleading-July-7-1991-Important
9. That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-
the-cia-was-convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7
10. Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US
surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-
surveillance-state-2017-1

11. The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS
January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-
Road-Conestoga-Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017
12. AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc.,
January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-
PROTOTYPE-Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017
13. Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-
Pflumm-Contractors-Inc-1993-to-1998-January-17-2017
14. Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media
Group and Stan J. Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-
Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-
17-2017
15. B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-
January-16-2017
16. 1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-
by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017
17. Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-
FUNDS-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017
18. Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J.
Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-
Eastern-Regional-Free-Agent-Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017
19. STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH
January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-
MEDIA-GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017
20. Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January

15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-
Banking-Business-Development-of-1987-January-15-2017
21. 1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films
with Stan J. Caterbone January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-
Bongiovi-Power-Station-Studios-and-Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-
15-2017

22. STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File
of October 17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-
Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015
23. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence

Agencies November 12, 2016
https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-
INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-
EVIDENCE-November-2-2016
24. Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016
25. Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November
14, 2016 | False Claims Act | Military
26. STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of
Conspiracy to .... Saturday November 12, 2016
27. Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan
J. Caterbone Civil Actions and Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 |
28. Robert Gates
29. Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice
Monday November 28, 2016 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence
Agency
30. VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa
Barbara, CA Friday November 25, 2016
31. Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email

Systems November 22, 2016 Published by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |
32. Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law
33. Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police
34. Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22,
2016 | Central Intelligence Agency
35. Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL,
from Satellite Terrorism in America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009
36. | J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation
37. JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 |
Justice | Government
38. CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY
GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016
39. ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF
LANCASTER, by The Advanced Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service

Organizations
40. Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY

From May of 2016 to January 2017 - January 10, 2017
41. My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in
China Who Started Peacepink- August 28, 2016
42. TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON
STOCK January 9, 2017
43. POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005
TO 2016 January 6, 2017
44. Judiciaries
45. UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department

US District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016
46. Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973
47. UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted

Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures,
December 27, 2016
48. Torture
49. Stan J. Caterbone on Twitter: "I'm reading FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL
INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence... on @Scribd! https://t.co/T3D9nIYvMt
#ReadMore"
50. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 re PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS
COMEY AND TRUMP REMOVE OBAMA January 23, 2017
51. INVOICE AND Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Pro Se Billings Invoice
Wednesday November 30, 2016
52. Kathy Harrison (KATHLEEN HARRISON NAMED IN SAVAGE SUIT v. Dave Brown)
Email Re Bi Polar March 10, 2005
53. The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking

Program - Lancaster City Police Strategic Plan, August 24, 2016
54. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Cases No. CI-17-00210 and CI-17-
00206 BOWMAN and SAVAGE v. BROWN, et.al.,
55. REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE and AMICUS BRIEF January 25, 2017.pdf | Amicus
Curiae | National Security Agency
56. Family of Karlie Hall files suit against Millersville University, others; calls death
preventable January 25, 2017 | Law Reference | Government
57. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Filled in Forms January 27, 2017

58. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT ISSUANCE LETTER FOR NEW CASE NO. 17-10615-ref To
Judge Fehling Friday January 27, 2017
59. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 17-10615 Judge Fehling Filed On
January 27, 2017 - CASE FILE | Plea | Defamation
60. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 EXHIBIT re THE DONALD TRUMP
PRESIDENCY and STAN J. CATERBONE as of January 28, 2017 - electronically filed |
Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Nasa
61. ACCIDENT REPORT NO. 1701-029468 LANCASTER CITY POLICE OFFICER REPPERT
SATURDAY JANUARY 28, 2017
62. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 PRAECIPE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
January 29, 2017 - FILED ELECTRONICALLY January 29, 2017
63. Stewart Baker - Wikipedia
64. 16-cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief in Middle District NOTICE
OF APPEAL TO USCA THIRD CIRCUIT January 26, 2017 | Defamation
65. Homeowners Rehab Application File of June 8, 2015 - COINTELPRO EXTORTION

MODEL RESULTS January 30, 2017
66. Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit BRIEF STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of February 1, 2017
67. PLAINTIFF Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY

RELIEF EASTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA With IFP and Civil Cover Sheet - on
February 2, 2017
68. Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 17-10615REF SUBMITTALS FOR FEBRUARY 3 - February

2, 2017
69. Jeremy Scahill on Donald Trump and the Military-Industrial Complex - Truthdig
In an interview with acTVism, the investigative journalist also discusses the
70. significance of the Ramstein Air Base in Germany. - 2017/02/02
71. Pennsylvania State Police Liquor Control Enforcement Formal Complaint AGAINST
DOWNTOWN LANCASTER BARS, August 12, 2016 | Lawsuit | United States Courts Of
Appeals
72. Case No. CI-16-08472 EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS -

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas September 21, 2016 - CRIMINAL ACT OF
TORTURE |
73. Torture LAW and the United States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, February 4, 2017
74. CI-16-08472 DOCKET SHEET February 3, 2017 and Torture LAW and the United
States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, February 4,
2017

75. LIP News - CORRUPTION IN THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND LNP -
February 4, 2017
76. LETTER to Andrew Wallet re Britney Spears Conservatorship February 4, 2017
78. 16-Cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF in Middle District ORDER
by JUDGE KANE TRANSFER to EASTERN DISTRICT PHIL January 31, 2017
79. Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re 2016-788 (Asworth) 2016-789

(Reinaker) February 2, 2017
80. Chapter 11 17-10615ref REORGANIZATION PLAN February 7, 2017 | Bankruptcy |

Chapter
81. Chapter 11 17-10615REF STAN J. CATERBONE CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN

and DISCLOSURE STATEMENT February 7, 2017
82. Third Circuit Senior Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, who is President Donald
Trump’s older sister, decided this week to go inactive on the bench, relinquishing
her staff and chambers despite being scheduled to hear cases this year.
83. STAN J. CATERBONE June 18, 2008 US District Court Case 08-02982 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., CASE FILE | Complaint
84.STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0000470-2017 DUTIES AT STOP SIGN - MOTION

TO DISMISS February 12, 2017

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF, OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES OF LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES August 7, 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF, OFFICE OF SUPERVISION SERVICES OF LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE SERVICES August 7, 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STAN J.

CATERBONE, PRO SE - ELEMENTS OF CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT EXTORTION

BRETT I. COLE, DEPUTY CHEIF,

re: PAYMENT NOTICE: Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016

Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Wilson,

COINCIDENTLY, OR NOT, THE SAME DAY I RECIEVED YOUR LETTER, SATURDAY

THIS IS CRIMINAL EXTORTION, ANY WAY YOU PARSE IT!

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 1 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

MAY I bring to your attention the following case law:

PRO SE & IN FORMA PAUPERIS

In Ascolese v. Southeastern Turnpike Authority, C 925 F. supp. 351, the case

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 2 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in

Under Pennsylvania Law, conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 3 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

ACTIVE COURT CASESACTIVE COURT CASES

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 4 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 5 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 6 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 7 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 8 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

LETTER TO BRETT I. COLE Page No. 9 of 59 Monday August 7, 2017

COMMONWEALTH OF OFFICIAL USE ONLY

JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD Recd:

CONFIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION

Address: 1250 Fremont Street Telephone:

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Stanley J. Caterbone Case Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000219-2016

Your Attorney: Opposing Attorney: Witness:

Name: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Name: Name: Stan J. Caterbone

Address: same as above Address: Address:

Phone: same as above Phone: Phone:

Date:_December 9, 2016________ Your Signature:___________________________________________

Please explain your complaint on the reverse of this form.

Dated: December 9, 2016 _________________________________

Appellate Courts Docket Sheets

Click the Print Preview icon to display the report

Appellate Courts Docket Sheets

Appellate Courts Docket Sheets

Click the Print Preview icon to display the report

Appellate Courts Docket Sheets

Click the Print Preview icon to display the report

LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Dated October 28, 2016

ACTIVE COURT CASES

ISSUES TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL

Date: October 28, 2016

SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED

AFFIDAVIT THAT COMPLIES WITH RULE 24(A)(1)

transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a

Where RICO laws might be applied1

RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December

Guilty by Trial (Lower Court) Defendant Was Present

CPCMS 9082 Printed: 10/14/2016

COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION ATTORNEY INFORMATION

Supreme Court No: Supreme Court No:

1 07/07/2016 Caterbone, Stanley J.

1 09/06/2016 Lancaster County District Attorney's

1 09/30/2016 Caterbone, Stanley J.

1 10/05/2016 Totaro, Donald R.

2 10/05/2016 Totaro, Donald R.

CPCMS 9082 Printed: 10/14/2016

1 10/13/2016 Pfursich, Jacquelyn E.

2 10/13/2016 Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster

Date:_December 9, 2016 Your Signature:___________________________________