Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amlie Deglaire
amelie.deglaire@agrocampus-ouest.fr
Introduction
Nutrient bioavailability
availability for the metabolic functions of the organism
nutrient content of a food
The best indicator of the nutritional quality of a nutrient
Influencing factors
Chemical state of the nutrient
Interactions with other food components
Presence of antinutritional factors
Release from the food matrix
Recent data : influence of the matrix state of natural foods or the
microstructure of processed foods ( or ) 1200
400
0
1991 1995 2000 2005 2009
Year
4. Conclusion
3
Outline
1. Definition
1. Food structure
2. Bioavailability vs. bioaccessibility
4. Conclusion
4
Food structure?
Food structure or food matrix = organisation of food constituents at multiple spatial
scales and their interactions
Provided by nature or imparted during processing and preparation (food manufacturing)
Impact on food quality in particular on sensory and nutritional aspects
Insight in food structure and how it changes during processing operations is essential for
producing high quality food
7
Impact of a process on the nutritionnal
quality profil
Apple drying
*
* No lingual lipase coded in humans.
Bacterial origin?
The physical properties of a food matrix can affect the efficiency of the
physical, enzymatic and chemical digestion processes
Nutrient bioavailability
Fraction of a nutrient that has been digested and absorbed
and is available for (has been used by) the metabolic functions of
the organism Metabolism
Blood
Urine
Absorption
Faeces
Digestion Excretion
10
Use and development of in vivo models
Bioavailability :
measure in the blood plasma
metabolic utilization : waste from digestion (faeces) + metabolism
(urine, blood) 11
Bioavailability measure
Blood sampling
Bioavailability = Area Under the Curve (quantity of nutrient absorbed) x 100
quantity of nutrient ingested
12
Bioavailability estimates
Metabolism
Blood
Urine
Absorption
Faeces
Digestion Excretion
Digestibility: (Ningested Nfaeces )/Ningested
Net Postprandial Protein Utilisation (NPPU):
(Ningested Nfaeces Nurine Nurea blood)/ Ningested
Biological value: NPPU/Digestibility
13
Nutritional quality of a nutrient / in vitro
Nutrient bioaccessibility
fraction of a compound that is released from its matrix in the
gastro-intestinal tract during digestion and thus becomes
available for intestinal absorption (Fernandez-Garcia et al. , Nut Res, 2009)
Blood
Urine
Absorption
Faeces
Digestion Excretion
14
Development of in vitro digestion models
Static Conditions Dynamic Conditions
Partnership with UMR GMPA Grignon
Constant pH
No flow le VMBB : enzymes
Constant [Enzymes]
Regulated pH
Dynamic flow
Regulated[Enzymes]
Bioaccessibility
15
Multi-scale characterization of digested food
Estomac
estomac Duodnum Jjunum Ilon
duodnum jjunum ilon
35 6.50
30 6.00
Will the liquid dairy sample Sample 1
25 5.50
coagulate when entering in
the stomach??? 20 5.00
G' (Pa)
pH
Prediction of the 15
pH
4.50
16
Multi-scale characterization of digested food
Antibody arrays Molecular scale
-lactalbumin
50%
Caseins
40%
30%
20%
More than 4700
10%
peptides identified in
Surprol the human jejunum 0%
Est 30' Est 1h30 Est 3h30
17
Development of in vitro digestion & absorption models
4. Conclusion
20
Carbohydrate : starch
Starch microstructure: granular (2-130 m ) / cristalline
Amylose content varies with the botanic species (mean : 20% / waxy wheat : 0%)
Starch digestion hydrolysis of glycosidic bond
Linkage -1,4 : salivary and pancreatic amylase
Linkage -1,6 (amylopectine) : membrane isomaltase (after amylase)
21
Starch granule organisation
Different behaviour
according to the botanical
sources (ex: potato vs. cereal)
Light microscope
under polarised
light
Light microscope
under polarised
light
20 m
26
Glycemic index : glucose release kinetics
Digestion X
Absorption
27
Glycemic index (GI)
1. 50 g of carbohydrates to test
2. Blood sampling (at regular intervals for 2-3 h)
3. Blood glucose content
4. Comparison with the reference (glucose)
5. Average on 8-10 volunteers
High
Average
Low
29
Food GI
GI
Alone Mixed diet
High
Average
Low
30
GI & health
Glucose as reference
Low GI (spagetthis: 50) < 55
Average GI(pain blanc: 69) 55-70
High GI (corn flakes: 80) > 70
Low GI
prolonged glucose disposal
before exercise (toughness)
potentially with a satiating effect
hypoglycaemia delayed
High GI
short glucose disposal
after exercise: stock recovery
Diet with high GI : potential impact on weight gain, food intake,
triglyceride synthesis increased , oxydative stress
31
Starch nature & GI
GI (Amylopectine) > GI(Amylose)
branched chain of amylopectin: more area accessible to enzymes
amylose: more rigid gel less accessible to enzymes/ more retrogradation
n=26
DG14
DG0
n=1
GI and
texture
(density: D)
558b 0.30 Glycemic Insulinemic Bread
6213a 0.21 index index density
538b 0.32
559b D: 0.24 Source: Rizkalla, 2009 37
Resistant starch
38
Resistant starch & health
39
Impact of a diet with high glycemic index
on health
n=3931 japanese women
Quartiles of GI diet (Average GI: Q1,50.3; Q2, 53.6; Q3, 55.8; Q4, 59.9, n=291)
Adjusted data for age, gender, BMI, tobacco, alcool, kcal, proteins, fibres, folates and cholesterol
Relative risk and confidence interval at 95% of diabete II according to the GI diet
quintile in 91 249 women
Source: Schulze et al., Am J Clin Nutr 2004 43
Conclusion: Technology and glycemic
index
(1) Raw material choice (+++)
Balance amylose/amylopectine
Associated nutrients (proteins and fibres)
44
Outline
1. Definition
1. Food structure
2. Bioavailability vs. bioaccessibility
4. Conclusion
45
Plasma 1200
1000
800
AA totaux (mol/L)
600
400
Am J Clin Nutr, 2006
200
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
-200
-400
Surprol
46
Milk protein microstructure : casein micelle
Different theoretical models have been proposed
Dalgleish et Marchin et
al. al.
2004 2007
200 nm
The real organisation of individual caseins within the micelle remains unknown
47
Casein micelle reactivity
Alkalinisation Cooling
(micellar destructuration
-casein
H2O
Calcium
Calcium Caseins
&
phosphate Heattreatments
phosphate >90C
Acidification
Denaturated whey proteins
Protons
Calciumphosphate
Calciumphosphate
H2O Lactose
Caseins
Cations
Anions
H2O
Addition of di H2O Casines
Addition
or trivalent Calciumphosphate
of
cations chelatants
Calcium Caseins H2O
Addition of NaCl
Globular proteins
Known 3D-structures
-lactalbumin -lactoglobulin
Sensitive to heat-
denaturation
Highly resistant to
proteolysis (digestion)
Serumalbumin Lactoferrin
49
Milk proteins
Casein micelle
MW = 0.5-1 x 106 kDa -lactoglobulin
av. diam = 180 nm MW = 18.6 kDa
2 SS bridges + 1 SH
-lactalbumin
k Casein
MW = 14.2 kDa
MW = 19.0 kDa
4 SS bridges
SS bridges
10
nm
50
Milk macrostructure and N bioavailability
Gastric emptying
of PEG
Dietary N in plasma
In pig
Gaudichon et al,
J Nutr, 94
milk yogurt
Famelart et al., 2011
Intestinal fluxes
milk of dietary N
time
yogurt In human. Gaudichon et al, B J Nutr, 95
51
Meat macrostructure
Energy needed to digest, absorb, and
assimilate meat meals in pythons
Catheterised mini-pigs
Meat cubes
Minced meat
52
Meat macrostructure
NPPU
Fast Slow
Healthy Prothesis protein
protein
teeth
53
Heat treatment & protein bioavailbility
54
Heat treatment of meat (<100) and bioavailability
of amino acids
Experiment conducted in mini-pigs (n=6) True ileal digestibility of N
60C: 94.7 0.5 %
75C: 96.3 0.4 %
95C: 95.1 0.7%
56
Raw 50C
Scanning Electron
Microscope
micrographs
60C 70C
Transverse sections
of beef muscle raw
and cooked
80C 90C
100C 121C
Source: Sant-Lhoutellier et al., J. Agric. Food Chem, 2008; Bax et al, JAFC, 2012 59
Heat (&water) on in vitro digestibility of cereal protein
of pasta
Low Temperature: 55C, High Temperature: 70, Very HT: 90C moisture level : 20%
VHT-LM: 90C - low moisture level : 12%
Soluble proteins
Insoluble proteins
Sample preparation
Ultra low heat fat-free
milk powder
Step 1:
water suspension 25% Dry Matter 35% Dry Matter
Concentrate 1 Concentrate 2
Step 2 :
Heat 80C/20 s 105C/60 s 80C/20 s 105C/60 s
treatment
85C / 3 min 85C / 3 min
Step 3 :
Drying
control
60 min 30 min
pH 3.0 pH 6.5
+ pepsin + trypsin
+ PC + chymotrypsin
+ bile salts
Biochemical characterisation
SDS-PAGE, LC-MS-MS, ELISA
6.0
3.5
2.5
Gastric Duodenal
66.3 A
A: 25% DM, 80C, 20s B: 25% DM,B85C, 3 min C: 25% DM, C
105C, 60 s
55.4 66.3
55.4
36.5 0 1 2 5 10 20 40 60 1 5 15 30 0 1 2 5 10 20 40 60 1 5 15 30 0 1 2 5 10 20 40 60 1 5 15 30
31.0 36.5
21.5 31.0
14.4 21.5
14.4
6.0
3.5 6.0
2.5 3.5
2.5
Gastric Duodenal Gastric Duodenal Gastric Duodenal
Peptide Bioactivity A B C E F G T
-CN(f108-113) Anti-hypertensif
-CN(f193-202) Anti-hypertensif
-CN(f193-209) Immunomodulatoire
s1-CN(f1-23) Antimicrobien
s1-CN(f23-34) Anti-hypertensif
s1-CN(f91-100) Anti-stress
s1-CN(144-149) Antioxidant
-lg(f9-14) Anti-hypertensif
65
Impact of milk structure on protein digestion and
amino acid bioavailability
Sample preparation
macrostructure
Ultra Low Heat unheated milk rennet gel
powder (raw milk) 24h-20 C,
pH 6.6
10 m
rehydration in rennet
water
heat treatment
90 C-10 min
microstructure
caseins caseins
-lactoglobulin
-lactoglobulin
[a]
dissociation of
k casein
[b]
Casein micelle in heated milk, serum aggregates
in SEM (Harwalkar et al., 1989)
10 nm
Caseins
Whey proteins
Unheated
Low-heat pasteurisation
High-heat p asteurisation
Utra High Temperature
Spray-dried milk
utilisation (%)
72
68
64
n=25
60
Microfiltered Pasteurised UHT
Unheated
Low-heat pasteurisation
High-heat p asteurisation
Spray-dried milk
Caseins
Whey proteins
Unheated milk
Low-heat pasteurisation
High-heat p asteurisation
OD 214 nm
Protein aggregation
+ Lactosylation of
Spray-dried milk
beta-lactoglobulines :
first products of the
Maillard reaction Caseins
Whey proteins
0 10
Time (min) Source: Lacroix et al., JAFC, 2006 73
Technological treatment and protein bioavailability
Alkaline treatment
Vegetal protein extraction
Detoxification
Ex: destruction of aflatoxines
Solubilisation and texturation of vegetal proteins
Destruction/modification AA :
Isomerisation of AA (Thr, Ile, Lys) from L to D
Neoformation of AA (cys et phosphosrine
dehydrolalanine) / formation of covalent bond type :
lysinoalanine (heat treatment)
Reduction of protein digestibility
Reduction of lysine bioavailability
74
Metabolic utilisation reduced for some D-amino acids
Proteins - lipids
Hydrophobic interaction
Covalent bond with lipid oxidation derivate
Reduction of lysine bioavailability and protein digestibility
Proteins-polyphenols (vegetal food)
Covalent bond between lysine and quinone (polyphenol
oxidation by enzymes or alkaline pH)
Reduction of lysine bioavailability and protein digestibility
Proteins - nitrites, sulfites or chlore derivates
Minimal decrease of bioavailability
Formation of toxic compounds (nitrosamines, dichlorovinylcystine,
methionine sulfoximine)
76
Outline
1. Definition
1. Food structure
2. Bioavailability vs. bioaccessibility
4. Conclusion
77
Technological treatment and lipid bioavailability
78
Saturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease risk
protective
At risk
Source: deOliveira et
al., AJCN, 2012
79
Technological treatment and lipid bioavailability
80
Impact of fat droplet size on lipid bioavailability
Human experiment (n=8)
Emulsion : 50g olive/fish oil (+ carbohydrates + protein)
Fat droplet size : Fine emulsion : 10 m vs. Coarse emulsion : 0.7 m
Before digestion
+ saliva 5 min
+ gastric juice 2 h
+ dudodenal juice
2h
Source: Hur et al., Food Chem, 2009 82
Impact of the emulsifying agent on lipid bioavailability
stearoyl-lactilate sodium
Emulsion (oil-in-water/milk)
n=9 n=9
Fat structure impacts fatty
acid and chylomicron plasma
kinetics but not overall
digestibility
Source: Vors et al., AJCN, 20123 84
Impact of fat structure on metabolic oritentation
36
31 Cas
Cas
21
14
-lac
6
3.5
2.5
0 30 60 120 150
Time (min)
Gastric digestion
Pasteurisation
Aggregation of proteins
around the native fat globule
87
Human milk pasteurisation : impact on protein & lipid
digestion
0 min
30 min
60 min
120 min
150 min
Triglycerids
Monoglycerid
PL/Prot
Time 0 30 60 120 30 60 120 180
(min)
75
50 pasteurised milk vs. raw milk
(AU)
25
Due to BSSL inactivation and structure effect ?
0
0 30 60 120
88
Outline
1. Definition
1. Food structure
2. Bioavailability vs. bioaccessibility
4. Conclusion
89
Micronutrients from plant foods and location
within the tissue
4. Conclusion
92
Carotenoids
Carotenoids : natural pigments yellow-orange red-purple,
highly hydrophobic compounds located in specialized plant
plastids (chromoplasts) of fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, algae
About 10 % of carotenoids (bta-, alpha-, gamma-carotne,
cryptoxanthine): vitamin A precursor
Beta-carotne: orange fruits (carott, apricot, mango), red palm oil,
dark green vegetables (hidden by chlorophylle)
Vitamin A: necessary for vision, epithelium tissu preservation,
bone growth, immune system
93 93
Carotenoids
Absorption: requires incorporation of lipophilic
carotenoids into mixed micelles (dietary lipids, bile
salts, and other lipophilic or amphiphilic compounds)
Liberation : fraction of the test compound released from the food matrix
into the aqueous supernatant
Bioaccessibility : fraction of the test compound released from the food
matrix into the aqueous supernatant and transferred into mixed micelles
Bioaccessibility / Bioavailability vary according to the
botanical origin : Green vegetables < oranges vegetables <fruits < oil
Process (thermal and/or mecanical) : increase the
bioavailability of carotens by destruction of the
vegetal matrix (Van Buggenhout et al., Trends in Food Science & Technology 2010)
94
Chromoplast structure & bioaccessibility of
carotenoids
BA: 0.5%d BA: 3.1%c
Beta-carotene: 13 080 g/100g Beta-carotene: 652 g/100g
Crystalloid
Globular-tubular
Light micrographs of carrot root and mango, papaya, and tomato fruit
mesocarp. Arrows mark chromoplasts.
Impact of
pectin and
other fibers
Vitamin A conversion
Commercial puree: 44 11%a
Home-made puree: 59 12%b
Grated carrot: 63 10%ab
98 98
Addition of oil into carotts and bioavailability
of carotenoids
4. Conclusion
100
Iron & spinach
Breakdown of
cellular
structures
Digestion of
cellular
structures
4. Conclusion
102
Improving health properties of food by
sharing our knowledge on the digestive
process
COST Action FA1005
INFOGEST
ALIMENTATION
AGRICULTURE
ENVIRONNEMENT
Harmonization of in vitro digestion models
Comparison in vitro / in vivo
Beneficial food component characterization Characterization of the digestion products
Stability of bioactives during processing Resistance to peptidases and absorption
Multi-scale characterization of food Active form of food components in the organism
104
Tech Univ Denmark Univ Aarhus MTT Univ Eastern Finland
Canada
Norwegian Univ Life Sci VTT Nofima
Wageningen UR Rothamsted Res
http://www.insidefood.eu
106
Food structure vs. bioavailability