Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oleh :
LEMIGAS
ABSTRACT
in reservoir. McGuire and Sikora, for example, depositional environment and post-depositional
studied the effect of high vertical permeability compaction history of the rock. For sandstones
caused by fractures on well productivity [1]. and other clastic sedimentary rocks, shale
They concluded that the presence of anisotropy contents and types, grain size, garain shape, and
changes the flow pattern significantly, hence particle orientation are the most important
modifying well productivity previously factors in KV KH relationship. However,
estimated under asumption of both radial and permeability anisotropy is also likely to be
linear flow patterns. Landrum and Crawford influenced by the scales of heterogeneity. As
studied the effect of anisotropic horizontal often presented (e.g. [10]), as a part of
permeability on sweep effciency in evaluation on heterogeneity, scales of
waterflooding, whereas more recently Datta heterogeneity may be classified into a set of
Gupta et al conducted simulation modeling to levels: microscopic, macroscopic, mesoscopic,
study the effect of permeability contrast between megascopic, and gigascopic. This implies that
layers (i.e. transversely isotropic condition) on heterogeneity and permeability anisotropy
recovery factor of polymer flooding, from which should be viewed as dependent on size and scale
they concluded that less contrast tends to show of the rock mass. Therefore, permeability
higher recovery factor [2,3]. On more anisotropy in formation has ideally to be viewed
operational level, Tariq et al [4] studied the through its relevant scale of heterogeneity.
effect of anisotropy on perforation and fluid
flow near wellbore using finite element method By observing this principle of scale-related
and found that high shot density is required in permeability anisotropy, it is implied that
anisotropic/laminated formation, while Smith et considering reservoirs are normally engineered
al and Gatens et al [5,6] studied effect of and managed at mesoscopic (log) and
horizontal permeability anisotropy on hydraulic megascopic (inter-well) scales then information
fracturing and witnessed the its significant regarding the anisotropy should also be derived
effects on generated fracture dimension and at these scales. Many investigators have spent
production gain brought by the fractures. efforts to derive vertical permeability at its most
Furthermore, a simulation study carried out by appropriate scale. For instance, [11,12] and
Besson suggested that slanted wells show better later investigators studied the effect of wells
production performance than horizontal wells in partial penetration on pressure drop around
anisotropic medium [7]. All these studies wellbore and suggested that the smaller the
underline the significance of recognizing the degree of vertical permeability anisotropy the
presence and degree of permeability anisotropy larger the pressure drop expected to occur.
in formations. Later, other studies suggested analysis of
pressure transient test data as a source of
Various investigators also spent their determining vertical permeability. Moncada,
attention to developing techniques to describe who showed how to derive vertical permeabilty
and determine permeability anisotropy. For from pressure derivative type-curve-matching, is
instance Culham developed pressure build-up one example [13].
equations for spherical flow pattern caused by
well partial penetration from which vertical Despite its importance, measurement of
permebility anisotropy can be estimated, permeability anisotropy at appropriate scale
whereas Odeh presented equations for cannot always be conducted for various practical
calculating skin factor under this flow regime reasons. Instead, most field operators still rely
[8,9]. on the traditional way of obtaining the
information: direct core analysis at smaller level
Permeability anisotropy is often used to of macroscopic scale. In core-derived
express the degree of heterogeneity in the permeability anisotropy, KV and KH are
formation. Vertical permeability (KV) is usually determined on regular basis of common depths.
different from horizontal permeability (KH), When core samples are of full-diameter type the
even for homogeneous rocks. Such vertical KV and KH are simply measured on the same
anisotropy effects are generally the result of sample, whereas for plug samples KV and KH are
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
measured on a pair of vertical and horizontal could be misleading since the ratios may differ
plug-samples taken from a common depth point. from one reservoir to another and even to one
Using core-derived information, some location within a reservoir to another. In
investigators have gone further to provide means essence, there may not be a single representative
of determining KV through empirical KV - KV/KH ratio at all for a reservoir of concerned.
(KH/ )0.5 relationships [14,15,16]. It is the purpose of the study therefore to
provide a general view over permeability
Permeability anisotropy in Indonesia, with vertical anisotropy in Indonesian reservoirs so
its complex geological setting, can always be that engineers and geoscientists operating in
regarded as an ever-factual issue in reservoir Indonesia can have a useful source of relevant
fluid flow-related matters. In Indonesias case, information in their day to day professional
the common practise of picking a single activities.
representative KV/KH ratios through assumption
histogram and cartesian plots but with KV/KH It is commonly acknowledged that actually
intervals of 0.3. All values less than 0.3 and there is no direct relationship between porosity
greater than 4.2 are included in cathegories of and permeability, since magnitudes of
<0.3 and >4.2, repectively. Exact values equal permeability are rather directly determined by
to the range limiting values are treated as to size and distribution of pore throat within the
belong to the lower range. It is also worth rock pore system. However, common practices
noting that even though, for a practical reason, in petrophysical analyses often link the two
all the KV/KH values greater than 1.5 and 4.2 are parameters from some practical reasons, and for
included into one class (KV/KH > 1.5 and > 4.2) some cases the relationships prove useful.
they will not make a misinformation problem Therefore, the study also considers possible
since in total they numerically are usually lower influence of differences in porosity on the
than 10% of the total population. KV/KH anisotropy. Porosity is devided into
three classes; low (< 15%), medium (15 - 25%),
and high (> 25%). Figures 10 through 12
Sandstones
present the KV/KH population for plug samples
Observation 1: sedimentary basin
whereas Figures 13 through 15 present the same
Following the number of productive population for whole core samples.
sedimentary basins in Indonesia, the first
The plots for the core plug samples exhibit
groupping is based on sedimentary basin of
similarity to the observation on the sedimentary
origin (Figure 1). All data roughly falls below
basin grouping (Observation 1), which also
KV/KH = 1.2. the value of The underlined idea
show larger proportion for lower KV/KH ranges
of having the data based on these sedimentary
and mode value within 0 0.1 range but at an
basins is the possibility of different
unrepresentatively low number proportionally to
heterogeneity pattern at gigascopic scale
total population. The plots in general show that
between one basin to another. For instance,
the population is relative uniformly distributed
Figures 2 through 5 and Figures 6 through 9
among the KV/KH ranges indicating no unique
present example KV/KH populations of
single representative KV/KH value. All data falls
sedimentary basins for and plug and whole core
roughly below KV/KH = 1.2.
samples, respectively. The plots based on this
basin grouping have shown that distribution for An interesting thing found in Observation 2
core plug samples (with large population) is is the similarity in distribution patterns of the
relatively even for the four basins presented, whole core samples (Figures 13 through 15) to
with mode within the range of 0 0.1. the core plug patterns. Obvious similarities are
However, the small proportion that represents visible when whole core samples patterns are
this mode (mostly between 13 17% of compared to the core plug patterns for their
population, except for South Sumatra basin with corresponding porosity ranges (e.g. Figure 10
its 26% of population) can be regarded as with Figure 13 for low porosity range). Indeed,
preventing the mode as the most representative local differences are also obvious but
values. semblances of similarity are also too clear to be
omitted. This can be taken as an indication that,
In general, the distribution pattern shown by
despite low in number of population, the KV/KH
whole core sample population is different
ratio measured at whole core size is also
compared to the pattern shown by core plug
influenced by the same causes (e.g. pore
sample population. Distributions shown by the
configuration) as in the case of core plug
four basins in Figures 6 through 9 follow
samples.
different patterns. This difference is likely
caused by two factors; size difference (i.e. rock From the overall results of Observation 2, it
heterogenity) and number of population. is almost clear that porosity has no much
Further investigation on this matter is discussed influence on KV/KH distribution. This is
later in the Further Discussion. indicated by similarity in the distributions for all
porosity ranges especially for the core plug
Observation 2: porosity ranges
samples (i.e. large sample number). This is very
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
logical since permeability is actually not directly laminated shaly sandstones. Not all samples
influenced by porosity. were used, only plug samples were taken into
analysis, and only samples with distinct
Observation 3: horizontal permeability
descriptions that belong to the specified
ranges
sandstone types were used. Figures 24 through
Since the magnitude of vertical permeability 28 present the KV/KH population for plug
is always expressed in a form relative to samples. Due to their small number available
horizontal permeability, it is therefore for Observation 4, no analysis was made for
neccessary to study the KV/KH tendencies with whole core.
variations in horizontal permeability values.
The plots in the figures show clearly the
Theoretically, there is no direct influence that
effect of sandstone types (i.e. pore system
might be exerted by horizontal permeability
types). Conglomeratic and glauconitic
towards vertical permeability, and the
sandstones show strong non-preference KV/KH
relationship between the two permeabilities is
distribution implying their irregular and
likely to be more influenced by rocks pore
heterogeneous pore network, whereas the
types. However, any evidence from analysis on
argillaceous sandstone show slight preference
the influence of horizontal permeability
towards smaller KV/KH ranges indicating the
variations on KV/KH can still be regarded as
probable influence of fine and very fine grains
useful. Permeability is devided into four classes;
present in the pore network on the rock. Strong
low (< 10 mD), medium (10 200 mD), high
preferences towards low KV/KH are shown by
(200 800 mD), and very high (> 800 mD).
the micaceous and laminated shaly sandstones.
Figures 16 through 19 and Figures 20 through
For the two sandstone types more than 30% of
23 present KV/KH populations for plug and
the population are characterized by KV/KH
whole core samples, respectively.
values within the range of 0 0.1. This
In a manner similar to effect of porosity, occurence is very logical considering the platty
there are also similarities in the population nature of the mica and laminated clay that are
distribution for the four horizontal permeability present in the rocks.
ranges, even though a relatively high KV/KH
From the results of Observation 5, it is
(frequency = 24%) is observed for medium
probably safe to conclude that low KV/KH values
permeability range. This can probably be
can be used in any relevant reservoir studies for
interpreted as there is no direct influence exerted
cases where micaceous or laminated shaly
by horizontal permeability on vertical
sandstones are the reservoir forming rocks. For
permeability. In other words, vertical
other sandstone types, more careful analyses
permeability tends to be independent of
have to be performed.
horizontal permeability.
Observation 5: vertical variation
Also similar to results of Observation 2,
there are semblances of similarity between core Most of wells from which the KV/KH data
plug and whole core sample distributions, were taken have sufficient samples that enable
despite the presence of local differences. us to observe degree of KV/KH variations in
Again, these differences are likely to be caused vertical direction. From the 135 wells,
by the small whole cores population. approximately 90% of the wells (120 wells)
exhibit high degree of KV/KH vertical variation
Observation 4: sandstone types
(i.e. high variance). This is indicated by their
The 4,616 sandstone plug and whole core degree of variance of greater than 0.6 (this value
samples used in this study consist essentially of is taken arbitrarilly to distinguish between low
various types of sandstones based on rock and high degree of variance). For some extreem
fabric, clay/shale structure, and presence of cases the degree of variation is as high as 1.6.
special mineral(s). For this study five types of Figures 29 and 30 show plots in two wells with
sandstones samples were taken for the study. lowest and highest KV/KH vertical variations,
The five sandstone types are conglomeratic, respectively.
glauconitic, argilaceous, micaceous, and
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
usually associated with presence of cracks or (Figures 45 and 46), tend to show larger
fissures, their planes most probably lies paralel proportion of KV/KH values < 0.3 whereas high
to vertical or sub-vertical directions. This permeability range with its smaller population
KV/KH of 4.2 can probably and favourably be (Figure 47) show much lower KV/KH values <
used as a clue for minimum KV/KH value for 0.3. On the other hand, low permeability
fractured tight limestone reservoirs. range for whole-core samples, wich is the
largest population for whole-core samples,
Observation 2: porosity ranges
shows much lower proportion of KV/KH values <
Porosity ranges used in the observation for 0.3. The differences in trends between plug and
carbonate rocks are the same as ones used in the whole core data population can definitely be
observation for sandstones. Figures 39 through taken as evidence that high level of
41and Figures 42 through 44 show present heterogeneity is shown the carbonate rocks.
KV/KH population for plug and whole core
Despite differences shown by both plug and
samples, respectively, representing three
whole core samples it is still obvious that the
porosity ranges: low (0 15%), medium (15
similarity in general trend of having most of
25%), and high (> 25%).
KV/KH values lower than 1.2 can be taken as an
All six plot show remarkably similar indication that the KV/KH values are not
distribution patterns, which are strikingly governed by the horizontal permebility. In other
characterized by most of the KV/KH data to fall words, the magnitudes of vertical permeability
bellow 1.2. This may in general be interpreted are independent of horizontal permeabilty.
that porosity does not affect KV/KH significantly.
Observation 4: carbonate rock types
In a manner similar to sandstone data, similarity
in patterns between core plugs and whole core The carbonate rocks used in this study
data also indicate that porosity does not affect covered various limestones (roughly 80% of
KV/KH at any scales. Therefore it can be said total) and dolomitic rocks (roughly 20% of
that, despite differences in ranges and patterns total). No anhydrites and evaporites were
between sandstones and carbonate rocks, available to this study. This is understandable
porosity is not a major governing factor to the since presence of the two carbonates in
KV/KH. Indonesian reservoirs is almost none. However,
for a simplicity reason the classification in this
Observation 3: horizontal permeability
observation follows Dunhams classification:
ranges
mudstone, wackestone, packstone, grainstone,
Same permeability ranges as ones used on boundstone, and, crystalline. For the purpose of
sandstone data were used in the observation for this study, this classification is simplified further
carbonate rocks. Figures 45 through 48 and by combining mudstone and packstone into one
Figures 49 through 52 show present KV/KH class, and grainstone and boundstone into
population for plug and whole core samples, another. Therefore, the carbonate rock type
respectively, representing four permeability classification is: mudstone-wackstone,
ranges: low (0 10 mD), medium (10 200 packstone, grainstone-bounstone, and
mD), high (200 800 mD), and very high (> crystalline. This classification is considered
800 mD). suitable for this study since this study is focused
Like in the case of other observations, the at anisotropy in rock permeability and
classification into ranges of permeability has consequently the simplified Dunhams rock
shown similar trends in which the bulk majority textural classification suits well to it. All data
of KV/KH data fall below the number of 1.2, both that are represented by other types of
for plug and whole core samples. However, a classifications were all converted into this
rather obvious difference is observed in the form classification. Figures 53 through 56 and
of larger population with KV/KH < 0.3 for plug Figures 57 through 60 show present KV/KH
samples compared to for plug samples. population for plug and whole core samples,
Permeability ranges for plug samples with large respectively, representing four rock types
population, e.g low and medium ranges according to Dunham classification: mudstone-
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
which micaceous and laminated shale by the scatter shown, even though in general the
sandstones show KV/KH mode values of 0 0.1 data fall roughly around the 45o equality line.
at around 30% of population. The remaining This implies that in general the representative
population exhibits no strong preference to any elemental volume (REV), as borrowed from the
particular KV/KH values. definition by Hudson and Cooling (1988) for
rock mechanical properties, of sandstones is
This non-preference tendency is clearly
probably still larger than the size of whole core
shown by core plug population in Observation 1,
samples. Volumes smaller than REV are likely
from which all basins (particularly basins with
to show significantly different permeability
large sample population, say larger than 500)
values, while volumes larger tend to exhibit
exhibit similar general distribution of KV/KH
similar permeability values. In other words,
population. Similar distribution is also shown
rock properties measured at scales of plug and
by core plug population in Observation 2
whole core samples are still much influenced by
(porosity ranges) and Observation 3 (horizontal
rock heterogeneity. With this conclusion, it is
permeability ranges) except for medium
therefore likely that the difference in patterns
permeability range, which shows larger
shown by the plug and whole core samples are
proportion for KV/KH = 0 0.1. Non-preference
likely caused by not only the smaller sizes of the
tendencies are also found in Observation 4
whole core samples population (total number =
except for the micaceous and laminated shale
340) relative to the plug sample population
sandstones.
(total number = 4,276) but also to the intense
For carbonate rocks, indeed some heterogeneity that characterize the core samples.
observations have shown that the KV/KH range
This difference between plug-size and
of 0 0.3 appears to be the most important
whole core-size is even greater for the more
range. This may falsely be taken as the most
complicated carbonate rocks. The plots shown
representative KV/KH range, since this range is
by Figures 65 and 66 have even shown higher
often represented by observation range that is
degree of scatter indicating the more obvious
made by small population only (e.g. Figures 48
absence of agreement between plug-size and
and 52). What is clearly shown by the carbonate
whole core-size, both vertical and horizontal
rocks is that a considerable majority of their
permeability. It is even further shown that
KV/KH values are lower than 1.2, even though
permeabilities measured at whole core-size, both
the observations also show that some data also
vertical and horizontal, are always greater than
fall in the region of KV/KH > 4.2. This value of
values measured at plug-size scale. When REV
1.2 can therefore be safely taken as the most
concept is applied to the carbonate rocks, it is
likely maximum KV/KH value for carbonates in
unarguably considered that whole core-size
Indonesia.
samples are more representative to the reservoir
For sandstone samples, comparisons in general. However, the similarity in patterns
between core plug and whole core sample between two sizes, as well as the inconsistencies
populations have shown differences in their of the patterns when number of population is put
respective general patterns. The general patterns into concern (e.g. large plug sample population
that characterize most core plug sample may have similar pattern to small whole core
populations show smooth and more even sample population, and vice versa) are probably
distributions among KV/KH ranges compared to an indication that the true REV may be obtained
the patterns shown by the whole core at scales larger than both plug and whole core
populations. In order to investigate the cause, a sizes.
separate observation on size effect on
In general, It is also understood that
permeability was also made by comparing
different reservoir may have different REV, but
permeabilities of whole core and plug samples at
from comparisons between sedimentary basins
same depths. The log-log plots for KV and KH
with large population, it can also be shown that
(Figures 63 and 64, respectively) show that there
heterogeneity has its effect at scales smaller than
is some degree of difference between the whole
basin size or more precisely at field or reservoir
core and plug samples permeabilities indicated
scales. This supports the results obtained in
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
30 30
mode 0.0 - 0.1
mean 0.60 Ss mode 0.0 - 0.1
25 25
population 1340 mean 0.53
population 688
20 20
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
15 15
10 Ss 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 2 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs from Figure 3 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs from
Central Sumatera basin South Sumatera basin
30
30
mode 0.0 - 0.1 mode 0.0 - 0.1
mean 0.60 25 mean 0.56
25 Ss
Ss population 1212 population 528
Frequency, % 20
20
Frequency, %
15
15
10
10
5
5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 4 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs from Figure 5 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs from
Kutai basin West Natuna basin
50 50
mode 0.0 - 0.1 mode 0.1 - 0.2
Ss mean 0.50 Ss mean 0.24
40 population 37 40 population 61
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 6 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core from Figure 7 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core from
West Natuna basin Tarakan basin
50 50
mode 0.6 - 0.7
mode 0.0 - 0.1
Ss mean 0.58
40
mean 0.35
40
Ss
population 120
population 29
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 8 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core from Figure 9 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core from
West Java Sea basin North Sumatera basin
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
30 30
mode 0.0 - 0.1
mode 0.0 - 0.1
25 Ss 25 Ss mean 0.59
mean 0.67
population 1644
population 1216
20 20
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 10 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs Figure 11 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs
classified as low porosity (between 0 to 15 %) classified as medium porosity (between 15 to 25 %)
25
30
mode 0.0 - 0.1
modus 0.0 - 0.1
mean 0.62
Ss mean 0.47
25 Ss 20 population 94
population 1452
20
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
15
15
10
10
5
5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 12 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs Figure 13 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core
classified as high porosity (higher than 25%) classified as low porosity (0 to 15%)
25 25
mode 0.1 - 0.2 mode 0.0 - 0.1
Ss mean 0.40 Ss mean 0.56
20 population 172 20 population 70
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 14 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core Figure 15 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core
classified as medium porosity (15 to 25%) classified as high porosity (higher than 25%)
30
30
mode 0.3 - 0.4
mode 0.0 - 0.1
Ss mean 0.69
25 Ss mean 0.52
population 1562 25
population 1311
20
Frequency, %
20
Frequency, %
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 16 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs Figure 17 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs
classified as low permeability (less than 10 mD) classified as medium permeability (10 to 200 mD)
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
30 30
mode 0.0 - 0.1 mode 0.0 - 0.1
Ss
25 Ss mean 0.60 mean 0.69
25
population 813 population 527
20 20
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 18 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs Figure 19 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs
classified as high permeability (200 to 800 mD) classified as very high permeability (more than 800 mD)
30 30
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 20 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core Figure 21 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core
classified as low permeability (less than 10 mD) classified as medium permeability (10 to 200 mD)
30 30
mode 0.0 - 0.1 Ss mode 0.6 - 0.7
Ss mean 0.45 25 mean 0.50
25
population 58 population 27
20 20
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 22 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core Figure 23 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone whole core
classified as high permeability (200 to 800 mD) classified asas very high permeability (more than 800 mD)
35 35
mode 0.7 - 0.8
mode 0.2 - 0.3
30 Ss mean 0.88
30 Ss mean 0.76
population 108
population 123
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 24 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs for Figure 25 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs for
conglomeratic sandstone glauconitic sandstone
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
35 35
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 26 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs for Figure 27 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs for
argilaceous sandstone micaceous sandstone
35
mode 0.0 - 0.1
Ss mean 0.39
30
population 184
25
Frequency, %
20
15
10
0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Kv/Kh
Figure 28 Anisotropy distribution of sandstone core plugs for
laminatic shaly sand
mean 0.91
Ss variance 1.59
Ss
265
650 270
275
Depth, m
Depth, m
655 280
285
660 290
295
665 300
Figure 29 Low vertical Kv/Kh variation of sandstone Figure 30 High Vertical Kv/Kh variation of sandstone
samples observed in a well of 'B' field (Central samples observed in a well of 'T' field (North Sumatera
Sumatera Basin) Basin)
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
0.8 0.7
Kv/Kh
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1 0.1
0 0
T-1 T-2 T-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
Well Well
Figure 31 Lateral Kv/Kh variation for sandstone samples in 'T' field Figure 32 Lateral Kv/Kh variation for sandstone samples in 'B'
(Barito Basin) Field (Central Sumatera Basin)
40 35
mode 0.0 - 0.3 mode 0.6 - 0.9
35 Ls mean 1.16 30
Ls
mean 1.75
population 433 population 267
30
25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 33 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs from Figure 34 Anisotropy distribution ofCarbonate core plugs from
North West Java Basin South Sumatera Basin
35 40
mode 0.0 - 0.3
30 Ls 35 mode 0.0 - 0.3
mean 2.57 Ls mean 0.89
population 482
25 30 population 121
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 35 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs Figure 36 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs from
from North Sumatera Basin North West Java Basin
40 35
mode 0.6 - 0.9
mode 0.0 - 0.3 Ls mean 1.56
35 Ls mean 1.12
30
population 426
population 51
30 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 > 4.5
4.2
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 37 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs from Figure 38 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs
South Sumatera Basin from North Sumatera Basin
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
35 35
mode 0.0 - 0.3 mode 0.0 - 0.3
Ls mean 2.24 30
Ls mean 1.37
30
population 732 population 598
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
> 4.2
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 39 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs classified Figure 40 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs classified
as low porosity (between 0 to 15 %) as medium porosity (between 15 to 25 %)
35 35
Ls mode 0.6 - 0.9
mode 0.0 - 0.3
30 mean 1.49 30 Ls
population 535 mean 1.7
population 303
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 41 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs Figure 42 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core
classified as high porosity (more than 25 %) classified as low porosity (between 0 to 15 %)
35 35
Ls mode 0.0 - 0.3
30
Ls mode 0.3 - 0.6
mean 1.3 30
mean 1.18
population 289
population 120
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 43 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core Figure 44 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core
classified as medium porosity (between 15 to 25 %) classified as high porosity (more than 25 %)
35 35
Ls mode 0.0 - 0.3
Ls mode 0.0 - 0.3
30 mean 1.95 30
mean 1.45
population 1250 population 474
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 45 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs classified
as low permeability (0 to 10 mD) Figure 46 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs classified
as medium permeability (10 to 200 mD)
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
35 35
mode 0.0 - 0.3
mode 0.6 - 0.9
Ls mean 0.91
Ls mean 0.75
30 30
population 23
population 125
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 47 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate cores plug classified Figure 48 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate core plugs classified
as high permeability (200 to 800 mD) as very high permeability (> 800 mD)
35 45
mode 0.6 - 1.2
Ls mean 1.59 40 mode 0.0 - 0.3
30
population 456 Ls mean 1.32
35
population 187
25
30
Frequency, %
20 Frequency, %
25
15 20
15
10
10
5
5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 49 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core Figure 50 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core
classified as low permeability (0 to 10 mD) classified as medium permeability (10 to 200 mD)
40 35
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 51 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core Figure 52 Anisotropy distribution of Carbonate whole core
classified as high permeability (200 to 800 mD) classified as very high permeability (>800 mD)
35 35
mode 0.0 - 0.3 mode 0.9 - 1.2
30 Ls mean 1.28 30 mean 1.77
population 408 population 570
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 > 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 > 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 53 Anisotropy distribution of core plugs classified as Figure 54 Anisotropy distribution of core plugs classified as
Mudstone - Wackstone rock type Packstone rock type
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
35 40
mode 0.6 - 0.9 mode 0.0 - 0.3
30 mean 1.58 35
mean 2.24
population 575 population 570
30
25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 >4.5
4.2 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 >4.5
4.2
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 55 Anisotropy distribution of core plugs classified as Figure 56 Anisotropy distribution of core plugs classified as
Grainstone - Boundstone rock type Crystalline rock type
35 35
mode 0.6 - 0.9 mode 0.0 - 0.3
30 mean 1.63 30 mean 1.34
population 81 population 319
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 57 Anisotropy distribution of whole core classified as Figure 58 Anisotropy distribution of whole core classified as
Mudstone-Wackstone rock type Packstone rock type
35 35
mode 0.3 - 0.9 mode 0.6 - 0.9
30 mean 1.69 30 mean 1.66
population 131 Ls population 137
25 25
Frequency, %
Frequency, %
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2> 4.2
4.5
Kv/Kh Kv/Kh
Figure 59 Anisotropy distribution of whole core classified as Figure 60 Anisotropy distribution of whole core classified as
Boundstone-Grainstone rock type Crystalline rock type
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09
Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI
25 - 28 Juli 2007, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta
___________________________________________________________________________
0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25
2565 11700
Ls
Ls
2570
11710
2575
11720
2580
2585 11730
2590
11740
2595
Depth, m
Depth, m
11750
2600
11760
2605
2610 11770
2615
11780
2620
11790
2625
2630 11800
Figure 61 Low vertical Kv/Kh variation of Carbonate Figure 62 High vertical Kv/Kh variation of Carbonate
samples observed in a well of 'SS' field (North East Java samples observed in a well of 'A' field (North Sumatera
Basin) Basin)
10000 10000
Ss Ss
Whole Core Permeability, mD
1000
100
100
10
1
0.01 0.1
0.01 1 100 10000 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Plug Permeability, mD Plug Permeabilty, mD
Figure 63 Comparison between sandstone Core Plug and Whole Figure 64 Comparison between sandstone Core plug and Whole
Core Vertical Permeability Core Horizontal Permeability
10000 10000
Ls Ls
Whole Core Permeability, mD
1000
100
100
10
1
0.01 0.1
0.01 1 100 10000 1 10 100 1000 10000
Plug Permeability, mD Plug Permeabilty, mD
Figure 65 Comparison between Carbonate Core Plug and Whole Figure 65 Comparison between Carbonate Core plug and Whole
Core Vertical Permeability Core Horizontal Permeability
___________________________________________________________________________________
IATMI 2007-TS-09