$15,000,000 lien for sale for crimes admitted to herein

Liens are against

East Side Marios Waterdown Ontario
The Willowgrove Residence LTC Ancaster Ontario
Hillside Park Residence 35 Arkledun Avenue Hamilton Ontario
Ilona Skeba of 1303 Shaver Rd Ancaster, ON

COMMON LAW DISTRESS ON THIRD PARTIES

Based upon

NON-JUDICIAL COMMON LAW LIEN

and
CLAIM OF RIGHT
By Default
In the nature of a Distress Infinite1
1
One that has no bounds with regard to its quantity, and may be repeated from time to time, until the
stubbornness of the party is conquered. Such are distresses for fealty or suit of court, and for compelling
jurors to attend. . . . Black’s 4th Ed.

(I) NOTICE OF ADMISSIONS BY DEFAULT

IN THE MATTER OF: breach of trust, unjust enrichment, tort of deceit,

negligence, breach of duty of care, conspiracy to breach trust, conspiracy to unjustly
enrich, conspiracy to deceive, and, conspiracy to neglect.

Between:

Norris Barens
Claimant

and

Ilona Skeba, a.k.a. Lony Skeba

HILLSIDE PARK, A.K.A. CENTRAL PARK LODGE HAMILTON, and
THE WILLOWGROVE RESIDENCE ANCASTER jointly and severally.
Respondent(s)

“Ejus est non nolle, qui potest velle”

 (International Common Law/Equitable Estoppel)

IN PERSONAM and IN REM

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Private between the parties.

Let it be know that Ilona Skeba, a resident of Hamilton, in the province of Ontario, and a
Respondent in this matter, knowingly and willingly, jointly and severally, personally and
corporately, by her consent, has admitted by Common Law Default process to the
following:

1.) She is the daughter of Ivor Barens.

2.) She has committed breach of trust in this matter with regard to lack of
information and accuracy of information provided to the claimant regarding
my father’s estate.
3.) She has committed breach of trust in this matter with regard to the distribution
and liquidation of assets owned by my father and in his estate, and have done
such to the detriment of my brother Norris Barens.
4.) By her actions, admitted to herein, she has unjustly enriched herself.
5.) By her actions, admitted to herein, she has deceived the Claimant.
6.) By her actions, admitted to herein, she has breached her duty of care.
7.) By her actions, admitted to herein, she has conspired to breach a trust.
8.) By her actions, admitted to herein, she has conspired to unjustly enrich
herself.
9.) By her actions, admitted to herein, she has conspired to deceive the Claimant.
10.) By her action, admitted to herein, she has conspired to commit neglect.

(b.) Let it be known that HILLSIDE PARK, A.K.A. CENTRAL PARK LODGE
HAMILTON, of Hamilton, in the Province of Ontario, and a Respondent in this matter,
knowingly and willingly, jointly and severally, personally and corporately, by it’s
consent, has admitted to following:

1.) To have conspired to interfere with contact between the Claimant and his
father, Ivor Barns, to the detriment of the Claimant.
2.) To have obstructed justice by lying about not receiving a power of attorney
faxed to us.

(c.) Let it be known that THE WILLOWGROVE, of Ancaster, in the Province of

Ontario, and a Respondent in this matter, knowingly and willingly, jointly and severally,
personally and corporately, by it’s consent, has admitted to the following:
 Date of first service: ___________
Date of second service: ___________
Date of third service: ___________

With PREJUDICE/BONDED

Actual and Constructive Notice of Lis Pendens and Common Law Distress to all Parties.

3.) To have conspired to interfere with contact between the Claimant and his
father, Ivor Barns, to the detriment of the Claimant.

(II) OPPORTUNITY TO DENY and REMEDY

1.) Having been given ample opportunity to respond and seek remedy and resolution
in this matter with a point by point denial of the assertions/claims enumerated
herein in the form of a sworn affidavit with supporting exhibits attached. The
Respondent(s) and each of them, have failed to rebut any or all assertions/claims
of the Claimant.
2.) Having failed to respond in the time and manner provided for herein meansl
invocation of the Doctrine of Acquiescence, tacit consent, Doctrine of Necessity,
and is an admission by the Respondent(s) and each of them to, inter alia, the
claims of the Claimant and furthermore, and thus has admitted, judgment nihil
dicit, to the Claimant’s right to recover in commerce, in any jurisdiction, for
damages caused by the Respondent(s) and each of them, including, but not limited
to, penalties and costs as outlined herein or as may be determined by any
subsequent judicial proceeding.
3.) The Respondent(s) have failed to respond to the Claimants Claim, they are now
stipulations between the parties and furthermore, this instrument is now, inter
alia, a Bill of Exchange pursuant to the Bills of Exchange Act, R.S., c. B-5,
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE and UNCITRAL CONVENTION ON
INTERNATIONAL BILLS OF EXCHANGE AND INTERNATIONAL
PROMISSORY NOTES, 1988©, UNITED NATIONS.
4.) This document is actual and constructive notice of DEFAULT NOTICE, PUBLIC
NOTICE, DISTRESS ON A BANK, and/or a claim on bond(s)/insurance, and
such notice has now been given on an international basis all concerned third
parties, including, but not limited to the following:
a. Financial institutions, including:
i. Banks,
ii. Credit Unions,
iii. Merchant banks,
iv. Private lenders, and
v. Corporate lenders,
b. Credit reporting agencies,
c. Government licencing agencies,
 NOT A DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
NOT AN OFFERING

File Number: _____________________

Financial Institution: _____________________
d. Bonding agencies, and
e. Insurance companies.

(III) COMMERCIAL GRACE

The Respondent(s) have failed to respond to the Claimant’s Claim and is thus
now liable in the full amount of this claim.

“Necessitas inducit privilialegium quod jura privata”

(IV) NOTICE OF NON-JUDICIAL CLAIM IN PERSONAM and IN REM

1.) Failing to respond to the Claimant’s Claim in the time and manner prescribed has
been willful disregard and dishonour of the Claimant’s Claim commercial
instrument and the Claimant’s Claim, has resulted in perfection of a NON-
JUDICIAL COMMON LAW LIEN and CLAIM OF RIGHT, judgment by nihil
dicit, in favour of the Claimant and against the Respondent(s) and each of them,
and in each of their equity in all collateral described herein in the sum certain of
$15,000,000.00 (15 million dollars, Canadian currency or its equivalent) and all
presumptions have been made in favour of the Claimant and against the
Respondent(s) in the nature of equitable estoppel and Distress Infinite.

“Necissitas facit licitum quod alisas known set licitum”

(V) FINANCING STATEMENT

1.) The Claimant hereby lays claim to the Respondent’s and each of their assets as
recorded in this Financing Statement which covers all present and after acquired
personal and real property, including, but not limited to the following types of
collateral regardless of jurisdiction or situs:
a. all corporate and personal judgments,
b. all corporate and personal licences,

HOKE v. EDWARDS AND OTHERS, 46 N.C. 532 (1854) 2 S.E. 70 “Upon a default or a nihil dicit, on an action of debt, in a
Justice’s judgment, the plaintiff is entitled to a final judgment, at the time when the default is made, and need not execute an inquiry
S.E.C. Tracer: _____________________
MT No: _____________________
Sub. Code: _____________________
BOJNET: _____________________
a. all certificates(s), bonds and insurance,
b. all private and public trusts,
c. all bank accounts,
d. all credit union accounts,
e. all trust accounts,
f. all saving accounts,
g. all current accounts,
h. all personal property,
i. all real property,
j. all vehicles, including cars, trucks, vehicles, boats, aircraft,
k. all land, real estates and buildings,
l. all tools, jigs, fixtures, building structures, trailers, workshops,
m. all stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, plus assignments of same,
n. all personal signatures,
o. all tangible and intangible property,
p. all authorship rights,
q. all works of art,
r. all inventory,
s. all retirement accounts,
t. all interests in trust(s)2,
u. all inheritance, presently or after acquired,
v. all accounts receivable,
w. all works of art
x. all trademarks,
y. all copyright to works of art,
z. all intellectual property,
aa. all rights to intellectual property,
bb. all franchises,
cc. all franchise agreements, and
dd. all inheritance, present and after acquired,

until satisfaction and accord has been made by the Secured Party pursuant to the facts
asserted herein and the claims perfected herein.

(VI) APPLICABLE COMMERCIAL MAXIMS

1.) ‘A workman is worth of his hire’

before a jury.”
WESTON v. LUMBER CO., 162 N.C. 165 (1913) 77 S.E. 430 “It is, therefore, not necessary, says a great law writer on this
subject, that the judgment should have been awarded upon the decision of an issue, for where it is given for a want of a plea, which is
judgment by nihil dicit, or were it one by non sum informatus, or by confession, or by default, the conclusiveness of it is the same as if
the fact has been actually (203) contested by plea or traverse.”

2
Includes active and inactive, express, resulting and constructive.
 (Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II Tim 2:6. Legal Maxim: “It
is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their property.”).
2.) ‘All are equal under the law’
(God’s Law – Ethical and Natural Law, Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24: 17-21; Deut.
1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col, 3:25. Legal Maxims: “No one is
above the law.”; “Commerce, by the Law of Nations, ought to be common, and
not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.”).
3.) ‘In commerce truth is sovereign’
(Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117: Matt. 6:33; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal Maxim: “To lie
is to go against the mind.” Oriental proverb: “Of all that is good, sublimity is
supreme.”).
4.) ‘Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit’
(Levl. 5:4-5, 6:3-5; 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt 5:33; James 5:12).
5.) ‘An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce’
(1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”).
6.) ‘An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce’
(Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in a court, tribunal, or arbitration forum consists
of a contest, or ‘dual’, of commercial affidavits wherein the points remaining
unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the matters to which judgment of the
law is applied.).
7.) ‘A matter must be expressed to be resolved’
(Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal Maxim: “He who fails to assert his
rights has none.”).
8.) ‘He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default’
(Book of Job; Matt. 10:22. Legal Maxim: “He who does not repel a wrong when
he can, occasions it.”).
9.) ‘Sacrifice is the measure of credibility’
(One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear an oath that he consents
to claim against his commercial liability in the event that any of his statements or
actions is groundless or unlawful, has no basis to asset claim or charges and
forfeits all credibility and right to claim authority. Acts 7, life/death of Stephen,
Legal Maxim: “He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.”).
10.) ‘A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter-
affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or by payment’
(Gen. 2-3; Matt. 4; Revelatoin. Legal Maxim: “If the plaintiff does not prove his
case, the defendant is absolved.”).

(VIII) POUNDBREACH/FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE

Upon perfection, a Claim of Lien exists in and upon the property of the
Respondent(s) and each of them. However, if the Respondent(s) commit poundbreach by
a sale, transfer, or assignment of any encumbered property, commercial liability attaches
to a third party and said transfer/transaction is reversible, being by its nature, a
fraudulent/fictitious conveyance.
(IX) ASSIGNMENT/NEGOTIATION

Upon perfection, this instrument may be sold, assigned, negotiated, hypothecated,

pledge or otherwise, in any commercial transaction and in any jurisdiction.

(X) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

I, Norris Barens, of Surrey B.C. mailing address: Centrapoint P.O. Box 19594 Vancouver
B.C. V5T- 4E7, make oath and say as follows:

1. I am the Claimant herein and as such have personal knowledge of the facts
hereinafter deposed to, except where same are stated to be made upon
information, and where so stated I believe such matters to be true.
2. On, or about, (2008) I cause to be served a Non-Judicial Common Law Lien and
Claim of Right upon Norris Barens See attached Exhibit (A).
3. To date I have received no communication from any of the aforementioned
Respondents denying my claims.

Affiant Norris Barens