PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY

College of Teacher Development

Faculty of Education Sciences
Taft Avenue, Manila

RUBRIC FOR INDIVIDUAL ORAL PRESENTATION & WRITTEN REPORT

Name of Presenter(s): Topic:

Course Code: PROF. ED. 9 (1) __________________________________ _____________________________
Course Title: ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF (2) __________________________________ _____________________________
LEARNING (3) __________________________________ _____________________________
Class and Section: _________________________ (4) __________________________________ _____________________________
Lesson: _________________________ (5) __________________________________ _____________________________
Date: _________________________ (6) __________________________________ _____________________________

Performance Task: Oral Presentation & Written Report

Objectives: In this activity, the PRESENTER is expected to:

1. demonstrate mastery of the assigned topic;

2. facilitate the discussion effectively and efficiently; and
3. show the desirable traits of an innovative teacher.

Task Description: Each student is assigned to facilitate the discussion of a topic in the course syllabus within the time agreed upon by the whole class.

Desired Format of the Written Report:

Paper Size: A4 (width: 11.69", height: 8.27")

Orientation: Portrait
Font Style: Times New Roman
Font Size: 11
Margins: 1 (top, left, right, bottom)
Single Space
Justified

Prepared by: Romelie Anne B. Calapardo, Faculty, PNU Manila in June 2017. Adapted from Prof. Marilyn U. Balagtas and Marilou M. Ubia, Faculty, PNU Manila, in November 2004.
Should you want to use this, please acknowledge the source.
 Instructions: Please judge the performance based on the criteria as reflected in the rubric. Check the traits evident then give the numerical
scale that corresponds to individual/ group performance. Compute the final grade considering the weight given to each criterion.

4 3 2 1 Presenters
Criteria Very Needs Weight
Excellent Satisfactory 1 2 3 4 5
Satisfactory Improvement (%)
1.Personal Appearance
The presenter:
a. is well-poised 6 or ALL of the
b. is properly groomed 4-5 of the given 2-3 of the given 0-1 of the given
given indicators
indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
c. uses appropriate attire (formal) of an excellent
excellent excellent excellent 5%
d. is free of mannerism performance are
performance are performance are performance are
evident.
e. has pleasant disposition evident. evident. evident.
f. speaks enthusiastically
g. others (please specify) _______________
Scale
WG
2. Mastery of the Content

a. Shares ideas without reading/ or reads once

in a while (i.e. using cue card or outlined 6 or ALL of the
text) 4-5 of the given 2-3 of the given 0-1 of the given
given indicators
b. Shares accurate ideas indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
of an excellent
excellent excellent excellent 25%
c. Explains clearly performance are
performance are performance are performance are
d. Answers questions with confidence and evident.
evident. evident. evident.
conviction
e. Answers questions accurately
f. Asks good questions to facilitate discussion
g. Others (please specify) _______________
Scale
WG

Prepared by: Romelie Anne B. Calapardo, Faculty, PNU Manila in June 2017. Adapted from Prof. Marilyn U. Balagtas and Marilou M. Ubia, Faculty, PNU Manila, in November 2004.
Should you want to use this, please acknowledge the source.
 4 3 2 1 Presenters
Criteria Very Needs Weight
Excellent Satisfactory 1 2 3 4 5
Satisfactory Improvement (%)
3. Presentation Skills
The presenter has:
a. well-modulated voice
b. good diction/ pronunciation
c. eye contact 9-10 or ALL of
d. interesting energetic presentation the given 6-8 of the given 3-5 of the given 0-2 of the given
e. self-confidence indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
excellent excellent excellent excellent 20%
f. natural gestures
performance are performance are performance are performance are
g. good command of the language of instruction evident. evident. evident. evident.
h. grammatically correct statement
i. the skill in classroom management
j. the skill in the utilization of instructional
materials
k. others (please specify) _______________
Scale
WG
4. Quality of Instructional Materials
a. Legible/visible/readable
b. Concise (key points are stressed in
bullet/graphical form)
c. Combination and contrast of colors are 7 or ALL of the
5-6 of the given 2-4 of the given 0-1 of the given
pleasing to the eye. given indicators
indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
d. Uses relevant and appropriate graphics or of an excellent
excellent excellent excellent 10%
visuals performance are
performance are performance are performance are
evident.
e. Free from grammatical/typographical errors evident. evident. evident.
f. Uses varied or extraordinary visual aids
g. List of references are shown at the end of
presentation
h. Others (please specify) ________________
Scale
WG
(Partial Grade I) 60%

Prepared by: Romelie Anne B. Calapardo, Faculty, PNU Manila in June 2017. Adapted from Prof. Marilyn U. Balagtas and Marilou M. Ubia, Faculty, PNU Manila, in November 2004.
Should you want to use this, please acknowledge the source.
 4 3 2 1 Presenters
Criteria Very Needs Weight
Excellent Satisfactory 1 2 3 4 5
Satisfactory Improvement (%)
*Evaluation of the Group Performance
(Note: The ratings here should be true to all
members of the group)

5. Parts of the Lesson

a. The motivation activity is related to the topic. 6 or ALL of the

b. The motivation part is fun and encourages 4-5 of the given 2-3 of the given 0-1 of the given
given indicators
active participation from the class. indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
of an excellent
excellent excellent excellent 15%
c. The lesson presented is complete or covers all performance are
performance are performance are performance are
the important concepts to be learned. evident.
evident. evident. evident.
d. The whole presentation contains a 10-item
quiz.
e. 5 questions are to test the students
knowledge and understanding of the topic.
f. 5 questions are to test the students skills in
analyzing practical classroom situations.
g. Others (please specify) _______________
Scale
WG
6. Time Management

a. The group presenters came on time and well 3 or ALL of the

prepared (preparation may take the first 5 2 of the given 1 of the given 0 of the given
given indicators
minutes of the session). indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
of an excellent
b. The motivation part is brief and did not take excellent excellent excellent 5%
performance are
much of the time (around 10 minutes or less). performance are performance are performance are
evident.
c. The presenters manages well their time. They evident. evident. evident.
started and ended on time.
d. Others (please specify) ________________
Scale
WG

Prepared by: Romelie Anne B. Calapardo, Faculty, PNU Manila in June 2017. Adapted from Prof. Marilyn U. Balagtas and Marilou M. Ubia, Faculty, PNU Manila, in November 2004.
Should you want to use this, please acknowledge the source.
 4 3 2 1 Presenters
Criteria Very Needs Weight
Excellent Satisfactory 1 2 3 4 5
Satisfactory Improvement (%)
7. Evidence of Teamwork/

a. All members reported. 3 or ALL of the

2 of the given 1 of the given 0 of the given
given indicators
b. Members assisted one another during actual indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
of an excellent
presentation. excellent excellent excellent 5%
performance are
c. All members came on time on the day of performance are performance are performance are
evident.
presentations substituted if a member failed to evident. evident. evident.
come for a valid reason.
d. Others (please specify) ________________
Scale
WG
8. Written Report

a. Given on or before the day of presentation or

on a specified data.
b. Follows the desired format
c. Computerized/ Encoded
d. Bound/compiled 9-10 or ALL of
e. Complete and includes basic parts (cover the given 6-8 of the given 3-5 of the given 0-2 of the given
page, table of contents, introduction, synthesis, indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an indicators of an
and list of references) excellent excellent excellent excellent 15%
f. All concepts and information are accurate. performance are performance are performance are performance are
g. Topics are well organized (i.e. ideas from evident. evident. evident. evident.
different sources were integrated).
h. Free from errors (spelling, grammar,
punctuations, or typographical errors).
i. Free of unnecessary and irrelevant material
j. Written report is submitted with Rubric for
Oral Presentation and Written Report
k. Others (please specify) _______________
Scale
WG
(Partial Grade II) 40%
(Add I and II)
Final Grade

Prepared by: Romelie Anne B. Calapardo, Faculty, PNU Manila in June 2017. Adapted from Prof. Marilyn U. Balagtas and Marilou M. Ubia, Faculty, PNU Manila, in November 2004.
Should you want to use this, please acknowledge the source.
 Final Grade Ranges:

3.0 - 4.0 = 90 - 100%

2.0 - 2.9 = 80 - 89%
1.0 - 1.9 = 70 - 79%

Comments:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Prepared by: Romelie Anne B. Calapardo, Faculty, PNU Manila in June 2017. Adapted from Prof. Marilyn U. Balagtas and Marilou M. Ubia, Faculty, PNU Manila, in November 2004.
Should you want to use this, please acknowledge the source.