Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXVI (2002)

Francis Bacon and the Humanistic

Aspects of Modernity
ROSE-MARY SARGENT

F rancis Bacon was a complex thinker who combined the universal and
practical concerns of Renaissance Humanism with a thoroughly modern
emphasis on a progressive break with traditional learning. His writings covered a
broad spectrum of styles, from detailed analyses and commentaries to aphorisms,
tables, histories, essays, and fables, specifically designed to serve his general proj-
ect for advancing all areas of learning. Although there has been an occasional
resurgence of interest in Bacons thought, the last in the mid-twentieth century by
literary scholars, philosophers have most often settled for an overly simplistic
account of his work bordering on caricature. This unfortunate neglect of Bacon
has adversely affected our ability to understand his influence on the next gen-
eration of English philosophers, despite the fact that they were quite explicit
about their debt to him. Instead, numerous studies have been generated claiming
to have found the social, political, or continental influences on the philosophers
of Restoration England. More importantly, however, by dismissing Bacons
significance, philosophers have deprived themselves of an opportunity to study
the subtle ways in which Bacon displayed and sought to reconcile the tensions
between traditional values and progressive learning that became an inherent part
of modernity.
Superficial readings of Bacons individual works in isolation from his project
or his context have led to some familiar criticisms. Indeed, at one time or another
he has been accused of being responsible for generating most of the problems asso-
ciated with the modern world. Literary and social studies have included discus-
sions of his supposed advocacy of industrial capitalism, colonialism, imperialism,
gender inequality, and other forms of political power struggle. The philosophical
literature, on the other hand, tends to be preoccupied with a popular account of
his call for an unthinking domination of nature to be pursued by a hopelessly nave

124
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 125

inductive and anti-hypothetical methodology.1 The social criticisms of Bacon focus

on the New Atlantis, early manuscript material, and selected passages from the
New Organon and De Augmentis, while the philosophical criticisms are often
based solely on isolated aphorisms from the New Organon. Little attention has
been paid to how these works relate to each other and to his other works, particu-
larly to his natural histories.
Bacon would be better seen as a situated philosopher. He believed that his
method could be applied in a general way to all areas of learning, but he was
careful to note that the nature of things would have to be taken into account
when applied. This is why he gave many and diverse precepts in the doctrine of
Interpretation, which in some measure may modify the method of invention
according to the quality and condition of the subject of the inquiry (vol. 4, 112,
I: 127).2 Bacon engaged in some speculative philosophical systematizing early on,
remnants of which can be seen in his discussion of the forms and latent processes
of bodies in Book II of the New Organon. He evidently abandoned this type of
project, however, in order to work out the details of his method for directly inves-
tigating the particular natures of things.3 Unlike Descartes works that can in large
part be studied in isolation from his context because of the internal coherence
of his system, Bacons works lack such coherence. Thus, when compared with
the Cartesian ideal in Western philosophy, his works appear to be confused and
unsophisticated.4 Bacon was quite methodical in his approach, however, and he
actually had a sophisticated plan for the advancement of learning, but he believed
that it would be premature to construct systems of knowledge. It is, therefore, a
mistake to compare his work with that of Descartes.
Spanning the divide between the Renaissance and Modernity, Bacon agreed
with the Humanists emphasis on the need for practical experience of all kinds.
The experience he thus acquired uniquely informed his vision for a new philoso-
phy. He learned in what areas knowledge was lacking and how difficult it would
be to establish any truth with finality. Yet he also saw that the more truth one could
find, even if it were local or tentative, the more ability one would have to aid
humanity by regaining dominion over nature. There is a developmental transition
in Bacons thought. The more he worked on plans for a great instauration, the
more he came to see the dynamic and progressive aspects of his project. After

1. See, e.g., Farrington (1979), Martin (1992), Merchant (1980), Weinberger (1986), and
Whitney (1990) for some of the social and political theses. Popper (1968) is, of course, the best
known proponent of the twentieth-century philosophical critique of Bacons inductive method.
2. See as well De Augmentis, Bk. 6: the method used should be according to the subject-
matter which is handled (vol. 4, 4512) All references to Bacon are given in the text to volume
and page number of the Spedding, Ellis, Heath edition of his works. When a reference is from the
New Organon, Book and Aphorism number are also provided.
3. For Bacons early speculative philosophy, see Rees (1996). On Bacons forms and
processes, see Hesse (1968) and McMullin (1990).
4. Not all philosophical studies are critical of course. Horton (1973) and Urbach (1987), e.g.,
have attempted to show Bacons method as more in line with the twentieth century ideal of the
hypothetico-deductive method. Perez-Ramos (1988) and Vickers (1987, 1996) have also written
favorably of Bacons philosophy but have tried to place it more within the concerns and practices
of the late Renaissance.
126 Rose-Mary Sargent

twelve years of writing the New Organon, for example, he found it necessary to
publish it in an incomplete form, because, although he thought that his method
was relatively easy to explain, he had learned that it is hard to practice (vol.
4, 40). Most of Bacons works were published in an incomplete and tentative form.
He experimented with learning, with what methods would work in what areas, and
how best to communicate such information to his readers. His modernity, which
consisted in the call for a revolution in learning, was tempered not only by an
emphasis on practical experience, but also by the humanistic themes of charity and
fallibilism. The following discussion will focus primarily on how these humanistic
elements make questionable the numerous criticisms of his philosophy. The
charitable intent of Bacons project, for example, contrasts with the social
utilitarian characterization of Bacon as a prophet of the industrial revolution
of Western capitalism. In a like manner, Bacons fallible approach contrasts with
the philosophical portrayal of his method as a mechanical means that leads
unproblematically to certain knowledge.

BACONS HUMANISTIC PROJECT

Bacons parents were both accomplished Tudor humanists who ensured that their
sons, Francis and Anthony, were well educated in the classics, history, and rhetoric.
In Bacons early manuscripts and in parts of his later works, such as Book 1 of the
Advancement of Learning, one can find traces of his humanist education in his dis-
cussion of the wisdom of the ancients. In passages in the New Organon (I: 7173)
and the New Atlantis, one can also see his belief in the possible existence of
intellectually advanced, lost civilizations. As a lawyer and a statesman, Bacon was
deeply immersed in the political and social life of Tudor and Stuart England and,
as had the humanists before him, he appreciated the importance of knowledge in
these realms.5 He used his position to seek patronage first from Elizabeth I and
then from James I, arguing that the search for knowledge is not an activity to be
kept separate from the moral sphere. All of these elements came together when
Bacon compared James to Hermes Trimegistus, the legendary writer of alchemi-
cal and magical texts. In his dedication of the Advancement of Learning, he wrote
that James had the power and fortune of a king, the knowledge and illumination
of a priest, and the learning and universality of a philosopher (vol. 3, 263). In a
similar manner, in the Epistle Dedicatory to The Great Instauration, Bacon com-
bined his search for patronage with an appeal to ancient wisdom when he there
compared James to King Solomon and suggested that he should follow his
example in taking order for the collecting and perfecting of a natural and experi-
mental history. It was only by this means, Bacon maintained, that philosophy

5. For Bacons life, see Coquillette (1992), Jardine and Stewart (1998), Peltonen (1996), and
Pinnick (1998). The Humanist themes discussed in this section are based on those identified by
Toulmin (1990), Shapiro (1991), and Vickers (1968b, 1996). Shapiro, however, regards these
Humanist sentiments as being more influential during the generation after Bacon.
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 127

and the sciences may no longer float in air, but rest on the solid foundation of
experience of every kind (vol. 4, 12).
Bacon devoted part of his time to a defense of learning in general and con-
tributed to the attempted compilation of all known learning that was part of
the encyclopedic project begun by the Renaissance humanists. In Book I of the
Advancement of Learning, he argued first for its excellence in response to criti-
cisms primarily of humanistic learning from the political, social, and religious
spheres. Within his defense he provided numerous examples drawn from history
that displayed the broad range and depth of his own learning. After a lengthy dedi-
cation to James I, Book II began with Bacons more practical advice about how
to advance learning, on which he would elaborate in much more detail in Books
IIIX of De Augmentis. Bacon sought to make a general and faithful perambu-
lation and survey of learning by cataloguing what he called its particular acts
and works (vol. 4, 290). In addition, however, he expanded the humanistic project
to include as well a discussion of what defects and undervalues I find in such par-
ticular acts (vol. 3, 264). As Bacon saw it, the works or acts which pertain to the
advancement of learning are conversant about three objects; the places of learn-
ing, the books of learning, and the persons of the learned (vol. 4, 284). Among
the defects he noted that there was not any public designation of fit men either
to write or to make inquiry concerning such parts of knowledge as have not been
sufficiently labored. Therefore, a review ought to be made of the sciences, and
account be taken what parts of them are right and well advanced, and what poor
and destitute (vol. 4, 290). In the preface to The Great Instauration he echoed
these sentiments in his discussion of the first part of his six-part plan designed
to lay out the divisions of the sciences concerning not only things already
invented and known, but likewise things omitted which ought to be there (vol. 4,
2223).
Given discussions in the secondary literature about Bacons rejection of
metaphorical language in the sciences, it might be surprising to some that he
approved of rhetoric and poetry as legitimate parts of knowledge in both the
Advancement of Learning and De Augmentis. In Book II, Bacon described poesy
as the joining at pleasure things which in nature would never have come together
and noted that this is the work of the imagination (vol. 4, 292). He was not speak-
ing of poetry as a particular style of speech (that he covered in Book VI), but as
any style that had feigned history as its subject matter (vol. 4, 315). In this sense,
poetry could be divided into Narrative, Dramatic, and Parabolical forms all of
which composed for Bacon the second principal part of learning (vol. 4, 314).
Narrative poetry was that which employed mere imitation, whereas Dramatic
made visible actions as if they were present, and Parabolical was that with
sacred or allegorical content (vol. 4, 316). At the end of his discussion of these
types, Bacon provided the reader with three lengthy examples of the Parabolical,
as philosophy according to the Fables of the Ancients, using the Fable of Pan for
natural philosophy, the story of Perseus for politics, and the fable of Dionysus for
moral philosophy (vol. 4, 318335). Poetry could be an effective way to excite
curiosity about questions concerning nature or to instill moral precepts and social
128 Rose-Mary Sargent

norms. Because poetry is an area of feigned history, however, it clearly would

not be appropriate for the construction of natural histories. But then neither was
the traditional logic taught at the schools.6
Bacon shared the humanists critical attitude toward the scholastic focus on
logical and dialectical manipulation. In the preface to The Great Instauration, he
argued that syllogisms only served to overcome an opponent in argument. His
new logic was designed instead to command nature in action (vol. 4, 24). Bacon
argued that the subtlety of nature is greater many times over than the subtlety
of the senses and understanding; so that all those specious meditations, specula-
tions, and glosses in which men indulge are quite from the purpose. The logic
which we now have is no help to us in finding out new sciences, because it
serves rather to fix and give stability to the errors which have their foundation
in commonly received notions than to help the search after truth. Thus, the
syllogism is no match for the subtlety of nature. Although it commands assent
to the proposition, it does not take hold of the thing (vol. 4, 4849, I: 1013).
Syllogisms are made of propositions, propositions consist of words, words are
symbols of notions. Therefore if the notions themselves (which is the root of the
matter) are confused and over-hastily abstracted from the facts, there can be no
firmness in the superstructure (vol. 4, 49, I: 14). Because the logic of his day
depended upon such notions, Bacon maintained that vicious demonstrations are
as the strongholds and defences of Idols; and those we have in logic do little else
than make the world the bond-slave of human thought, and human thought the
bond-slave of words (vol. 4, 70, I: 69).
Syllogisms also yield propositions that are barren of works, remote from
practice, and altogether unavailable for the active department of the sciences (vol.
4, 24).7 As Bacon noted, logical invention does not discover principles and chief
axioms, of which arts are composed, but only such things as appear to be consis-
tent with them (vol. 4, 8081, I: 82). In a highly critical statement he declared, if
the truth must be spoken, when the rational and dogmatical sciences began the
discovery of useful works came to an end (vol. 4, 83, I: 85). In the preface to The
Great Instauration, he wrote of his hope to establish forever the true and lawful
marriage of the rational and the empirical faculty, the separation of which has
thrown into confusion all the affairs of the human family. To accomplish this, he
fervently prayed to God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost,
that they will vouchsafe through my hand to endow the human family with new
mercies. It was the duty of natural philosophers to cultivate truth in charity
(vol. 4, 20).
The power or utility of which Bacon spoke is often interpreted as
modern utilitarianism, but Bacons notion was much closer to the Humanist ideal
of the improvement of the moral and social worlds. Bacon criticized scholasticism

6. In opposition to the emphasis upon dialectic presented by Jardine (1974), Vickers (1996)
argues that Bacon saw the rationality of rhetoric as well. See also Briggs (1989) on Bacons use
of rhetoric and his innovative traditionalism.
7. See Perez-Ramos (1988), Sargent (1999), and Vickers (1987) for Bacons emphasis on
Christian charity and ethical responsibility.
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 129

because he saw it as a useless and barren philosophy full of abstract terms that
had no bearing on the moral life of the individual or the conduct of society. Just
as Bacon appropriated the encyclopedic impulse and used it for new purposes, so
he sought to extend the concerns of morality and the promotion of an active life
into the sphere of natural philosophy. He urged his readers to join in consulta-
tion for the common good (vol. 4, 21). At the end of his preface to The Great
Instauration, Bacon added a general admonition to all; that they consider what
are the true ends of knowledge, and that they seek it not either for pleasure of the
mind, or for contention, or for superiority to others, or for profit, or fame, or power,
or any of these inferior things; but for the benefit and use of life; and that they
perfect and govern it in charity (vol. 4, 2021).
Bacons desire to produce charitable works through advancements in natural
philosophy went far beyond the merely expedient. He opposed the mechanics who
sought the empirical and operative only, and he criticized previous industry in
experimenting that had begun with proposing to itself certain definite works to
be accomplished and then pursued them with premature and unseasonable
eagerness (vol. 4, 17). Rather, one should begin with experiments of light and
first endeavour to discover true causes and axioms . . . for axioms rightly dis-
covered and established supply practice with its instruments, not one by one, but
in clusters and draw after them trains and troops of works (vol. 4, 110, I: 70). As
Bacon explained, Human knowledge and human power meet in one, for where
the cause is not known the effect cannot be produced. Nature to be commanded
must be obeyed, and that which in contemplation is as the cause is in operation
as the rule (vol. 4, 47, I: 3). It was a sign that one had truly discovered the causes
operative in a particular process if one were able to manipulate them to produce
a desired effect. Therefore, in addition to the charitable intent of utility, it also had
an epistemic aspect: works themselves are of greater value as pledges of truth
than as contributing to the comforts of life (vol. 4, 110, I: 124).
Works, as tests of knowledge, are required because of the fallible nature of
human reason. As Bacon often reminded his readers, the human understanding
is no dry light, but receives an infusion from the will and affections (vol. 4, 57, I:
49). Indeed, the universe to the eye of human understanding is framed like a
labyrinth; presenting as it does on every side so many ambiguities of way, such
deceitful resemblances of objects and signs, natures so irregular in their lines and
so knotted and entangled (vol. 4, 18). Bacon would later maintain that by far the
greatest hindrance and aberrations of the human understanding proceeds from the
dullness, incompetency, and deceptions of the senses (vol. 4, 58, I: 50). Reason and
the senses may both fail us and thus experiments are needed as sponsors and
sureties for the truth of philosophies (vol. 4, 73, I: 73). The fruits and works that
Bacon sought can provide the necessary constraints on our senses and reason.With
the production of works, the sense decides touching the experiment only, and the
experiment decides touching the point in nature and the thing itself (vol. 4, 58, I:
50). Bacon began with the goal of certainty. As late as The Great Instauration, he
would sometimes write of induction as a process that could lead to an inevitable
conclusion (vol. 4, 25). He was cautious, however, about how soon one could
expect the completion of the project.
130 Rose-Mary Sargent

Bacons fallibilism, derived partly from Humanist influences and partly from
his own experience, led him to a probabilistic stance toward knowledge.8 Inquiry
was in a constant state of development and thus knowledge acquisition would
require a dynamic and tentative process. In the preface to the New Organon,
Bacon proposed to establish progressive stages of certainty (vol. 4, 40). At the
end of Book I, he noted that it was now time for me to propound the art itself
of interpreting nature; in which, although I conceive that I have given true and
most useful precepts, yet I do not say either that it is absolutely necessary (as if
nothing could be done without it) or that it is perfect. Then, he added, It is true
however that by my precepts everything will be in more readiness and much more
sure (vol. 4, 115, I: 130). He did not pretend to provide a final theory. He was only
sowing . . . for future ages the seeds of a purer truth and performing my part
towards the commencement of the great undertaking (vol. 4, 104, I: 116). The
Organon could do the work, it was the right method, but it had to be applied dif-
ferently to different cases. Even the method itself was not immune to amendment.
It could require future alteration because the art of discovery may advance as
discoveries advance (vol. 4, 115, I: 130).
The New Organon was only part two of a six-part plan for The Great Instau-
ration. After the encyclopedic compilation of part one and the method of part two,
came part three that was intended to provide the natural histories to serve as the
material upon which the method would work. As Bacon described this part, the
object of the natural history which I propose is not so much to delight with variety
of matter or to help with present use of experiments, as to give light to the
discovery of causes and supply a suckling philosophy with its first food (vol. 4,
2829). The fourth part, the Ladder of the Intellect, was to provide examples
of the application of the principles of the new method that could be used as
models for those who followed (vol. 4, 31). The fifth part, concerning
Anticipations, was to provide speculations before certain conclusions, in
order to establish provisionally certain degrees of assurance, for use and relief
until the mind shall arrive at a knowledge of causes in which it can rest (vol. 4,
32). Finally, the sixth part was to be devoted to the new philosophy. Bacon
noted that the completion, however, of this part is a thing both above my strength
and beyond my hopes (vol. 4, 32). After his retirement from public life, Bacon
spent his time composing natural histories on particular subjects and compiling
masses of observations in his Sylva Sylvarum to contribute to the third and fourth
parts of his great instauration. It was his experience with this project that led
him to see even more clearly the tremendous amount of effort that his project
would require.
At the end of his life, he wrote the incomplete and curious fable of New
Atlantis about a utopian society governed by a scientific elite that was somewhat

8. Shapiro (1991) recognized that practical experience and probabilism are humanistic
themes, but she traced the development of these at mid-seventeenth century England to the influ-
ence of Continental thinkers, such as Gassendi and Mersenne. See Briggs (1989), Gilbert (1960),
Perez-Ramos (1988), Sargent (1989, 1999), and Vickers (1968a) for how Bacon had earlier incor-
porated these elements within his philosophy.
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 131

at odds with his earlier call for a more democratic process of investigation. Bacon
introduced the readers to details about the islands scientific institution, Solomons
House, by telling of the elaborate arrival of one of the fathers of the house to the
city in which the shipwrecked sailors were staying. The father agreed to a meeting
with the narrator of the story and explained to him the purpose for which they
worked: The End of our Foundation is the knowledge of Causes, and secret
motions of things; and the enlarging of the bounds of Human Empire, to the effect-
ing of all things possible (vol. 3, 156). The remainder of the fathers narration is
devoted to detailed descriptions of the laboratories, gardens, instruments, and
workers who were actively engaged in the continuing process of the discovery and
application of new knowledge. He told, for example, of parks of animals kept for
dissections and trials that thereby we may take light what may be wrought upon
the body of man (vol. 3, 159). Among the workers he described were Merchants
of Light who traveled in secret to other lands to gather information about their
current states of learning (vol. 3, 164). Among the other fellows of Solomons
House were experimenters, compilers, and interpreters, such as the Miners who
try new experiments of their own devising (vol. 3, 164). Bacons description of
this society mirrors well his vision for a continuous process of discovery and inven-
tion designed for charitable goals. The islanders had many innovations and seem-
ingly miraculous discoveries, but this was not a closed society where everything
had been accomplished.9

BACON AND MODERNITY

Although Bacon was heavily influenced by the Humanists, he was involved in more
than the rebirth of letters that marked the Renaissance. To all of the elements dis-
cussed above, from the encyclopedic and charitable projects to the recognition of
the fallibility of human reason and the need for practical experience, Bacon gave
a distinctive twist by extending the range of their application. In a modern manner,
he sought not merely to advance but to revolutionize the process of learning by
turning away from the traditions of antiquity. Party zeal and emulation are at an
end, he proclaimed (vol. 4, 41). In their place was to be the progressive compila-
tion of new discoveries.
Bacon knew the ancient texts well, but he rejected appeals to their author-
ity because he saw this as anti-progressive. Men have been kept back as by a kind
of enchantment from progress in the sciences by reverence for antiquity, by the
authority of men accounted great in philosophy, and then by general consent (vol.
4, 8182, I: 84). He maintained that his thoughts and suggestions were quite new;
totally new in their very kind: and yet they are copied from a very ancient model;

9. Whitney (1990), e.g., sees the merchants of light as indicative of imperialistic and
colonizing elements within the story. But these explorers were employed only for the discovery
of knowledge from less advanced civilizations and were not charged with plundering or in any
way altering the countries that they visited. There is also an implicit criticism of imperialism
in the story. The island of Bensalem was described as the only ancient civilization to survive
because it was a peaceful realm, unlike the other more warlike lost civilizations of the ancient
Americas.
132 Rose-Mary Sargent

even the world itself and the nature of things and of the mind (vol. 4, 11). Like
others of the early modern era, Bacon was most impressed by the discovery of
new worlds and the benefits that society had derived from such technical inven-
tions as the compass, printing press, gunpowder, and the manufacture of silk (vol.
4, 18, 99100, I: 109, 110). As indicated most perspicuously by the titles that he
chose for his works, he sought to employ new methods for new ends in order that
humanity would be endowed with even more new discoveries and powers (vol.
4, 79, I: 81).
Bacon was clearly modern in his desire for progress, yet he was opposed to
the strain in modernity that Toulmin has called the narrowing of rationality
the idea that all rationality is reducible to deductive logic and that it can be applied
in all areas indiscriminately.10 The modernity expressed in the systematic style of
Descartes philosophy, for example, would be more akin to what Bacon in his day
saw as the most ordinary method by which a person to discover something first
seeks out and sets before him all that has been said about it by others; then
he begins to meditate for himself; so by much agitation and working of the wit
solicits and as it were evokes his own spirit to give him oracles (vol. 4, 80, I: 82).
Bacons criticisms of philosophical systematizing were mainly aimed at the
Aristotelians, although his criticisms would apply to the style that Descartes would
later develop. In particular Bacon argued that method of discovery and proof
according to which the most general principles are first established and then inter-
mediate axioms are tried and proved by them, is the parent of error and the curse
of all science (vol. 4, 70, I: 69). As he wrote: the Rational School of philosophers
snatches from experience a variety of common instances, neither duly ascertained
nor diligently examined and weighed, and leaves all the rest to meditation and
agitation of wit (vol. 4, 6364, I: 62).
Bacon had no entire or universal theory to propound and he was opposed
to those who did (vol. 4, 104, I: 116). Systems were as stage plays (vol. 4, 55, I:
44). These play books of philosophical systems (vol. 4, 62, I: 61) were nothing
more than Idols of the mind, specifically Idols of the Theatre, because they were
like the stories invented for the stage that are more compact and elegant, and
more as one would wish them to be, than true stories out of history (vol. 4, 63, I:
62). Systems inhibit the progress of learning because their creators set them forth
with such ambition and parade, and bring them into the view of the world so
fashioned and masked, as if they were complete in all parts and finished (vol. 4,
85, I: 86). Bacon chose instead to follow more ancient seekers after truth who
put what they had learned into aphorisms, that is, into short and scattered sen-
tences, not linked together by an artificial method, and did not pretend or profess
to embrace the entire art (I: 86). In De Augmentis, Bacon returned to this theme
stating his opposition to methods as a means of transmission. Methodical deliv-
ery is fit to win consent or belief, but of little use to give directions for practice
(vol. 4, 451). Instead, he favored aphorisms that as only portions and as it were

10. Toulmin (1990), p. 20. Others have either tried to make Bacon fit this mold or have
criticized him for failing to do so. See, e.g., Campbell (1986), Hattaway (1978), Jardine (1990),
and Whitney (1986).
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 133

fragments of knowledge, invite others to contribute and add something in their

turn; whereas methodical delivery carrying the show of a total makes men care-
less, as if they were already at the end (vol. 4, 451).
Most of the works discussed above were programmatic works wherein
Bacon set out his method for pursuing his project and his hopes about the bene-
fits that would accrue from the results achieved. As mentioned briefly, however,
he also produced detailed natural histories in order to provide models for his
method and the material upon which his method would work. His natural histo-
ries were not to be compiled simply as a repertoire of an empirical knowledge of
particulars for curiosity or entertainment value. Rather they were to be carefully
compiled in such a way as to aid in the discovery of causes. Ever mindful of the
dynamic and progressive nature of his enterprise, however, Bacon tried to leave
his histories open-ended so that others could make additions or corrections to
them. In a preliminary manner in Book II of the New Organon, he gave some
examples of compiling tables where one would ask questions of nature in a
particular manner. He also included there a lengthy discussion of twenty-seven
prerogative instances that provided numerous examples of how to construct
testing situations when pursuing inquiry (see, e.g., the Instance of the Fingerpost,
II: 36).
In the Parasceve or Preparative towards a Natural and Experimental History,
appended to the New Organon, Bacon gave more practical advice concerning part
three of his great plan. In ten aphorisms on how to compose natural history, he
maintained that materials should be collected that are useful for philosophy, that
sources should be provided for the information, and that all observations should
be set down as completely and quantitatively as possible. But this was not meant
to be the rather mindless objective collection of singular facts that has often
been described. Bacon noted in his rules for writing that one should include five
things that will make the history fitter and more convenient for the work of the
interpreter (vol. 4, 261). He began by suggesting that questions (I do not mean
as to the causes but as to the fact) should be added, in order to provoke and stim-
ulate further inquiry (vol. 4, 261). Secondly, he noted that in any new and more
subtle experiment the manner in which the experiment was conducted should be
added, that men may be free to judge for themselves whether the information
obtained from that experiment be trustworthy or fallacious, and also that mens
industry may be roused to discover, if possible, methods more exact (vol. 4, 261).
Thirdly, he noted that it would be useful to include remarks on whether there is
anything doubtful or questionable in the reports (vol. 4, 261). Fourthly, it would
not be amiss to intersperse observations occasionally (vol. 4, 261). Finally, one
should give a brief review of currently received opinions that they may touch
and rouse the intellect, and no more (vol. 4, 262).
In 1622, after he retired from public life, Bacon published his first full-scale
natural history, The History of the Winds, that would fulfill a portion of part four
of the great instauration, the ladder of the intellect, by serving as a model for
others to follow. In the preface to this work, he admonished his readers to put
aside reverence for the authority of philosophers and instead to have reverence
for the works of the creator and to seek useful knowledge by direct investigations
134 Rose-Mary Sargent

of nature. He acknowledged that although there was much left to be perfected in

the New Organon, he had turned his attention to natural histories because they
provide the material on which his logic is to work and he thought it best to make
a start so that others may know how to make a contribution to this part of his
project (vol. 5, 133). As he said, even if the Organon were complete, it would
not without the Natural History much advance the Instauration of the Sciences
(vol. 5, 134). Therefore, he thought it better and wiser by all means and above all
things to apply myself to this work (vol. 5, 134).
Between the preface and the history proper, Bacon inserted a Rule more
exact and more succinct than that of the Parasceve on how to write such histo-
ries (vol. 5, 13536).11 Bacon suggested that writers of natural histories first need
to pose questions concerning the subject matter handled and then provide a
detailed account of the experiments performed. Interspersed throughout the
histories, Bacon noted that one should include injunctions, methodological ex-
planations, admonitions and cautions, observations, speculations, and reminders
concerning practice. He explained that the methods followed had to be carefully
described for there may be a mistake, and it may stimulate others to devise better
and more exact methods (vol. 5, 136). The admonitions and cautions concerning
the fallacies of things, and the errors and scruples which may occur in inquiry and
discovery were also required so as to exorcise as much as possible all delusions
and false appearances (vol. 5, 136). Speculations that are rudiments of inter-
pretation concerning causes were to be introduced sparingly, and rather as
suggesting what the cause may be than defining what it is as things useful, if
not altogether true (vol. 5, 136).
Bacon followed this rule in the histories that he wrote. In The History of
Dense and Rare, for example, he began with an introduction that contained a dis-
cussion about the importance of studying the quantity and proportions of matter
and how they are distributed in bodies. He acknowledged the general principle
that the sum total of matter remains always the same but added that this sum
of matter is variously distributed among different bodies cannot be doubted (vol.
5, 33940). The history itself began with a table of the comparative weights of
various bodies enclosed within the same space followed by a discussion of how he
set up the experimental situation for collecting the data provided in the table (vol.
5, 34143). He then provided four admonitions concerning the experimental set
up. Among these were his remarks on how the smallness of the vessel employed
for weighing the materials was not favorable for verifying the exact proportions
and that he had only been able to include weights for such bodies as could con-
veniently be made to fill up the space or measure (vol. 5, 343). This discussion
was followed by seven observations on the experiment that explored its signifi-
cance, such that it provided information that contradicted the opinion of Aristo-
tle (vol. 5, 34447). Interspersed within these observations were injunctions such
as suggestions for future areas of inquiry, and Reminders concerning Practice
including his conclusion from the data that the transmutation of metals into gold,
is to be much doubted of (vol. 5, 346).

11. See Sargent (1999) for discussions of, and selections from, these historical works.
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 135

The most popular work by Bacon during the seventeenth century was his
Sylva Sylvarum, a massive compilation of observations, published shortly after his
death by his chaplain William Rawley (vol. 2, 339680). Composed of ten cen-
turies, Bacon grouped together according to topic a total of 1,000 observations, a
number of which were taken from the works of others such as Aristotle, Pliny, and
Porta. Although the Sylva Sylvarum in this respect resembles the compilations of
learning that Bacon put together in Books IIIX of De Augmentis, it was intended
as a model for how to write natural histories and thus was also a contribution to
part four of The Great Instauration. In addition, the observations of others that
were included here were stripped of what Bacon found to be the speculative and
erroneous explanations of the original authors and supplied with his own alter-
native interpretations. He also included methodological comments concerning
problems with interpreting experiments and advocated the idea of reporting
experiments in consortgrouping together experiments that have similar
import so that they might shed light on each other.
As he had hoped, Bacons two types of histories, as well as the method-
ological advice of his New Organon, served as a model for the next generation of
natural philosophers in England. His influence can be seen in the work of one of
his most famous followers, Robert Boyle. Among Boyles early manuscripts are
many loose sheets and notebooks filled with observations compiled for the
purpose of continuing Bacons Sylva Sylvarum.12 Boyle also frequently followed
Bacons example by grouping experiments together under the explicit heading of
experiments in consort in published works, such as his History of Colours and
Experimenta et observationes physicae.13 Most significantly, in Boyles first major
scientific work, his New Experiments Physico-Mechanical Touching the Spring of
the Air, he followed Bacons pattern for a natural and experimental history almost
to the letter. He began with a brief discussion of the importance of studying the
air. He followed this with a detailed description of the air pump together with
experiments that concerned its construction and the phenomena that it exhibited.
He then proceeded in an orderly progression to those experiments performed in
order to prove the weight of the air. In his well-known, but frequently misunder-
stood, digressions, Boyle provided numerous observations and admonitions con-
cerning the functioning of his air pump and tentative speculations concerning the
causes responsible for the effects produced in order to excite the curiosity of his
readers and thus involve them in the experimental project.14

12. Boyle (1772/1965), vol. 1, 305. See Sargent (1995), ch. 6 for more detailed discussion of this
manuscript material. See Sargent (1986, 1989) for more information on Bacons influence on
Boyle.
13. Ibid., vol. 1. Part 2 of Colours (pp. 70824) has fifteen experiments in consort on black and
white that were designed to show how the texture of bodies is responsible for the different capac-
ities that they have for absorbing or reflecting light. Part 3 (pp. 72488) contains fifty numbered
experiments along with numerous annotations concerning the production of all other colors. In
Boyles last work, Experimenta et observationes physicae, he explicitly discussed the role of experi-
ments in consort once again and described them as those wherein divers experiments and obser-
vations, all of them relating to the same subject or purpose, are set down together (vol. 5, 567).
14. Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 1117. See Sargent (1995), ch. 78, for more detail on Boyles practices
of experimenting and writing up experimental reports.
136 Rose-Mary Sargent

CONCLUSION

Having a more nuanced and sophisticated understanding of Bacons philosophy

can help us understand the next generation of English philosophers. Of course, the
works of other natural philosophers, such as Galileo, Pascal, and Descartes, were
influential by then as well, but Bacon was considered by some as their primary
source and model for natural philosophy. Yet instead of taking Boyle at his word
when he wrote about continuing Bacons project, for example, historians have
often gone to great lengths to deny Bacons import. This is unfortunate for a
number of reasons. First, it hampers our understanding of how the themes of
charity, morality, social obligation, political responsibility, and modesty all played
a role in the rhetorical approach taken by natural philosophers of Restoration
England and how these themes were not unique to this time but were tied,
via Bacon, to the humanist tradition. Secondly, when looking for continental
counterparts, the ones normally seen as influential are those that followed a strict
empiricist epistemology that then tends to be attributed to philosophers like Boyle
despite the fact that he speculated freely concerning unobservable causal
processes. This flawed epistemological picture is often then read further back into
Bacons philosophy as well and subsequently gives rise to the erroneous idea of a
generalized program of English empiricism. Finally, the failure to recognize
Bacons influence leads to a lack of appreciation for the import of Boyles diffi-
dence and his many theoretical and methodological digressions. The experi-
mental method and its so-called literary technology can be better understood not
as addressing particular concerns of Restoration England but as part of Bacons
project for knowledge acquisition through a dynamic process of discovery.15
Bacon was a revolutionary and progressive thinker who made significant
contributions to the development of modern experimental science and its philos-
ophy. Indeed, writing in 1733, Voltaire went so far as to describe Bacon as the
father of experimental philosophy. He went on to maintain that In a word,
nobody before Chancellor Bacon had understood experimental philosophy; and
of all the physical experiments that have been made since his time, hardly one was
not suggested in his book. However, he also noted that Bacons New Organon,
which was the best of his works, had also become the most useless. It was the
scaffolding by which the new philosophy has been built; and when that edifice had
been erected at least in part, the scaffolding was no longer of any use.16 Bacons
experimental works were to be eclipsed by later generations. There was a renewed
interest in his philosophical and methodological works in the nineteenth century,

15. Shapin and Schaffer (1985) discuss the notion of literary technology as being fashioned
by Boyle in order to enhance virtual witnessing and thus lend legitimacy to the experimental
program. They maintain that Although Boyles inspiration may, plausibly, have been Baconian,
the influence of Bacon is sometimes exaggerated . . . It is useful to remember that it was Boyle,
not Bacon, who developed the literary forms for an actual programme of systematic experimen-
tation; it is hard to imagine two more different forms than Bacons aphorisms and Boyles experi-
mental narratives (p. 63, n. 85). I would respond that it is useful to know that Bacon wrote more
works than the New Organon.
16. Voltaire (1773/1961), pp. 479.
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 137

but in that post-Humean context Bacon came to be seen by philosophers such as

Mill and Reid as little more than a strict empiricist and anti-hypothetical induc-
tivist. Such interpretation would in turn lead to Poppers severe criticisms of
Bacons naivet in the twentieth century and Bacons subsequent frequent dis-
missal by philosophers in general.17
In addition to a more nuanced understanding of historical development,
however, Bacons works can provide a valuable philosophical resource for issues
today. Because of Bacons myriad interests and his attempt to design a progres-
sive approach to learning in all areas, there are numerous tensions in the complete
body of his works.18 He sought the dual goals of knowledge and power, for
example, but often these goals appear to be in conflict. He called for a rather demo-
cratic approach to inquiry, yet he recognized that as knowledge progressed, a hier-
archical division of labor would also be required. In a similar manner, while he
advocated the free communication of information among all investigators in all
countries, he also acknowledged that in some cases secrecy would be appropriate.
In part, these and other tensions are the result of Bacons eschewal of philosophi-
cal systematizing that, in turn, reflects the humanistic influence on his thought. As
modern science and its narrative developed in the nineteenth and twentieth cen-
turies, the earlier humanistic elements were lost and forgotten. By the end of the
twentieth century, modern science and modern philosophy were severely criticized
from a number of perspectives for their presumed autonomy from the influences
of the social world. Paradoxically, perhaps, one way to respond to such challenges
is through a more careful study of Bacons modernity. Because of the mitigating
influence of humanism seen, for example, in his charitable impulse and fallible
approach, a retrieval of his works can help to point to ways in which to reconcile,
without necessarily resolving, the tensions inherent in modernity.

REFERENCES

Bacon, F. 185774. The Works of Francis Bacon. 14 vols. James Spedding, Robert L. Ellis, and
Douglas D. Heath, eds. London: Longman and Co.
Boyle, R. 1772/1965. The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle. 6 vols. Thomas Birch, ed. Reprint:
Hildesheim, Germany: Georg Olms.
Briggs, J. C. 1989. Francis Bacon and the Rhetoric of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Campbell, J. A. 1986. Scientific Revolution and the Grammar of Culture: The Case of Darwins
Origin. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 72:35176.
Coquillette, D. R. 1992. Francis Bacon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Farrington, B. 1979. Francis Bacon: Philosopher of Industrial Science. New York: Henry Schuman.
Gilbert, N. 1960. Renaissance Concepts of Method. New York: Columbia University Press.

17. See Sargent (1999) for more detail on the historical reception of Bacons philosophy in
the nineteenth century. The nineteenth-century interpretations became a part of the lore of the
twentieth century. See, e.g., Campbell (1986) who describes how Reid out-Baconed Bacon in his
polemic against hypotheses (p. 356). It would be closer to the mark to say that Reid transformed
Bacons precepts to fit his own purposes.
18. These and similar tensions are discussed more fully in McMullin (1985), Peltonen (1992),
Sargent (1996), and Whitney (1986).
138 Rose-Mary Sargent

Hattaway, M. 1978. Bacon and Knowledge Broken: Limits for Scientific Method. Journal of the
History of Ideas 39:18397.
Hesse, M. 1968. Francis Bacons Philosophy of Science. In Essential Articles for the Study of
Francis Bacon. Brian Vickers, ed. Hamden, CT: Archon Press, pp. 11539.
Horton, M. 1973. In Defence of Francis Bacon. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
4:24178.
Jardine, L. 1974. Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Jardine, L. 1990. Experientia Literata or Novum Organum? The Dilemma of Bacons Scientific
Method. In Francis Bacons Legacy of Texts. William A. Sessions, ed. New York: AMS Press,
pp. 4767.
Jardine, L. and A. Stewart. 1998. Hostage to Fortune: The Troubled Life of Francis Bacon. London:
Gollancz.
Martin, J. 1992. Francis Bacon, the State and the Reform of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
McMullin, E. 1985. Openness and Secrecy in Science: Some Notes on Early History. Science,
Technology, and Human Values 10:1423.
McMullin, E. 1990. Conceptions of Science in the Scientific Revolution. In Reappraisals of the
Scientific Revolution. David C. Lindberg and Robert S. Westman, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 2792.
Merchant, C. 1980. The Death of Nature. New York: Harper and Row.
Peltonen, M. 1992. Politics and Science: Francis Bacon and the True Greatness of States. The
Historical Journal 35:279305.
Peltonen, M., ed. 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Perez-Ramos, A. 1988. Francis Bacons Idea of Science and the Makers Knowledge Tradition.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pinnick, C. L. 1998. Francis Bacon: A Sure Plan. Metascience 7:51523.
Popper, K. R. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
Rees, G. 1996.Bacons Speculative Philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Markku
Peltonen, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12145.
Sargent, R.-M. 1986. Robert Boyles Baconian Inheritance: A Response to Laudans Cartesian
Thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17:46986.
Sargent, R.-M. 1989. Scientific Experiment and Legal Expertise: The Way of Experience in
Seventeenth-Century England. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20:1945.
Sargent, R.-M. 1995. The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sargent, R.-M. 1996. Bacon as an Advocate for Cooperative Scientific Research. In The Cam-
bridge Companion to Bacon. Markku Peltonen, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
pp. 14671.
Sargent, R.-M. 1999. General Introduction. In Francis Bacon, Selected Philosophical Works.
Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. vixxxvi.
Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Shapiro, B. 1991. Early Modern Intellectual Life: Humanism, Religion and Science in
Seventeenth-Century England. History of Science 29:4571.
Toulmin, S. 1990. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Urbach, P. 1987. Francis Bacons Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal. LaSalle,
IL: Open Court.
Vickers, B., ed. 1968a. Essential Articles for the Study of Francis Bacon. Hamden, CT: Archon
Books.
Vickers, B. 1968b. Francis Bacon and Renaissance Prose. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Vickers, B. 1987. English Science, Bacon to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity 139

Vickers, B. 1996. Bacon and Rhetoric. In The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Markku
Peltonen, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20031.
Voltaire. 1733/1961. Philosophical Letters. Ernest Delworth, trans. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Weinberger, J. 1986. Science and Rule in Bacons Utopia: An Introduction to the Reading of the
New Atlantis. American Political Science Review 70:86585.
Whitney, C. 1986. Francis Bacon and Modernity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Whitney, C. 1990. Merchants of Light: Science as Colonization in the New Atlantis. In Francis
Bacons Legacy of Texts. William A. Sessions, ed. New York: AMS Press, pp. 25568.