Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Incident Management:
ICCS PLUS
Images courtesy of:
Australian Capital Territory Police and photographer Ian Thorburn.
Australian Federal Police.
New South Wales Police Force
New Zealand Police
Northern Territory Police, Fire and Emergency Services.
Queensland Police Service
South Australia Police
2005 Victoria Police - Image Library Permission is explicitly denied for any reproduction, distribution, projection, manipulation, adaptation, alteration or use
of this image without the prior express written consent of the Victoria Police M&CC Image Library and, depending on use, payment of a fee or arrangement
thereof. This includes publishing in either print or electonic form, for commercial or non-commercial purposes.
Western Australia Police Public Affairs Branch.
ANZPAA 2012
Disclaimer
A Common Approach to Incident Management: ICCS Plus has been prepared for use in operational policing in Australia and may
not be relied upon for any other purpose. The information contained in the document relates to a common principles-based
framework. The document is not a substitute nor is intended to take precedence in relation to any legistation, policy, standard
protocols or procedures applying in any particular jurisdiction.
In 2011 the ANZPAA Board directed the The framework set out in this document
Agency to work with Deputy is based on the approach developed by
Commissioners in developing a the National Counter-Terrorism
common incident management Committee, known as the Incident
framework within which all Australian Command and Control System or
jurisdictions could work, and thereby ICCS, hence the title for this framework:
enhance the interoperability of police ICCS Plus.
staff working across jurisdictions.
The work of Deputy Commissioners
With the increasing number, complexity and staff throughout the police
and scale of incidents confronting police jurisdictions of Australia in finalising this
jurisdictions of Australia, having an framework for ANZPAA Board adoption
agreed incident management framework is gratefully acknowledged.
based on tried and tested principles
which can be applied in a wide range of
emergencies and other situations, will
help keep Australian communities safer.
The National Counter-Terrorism The framework is designed to support The ICCS Plus principles below provide
Committees Incident Command and the successful planning for, response to guidance on how to apply the framework.
Control System (NCTC-ICCS) is the and resolution of incidents, including Safety
national policing standard for dealing with emergencies, by providing comprehensive Operational safety is to be applied at all times.
terrorism incidents. standard processes to be applied by The ultimate aim is to safely manage all police
police and in working with other operations. Acting safely involves the
continuous assessment and control of risk as
Historically, police have incorporated the agencies, irrespective of the complexity, circumstances change.
concepts of the NCTC-ICCS into nature, size or scale of the incident. It is
broader incident management processes therefore consistent with an all hazards Taking Charge
in conjunction with individual State and approach. Taking charge is about actively taking
responsibility, exercising initiative and applying
Territory legislative provisions and leadership. It includes being proactive and
operational requirements. ICCS Plus can also be applied to responsive to changing or developing
planned operations and other known circumstances.
Police in Australia attend thousands of events. By applying this framework to Decision Making
incidents every day, from those requiring incident management there can be a In responding to incidents decisions are often
single-officer responses to those seamless transition from planned required in an environment of pressure and
requiring multi-agency and even multi- operations to emergency responses uncertainty, lack of information and before
jurisdictional operations. within the same event. comprehensive awareness can be achieved.
Delaying or avoiding a decision can lead to
additional or greater risks.
The latter responses invoke particular Although, there are differences between
responsibilities for police and Police ICCS Plus and the Australasian Inter- Communications
Commissioners under State and Territory Service Incident Management System All communications during an incident should
be timely, succinct and as far as possible in
laws and create a need for greater (AIIMS), in describing ICCS Plus plain language.
understanding and preparedness with applicable concepts and definitions in
respect to police incident management AIIMS have been adopted whereever Incident Action Plan
processes. possible. The resolution of an incident will require a
defined plan that clearly states the mission
and describes the strategies and tactics to be
Research into police roles in incident employed. The plan needs to be concise and
management has identified ten core clear to facilitate implementation.
elements. These have been expressed
Priority of Action
as functions with associated Activities need to be undertaken in order of
responsibilities that are essential to the priority and monitored. As circumstances
successful resolution of an incident. change, the order needs to be re-assessed
and where necessary, amended.
The ICCS Plus framework comprises Delegation
these ten functions as the foundation for Delegation is often necessary in order to
standardising incident management achieve resolution of an incident of any size.
practices within and across police Responsibility for undertaking a task can be
jurisdictions of Australia. delegated but not the accountability for it
being carried out.
These functions are intended to be Span of control
addressed as far as reasonable practical Span of control relates to the number of
groups, individuals or tasks that can be
in the circumstances.
successfully managed by one person and
operates as a way to avoid overwhelming any
one individual with too much responsibility.
Functional Management
Functional management involves managing
multiple responsibilities, tasks or resources by
grouping them into manageable, related
activity types.
The purpose of developing a common Incident Management While there are many similarities in these
approach to incident management Framework arrangements across jurisdictions there
across Australia for police is to: are differences in how incident,
including emergency, management is
Legal and Administrative
support nationally consistent applied. A list of relevant legislation and
Responding to and resolving an incident
activities when police respond to an emergency management plans in each
may require police to work with other
incident, and therefore enhance jurisdiction are at Attachment A.
agencies both within their jurisdiction
interoperability when the need
and cross-jurisdictionally.
arises to work cross-jurisdictionally Governance and Review Processes
help ensure the key elements of The ANZPAA Board has responsibility
Incident management, in particular multi-
incident management are for this document, including monitoring,
agency and multi-jurisdictional response
considered and where appropriate implementation and review.
operations, takes place within the
addressed emergency management legal and
This document is to be reviewed no less
ensure consistent training and administrative framework of each
than 12 months after its initial
education in this field jurisdiction.
endorsement and bi-annually thereafter.
provide a basis for partners to
understand the police approach
and enable their roles to be
complementary
enable smooth interactions
between police jurisdictions and
other agencies in multi-agency and
multi-jurisdictional incidents
provide a basis to review incidents,
including emergency management
processes in Australia
give the community and
stakeholders confidence that police
jurisdictions are aligned to a
national, common framework when
responding to incidents.
Command - directing, with authority, Function - an activity or grouping of Police Forward Commander - the
the employees and resources of an activities addressing core responsibilities person accountable and responsible for
organisation in performing the required of the control authority. field (operational and tactical) command
roles and tasks. Command operates of police resources in response to an
vertically within an organisation. A Field operations - the level at which incident. The Police Forward
person commands employees of their hands on incident resolution is Commander can also be the Incident
own agency; they do not command managed at the incident site or Controller concurrently.
people from another agency unless it is associated area. The Police Forward
by formal agreement. Commander operates at this level. Strategic Operations - the level above
field operations at which policy, strategy
Control - the overall direction of Incident - an event requiring police and the overall response framework are
incident management activities. response and includes emergency, established and managed. This can
Authority for control carries with it the planned and unplanned operations and occur at both regional and State and
responsibility for tasking and other events. An incident covers Territory level. The Police Commander
coordinating other organisations anything from a vehicle accident to a operates at this level.
depending on the circumstances. multi-jurisdictional bushfire, which may
Control operates horizontally when comprise multiple incidents. Support Agency - an agency which
compared to command. provides essential services, personnel
Incident Controller - the person from or material to support or assist the
Control Authority - the organisation the control authority who has control authority.
(lead agency) that exercises control over responsibility for the field management
the resolution of an emergency in of all incident operations.
accordance with State or Territory
legislation. The control authority is Police Commander - the person
responsible for managing response and (appointed) who is responsible and
recovery operations for the duration of accountable for the overall strategic
the incident or until there has been a command of police resources in
formal handover to another organisation. response to the incident and for
providing direction, oversight and
Delegation - involves the assignment of support to the Police Forward
functions and tasks to others together Commander. Where Police are the
with the necessary authority, freedom of Control Authority, the Police
action and resources to complete the Commander is also responsible for the
task. The person delegating retains strategic control of the other agencies
accountability but is no longer involved in the resolution of the incident.
responsible for undertaking the actual
task.
NOTE: This depiction does not imply an organisational structure to be applied to all incidents. All of these functions may or may not be applicable. Some functions may be aligned together under a multifunction
command and control structure. Some functions may be addressed as part of an appreciation process and not considered further. In this sense, this depiction represents a thinking model.
Description
The Command and Control function is to take charge of and provide leadership for the response and resolution of the incident.
How effectively and efficiently an incident is resolved can depend on the leadership and incident management skills of the control
authority. The control authority is to take charge of response activities, manage resourcing and delegate tasks as required. As the
number of personnel at an incident increases, there is a need to appoint managers of tasks and functions, with the establishment
of a clear command structure so as to always maintain effective control. When the incident involves a multi-agency response and
police are the control authority, police are accountable and responsible for the overall strategic command, control and co-
ordination of other agencies personnel and other resources. Actual command of people from other agencies can only occur by
agreement where not otherwise provided for in legislation. During incidents where police are a support agency, police are
responsible for the command of their own resources and are subject to the direction of the control authority. In this situation,
police may still have coordinating responsibilities under jurisdictional frameworks.
Responsibility
The responsibilities of the command and control function are to conduct debriefs and/or post operational reviews as
take charge of and provide leadership for the response and appropriate.
resolution of the incident, including the establishment of a
management structure. Field Operations
The field tasks associated with the command and control
Tasks function may include, as far as reasonably practicable:
Strategic Operations applying the ICCS Plus framework including its principles
The strategic tasks associated with the command and control taking charge and delegating tasks and functions as
function may include, as far as reasonably practicable: required for the resolution of the incident
applying the ICCS Plus framework including its principles being recognisable as the Police Forward Commander
providing direction, oversight and support to the Police identifying whether the incident is high risk
Forward Commander
building an appropriate command and control structure
ensuring the Police Forward Commander is taking charge,
remaining at the forward command post until relieved or
appropriately delegating functions and tasks and has an
the incident is resolved
effective field command and control structure
ensuring all relevant information is recorded and
maintaining a strategic command and control focus and not
communicated (see intelligence function also)
be drawn into field level decisions and activities
assuming responsibilities of the Police Commander when
deciding when an incident is resolved or completed
no-one has been appointed
building and maintaining effective relationships with strategic
regularly communicating with all persons and agencies
management of other agencies involved in the incident
involved in the field
ensuring executive management is advised of the incident,
conduct debriefs and/or post operational reviews as
relevant issues and updates, as appropriate
appropriate.
Role of Co-ordination
In addition to Command and Control responsibilities police also have legislative responsibilities for co-ordination at an incident that
may differ across jurisdictions. In most States and Territories it is distinct from their role as either the control authority or support
agency. A Police Commissioner as the State Coordinator (term varies across jurisdictions) generally has additional co-ordination
responsibilities. Co-ordination is generally an assurance role aimed at ensuring effective multi-agency response activities. This may
include ensuring:
clear and effective command and control arrangements are public information and warnings are appropriate and actually
in place and being maintained disseminated to communities at risk in a timely way
incident management objectives and priorities are met public safety risks are clearly understood and being actioned
support agencies are working together with the control accordingly
authority in an integrated way quality information is being supplied to all persons and
all available and appropriate resources have been activated agencies involved in the resolution of the incident.
Description
Intelligence should be considered in a broad context. It involves the collection and analysis of information or data, its recording,
analysis and dissemination potentially as intelligence. The role of intelligence supports the building of situational awareness,
including with other agencies involved to support their decision-making in the resolution of the incident. Additionally, intelligence
should address questions in relation to likely future situations and include identifying risks and potential impacts upon individuals
and the community.
Description
The control authority is responsible for determining the mission and developing the overall plan to support the objectives and
strategies for the resolution of the incident. In doing so, consultation should occur, where possible and appropriate, with persons
and agencies involved in the response and resolution of the incident to ensure that the plan is appropriate and achievable. It is
essential the overall mission and objectives are determined and communicated as they dictate the actual activities undertaken to
resolve the incident. Persons delegated functions or tasks are to develop their own plan to achieve them.
Description
The operations function involves implementing the plan by the assignment of tasks, utilising the available resources, monitoring
their activities and adjusting the plan where necessary. There are often more tasks than there are available resources so it is
essential activities are prioritised. The key priority in implementing the plan is to preserve community safety, particularly those
immediately impacted by the incident and then those likely to be impacted by the developing or changing situation.
Description
Logistics is about having the right resources at the right place, at the right time. It includes acquiring facilities, services and
materials, as well as personnel in support of the management and resolution of the incident. It also involves the administration and
financial management of resources, including their release, once they are no longer required. Logistical activities often require
considerable lead-time before they can deliver. All persons and agencies involved in the incident should be mindful of the
diminishing capacity of resources over time and to take early action to maintain capabilities.
Description
Providing timely and accurate public information in order to protect and reassure the community is vital. Public information needs
are to be addressed from the beginning to the end of the incident. This may place additional responsibilities upon the intelligence
function as this is the primary source of information for messages to the community. Additionally, the increasing use and
awareness of social media to provide real-time independent and unofficial information in the public domain needs to be monitored
both from the perspective of other sources of incident information and to counter potentially dangerous inaccuracies and myths.
Description
The investigations function is to meet statutory investigation requirements in relation to the incident. This function may also, under
direction of the Police Commander or Police Forward Commander, cover the conduct of debriefs or post operation reviews from
the perspective of reinforcing good performances and to identify areas of weaknesses where lessons can be learnt and
improvements made. The responsibility for debriefing rests with the Police Commander or Police Forward Commander regardless
of who actually performs the administrative tasks associated with debriefing.
Description
The communications function involves field communications within police and across other agencies involved in the incident, and
includes the reporting upwards from the field to the strategic management level and when necessary, to executive management.
Communication should focus on priority issues, the sharing of key information, identifying gaps in the progress of assigned tasks,
and identifying future activities and the assignment of responsibilities to those tasks. Communications with the media and the
community are separate and form part of the Public Information function.
Description
The ultimate aim of the safety function is to eliminate at source risks to health safety and welfare. Where risks cannot be
eliminated, they should be minimised. This will help ensure the safe resolution of the incident. It is a shared responsibility and
relates to recognising that the site of an incident is a workplace subject to work health and safety laws. Although the control
authority has overall accountability for workplace safety, all persons and agencies involved in the response and resolution of the
incident are required so far as is reasonably practicable to adopt safe work practices and safe systems of work. The management
of safety, while subject to work health and safety laws, must balance the safety of the public and that of the responders.
Description
The recovery function has two parts: relief and longer term recovery. Relief involves addressing the immediate needs of people
displaced by the incident or prevented from returning home or to their business. This may include addressing their social, welfare
and information needs. Recovery is about returning the situation and the community impacted by an emergency back to a
normal state. A community impacted by a disaster may require a long-term recovery program. Recovery organisations need long
lead-time. Therefore it is important that at an early stage the control authority considers the short and long term needs of the
affected community and makes the necessary notifications to the appropriate relief and recovery agencies.
Multi-agency
Multi-agency command and control arrangements vary Agencies come together at field and strategic operations levels
depending upon the type of incident and the resources through their respective agency commanders or liaison
involved. officers.
Normally, agencies operate as independent units being The focus of their activities is controlled by the control
responsible for the command of their own personnel and other authority.
resources.
Table 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the structure.
Each agency is responsible for establishing and maintaining
their command structure and the control authority has the
added responsibility of building and maintaining the field and
strategic level control structures.
Multi-jurisdiction
The appropriate police command and control structure will It is the responsibility of the respective Police Commissioners
vary for an incident that crosses jurisdictional boundaries, through their Police Commanders (of the jurisdictions involved)
involves multiple related incidents occurring in multiple to agree on an appropriate command structure suitable for the
jurisdictions or when a jurisdiction provides police resources to situation.
another jurisdiction.
Northern Territory
Disaster Act 1982
Northern Territory All Hazards Emergency Management Arrangements
Queensland
Disaster Management Act 2003
Public Safety Preservation Act 1986
State Disaster Management Plan
South Australia
Emergency Management Act 2004
State Emergency Management Plan
Tasmania
Emergency Management Act 2006
Tasmania Emergency
Victoria
Emergency Management Act 1986
Emergency Management Manual Victoria
Western Australia
Emergency Management Act 2005
Emergency Management Regulations 2006