Date 19th - 22nd December, 2016

Location Abyas - NOIDA 132

Total No of Responses 25
Feedback : AW
Facilitator Rajagopalan

Sr. No Feedback Questions Strongly Agree

Weights assigned 5
Facilitator Effectiveness
1 Facilitator ensured that program objectives were met. 7
2 Facilitator effectively addressed participants' questions. 17
3 Facilitator effectively presented the learning content. 9
4 Facilitator was well prepared and organized. 11

Program Effectiveness
1 Program materials and exercises were helpful and informative. 8
2 The program will enable me to apply my learning on the job. 7
3 The hands-on experience reinforced learning. 8
4 I recommend this program for other users of AWS Architecture and SysOps in Adobe 10

Feedback Summary
Facilitator Effectiveness 4.03
Program Effectiveness 4.08
Feedback : AWS Architecture and SysOps

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Weighted Rating

4 3 2 1

4 7 7 0 3.44
7 1 0 0 4.64
9 6 1 0 4.04
6 5 3 0 4.00
Overall 4.03

11 3 3 0 3.96
16 2 0 0 4.20
14 3 0 0 4.20
8 4 2 1 3.96
Overall 4.08
Sr. No. Suggestions to improve
1 Better time management
Time management was really poor. That is
something needs to be worked upon. But for
2
the rest, the instructor was really organized
and had knowledge of what he was teaching.
Better Planning is required. Tight
schedules(more content in less time) as was
planned for this training, generally doesnt
work. First day of training was totally wasted
3
as more stress given on basics and because of
that time to cover Advanced topics was
reduced and in the end few topics were not
covered atbetween
There is some mismatch all. audience,
contents and course duration. Trainer has good
4 knowledge on contents and could have much
better if program duration could extend by 2
days.we ran out of time
By the end of training,
could not cover all topics. Also not all
advanced topics got enough attention due to
time shortage. Duration of this training was
too short compared to the Contents to cover.
5
Also, since the per-requisite of this program
was to know AWS Basics already, therefore,
somewhat lesser emphasis at the very basics
could have earned more time to devote at the
Okay, firstlyadvanced level topics.
a 5 day training was squeezed in
to 4 days.. and the curriculum was not
6
adjusted accordingly. Please don't do that
While designing such again
training duration should
be kept in mind. I believe duration was less for
7
these many training contents and that's why
some topics were left out.
8 Please don't cut down the training time
The program was not planned properly. Day 1
stuff took 2 days to cover. Day 3 topic haven't
been covered. Training didn't happen
9
according to the plan. Some topics were
stretched, some were skipped and some were
just touched upon.
10 Better time management
11 Few course contents not covered
12 Time was the problem, not managed wisely.
We were expecting this training to be on
expert level and have a deep dive on topics.
13
But it eventually came up to be a Basics
training.
14 Time Management of Course.
 DO not reduce the number of days. Provide
15
ample time for the training to be completed
I think he should focus on important topics and
16
time management
 List your Key Learnings from the Session
Basics of AWS
Couldn't reach to the point where I required learning in
depth. Still to mention one: VPC, ECS

Many AWS services and their usage.

VPC EC2 Containers cloudfront cloudwatch

It was good learning experience.

Basic of AWS

Handons experience of some of the AWS services.

Basics of AWS
Enablement and hands-on on various Cloud Services.

Overview of some new services.

Basics were discussed is detail which is foundation for for
advanced learning and clarification of the concepts.